As razões que a razão desconhece: Penso, logo engano-me? (*)
Miguel M. Gonçalves (**)
Óscar F. Gonçalves (**)
RESUMO
Neste artigo realiza-se uma revisão dos estudos sobre análise de razões, desenvolvidos nas duas últimas décadas por Wilson et al. (cf., Wilson & Schooler, 1991). Este programa de investigação tem demonstrado de forma sistemática que a análise de razões acerca do nosso comportamento produz efeitos disfuncionais, reduzindo a congruência atitude (medida de auto-relato)-comportamento ou conduzindo a uma menor satisfação pós-escolha em bens de consumo.
São analisadas as propostas interpretativas desta disfuncionalidade, a possibilidade de interpretar estes resultados como uma função da desejabilidade social e o papel que as razões explicativas poderão ter na vida quotidiana.
]]> Finalmente, é proposta uma re-interpretação dos resultados destes estudos a partir da distinção entre pensamento narrativo e pensamento paradigmático (Bruner, 1986).
Palavras-chave: Disfuncionalidade da análise de razões, congruência relatos verbais-comportamento, congruência atitude-comportamento.
ABSTRACT
In this article we review the studies concerned with reason analysis, developed in the last two decades by Wilson et al (cf., Wilson & Schooler, 1991). This research systematically demonstrates that behavioral reason analysis produces dysfunctional effects by reducing the congruency between attitudes (verbal report measure) and behaviors. The disfunctionality of reason analysis also produces less satisfaction after choosing products for consumption. We analyse the interpretations of this dysfunctionality. Foremost, the possible interpretations of these results could be a product of social desirability and the function that explanatory reasons may have in daily life. Finally, we propose a re-interpretation of the results of these studies based on the distinction between paradigmatic thinking and narrative thinking (Bruner, 1986).
Key-words: Dysfunctionality of reason analysis, verbal report-behavior congruency, attitude-behavior congruency.
]]> Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.
Full text only available in PDF format.
REFERÊNCIAS
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [ Links ]
Buss, A. H. (1980). Self-consciousness and social anxiety. San Francisco: Freeman.
Descartes, R. (1984). O discurso do método. Porto: Porto Editora (publicado originalmente em 1637).
Eco, U. (1984). Porquê «O Nome da Rosa»? Lisboa: Difel.
Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-Experiential self theory. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 165-192). New York: Guilford.
]]> Ericson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal report as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.Evans, J. St. B. T. (1980). Current issues in the psychology of reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 227-239.
Gardner, H. (1985). The mind´s new science. New York: Basic Books.
Gonçalves, M. M. (1995). Auto-conhecimento e acesso introspectivo: Do self reificado ao self narrativo. CEEP, U.M.: Braga.
Kihlstrom, J. F. (1984). Conscious, sub-conscious, unconscious: A cognitive perspective. In. K.S. Bowers & D. Meichenbaum (Eds.), The unconscious reconsidered (pp. 149-211). New York: J. Wiley.
Lieberman, D. A. (1979). Behaviorism and the mind: a (limited) call for a return to introspection. American Psychologist, 34, 319-333.
Mahoney, M. J., & Gabriel, T. (1987). Psychotherapy and the cognitive sciences: An evolving alliance. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 1, 39-60.
Meichenbaum, D., & Fong, G. T. (1993). How individuals control their own minds: a constructive narrative perspective. In D. M. Wegner, & J. M. Pennebaker (Eds.), Handbook of mental control. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Miller, M. G., & Tesser, A. (1986). Effects of affective cognitive focus on the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 270-276.
Miller, M. G., & Tesser, A. (1989). The effects of affective-cognitive consistency and thought on the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 189-202.
]]> Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. New York: Freeman.Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1980). Human inference: strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
Schooler, J. W., & Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
Varela, F. J. (1989). Connaître. Paris: Ed. du Seuil.
Wilson, T. D., Dunn, D. S., Bybee, J. A., Hyman, D. B., & Rotondo, J. A. (1984). Effects of analyzing reasons on attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 5-16.
Wilson, T. D., & Dunn, D. S. (1986). Effects of introspection on attitude-behavior consistency: analyzing reasons versus focusing on feelings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 249-263.
Wilson, T. D., Dunn, D. S., Kraft, D., & Lisle, D. J. (1989). Introspection, attitude change, and attitude-behavior consistency: the disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do. In L Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 22, pp. 287-343). New York: Academic Press.
Wilson, T. D., Hull, J. G., & Johnson, J. (1981). Awareness and self-perception: verbal reports on internal states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 53-71.
Wilson, T. D., Kraft, D., & Dunn, D. S. (1989). The disruptive effects of explaining attitudes: the moderating effect of knowledge about the attitude object. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 379-400.
]]> Wilson, T. D., Lisle, D. J., Schooler, J. W., Hodges, S. D., Klaaren, K. J., & LaFleur, S. J. (1993). Introspection about reasons can reduce post-choice satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 331-339.Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.
Wong, P. T. D., & Weiner, B. (1981). When people ask «why» questions, and the heuristic of attributional search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650-663.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and Thinking: preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 123-131.
(*) A correspondência sobre este artigo deverá ser enviada para: Miguel M. Gonçalves, Departamento de Psicologia, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4709 Braga Codex, Portugal. Fax: 053678987, Telefone: 053604240. e-mail: mgoncalves@iep.uminho.pt
(**) Universidade do Minho, Departamento de Psicologia.