Marisa Carvalho* e Sílvio Barge**
*Interna do internato médico de Medicina Geral e Familiar, USF Mais Saúde.
**Interno do internato médico de Medicina Geral e Familiar, USF Lethes.
Resumo
Objectivo: Determinar se existe evidência de benefícios clínicos na suplementação com vitamina D nos lactentes.
Fontes de dados: Base de dados MEDLINE e sítios electrónicos de Medicina Baseada na Evidência.
]]> Métodos de revisão: Pesquisa de normas de orientação clínica, meta-análises, revisões sistemáticas, revisões baseadas na evidência e ensaios clínicos, publicados até Janeiro de 2010, em inglês, francês, espanhol e português, utilizando os termos MeSH: vitamin D, dietary supplements. Para avaliar a qualidade dos estudos e a força de recomendação, foi utilizada a escala Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy da American Family Physician.Resultados: Foram identificados 340 artigos, tendo sido seleccionados nove que cumpriam a totalidade dos critérios de inclusão, dos quais três normas de orientação clínica, duas revisões sistemáticas, uma revisão baseada na evidência, dois consensos de peritos e um estudo de coorte. Não existe consenso acerca da necessidade de suplementação com vitamina D nos lactentes, nem da dose a utilizar. Suplementação com 400UI/L/dia de vitamina D a todos os lactentes em aleitamento materno exclusivo ou que ingiram menos de 1L de leite artificial por dia parece ser benéfica e segura.
Conclusão: Neste momento, o mais consensual é a recomendação de suplementação com 400UI/L/dia de vitamina D a todos os lactentes em aleitamento materno exclusivo, ou até que ingiram pelo menos 1L de leite artificial por dia, para prevenir o raquitismo. São necessários mais estudos controlados, aleatorizados, de longa duração e boa qualidade que avaliem as necessidades de vitamina D em diferentes populações.
Palavras-chave: Vitamina D; Suplementos Dietéticos; Lactente.
Vitamin D supplementation in infants: what is the evidence?
Abstract
Objective: To determine if there is evidence of clinical benefit for vitamin D supplementation in infants.
Sources: MEDLINE data base and Evidence Based Medicine electronic sites.
Review methods: A search for clinical practice guidelines, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, evidence-based reviews and clinical trials published before January 2010, in English, French, Spanish and Portuguese was performed using the MeSH terms: “vitamin D” and “dietary supplements”. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy scale of the American Family Physician was used to assess the quality of the studies and the strength of the recommendation.
]]> Results: We identified 340 articles, but only nine met all of our inclusion criteria. These consisted of three clinical practice guidelines, two systematic reviews, an evidence-based review, a consensus statement of two experts and one cohort study. No agreement was found regarding the need for vitamin D supplements or the recommended dose. Vitamin D supplementation with 400 IU per day for all infants who are exclusively breastfed or who ingest less than one liter of formula milk per day seems beneficial and safe.Conclusion: Currently, the most common recommendation for preventing rickets is the provision of 400 IU of vitamin D per day to infants who are exclusively breastfed, or who are fed with at least one liter of milk a day. Additional controlled, randomized, long-term high quality studies are necessary to assess the need for vitamin D supplementation in different populations.
Keywords: Vitamin D; Dietary Supplements, Infant.
Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.
Full text only available in PDF format.
REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS
1. Welsh J, Wietzke JA, Zinser Gm, Byrne B, Smith K, Narvaez C. Vitamin D-3 receptor as a target for breast cancer prevention. J Nutr 2003 Jul; 133 (7 Suppl): 2425S-2433S.
2. Health Canada. Vitamin D supplementation for breastfed infants: 2004 Health Canada Recommendation. Disponível em: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/alt_formats/hpfb-dgpsa/pdf/nutrition/vita_d_supp-eng.pdf [acedido em 9/02/2010].
]]> 3. Lerch C, Meissner T. Interventions for the prevention of nutritional rickets in term born children. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2007 Oct 17; (4): CD006164.4. Wagner CL, Greer FR, and the Section on Breastfeeding and Committee on Nutrition. Prevention of rickets and vitamin D deficiency in infants, children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2008 Nov; 122 (5): 1142-52.
5. Munns C, Zacharin MR, Rodda CP, Batch JA, Morley R, Cranswick NE, et al. Prevention and treatment of infant and childhood vitamin D deficiency in Australia and New Zealand: a consensus statement. Med J Aust 2006 Sep 4; 185 (5): 268-72.
6. Barrett EJ, Barrett P. The parathyroid glands and vitamin D. In: Boron F, Boulpaep E, editors. Medical Physiology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, Elsevier Science; 2003. p. 1086-101.
7. Mimouni FB, Shamir R. Vitamin D requirements in the first year of life. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2009 May; 12 (3): 287-92.
8. Kulie T, Groff A, Redmer J, Hounshell J, Schrager S. Vitamin D: an evidence-based review. J Am Board Fam Med 2009 Nov-Dec; 22 (6): 698-706.
9. Peehl DM, Krishnan AV, Feldman D. Pathways mediating the growth-inhibitory actions of vitamin D in prostate cancer. J Nutr 2003 Jul; 133 (7 Suppl): 2461S-2469S.
10. Cranney A, Horsley T, O’Donnell S, Weiler HA, Puil L, Ooi DS, et al. Effectiveness and safety of vitamin D in relation to bone health. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 158 (Prepared by the University of Ottawa Evidence-based Practice Center (UO-EPC) under Contract No. 290-02-0021. AHRQ Publication No. 07-E013. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007. Disponível em: http://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/evidence/pdf/vitamind/vitad.pdf [acedido em 11/02/2010].
11. First Nations, Inuit and Métis Health Committee 2007-01. Vitamin D supplementation: recommendations for Canadian mothers and infants. Paediatr Child Health 2007 Sep; 12 (7): 583-98.
12. Gordon CM, Feldman HA, Sinclair L, Williams AL, Kleinman PK, Perez-Rossello J, et al. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among healthy infants and toddlers. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008 Jun; 162 (6): 505-12.
]]> 13. Holick MF. Vitamin D: a millenium perspective. J Cell Biochem 2003 Feb 1; 88 (2): 296-307.14. Fuller KE, Casparian JM. Vitamin D: balancing cutaneous and systemic considerations. South Med J 2001 Jan; 94 (1): 58-64. [ Links ]
15. Bischoff HA, Stähelin HB, Dick W, Akos R, Knecht M, Salis C, et al. Effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on falls: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res 2003 Feb; 18 (2): 343-51.
16. Munger KL, Zhang SM, O'Reilly E, Hernán MA, Olek MJ, Willett WC, et al. Vitamin D intake and incidence of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2004 Jan 13; 62 (1): 60-5.
17. Hyppönen E, Läärä E, Reunanen A, Järvelin MR, Virtanen SM. Intake of vitamin D and risk of type 1 diabetes: a birth-cohort study. Lancet 2001 Nov 3; 358 (9292): 1500-3.
18. Martineau AR, Wilkinson RJ, Wilkinson KA, Newton SM, Kampmann B, Hall B, et al. A single dose of vitamin D enhances immunity to mycobacteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007 Jul 15; 176 (2): 208-13.
19. McGrath J, Saari K, Hakko H, Jokelainen J, Jones P, Järvelin MR, et al. Vitamin D supplementation during the first year of life and risk of schizophrenia: a Finnish birth cohort study. Schizophr Res 2004 Apr 1; 67 (2-3): 237-45.
20. Hyppönen E, Hartikainen AL, Sovio U, Järvelin MR, Pouta A. Does vitamin D supplementation in infancy reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia? Eur J Clin Nutr 2007 Sep; 61 (9): 1136-9.
21. Hyppönen E, Sovio U, Wjst M, Patel S, Pekkanen J, HΩartikainen AL, et al. Infant vitamin D supplementation and allergic conditions in adulthood: northern Finland birth cohort 1966. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004 Dec; 1037: 84-95.
22. Holick MF. Vitamin D: its role in cancer prevention and treatment. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2006 Sep; 92 (1): 49-59.
]]> 23. Grant WB, Garland CF. A critical review of studies on vitamin D in relation to colorectal cancer. Nutr Cancer 2004; 48 (2): 115-23.24. Direcção-Geral da Saúde - Divisão de Saúde Materna, Infantil e dos Adolescentes. Saúde Infantil e Juvenil: Programa-tipo de actuação. 2ª ed. Lisboa: Direcção-Geral da Saúde; 2005. Disponível em: http://www.dgs.pt/upload/membro.id/ficheiros/i008188.pdf [acedido em 9/03/2010].
25. Prontuário terapêutico. Disponível em: http://www.infarmed.pt/prontuario/index.php [acedido em 10/03/2010].
26. Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, Woolf SH, Susman J, Ewigman B, et al. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Am Fam Physician 2004 Feb 1; 69 (3): 548-56.
CONFLITOS DE INTERESSE
As autoras declaram não possuir qualquer tipo de conflito de interesses.
Marisa Rocha Carvalho
]]> Loteamento do Campo de Golfe, n.o 56 BSanto Amaro – Fornelos
4990-620 Ponte de Lima
E-mail: marisacarvalho6@gmail.com
Recebido em 05/11/2010
Aceite para publicação em 01/05/2011
]]>