Marco Vasconcelos (**)
Pedro B. Albuquerque (***)
RESUMO
As investigações sobre memória humana têm revelado dissociações entre diferentes tarefas de memória, quer em sujeitos normais, quer em pacientes com défices de memória. O presente estudo procurou avaliar a aplicabilidade das abordagens teóricas dominantes nesta área em participantes normais. A abordagem dos múltiplos sistemas de memória prevê dissociações entre um sistema de memória implícita e um sistema de memória explícita. Alternativamente, a abordagem da transferência apropriada de processamento prevê dissociações baseadas no grau de sobreposição das operações cognitivas requeridas na codificação e recuperação da informação, prevendo dissociações entre tarefas conceptuais e perceptivas. Os resultados obtidos revelaram que o desempenho nas tarefas de memória explícita de evocação livre e evocação guiada por pistas grafémicas se dissociou do desempenho nas tarefas de memória implícita de completamento de fragmentos de palavras e de conhecimento geral. A manipulação do nível de processamento de informação durante o estudo potenciou o desempenho nas tarefas explícitas, mas não teve qualquer efeito nas tarefas implícitas, independentemente do carácter conceptual ou perceptivo das mesmas. Estes resultados sugerem que as dissociações entre diferentes tarefas de memória são melhor compreendidas assumindo a existência de diferentes sistemas de memória subjacentes às diferentes tarefas.
Palavras-chave: Memória implícita, memória explícita, processamento perceptivo, processamento conceptual, dissociações.
ABSTRACT
]]> Human memory research has been revealing dissociations among memory tasks, both in normal and in memory-impaired subjects. This study evaluates the applicability of the dominant theoretical approaches in this domain to normal participants. The memory systems approach predicts dissociations between an implicit memory system and an explicit memory system. Alternatively, a processing account predicts dissociations based on the degree of overlap between the cognitive operations at study and test, resulting in dissociations between conceptual and perceptive tasks. Results revealed that performance in the explicit memory tasks of free recall and graphemic cued recall was dissociated from performance in the implicit memory tasks of word fragment completion and general knowledge questions. The manipulation of the level of processing at study enhanced performance in the explicit memory tasks, but had no effect on the implicit memory ones, independently of the perceptive or conceptual nature of the tasks. These findings suggest that dissociations among memory measures are better explained in terms of different memory systems that underlie different memory tasks.Key words: Implicit memory, explicit memory, data-driven processes, conceptually-driven processes, dissociations.
Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.
Full text only available in PDF format.
REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS
Albuquerque, P. B. (2001). Memória implícita e processamento: Do subliminar à formação de imagens. Braga: CEEP. [ Links ]
Berry, D. C., Banbury, S., & Henry, L. (1997). Transfer across form and modality in implicit and explicit memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 1-24.
Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 657-668.
]]> Blaxton, T. A. (1992). Dissociations among memory measures in memory-impaired subjects: Evidence for a processing account of memory. Memory & Cognition, 20, 549-562.Cermak, L. S. (1993). Automatic vs controlled processing and the implicit task performance of amnesic patients. In P. Graf, & M. E. J. Masson (Eds.), Implicit memory: new directions in cognition, development, and neuropsychology (pp. 287-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cofer, C. C. (1967). Conditions for the use of verbal associations. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 1-12.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover. (Trabalho original publicado em 1885; traduzido em 1913).
Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1987). Selective effects of interference on implicit and explicit memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 45-53.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analysing interactive processes in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 485-508.
Jacoby, L. L. (1988). Memory observed and memory unobserved. In U. Neisser, & E. Winograd (Eds.), Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory (pp. 145-177). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
Keane, M. M., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Fennema, A. C., Growdon, J. H., & Corkin, S. (1991). Evidence for a dissociation between perceptual and conceptual priming in Alzheimer’s disease. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105 (2), 326-342.
Lockhart, R. S., & Craik, F. M. I. (1990). Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 87-112.
]]> Mulligan, N. W. (1998). The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 27-47.Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
Roediger, H. L., & Weldon, M. S., & Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger, & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honor of Endel Tulving (pp. 3-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., Stadler, M. A., & Riegler, G. H. (1992). Direct comparison of word stems and word fragments in implicit and explicit retention tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1251-1269.
Schacter, D. L. (1990). Perceptual representation systems and implicit memory: Toward a resolution of the multiple memory systems debate. In A. Diamond (Ed.), The development and neural bases of higher cognitive functions (pp. 543-571). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Schacter, D. L., Bowers, J., & Booker, J. (1989). Intention, awareness, and implicit memory: The retrieval inten-tionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shimamura, A. P. (1993). Neuropsychological analyses of implicit memory: History, methodology and theoretical interpretations. In P. Graf, & M. E. J. Masson (Eds.), Implicit memory: new directions in cognition, development, and neuropsychology (pp. 265-285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Squire, L. B., Knowlton, B., & Musen, G. (1993). The structure and organization of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 453-495.
Squire, L. R., & Kandel, E. R. (2000). Memory: From mind to molecules. New York: Freeman & Company.
Srinivas, K. (1988). Testing the nature of two implicit tests for dissociations between conceptually-driven and data-driven processes. Tese de Mestrado não publicada, Purdue University.
]]> Tulving, E., Hayman, C. A. G., & MacDonald, C. A. (1991). Long-lasting perceptual priming and semantic learning in amnesia: A case experiment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 595-617.Vaidya, C. J., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Keane, M. M., & Monti, L. A. (1995). Perceptual and conceptual memory processes in global amnesia. Neuropsychology, 10, 529-537.
Wagner, A. D., Desmond, J. E., Demb, J. B., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1997). Semanticrepetition priming for verbal and pictorial knowledge: A functional MRI study of left inferior prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 (6), 714-726.
Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1974). The effect of prior learning on subsequent retention in amnesic patients. Neuropsychologia, 12, 419-428.
Weldon, M. S., & Roediger, H. L. (1987). Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 15, 269-280.
Zola-Morgan, S., & Squire, L. R. (1990). The neuropsy-chology of memory: Parallel findings in humans and nonhuman primates. In A. Diamond (Ed.), The development and neural bases of higher cognitive functions (pp. 434-456). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
(*) Dados submetidos pelo primeiro autor ao Departamento de Psicologia da Universidade do Minho em cumprimento parcial dos requisitos para a obtenção do grau de mestre em Psicologia, área de especialização em Ciências Cognitivas.
(**) Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, USA. E-mail: marcov@psych.purdue.edu
(***) Universidade do Minho, Portugal.
]]>