MIGUEL PINA E CUNHA (*)

JOÃO VIEIRA DA CUNHA (**)

JESUÍNA CAIXEIRINHO (***)

RESUMO

Este artigo apresenta uma visão geral do problema do controlo organizacional. O argumento central do trabalho é o de que as organizações têm procurado alterar o exercício do controlo, no sentido do aumento da flexibilidade. Para esse efeito, as formas tradicionais de controlo intrusivo têm vindo a ser substituídas por formas de controlo menos intrusivas. Para ilustrar esta mudança de foco na gestão do controlo, o texto começa por apresentar as diversas formas possíveis de controlo organizacional, após o que se centra na discussão de algumas tipologias importantes. Por fim, é discutida a questão do controlo nas organizações baseadas na confiança, sendo introduzido o conceito de rede mínima.

Palavras-chave: Controlo, flexibilidade, redes mínimas.

This paper presents a general overview of organizational control. It argues that organizations have been changing the way they control their members by shifting from the control of flexibility to the flexibility of control. In order to do so, traditional forms of obtrusive control are being substituted by more inobtrusive controls. To illustrate these changes, the paper discusses possible alternatives of control, presents the major typologies of organizational control, and discusses the particular case of control in trust-based organizations, introducing the concept of the minimal network.

Key words: Control, flexibility, minimal networks.

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text only available in PDF format.

REFERÊNCIAS

Adler, P. S. (1993). The learning bureaucracy: New United Motors Manufacturing Incorporated. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (vol. 15, pp. 111-194). Greenwhich, CT: JAI Press.         [ Links ]

Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 61-89.         [ Links ]

Amabile, T. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76 (5), 77-87.         [ Links ]

Argyris, C. (1974). Behind the front page. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.         [ Links ]

Arvey, R. D., & Ivancevich, J. M. (1980). Punishment in organizations: A review, propositions, and research suggestions. Academy of Management Review, 5, 123-132.         [ Links ]

Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 400-437.         [ Links ]

Barley, S., & Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 363-399.         [ Links ]

Bastien, D., & Hostager, T. (1988). Jazz as a process of organizational innovation. Communication Research, 15 (5), 582-602.         [ Links ]

Bertero, C. O. (2000). Questões de governança empresarial. In S. B. Rodrigues & M. P. Cunha (Eds.),Estudos organizacionais: Novas perspectivas na administração de empresas (pp. 429-444). São Paulo: Iglu.         [ Links ]

Boulding, K. (1956). General systems theory: The skeleton of science. Management Science, 2, 197-208.         [ Links ]

Brown, S., & Eisenhardt, K. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1-34.         [ Links ]

Cunha, J. V., Clegg, S., & Cunha, M. P. (2000). Management: Thesis, antithesis, synthesis. Presented at the APROS conference, Sydney, Australia, December.         [ Links ]

Cunha, J. V., Cunha, M. P., & Kamoche, K. (1999). Minimal networks: A contribution to the understanding of control in trust-based organizations. Working paper #361. Faculdade de Economia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.         [ Links ]

Cunha, M. P., Cunha, J. V., & Kamoche, K. (2000). The age of emergence: Toward a new organizational mindset. In M. Abdelsamad & E. Myers (Eds.), Selected readings from the Society for Advancement of Management international management conference (pp. 229-234). Corpus Christi, TX: SAM.         [ Links ]

Drucker, P. (1988). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb., 45-53.         [ Links ]

Eisenberg, E. M. (1990). Jamming: Transcendence trough organizing. Communication Research, 17 (2), 139-164.         [ Links ]

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1985). Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31, 134-149.         [ Links ]

Elderkin, K. W., & Bartlett, C. A. (1991). General Electric: Jack Welch's second wave (A). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.         [ Links ]

Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 26, 21-32.        [ Links ]

Etzioni, A. (1965). Organizational control structure. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 650-677). Chicago: Rand McNally.         [ Links ]

Ezzamel, M., & Willmott, H. (1998). Accounting for team-work: A critical study of group-based systems of organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 358-396.        [ Links ]

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press        [ Links ]

Follett, M. P. (1940). The giving of orders. In H. C. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 50-70). New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.         [ Links ]

Fournier, V., & Grey, C. (2000). At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 53, 7-32.         [ Links ]

Frances, J., Levacic, R., Mitchell, J., & Thompson, G. (1991). Introduction. In J. Frances, R. Levacic & J. Mitchell (Eds.), Markets, hierarchies and networks (pp. 1-19). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.         [ Links ]

Heckscher, C. (1994). Defining the post-bureaucratic type. In C. Heckscher & A. Donnellon (Eds.), The post-bureaucratic organization (pp. 14-62). Thousand Oaks: Sage.         [ Links ]

Hedberg, B., Nystrom, P., & Starbuck, W. (1976). Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 41-65.         [ Links ]

Hofstede, G. (1978). The poverty of management control philosophy. Academy of Management Review, 3, 450-461.         [ Links ]

Jarvenpaa, S., & Shaw, T. (1998). Swift trust in global virtual teams. Unpublished manuscript. University of Texas.         [ Links ]

Langfred, C. W. (2000). The paradox of self-management: Individual and group autonomy in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 563-585.         [ Links ]

Lewis, M. W., & Dehler, G. E. (2000). Learning through paradox: A pedagogical strategy for exploring contradictions and complexity. Journal of Management Education, 24, 708-725.         [ Links ]

Marsden, P. V., Cook, C., & Knoke, D. (1994). Measuring organizational structures and environments. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 891-910.         [ Links ]

Mastenbrook, W. F. G. (1999). Uma perspectiva histórica da inovação organizacional: A mudança como gestão de dualidades. Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão, 5 (1), 43-59.         [ Links ]

Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.         [ Links ]

Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.         [ Links ]

Morgan, G. (1989). Creative organization theory. A re-sourcebook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.         [ Links ]

Ouchi, W. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organization control mechanisms. Management Science, 25, 833-848.         [ Links ]

Pascale, R. (1985). The paradox of "corporate culture": Reconciling ourselves to socialization. California Management Review, 27, 26-41.         [ Links ]

Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.         [ Links ]

Pfeffer, J. (1997). New directions for organizational theory: Problems and prospects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.        [ Links ]

Picken, J. C., & Dess, G. (1997). Out of (strategic) control. Organizational Dynamics, Summer, 35-48.         [ Links ]

Podsakoff, P., Tods, W., Grover, R., & Huber, V. (1984). Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: Fact or fiction. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 21-63.         [ Links ]

Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (vol. 12, pp. 295-336). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.         [ Links ]

Ritzer, G. (1996). Sociological theory (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.         [ Links ]

Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Century Business.         [ Links ]

Sewell, G. (1998). The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 397-428.         [ Links ]

Stacey, R. D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.        [ Links ]

Starbuck, W. H. (1965). Organizational growth and development. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 451-533). Chicago: Rand McNally.         [ Links ]

Steiner, G. A. (1997). Strategic planning. New York: Simon & Schuster.         [ Links ]

Walton, R. E. (1985). From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 63 (2), 77-84.         [ Links ]

Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.         [ Links ]

Weick, K. E. (1993). Organizational redesign as improvisation. In G. P. Huber & W. H. Glick (Eds.),Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance (pp. 346-379). New York: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.         [ Links ]

Weick, K. E. (1999). The aesthetic of imperfection in orchestras and organizations. In M. P. Cunha & C. A. Marques (Eds.), Readings in organization science (pp. 541-563). Lisboa: ISPA.         [ Links ]

Weick, K. E. (s.d.). Tools and tragedies in wildland firefighting: Barriers to risk mitigation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.        [ Links ]

(*) Departamento de Gestão, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua Marquês de Fronteira, 20, 1099-038 Lisboa, mpc@fe.unl.pt

(**) MIT Sloan School of Management, 50 Memorial Drive, Office E52-509, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA, jvc@mit.edu

(***) Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa.