<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0870-6352</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Silva Lusitana]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Silva Lus.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0870-6352</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Unidade de Silvicultura e Produtos Florestais]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0870-63522011000100008</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Resposta Fisiológica de Pinus spp. nas Primeiras Horas após Infecção com Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae)]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Physiological Response of Pinus spp. In the First Hours After Infection with Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae)]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Réponse Physiologique de Pinus spp. aux Premières Heures aprés l'Infection par Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae)]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carla]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vasconcelos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marta]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Católica Portuguesa Escola de Biotecnologia ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[PORTO ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>99</fpage>
<lpage>110</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0870-63522011000100008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0870-63522011000100008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0870-63522011000100008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[O objectivo deste estudo consistiu na comparação da resposta à infecção com o nemátode da madeira do pinheiro (NMP) Bursaphelenchus xylophilus entre Pinus pinaster e Pinus pinea no estádio inicial da doença, três horas após inoculação. O NMP é o agente causal da doença da madeira do pinheiro, tem em Portugal como hospedeiro principal o pinheiro bravo, P. pinaster, e tem como vector Monochamus galloprovincialis. Actualmente, não há estudos que descrevam os efeitos da infecção do nemátode nas plantas a um estádio inicial da doença e, no que diz respeito aos efeitos fisiológicos e metabólicos nas plantas, verificou-se uma diminuição de 10,9% no teor de água em P. pinaster (por comparação com árvores inoculadas com água) e 6,7% em P. pinea; relativamente à concentração de clorofilas, uma diminuição para cerca de metade do valor controlo foi registado para ambas as espécies, mas mais pronunciadamente em P. pinaster. Um estudo exploratório com cromatografia gasosa também foi efectuado, que demonstrou que os compostos voláteis produzidos permitem uma clara diferenciação entre espécies, mas não entre inoculação controlo vs. nemátode.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to compare the response to infection with the pine wood nematode (PWN) Bursaphelenchus xylophilus between Pinus pinaster and Pinus pinea at an initial stage of the disease, three hours after inoculation. The PWN is the causal agent of pine wilt disease, in Portugal its main host is the maritime pine, P. pinaster, and its vector is Monochamus galloprovincialis. Currently there are no studies that describe the effects of nematode infection in plants at an early stage of the disease and with regards to the physiological and metabolic indicators of the disease response in the plants, there was a decrease of 10.9% of water content in P. pinaster (compared with trees inoculated with water) and 6.7% in P. pinea; in the study of total chlorophyll concentration, a decrease to about half of the control value was recorded for both species, but more pronounced in P. pinaster. An exploratory study was also made with gas chromatography, which showed that the volatile compounds produced were distinct between species, but not between control vs. nematode-inoculated plants.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[Le but de cette étude était de comparer la réponse à l'infection par le nématode du pin (NDP) Bursaphelenchus xylophilus entre Pinus pinaster et Pinus pinea dans la phase initiale de la maladie, trois heures après l'inoculation. Le NDP est l'agent causal de la maladie de dépérissement du pin, au Portugal son hôte principal est le pin maritime, P. pinaster, et son vecteur Monochamus galloprovincialis. Actuellement, il n'existe pas d'études qui décrivent les effets de l'infection par le nématode des plantes à un stade précoce de la maladie et en ce qui concerne les indicateurs physiologiques et métaboliques chez les plantes, il ya eu une diminution de la teneur en eau de 10,9% en P. pinaster (comparaison avec les arbres inoculés avec de l'eau) et 6,7% en P. pinea; dans l'étude de la concentration de chlorophylle totale, une diminution d'environ la moitié de la valeur de commande a été enregistrée pour les deux espèces, mais plus prononcée dans P. pinaster. Une étude exploratoire a également été faite avec chromatographie en phase gazeuse, qui a montré que les composés volatils produits permettent une nette différenciation entre les espèces, mais pas entre le contrôle des plantes contre les nématodes inoculés.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Concentração de clorofilas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[conteúdo de água]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[cromatografia gasosa]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Chlorophyll concentration]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[water content]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[gas chromatography]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Concentration de chlorophylle]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[teneur en eau]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[chromatographie en phase gazeuse]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ 
	    <p><b>Resposta Fisiol&oacute;gica de <i>Pinus</i> spp. nas Primeiras Horas ap&oacute;s Infec&ccedil;&atilde;o com <i>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</i> (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae)</b></p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><b>Carla Santos* e Marta Vasconcelos**</b></p>

	    <p>*Bolseira de Investiga&ccedil;&atilde;o</p>

	    <p>**Investigadora Auxiliar</p>

	    <p>CBQF &#150; Escola de Biotecnologia. Universidade Cat&oacute;lica Portuguesa. Rua Dr. Ant&oacute;nio Bernardino de Almeida, 4200&#45;072 PORTO</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><b>Sum&aacute;rio</b></p> 
	    <p>O objectivo deste estudo consistiu na compara&ccedil;&atilde;o da resposta &agrave; infec&ccedil;&atilde;o com o nem&aacute;tode da madeira do pinheiro (NMP) <i>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</i> entre <i>Pinus pinaster</i> e <i>Pinus pinea</i> no est&aacute;dio inicial da doen&ccedil;a, tr&ecirc;s horas ap&oacute;s inocula&ccedil;&atilde;o. O NMP &eacute; o agente causal da doen&ccedil;a da madeira do pinheiro, tem em Portugal como hospedeiro principal o pinheiro bravo, <i>P. pinaster,</i> e tem como vector <i>Monochamus galloprovincialis</i>.</p>

	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Actualmente, n&atilde;o h&aacute; estudos que descrevam os efeitos da infec&ccedil;&atilde;o do nem&aacute;tode nas plantas a um est&aacute;dio inicial da doen&ccedil;a e, no que diz respeito aos efeitos fisiol&oacute;gicos e metab&oacute;licos nas plantas, verificou&#45;se uma diminui&ccedil;&atilde;o de 10,9% no teor de &aacute;gua em <i>P. pinaster</i> (por compara&ccedil;&atilde;o com &aacute;rvores inoculadas com &aacute;gua) e 6,7% em <i>P. pinea</i>; relativamente &agrave; concentra&ccedil;&atilde;o de clorofilas, uma diminui&ccedil;&atilde;o para cerca de metade do valor controlo foi registado para ambas as esp&eacute;cies, mas mais pronunciadamente em <i>P. pinaster</i>. Um estudo explorat&oacute;rio com cromatografia gasosa tamb&eacute;m foi efectuado, que demonstrou que os compostos vol&aacute;teis produzidos permitem uma clara diferencia&ccedil;&atilde;o entre esp&eacute;cies, mas n&atilde;o entre inocula&ccedil;&atilde;o controlo <i>vs</i>. nem&aacute;tode.</p>

	    <p><b>Palavras&#45;chave:</b> Concentra&ccedil;&atilde;o de clorofilas; conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua; cromatografia gasosa</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><b>Physiological Response of <i>Pinus</i> spp. In the First Hours After Infection with <i>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</i> (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae)</b></p>

	    <p><b>Abstract</b></p> 
	    <p>The purpose of this study was to compare the response to infection with the pine wood nematode (PWN) <i>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</i> between <i>Pinus pinaster</i> and <i>Pinus pinea</i> at an initial stage of the disease, three hours after inoculation. The PWN is the causal agent of pine wilt disease, in Portugal its main host is the maritime pine, <i>P. pinaster</i>, and its vector is <i>Monochamus galloprovincialis</i>.</p>

	    <p>Currently there are no studies that describe the effects of nematode infection in plants at an early stage of the disease and with regards to the physiological and metabolic indicators of the disease response in the plants, there was a decrease of 10.9% of water content in <i>P. pinaster</i> (compared with trees inoculated with water) and 6.7% in <i>P. pinea</i>; in the study of total chlorophyll concentration, a decrease to about half of the control value was recorded for both species, but more pronounced in <i>P. pinaster</i>.</p>

	    <p>An exploratory study was also made with gas chromatography, which showed that the volatile compounds produced were distinct between species, but not between control <i>vs.</i> nematode&#45;inoculated plants.</p>

	    <p><b>Key words</b>: Chlorophyll concentration; water content; gas chromatography</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>R&eacute;ponse Physiologique de <i>Pinus</i> spp. aux Premi&egrave;res Heures apr&eacute;s l'Infection par <i>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</i> (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae)</b></p>

	    <p><b>R&eacute;sum&eacute;</b></p> 
	    <p>Le but de cette &eacute;tude &eacute;tait de comparer la r&eacute;ponse &agrave; l'infection par le n&eacute;matode du pin (NDP) <i>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</i> entre <i>Pinus pinaster</i> et <i>Pinus pinea</i> dans la phase initiale de la maladie, trois heures apr&egrave;s l'inoculation. Le NDP est l'agent causal de la maladie de d&eacute;p&eacute;rissement du pin, au Portugal son h&ocirc;te principal est le pin maritime, <i>P. pinaster</i>, et son vecteur <i>Monochamus galloprovincialis</i>.</p>

	    <p>Actuellement, il n'existe pas d'&eacute;tudes qui d&eacute;crivent les effets de l'infection par le n&eacute;matode des plantes &agrave; un stade pr&eacute;coce de la maladie et en ce qui concerne les indicateurs physiologiques et m&eacute;taboliques chez les plantes, il ya eu une diminution de la teneur en eau de 10,9% en <i>P. pinaster</i> (comparaison avec les arbres inocul&eacute;s avec de l'eau) et 6,7% en <i>P. pinea</i>; dans l'&eacute;tude de la concentration de chlorophylle totale, une diminution d'environ la moiti&eacute; de la valeur de commande a &eacute;t&eacute; enregistr&eacute;e pour les deux esp&egrave;ces, mais plus prononc&eacute;e dans <i>P. pinaster</i>.</p>

	    <p>Une &eacute;tude exploratoire a &eacute;galement &eacute;t&eacute; faite avec chromatographie en phase gazeuse, qui a montr&eacute; que les compos&eacute;s volatils produits permettent une nette diff&eacute;renciation entre les esp&egrave;ces, mais pas entre le contr&ocirc;le des plantes contre les n&eacute;matodes inocul&eacute;s.</p>

	    <p><b>Mots cl&eacute;s</b>: Concentration de chlorophylle; teneur en eau; chromatographie en phase gazeuse</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><b>Introdu&ccedil;&atilde;o</b></p>

	    <p>O nem&aacute;tode da madeira do pinheiro (NMP), <i>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</i> (Steiner and Buhrer, 1934) Nickle, 1970 &eacute; o agente causal da doen&ccedil;a da madeira do pinheiro (DMP) (NICKLE <i>et al</i>., 1981). O g&eacute;nero, <i>Bursaphelenchus</i> Fuchs 1937 inclui quase 90 esp&eacute;cies e faz parte da Fam&iacute;lia Aphelenchoididae. Os nem&aacute;todes que pertencem a este g&eacute;nero podem ser micof&aacute;gicos, parasitas de plantas, ou ambos, sendo que <i>B</i>. <i>xylophilus</i> pertence &agrave; &uacute;ltima categoria (ZHAO <i>et al</i>., 2008).</p>

	    <p>Esta doen&ccedil;a mata, tipicamente, pinheiros com mais de 10 anos de idade em per&iacute;odos de tempo que podem ser entre poucas semanas a meses e, apesar de todos os avan&ccedil;os alcan&ccedil;ados nesta &aacute;rea, o mecanismo da doen&ccedil;a ainda n&atilde;o foi clarificado (ZHAO <i>et al</i>., 2008). No seu pa&iacute;s nativo, EUA, o nem&aacute;tode n&atilde;o &eacute; considerado um agente patog&eacute;nico, mas ap&oacute;s a sua exporta&ccedil;&atilde;o, as consequ&ecirc;ncias foram massivas nas florestas mundiais, o que levou a um abalo grave na economia de cada zona afectada (ZHAO <i>et al</i>., 2007).</p>

	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Em Portugal, o NMP &eacute; transportado pelo vector <i>Monochamus galloprovinciallis,</i> uma esp&eacute;cie end&eacute;mica (NAVES <i>et al</i>., 2007), e o seu hospedeiro principal &eacute; <i>P. pinaster</i> Ait. (MOTA <i>et al</i>., 1999). O pinheiro bravo &eacute; muito importante para a economia portuguesa, na medida em que ocupa mais de um milh&atilde;o de hectares das florestas nacionais e v&aacute;rios estudos t&ecirc;m vindo a ser direccionados para o seu melhoramento gen&eacute;tico (AGUIAR <i>et al.</i> 2003; CORREIA <i>et al.</i> 2004). As esp&eacute;cies <i>Pinus sylvestris</i> e <i>Pinus halepensis</i> tamb&eacute;m s&atilde;o poss&iacute;veis hospedeiros do NMP, por&eacute;m a sua distribui&ccedil;&atilde;o e abund&acirc;ncia &eacute; limitada em Portugal (MOTA e VIEIRA, 2008). Estudos recentes, sob condi&ccedil;&otilde;es laboratoriais, demonstraram que as popula&ccedil;&otilde;es portuguesas de <i>M. galloprovincialis</i> demonstram prefer&ecirc;ncia por <i>P. sylvestris</i> em rela&ccedil;&atilde;o a outras esp&eacute;cies de pinheiro (KOUTROUMPA <i>et al</i>., 2009). Estas prefer&ecirc;ncias alternativas podem eventualmente redireccionar o nem&aacute;tode, <i>B. xylophilus</i>, a infestar outros tipos de &aacute;rvores, e &eacute; por isto que s&atilde;o necess&aacute;rios mais estudos, dado que a flora portuguesa &eacute; t&atilde;o diversa.</p>

	    <p><i>P. pinea</i> &eacute; outra esp&eacute;cie de pinheiro importante em Portugal, dado que, na natureza, n&atilde;o &eacute; afectada pela doen&ccedil;a. Aparentemente, o vector n&atilde;o se alimenta, nem coloniza estes pinheiros; no entanto, o nem&aacute;tode &eacute; capaz de invadir, multiplicar&#45;se, infectar e matar esta &aacute;rvore (ZHAO <i>et al</i>., 2008), apesar de mais lentamente do que em <i>P. pinaster</i> (MOTA e VIEIRA, 2008).</p>

	    <p>Tendo em conta os riscos de dispers&atilde;o da doen&ccedil;a, foram desenvolvidos regulamentos rigorosos para eliminar a peste, particularmente aquando da importa&ccedil;&atilde;o de madeira e derivados (DWINELL, 1997). Ap&oacute;s a detec&ccedil;&atilde;o do nem&aacute;tode em pinheiro bravo portugu&ecirc;s, foi desenvolvido e implementado o programa de controlo "PROLUNP".</p>

	    <p>No que respeita &agrave; detec&ccedil;&atilde;o visual da doen&ccedil;a, durante os diferentes est&aacute;dios de infec&ccedil;&atilde;o (desde o inicial ao avan&ccedil;ado) os sintomas v&atilde;o&#45;se agravando e acabam por resultar na morte do hospedeiro. Entre os principais sintomas encontra&#45;se a cessa&ccedil;&atilde;o de exsuda&ccedil;&atilde;o de resina nos caules, diminui&ccedil;&atilde;o da fotoss&iacute;ntese, degeneresc&ecirc;ncia das c&eacute;lulas parenquimatosas e xil&eacute;micas, forma&ccedil;&atilde;o traum&aacute;tica de canais de resina, produ&ccedil;&atilde;o de subst&acirc;ncias fitot&oacute;xicas, aumento da taxa respirat&oacute;ria e da s&iacute;ntese de etileno (FUKUDA, 1997). Para al&eacute;m destes, o sintoma mais cr&iacute;tico &eacute; o amarelecimento das agulhas, que aparece no est&aacute;dio mais tardio da infec&ccedil;&atilde;o, at&eacute; que a &aacute;rvore fica castanha por completo, o que acaba por complicar a detec&ccedil;&atilde;o atempada da doen&ccedil;a (GLEASON <i>et al</i>., 2000).</p>

	    <p>De acordo com RUTHERFORD <i>et al</i>. (1992), <i>B. xylophilus</i> move&#45;se mais rapidamente quando as temperaturas s&atilde;o elevadas, o que explica o desenvolvimento dr&aacute;stico de sintomas durante o ver&atilde;o. Nestas condi&ccedil;&otilde;es, a &aacute;rvore sofre stress h&iacute;drico e a fotoss&iacute;ntese nas agulhas diminui, o que acelera o desenvolvimento dos sintomas e conduz &agrave; morte das &aacute;rvores infectadas (FUKUDA, 1997). Esta diminui&ccedil;&atilde;o do conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua, quer nos caules, quer nas agulhas, tem vindo a ser estudada e ocorre usualmente pouco antes dos sintomas de infec&ccedil;&atilde;o serem vis&iacute;veis em &aacute;rvores inoculadas (TAN <i>et al</i>., 2005). Deste modo, o teor de &aacute;gua e a sua reten&ccedil;&atilde;o &eacute; considerado um factor de grande peso na patologia da doen&ccedil;a do nem&aacute;tode da madeira do pinheiro (BOLLA <i>et al</i>., 1986) e o stress causado pelas temperaturas elevadas &eacute; tamb&eacute;m um factor abi&oacute;tico muito preponderante na acelera&ccedil;&atilde;o da morte do pinheiro, dado que promove a multiplica&ccedil;&atilde;o de <i>B. xylophilus</i> (SIKORA e MALEK, 1991).</p>

	    <p>Os monoterpenos s&atilde;o um grupo de vol&aacute;teis resultantes do metabolismo secund&aacute;rio das &aacute;rvores e t&ecirc;m um papel muito importante na media&ccedil;&atilde;o das interac&ccedil;&otilde;es entre planta e ambiente, podendo induzir respostas de defesa, que ajudam as plantas a diferenciar entre danos causados por insectos e danos mec&acirc;nicos (MATEUS <i>et al</i>., 2010). Determinados vol&aacute;teis s&atilde;o comummente activados nas vias biosint&eacute;ticas de v&aacute;rias plantas, como o a&#45;pineno (que estima&#45;se fazer parte em 85% dos &oacute;leos essenciais das pin&aacute;ceas), b&#45;pineno, limoneno e mirceno (PROEN&Ccedil;A DA CUNHA, 2005) e, quando infectadas, estas &aacute;rvores emitem um conjunto caracter&iacute;stico de compostos vol&aacute;teis que atraem o vector <i>Monochamus</i>. Os &oacute;leos essenciais tamb&eacute;m t&ecirc;m vindo a ser estudados como potenciais agentes de controlo contra a doen&ccedil;a, dado que alguns possuem actividade nematicida (KIM <i>et al.</i>, 2008).</p>

	    <p>A cromatografia gasosa &#150; espectrofotometria de massa (GC&#45;MS) &eacute; o m&eacute;todo mais frequentemente usado na identifica&ccedil;&atilde;o de vol&aacute;teis, mas a sua aplicabilidade &eacute; limitada, dado que os vol&aacute;teis emitidos pelas &aacute;rvores s&atilde;o altamente complexos, o que dificulta a separa&ccedil;&atilde;o de todos os componentes (MATEUS <i>et al</i>., 2010). Na maioria dos estudos, os vol&aacute;teis t&ecirc;m vindo a ser isolados por destila&ccedil;&atilde;o&#45;extrac&ccedil;&atilde;o simult&acirc;nea (SDE), que inclui um solvente de extrac&ccedil;&atilde;o, que frequentemente &eacute; co&#45;elu&iacute;do com picos menos retidos numa corrida de cromatografia (SANTOS <i>et al</i>., 2006). Em alternativa, o m&eacute;todo de microextrac&ccedil;&atilde;o em fase gasosa de <i>headspace</i> (HS&#45;SPME) tem vindo a ser implementado, dado que dispensa a interven&ccedil;&atilde;o de solventes (Supleco, Bulletin 923A).</p>

	    <p>Cr&ecirc;&#45;se que, &agrave; medida que a invas&atilde;o do nem&aacute;tode come&ccedil;a, uma resposta hipersensitiva &eacute; activada, que resulta na liberta&ccedil;&atilde;o de fen&oacute;licos, s&iacute;ntese de toxinas e fitoalexinas e na compartimentaliza&ccedil;&atilde;o do xilema e outros tecidos, seguido da inunda&ccedil;&atilde;o dos traque&iacute;deos com oleoresina e subst&acirc;ncias t&oacute;xicas (MYERS, 1988). Estudos recentes demonstram que estes mecanismos de defesa contra agentes patog&eacute;nicos ocorrem nas primeiras horas ap&oacute;s infec&ccedil;&atilde;o (BALDO <i>et al</i>., 2010).</p>

	    <p>Neste trabalho foram realizados estudos sobre diferen&ccedil;as fenot&iacute;picas e metab&oacute;licas entre pinheiro infectado e n&atilde;o&#45;infectado das esp&eacute;cies <i>P. pinea</i> e <i>P. pinaster</i>, a um ponto inicial da infec&ccedil;&atilde;o, dado que &eacute; considerado que imediatamente nas primeiras horas ap&oacute;s infec&ccedil;&atilde;o &eacute; activada uma resposta hipersensitiva de defesa nas plantas.</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Materiais e m&eacute;todos</b></p>

	    <p><i>Material vegetal</i></p>

	    <p>As plantas utilizadas nestes estudos foram <i>Pinus pinea</i> e <i>Pinus pinaster</i> com aproximadamente 1 ano de idade (com alturas de 50&plusmn;5 cm), provenientes do Viveiro Anadiplanta (Anadia, Aveiro; 40&ordm;26'27''N, 8&ordm;25'47''W). As &aacute;rvores foram transferidas dos recipientes para vasos com partes iguais de turfa negra (Siro Plant) e vermiculite exfoliada e foram crescidas em ambiente controlado, numa c&acirc;mara fitoclima Aralab 10000EHF, com humidade relativa de 80% e um fotoper&iacute;odo de 16h dia / 8h noite, com cerca de 490 mmol/m<sup>2</sup>s de intensidade luminosa. A temperatura foi mantida a 24&#45;26&ordm;C durante o per&iacute;odo de dia e a 19&#45;20&ordm;C durante o per&iacute;odo da noite.</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><i>Cultura de nem&aacute;todes</i></p>

	    <p>Pequenos quadrados com cerca de 1cm<sup>2</sup> de Potato Dextrose Agar com <i>Botrytis cinerea</i>, crescido a 26&ordm;C por 7 dias, foram transferidos para 5 g de gr&atilde;os de cevada Seara<sup>&reg;</sup>, previamente autoclavados em tubos de ensaio com 10 ml de &aacute;gua desionizada. Estes tubos foram incubados nas mesmas condi&ccedil;&otilde;es anteriormente descritas e seguidamente, pequenos peda&ccedil;os de cevada com <i>B. xylophilus</i> isolado geogr&aacute;fico HF (isolado da Regi&atilde;o de Set&uacute;bal) crescido previamente, foram colocados dentro dos tubos onde o fungo havia sido crescido. Os nem&aacute;todes multiplicados foram extra&iacute;dos pela t&eacute;cnica dos funis de Baermann (BAERMANN, 1917) antes da inocula&ccedil;&atilde;o e, apenas nem&aacute;todes extra&iacute;dos dentro de um per&iacute;odo de 2h &eacute; que foram utilizados nas experi&ecirc;ncias subsequentes.</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><i>Inocula&ccedil;&atilde;o e tempo de amostragem</i></p>

	    <p>Nos testes realizados, foram estabelecidos quatro tratamentos diferentes, nomeadamente, &aacute;rvores <i>P. pinaster</i> e &aacute;rvores <i>P. pinea</i> selecionadas aleatoriamente e inoculadas com <i>B. xylophilus</i> estirpe HF e &aacute;rvores <i>P. pinaster</i> e &aacute;rvores <i>P. pinea</i> selecionadas aleatoriamente e inoculadas com &aacute;gua desionizada (controlo). Para a determina&ccedil;&atilde;o do conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua e extrac&ccedil;&atilde;o e quantifica&ccedil;&atilde;o de clorofilas totais, foram utilizadas 30 r&eacute;plicas biol&oacute;gicas; para a an&aacute;lise dos compostos vol&aacute;teis foram utilizadas 7 r&eacute;plicas biol&oacute;gicas.</p>

	    <p>De acordo com a t&eacute;cnica descrita por FUTAI e FURUNO (1979), uma ferida de 3&#45;5 cm foi feita no caule da &aacute;rvore com um bisturi a cerca de 40 cm acima do n&iacute;vel do solo. Uma suspens&atilde;o de 1000 nem&aacute;todes em 650 ml de &aacute;gua desionizada foi inoculada nas feridas que, seguidamente, foram cobertas com parafilme para evitar a secagem do in&oacute;culo e sa&iacute;da dos nem&aacute;todes. O mesmo procedimento foi seguido para as &aacute;rvores controlo, utilizando 650 ml de &aacute;gua desionizada.</p>

	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Tr&ecirc;s horas ap&oacute;s inocula&ccedil;&atilde;o (3 hai), para cada amostra experimental, o caule completo foi recolhido, cortado em pequenos peda&ccedil;os e armazenado a &#45;80&ordm;C at&eacute; realiza&ccedil;&atilde;o das an&aacute;lises futuras.</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><i>Determina&ccedil;&atilde;o do conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua</i></p>

	    <p>Os caules de cada tratamento foram liofilizados por 72 h; o conte&uacute;do em &aacute;gua e a diminui&ccedil;&atilde;o do conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua foram calculados como demonstrado por TAN <i>et al</i>. (2005), pelas seguintes equa&ccedil;&otilde;es:</p>

	    <p>Conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua (%) = (peso da amostra fresca &#150; peso da amostra liofilizada) x 100 / peso da amostra fresca;</p>

	    <p>Diminui&ccedil;&atilde;o do conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua (%) = (conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua da planta controlo &#150; conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua da planta inoculada) x100 / conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua da plana controlo.</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><i>Extrac&ccedil;&atilde;o e quantifica&ccedil;&atilde;o das clorofilas totais</i></p>

	    <p>Seguiu&#45;se o protocolo de ABAD&Iacute;A <i>et al</i>. (1984), com algumas modifica&ccedil;&otilde;es. Foram adicionados 12,5 ml duma solu&ccedil;&atilde;o de CaCO<sub>3</sub> em metanol (4 g/L) a 0,5 g de agulhas de pinheiro de cada amostra individual. Ap&oacute;s um per&iacute;odo de incuba&ccedil;&atilde;o de 48 h no escuro, &agrave; temperatura ambiente, 1 ml da solu&ccedil;&atilde;o metan&oacute;lica foi dilu&iacute;do em 25 ml de &aacute;gua desionizada e a absorv&acirc;ncia foi lida a 663 nm e 645 nm. A quantifica&ccedil;&atilde;o espectrofotom&eacute;trica de clorofilas foi calculada segundo a equa&ccedil;&atilde;o:</p>

	    <p><img src="/img/revistas/slu/v19n1/19n1a08e1.gif"></p>

	    
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><i>An&aacute;lise de compostos vol&aacute;teis</i></p>

	    <p>Foi realizada uma an&aacute;lise explorat&oacute;ria do padr&atilde;o dos compostos vol&aacute;teis com um cromat&oacute;grafo de g&aacute;s HP 5890A (Hewlett Packard, USA) equipado com um detector de ioniza&ccedil;&atilde;o por chama (GC&#45;FID). A separa&ccedil;&atilde;o foi realizada numa coluna Stabilwax&#45;DA com 60m, 0.25mmID, 0.25&micro;m (RESTEK), com hidrog&eacute;nio como g&aacute;s transportador, a uma taxa de fluxo de 30 ml/min. A temperatura do forno foi inicialmente mantida a 40&ordm;C por 1 min e depois aumentada at&eacute; 220&ordm;C, numa taxa de 2&ordm;C/min, a qual foi mantida durante 10 min. O detector de ioniza&ccedil;&atilde;o por chama foi tamb&eacute;m mantido a 220&ordm;C.</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><i>An&aacute;lise Estat&iacute;stica</i></p>

	    <p>As &aacute;reas relativas dos elementos presentes na frac&ccedil;&atilde;o vol&aacute;til da an&aacute;lise por CG foram usadas para a an&aacute;lise de dados. O processamento destes dados foi realizado com o programa PASW Statistics 18 (IBM, USA). Aos dados resultantes da cromatografia gasosa, foi realizada uma an&aacute;lise de componentes principais (PCA) que &eacute; uma an&aacute;lise estat&iacute;stica multivariada que permite a redu&ccedil;&atilde;o dos dados ao explicar a vari&acirc;ncia existente entre os componentes principais, ou seja, combina&ccedil;&otilde;es lineares das vari&aacute;veis. Deste modo, este tipo de an&aacute;lise permitiu verificar se amostras correspondentes a determinado tratamento produzem uma resposta suficientemente semelhante para se agruparem e se se cria um padr&atilde;o que as diferencie dos outros grupos (SUMNER <i>et al</i>., 2003).</p>

	    <p>Todas as outras an&aacute;lises e gr&aacute;ficos, respeitantes aos dados do conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua e extrac&ccedil;&atilde;o de clorofilas, foram obtidos com Microsoft Excel e GraphPad Software (La Jolla, USA). A normalidade dos dados foi confirmada e o teste param&eacute;trico t&#45;student foi escolhido para comparar os grupos em estudo.</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><b>Resultados e discuss&atilde;o</b></p>

	    <p><i>Determina&ccedil;&atilde;o do conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua</i></p>

	    <p>A infec&ccedil;&atilde;o causada pelo nem&aacute;tode bloqueia a condu&ccedil;&atilde;o da &aacute;gua e reduz a taxa de transpira&ccedil;&atilde;o (TAN <i>et al.</i>, 2005). Tr&ecirc;s horas ap&oacute;s a invas&atilde;o com o nem&aacute;tode, o conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua do caule, quer em <i>P. pinaster</i> que em <i>P. pinea</i> diminuiu em compara&ccedil;&atilde;o com as &aacute;rvores controlo (Figura 1).</p>

	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
	
	    <p><a name="topf1"></a></p>

	    <p><img src="/img/revistas/slu/v19n1/19n1a08f1.gif"></p>

	    
<p><b><a href="#f1">Figura 1</a></b> &#150; Conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua do caule em <i>P. pinaster</i> inoculado com &aacute;gua (n) ou <i>B. xylophilus</i> estirpe HF (p) e em <i>P. pinea</i> inoculado com &aacute;gua (l) ou <i>B. xylophilus</i> estirpe HF (u). Cada valor representa a m&eacute;dia &plusmn;desvio padr&atilde;o.</p>
	
	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p>Os resultados demonstraram uma diminui&ccedil;&atilde;o do conte&uacute;do da &aacute;gua de 10,9% ap&oacute;s inocula&ccedil;&atilde;o com o nem&aacute;tode em <i>P. pinaster</i> (<i>p</i>&lt;0.05) e de 6,7% em <i>P. pinea</i> (<i>p</i>&gt;0.05), sendo que apenas as diferen&ccedil;as entre <i>P. pinaster</i> inoculado com nem&aacute;tode e controlo &eacute; que foram estatisticamente significativas. O <i>P. pinea</i> como hospedeiro da DMP &eacute; ainda muito pouco estudado assim como o porqu&ecirc; desta esp&eacute;cie parecer ter uma menor susceptibilidade ao nem&aacute;tode (MOTA e VIEIRA, 2008). Mas estes resultados expressam uma clara diferen&ccedil;a na resposta &agrave; infec&ccedil;&atilde;o com nem&aacute;tode entre <i>P. pinaster</i> e <i>P. pinea</i> (<i>p</i>&lt;0.05) o que pode indicar que, no que se refere ao conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua nos caules, o pinheiro manso &eacute; menos afectado do que o pinheiro bravo, o hospedeiro principal da doen&ccedil;a em Portugal. Isto pode sugerir, como denotado por FUTAI (2003), que a resist&ecirc;ncia de certas esp&eacute;cies, como o <i>P. taeda</i>, pode ser parcialmente explicada por certos repelentes hidrof&iacute;licos que fazem parte da madeira deste tipo de &aacute;rvores, que levam &agrave; agrega&ccedil;&atilde;o das esp&eacute;cies de <i>Bursaphelenchus</i> &agrave;s subst&acirc;ncias hidrof&oacute;bicas, enquanto a sua invas&atilde;o nos tecidos hospedeiros s&atilde;o controlados por estas referidas subst&acirc;ncias hidrof&iacute;licas.</p>

	    <p>O desenvolvimento dos sintomas a temperaturas elevadas depende do grau de avan&ccedil;o da cavita&ccedil;&atilde;o dos traque&iacute;deos causada pela movimenta&ccedil;&atilde;o do nem&aacute;tode (RUTHERFORD <i>et al</i>., 1992). Os estudos de TAN <i>et al.</i> (2005) em pinheiro negro japon&ecirc;s (<i>P. thunbergii</i>), com 3&#45;4 anos de idade, foram conduzidos entre 5 e 70 dias ap&oacute;s infec&ccedil;&atilde;o (dai) e registaram uma diminui&ccedil;&atilde;o percentual de 7,2% e 36,1%, a 10 e a 70 dai, respectivamente. Estudos pr&eacute;vios em <i>P. sylvestris</i> e <i>P. strobus</i> com 20&#45;30 anos (BOLLA <i>et al</i>., 1986) durante 3 meses, demonstraram que estas altera&ccedil;&otilde;es no conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua podem ser provocadas pelo bloqueio no sistema de transporte de &aacute;gua das plantas, resultante da infec&ccedil;&atilde;o com o nem&aacute;tode.</p>

	    <p>Considerando que este &eacute; um estudo nas primeiras horas ap&oacute;s infec&ccedil;&atilde;o, a diminui&ccedil;&atilde;o do conte&uacute;do de &aacute;gua foi muito aguda e indica que h&aacute; uma resposta forte e imediata &agrave; infec&ccedil;&atilde;o. M&eacute;todos para detectar a DMP no seu est&aacute;dio inicial s&atilde;o urgentes para evitar a dissemina&ccedil;&atilde;o entre &aacute;rvores. Como demonstrado na <a href="#topf1">Figura 1</a><a name="f1">, 3 horas ap&oacute;s infec&ccedil;&atilde;o (hai) os conte&uacute;dos de &aacute;gua em <i>P. pinaster</i> diminu&iacute;ram e pode revelar este sintoma como um poss&iacute;vel indicador precoce para uma &aacute;rvore infectada.</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><i>Extrac&ccedil;&atilde;o e quantifica&ccedil;&atilde;o das clorofilas totais</i></p>

	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>A clorose em agulhas &eacute; um sintoma distintivo da fase avan&ccedil;ada da DMP (FUKUDA, 1997). Na Figura 2 encontram&#45;se os resultados da concentra&ccedil;&atilde;o de clorofilas em <i>P. pinaster</i> e <i>P. pinea</i>, inoculados com nem&aacute;tode e controlos.</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><a name="topf2"></a></p>
	
	    <p><img src="/img/revistas/slu/v19n1/19n1a08f2.gif"></p>

	    
<p><b><a href="#f2">Figura 2</a></b> &#150; Concentra&ccedil;&atilde;o das clorofilas totais de <i>P. pinaster</i> inoculado com &aacute;gua (n) ou <i>B. xylophilus</i> estirpe HF (p) e de <i>P. pinea</i> inoculado com &aacute;gua (l) ou <i>B. xylophilus</i> estirpe HF (u). Cada valor representa a m&eacute;dia &plusmn; desvio padr&atilde;o</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p>Existe uma varia&ccedil;&atilde;o natural entre a pigmenta&ccedil;&atilde;o das agulhas de <i>P. pinea</i> e <i>P. pinaster</i>, sendo mais escura em <i>P. pinaster</i>. Este facto est&aacute; relacionado com a maior concentra&ccedil;&atilde;o de clorofilas totais que foram extra&iacute;das desta esp&eacute;cie, quando comparadas com <i>P. pinea</i> (p&lt;0.0001).</p>

	    <p>Mais ainda, ap&oacute;s infec&ccedil;&atilde;o, a concentra&ccedil;&atilde;o de clorofilas diminuiu em ambas as esp&eacute;cies, mais acentuadamente em <i>P. pinaster</i>. Visualmente, nenhuma altera&ccedil;&atilde;o foi identificada na cor das agulhas dos pinheiros ap&oacute;s inocula&ccedil;&atilde;o, mais especificamente, nenhum ind&iacute;cio de amarelecimento das agulhas foi detectado. No entanto, como demontrado na <a href="#topf2">Figura 2</a><a name="f2"></a>, ap&oacute;s extrac&ccedil;&atilde;o, houve uma diferen&ccedil;a significativa nos n&iacute;veis de clorofila entre pinheiros inoculados com nem&aacute;tode e os controlos, o que indica que logo 3 hai os n&iacute;veis de clorofila come&ccedil;am rapidamente a diminuir, de forma mais abrupta em <i>P. pinaster</i>. Estas diferen&ccedil;as entre tratamentos na concentra&ccedil;&atilde;o de clorofilas totais foram estatisticamente suportadas (<i>p</i>&lt;0.0001) e demonstram que os valores obtidos n&atilde;o s&atilde;o um falso positivo, provocado apenas pelas feridas realizadas para inocular as solu&ccedil;&otilde;es. Tamb&eacute;m as respostas entre esp&eacute;cies foram muito diferentes (<i>p</i>&lt;0.0001).</p>

	    <p>Assim, estes resultados indicam que a diminui&ccedil;&atilde;o da concentra&ccedil;&atilde;o de clorofila nas agulhas d&aacute;&#45;se num est&aacute;dio precoce da doen&ccedil;a. Deste modo, verificou&#45;se que os n&iacute;veis de clorofila diminuem rapidamente nas primeiras horas p&oacute;s infec&ccedil;&atilde;o, o que influencia os processos fotossint&eacute;ticos e conduz &agrave; morte da &aacute;rvore.</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><i>An&aacute;lise de compostos vol&aacute;teis</i></p>

	    <p>Os vol&aacute;teis das plantas podem ser emitidos constitutivamente ou podem ser induzidos sob determinadas condi&ccedil;&otilde;es ambientais e t&ecirc;m um papel importante na media&ccedil;&atilde;o das interac&ccedil;&otilde;es entre plantas e insectos herb&iacute;voros (MATEUS <i>et al</i>., 2010).</p>

	    <p>Em estudos pr&eacute;vios (dados n&atilde;o publicados) sobre a express&atilde;o gen&eacute;tica em <i>P. pinaster</i> e <i>P. pinea</i> 3hai, foram isolados genes relacionados com a produ&ccedil;&atilde;o de metabolitos secund&aacute;rios. Isto levou &agrave; utiliza&ccedil;&atilde;o de cromatografia gasosa para comparar os padr&otilde;es dos vol&aacute;teis emitidos por estas &aacute;rvores inoculadas com &aacute;gua ou nem&aacute;tode, no mesmo tempo de amostragem acima referido. No sentido de perceber o padr&atilde;o das intercorrela&ccedil;&otilde;es entre as vari&aacute;veis em estudo (agrupamento de amostras por esp&eacute;cie de pinheiro e/ou por tipo de tratamento), foi conduzida uma an&aacute;lise estat&iacute;stica explorat&oacute;ria, usando a an&aacute;lise de componentes principais (PCA) e o modelo resultou em dois factores principais significativos, que explicaram 44,9% da vari&acirc;ncia nos dados, tal como representado na Figura 3.</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><img src="/img/revistas/slu/v19n1/19n1a08f3.gif"></p>

	    
<p><b>Figura 3</b> &#150; An&aacute;lise dos padr&otilde;es de vol&aacute;teis de <i>P. pinaster</i> inoculado com &aacute;gua (n) ou <i>B. xylophilus</i> estirpe HF (p) e de <i>P. pinea</i> inoculado com &aacute;gua (l) ou <i>B. xylophilus</i> estirpe HF (u). Um total de 44,9% da vari&acirc;ncia dos dados foi explicada por dois componentes principais significativos (24,6% da vari&acirc;ncia na matriz <b>X</b> e 20,3% da vari&acirc;ncia na vari&aacute;vel <b>Y</b>)</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p>Dois grupos foram diferenciados, sendo que a maioria das amostras de <i>P. pinaster</i> foram separadas das de <i>P. pinea</i> pelo factor discriminante com 20,3% de peso na explica&ccedil;&atilde;o da vari&acirc;ncia. O primeiro factor discriminante, com 24,6% de peso, n&atilde;o resultou em nenhuma tend&ecirc;ncia pronunciada entre tratamentos (controlo <i>versus</i> inocula&ccedil;&atilde;o com nem&aacute;tode).</p>

	    <p>SANTOS <i>et al</i>. (2006) realizaram an&aacute;lises de GC&#45;MS de forma a verificar se seria poss&iacute;vel distinguir amostras de floema de <i>P. halepensis</i>, <i>P. sylvestris</i>, <i>P. pinaster</i> e <i>P. pinea</i> provenientes da Serra da Lous&atilde;, de Alc&aacute;cer do Sal e da Serra da Ota, e conclu&iacute;ram, tal como no presente trabalho, que os padr&otilde;es de cada esp&eacute;cie s&atilde;o diferenci&aacute;veis e distintos. Adicionalmente, estudos de GCxGC realizados em agulhas de 11 esp&eacute;cies diferentes de pinheiro adulto, localizados em Portugal Central, resultaram numa discrimina&ccedil;&atilde;o das esp&eacute;cies e caracteriza&ccedil;&atilde;o qu&iacute;mica bem sucedidas (MATEUS <i>et al.</i>, 2010). MUMM <i>et al.</i> (2003; 2004) analisaram tamb&eacute;m os vol&aacute;teis produzidos ap&oacute;s deposi&ccedil;&atilde;o de ovos ou feridas mec&acirc;nicas emitidos quer pelas agulhas de <i>P. sylvestris</i> com 35 a 45 anos, quer pelos ramos de <i>P. nigra</i> de 14 anos de idade, com GC&#45;MS. Perceberam que estes danos afectam significativamente a composi&ccedil;&atilde;o quantitativa da mistura dos vol&aacute;teis.</p>

	    <p>Estes resultados indicam que, apesar de ser poss&iacute;vel fazer uma distin&ccedil;&atilde;o clara entre esp&eacute;cies, a produ&ccedil;&atilde;o de vol&aacute;teis <i>de novo</i> em resposta &agrave; infec&ccedil;&atilde;o com NMP, 3 hai, n&atilde;o produz um padr&atilde;o diferenci&aacute;vel numa simples corrida de GC, apesar da sua ac&ccedil;&atilde;o como agentes prim&aacute;rios na defesa contra patog&eacute;neos.</p>

	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><b>Conclus&otilde;es</b></p>

	    <p>Apesar das modifica&ccedil;&otilde;es fisiol&oacute;gicas analisadas serem normalmente associadas aos est&aacute;dios tardios da infec&ccedil;&atilde;o, foi detectada uma tend&ecirc;ncia para a redu&ccedil;&atilde;o no conte&uacute;do da &aacute;gua e na concentra&ccedil;&atilde;o de clorofilas 3 h ap&oacute;s infec&ccedil;&atilde;o. Este resultado &eacute; bastante revelador, dado que a infec&ccedil;&atilde;o provocou danos quase de imediato na &aacute;rvore. Tamb&eacute;m se pode verificar que as respostas foram distintas entre <i>P. pinea</i> e <i>P. pinaster</i>, o que &eacute; suportado pela diferen&ccedil;a de susceptibilidade entre esp&eacute;cies &agrave; doen&ccedil;a, j&aacute; demonstrado por FUTAI (2003) e que pode estar relacionado com as rela&ccedil;&otilde;es filogen&eacute;ticas dentro do seu g&eacute;nero.</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><b>Refer&ecirc;ncias bibliogr&aacute;ficas</b></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>ABAD&Iacute;A, J., MONGE, E., MONTA&Ntilde;ES, L., HERAS, L., 1984. Extraction of iron from plant leaves by Fe(II) chelators. <i>Journal of Plant Nutrition</i> <b>7</b>(1&#45;5): 777&#45;784.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000108&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>AGUIAR, A., ALMEIDA, M.H., BORRALHO, N., 2003. Genetic Control of Growth, Wood Density and Stem Characteristics of <i>Pinus pinaster</i> in Portugal. <i>Silva Lusitana</i> <b>11</b>(2): 131&#45;139.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000110&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>BAERMANN, G., 1917. Eine einfache Methode zur Auffindung von Ankylostomum (nematoden) Larven in Erdproben. <i>Geneesk, Tijdschr, Ned&#45;Indie</i> <b>57</b>: 131&#45;137.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000112&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>BALDO, A., NORELLI, J.L., FARRELL Jr. R., BASSET, C.L., ALDWINCKLE, H.S., MALNOY, M., 2010. Identification of genes differentially expressed during interaction of resistant and susceptible apple cultivars (<i>Malus</i> x <i>domestica</i>) with <i>Erwinia amylovora</i>. <i>BMC Plant Biology</i> <b>10</b>(1). doi:10.1186/1471&#45;2229&#45;10&#45;1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000114&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>BOLLA, R.I., WINTER, R.E.K., FITZSIMMONS, K., LINIT, M.J., 1986. Pathotypes of the Pinewood Nematode <i>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</i>. <i>Journal of Nematology</i> <b>18</b>(2): 230&#45;238.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000115&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>CORREIA, I., ALMEIDA, H., AGUIAR, A., 2004. Variabilidade do Crescimento e da Forma de Proveni&ecirc;ncias de <i>Pinus pinaster</i> Aiton aos 8 Anos, na Mata Nacional do Escaroup.<i>Silva Lusitana</i> <b>12</b>(2): 151&#45;182.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000117&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>DWINELL, L.D., 1997. The Pinewood Nematode: Regulation and Mitigation. <i>Annu Rev Phytopathol</i> <b>35</b>: 153&#45;166.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000119&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>FUKUDA, K., 1997. Physiological Process of the Symptom Development and Resistance Mechanism in Pine Wilt Disease. <i>J For Res</i> <b>2</b>: 171&#45;181.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000121&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>FUTAI, K., 2003. Pine Wilt Disease: Various biological relationships and resulting events. <i>Proceedings: International Union of Forest Research Organizations Kanazawa 2003 "Forest Insect Population Dynamics and Host Influences".    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000123&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></i></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>FUTAI, K., FURUNO, T., 1979. The variety of resistances among pine species to pine wood nematode, <i>Bursaphelenchus lignicolus</i>. <i>Bull Kyoto Uni For</i> <b>51</b>: 23&#45;36.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000125&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>GLEASON, M., LINIT, M., ZRIBA, N., DONALD, P., TISSERAT, N., GIESLER, L., 2000. Pine Wilt: A fatal disease of exotic pines in the Midwest. <i>Sustainable Urban Landscape</i> <b>9</b>.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000127&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>KIM, J., SEO, S&#45;M., LEE, S&#45;G., SHIN, S&#45;C., PARK, I&#45;K., 2008. Nematicidal activity of plant essential oils and components from Coriander (<i>Coriandrum sativum</i>), Oriental Sweetgun (<i>Liquidambar orientalis</i>), and Valerian (<i>Valeriana wallichii</i>) essential oils against Pine Wood Nematode (<i>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</i>). <i>J Agric Food Chem</i> <b>56</b>: 7316&#45;7320.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000129&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>KOUTROUMPA, F.A., SALLE, A., LIEUTIER, F., ROUX&#45;MORABITO, G., 2009. Feeding and oviposition preferences of <i>Monochamus galloprovincialis</i> on its main hosts <i>Pinus sylvestris</i> and <i>Pinus pinaster</i>. <i>Entomologia Hellenica</i> <b>18</b>: 35&#45;46.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000131&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>MATEUS, E., BARATA, R.C., ZROSTL&Iacute;KOV&Aacute;, J., GOMES DA SILVA, M.D.R., PAIVA, M.R., 2010. Characterization of the volatile fraction emitted by <i>Pinus</i> spp. by one&#45; and two&#45;dimensional chromatographic techniques with mass spectrometric detection. <i>Journal of Chromatography A</i> <b>1217</b>: 1845&#45;1855.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000133&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>MOTA, M.M., BRAASCH, H., BRAVO, M.A., PENAS, A.C., BURGERMEISTER, W., METGE, K., SOUSA, E., 1999. First report of <i>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</i> in Portugal and in Europe. <i>Nematology</i> <b>1</b>(7&#45;8): 727&#45;734.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000135&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>MOTA, M.M., VIEIRA, P.R. (Eds.) 2008. Pine Wilt Disease: A worldwide threat to forest ecosystems. Springer, s.l.. 405 p.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000137&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>MUMM, R., SCHRANK, K., WEGENER, R., SCHULZ, S., HILKER, M., 2003. Chemical analysis of volatiles emitted by <i>Pinus sylvestris</i> after induction by insect oviposition. <i>Journal of Chemical Ecology</i> <b>29</b>(5): 1235&#45;1252&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000139&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>MUMM, R., TIEMANN, T., SCHULZ, S., HILKER, M., 2004. Analysis of volatiles from black pine (<i>Pinus nigra</i>): significance of wounding and egg deposition by herbivorous sawfly. <i>Phytochemistry</i> <b>65</b>: 3221&#45;3230.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000140&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>MYERS, R.F., 1988. Pathogenesis in Pine Wilt caused by Pinewood Nematode, <i>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</i>. <i>Journal of Nematology</i> <b>20</b>(2): 236&#45;244.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000142&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>NAVES, P., SOUSA, E., QUARTAU, J.A., 2007. Winter dormancy of the pine sawyer <i>Monochamus galloprovincialis</i> (Col., Cerambycidae) in Portugal. <i>J Appl Entomol</i> <b>131</b>: 669&#45;673.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000144&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>NICKLE, W.R., GOLDEN, A.M., MAMIYA, Y., WERGIN, W.P., 1981. On the taxonomy and morphology of the Pine Wood Nematode, <i>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</i> (Steiner &amp; Buhrer 1934) Nickle 1970. <i>Journal of Nematology</i> <b>13</b>(3): 385&#45;392.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000146&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>PROEN&Ccedil;A DA CUNHA, A., 2005. Farmacognosia e Fitoqu&iacute;mica. Funda&ccedil;&atilde;o Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisboa. 671 p.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000148&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>RUTHERFORD, T.A., RIGA, E., WEBSTER, J.M., 1992. Temperature&#45;mediated behavioural relationships in <i>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</i>, <i>B. mucrunatus</i>, and their hybrids. <i>Journal of Nematology</i> <b>24</b>(1): 40&#45;44.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000150&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>SANTOS, A.M., VASCONCELOS, T., MATEUS E., FARRALL, M.H., GOMES DA SILVA, M.D.R., PAIVA, M.R., BRANCO, M., 2006. Characterization of the volatile fraction emitted by phloems of four pine species by solid&#45;phase microextraction and gas chromatography&#45;mass spectrometry. <i>Journal of Chromatography A</i> <b>1105</b>: 191&#45;198.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000152&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>SIKORA, E.J., MALEK, R.B., 1991. Influence of temperature on development of Pine Wilt in Scots Pine. <i>Journal of Nematology</i> <b>23</b>(2): 188&#45;193.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000154&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>SUMNER, L.W., MENDES, P., DIXON, R.A., 2003. Plant metabolomics: large&#45;scale phytochemistry in the functional genomics era. <i>Phytochemistry</i> <b>62</b>: 817&#45;836.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000156&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>TAN, J&#45;J., YE, J&#45;R., WU, X&#45;Q., ZHU, Y&#45;F., LI, Y., 2005. A study on disease development and early diagnosis of pine wood nematode, <i>Bursaphenchus xylophilus</i>, infection of Japanese black pine. <i>Nematology</i> <b>7</b>(4): 481&#45;485.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000158&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>ZHAO, B.G., FUTAI, K., SUTHERLAND, J.R., TAKEUCHI, Y. (Eds.), 2008. Pine Wilt Disease. Springer, s.l.. 459 p.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000160&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800029&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

	    <!-- ref --><p>ZHAO, L., WEI, W., LIU, X., KANG, L., SUN, J., 2007. A novel rapid sampling method for pinewood nematode, <i>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</i> (Nematoda: Parasita&#45;phelenchidae). <i>Can. J. For. Res.</i> <b>37</b>: 1867&#45;1872.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000162&pid=S0870-6352201100010000800030&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
	    <p>&nbsp;</p>

	    <p><b>Agradecimentos</b></p>

	    <p>Os autores gostariam de agradecer &agrave; Autoridade Florestal Nacional e ao Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas, I.P., pelo financiamento do projecto "Estrat&eacute;gia biotecnol&oacute;gica para combater a doen&ccedil;a da madeira do pinheiro", Dr. Manuel Mota e Dr. Pedro Barbosa por terem cedido a estirpe de nem&aacute;tode HF e &agrave; Doutora Marta R. M. Lima pelo apoio na t&eacute;cnica de cromatografia gasosa.</p>

	    <p>&nbsp;</p>
	
    <p><i>Entregue para publica&ccedil;&atilde;o em Mar&ccedil;o de 2011</i></p>

	    <p><i>Aceite para publica&ccedil;&atilde;o em Maio de 2011</i></p>
     ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ABADÍA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MONGE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MONTAÑES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HERAS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Extraction of iron from plant leaves by Fe(II) chelators]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Plant Nutrition]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>1-5</numero>
<issue>1-5</issue>
<page-range>777-784</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[AGUIAR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALMEIDA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BORRALHO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Genetic Control of Growth, Wood Density and Stem Characteristics of Pinus pinaster in Portugal]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Silva Lusitana]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>131-139</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BAERMANN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="de"><![CDATA[Eine einfache Methode zur Auffindung von Ankylostomum (nematoden) Larven in Erdproben]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geneesk, Tijdschr, Ned-Indie]]></source>
<year>1917</year>
<volume>57</volume>
<page-range>131-137</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BALDO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NORELLI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FARRELL Jr.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BASSET]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALDWINCKLE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MALNOY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Identification of genes differentially expressed during interaction of resistant and susceptible apple cultivars (Malus x domestica) with Erwinia amylovora]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMC Plant Biology]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOLLA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WINTER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.E.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FITZSIMMONS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LINIT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Pathotypes of the Pinewood Nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Nematology]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>230-238</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CORREIA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALMEIDA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[AGUIAR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Variabilidade do Crescimento e da Forma de Proveniências de Pinus pinaster Aiton aos 8 Anos, na Mata Nacional do Escaroup]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Silva Lusitana]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>151-182</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DWINELL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Pinewood Nematode: Regulation and Mitigation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Annu Rev Phytopathol]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<page-range>153-166</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FUKUDA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Physiological Process of the Symptom Development and Resistance Mechanism in Pine Wilt Disease]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J For Res]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>171-181</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FUTAI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Pine Wilt Disease: Various biological relationships and resulting events]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings: International Union of Forest Research Organizations Kanazawa 2003 "Forest Insect Population Dynamics and Host Influences"]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FUTAI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FURUNO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The variety of resistances among pine species to pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus lignicolus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Bull Kyoto Uni For]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<page-range>23-36</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GLEASON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LINIT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZRIBA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DONALD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TISSERAT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GIESLER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Pine Wilt: A fatal disease of exotic pines in the Midwest]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Sustainable Urban Landscape]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>9</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KIM]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SEO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S-M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LEE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S-G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SHIN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S-C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PARK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I-K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Nematicidal activity of plant essential oils and components from Coriander (Coriandrum sativum), Oriental Sweetgun (Liquidambar orientalis), and Valerian (Valeriana wallichii) essential oils against Pine Wood Nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Agric Food Chem]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>56</volume>
<page-range>7316-7320</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KOUTROUMPA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SALLE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LIEUTIER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROUX-MORABITO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Feeding and oviposition preferences of Monochamus galloprovincialis on its main hosts Pinus sylvestris and Pinus pinaster]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Entomologia Hellenica]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>35-46</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MATEUS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BARATA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZROSTLÍKOVÁ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GOMES DA SILVA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.D.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PAIVA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Characterization of the volatile fraction emitted by Pinus spp. by one- and two-dimensional chromatographic techniques with mass spectrometric detection]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Chromatography]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>1217</volume>
<page-range>1845-1855</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MOTA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BRAASCH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BRAVO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PENAS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BURGERMEISTER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[METGE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SOUSA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[First report of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in Portugal and in Europe]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nematology]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>7-8</numero>
<issue>7-8</issue>
<page-range>727-734</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MOTA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIEIRA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Pine Wilt Disease: A worldwide threat to forest ecosystems]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<page-range>405</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MUMM]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCHRANK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WEGENER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCHULZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HILKER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Chemical analysis of volatiles emitted by Pinus sylvestris after induction by insect oviposition]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Chemical Ecology]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>1235-1252</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MUMM]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCHRANK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WEGENER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCHULZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HILKER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Chemical analysis of volatiles emitted by Pinus sylvestris after induction by insect oviposition]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Chemical Ecology]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>1235-1252</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MUMM]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TIEMANN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCHULZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HILKER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Analysis of volatiles from black pine (Pinus nigra): significance of wounding and egg deposition by herbivorous sawfly]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Phytochemistry]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<page-range>3221-3230</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MYERS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Pathogenesis in Pine Wilt caused by Pinewood Nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Nematology]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>236-244</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NAVES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SOUSA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[QUARTAU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Winter dormancy of the pine sawyer Monochamus galloprovincialis (Col., Cerambycidae) in Portugal]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Appl Entomol]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>131</volume>
<page-range>669-673</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NICKLE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GOLDEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MAMIYA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WERGIN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[On the taxonomy and morphology of the Pine Wood Nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner & Buhrer 1934) Nickle 1970]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Nematology]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>385-392</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PROENÇA DA CUNHA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Farmacognosia e Fitoquímica]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<page-range>671</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Lisboa ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RUTHERFORD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RIGA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WEBSTER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Temperature-mediated behavioural relationships in Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, B. mucrunatus, and their hybrids]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Nematology]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>40-44</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SANTOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VASCONCELOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MATEUS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FARRALL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GOMES DA SILVA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.D.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PAIVA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BRANCO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Characterization of the volatile fraction emitted by phloems of four pine species by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Chromatography]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>1105</volume>
<page-range>191-198</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SIKORA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MALEK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Influence of temperature on development of Pine Wilt in Scots Pine]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Nematology]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>188-193</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SUMNER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MENDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DIXON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Plant metabolomics: large-scale phytochemistry in the functional genomics era]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Phytochemistry]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>62</volume>
<page-range>817-836</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J-J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[YE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J-R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X-Q.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZHU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y-F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A study on disease development and early diagnosis of pine wood nematode, Bursaphenchus xylophilus, infection of Japanese black pine]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nematology]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>481-485</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZHAO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FUTAI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SUTHERLAND]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TAKEUCHI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Pine Wilt Disease]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<page-range>459</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZHAO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WEI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LIU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KANG]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SUN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A novel rapid sampling method for pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Parasita-phelenchidae)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Can. J. For. Res.]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<page-range>1867-1872</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
