<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0871-018X</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista de Ciências Agrárias]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. de Ciências Agrárias]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0871-018X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0871-018X2008000200003</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Efeito de milho Bt sobre a entomofauna não alvo]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Side-effect of maize Bt on non-target arthropods]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Filomena]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vieira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maria Margarida]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lavadinho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[António Manuel Pereira]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mendonça]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Teresa Rita]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,DGADR - Direcção-Geral de Protecção das Culturas  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Oeiras ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>29</fpage>
<lpage>33</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0871-018X2008000200003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0871-018X2008000200003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0871-018X2008000200003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Com o objectivo de verificar o impacte de milho Bt na fauna auxiliar de artrópodes, cultivaram-se, durante três anos (2002-2004), duas variedades de milho geneticamente modificadas (Compa CB e Elgina) e as suas isogénicas (Dracma e Cecília). Os ensaios foram realizados no Núcleo de Ensaios e de Controlo do Escaroupim, no Ribatejo. As amostragens de artrópodes auxiliares foram realizadas quinzenalmente, durante o ciclo vegetativo da cultura, em quatro talhões, usando o método de aspiração. Não se encontraram diferenças na fauna auxiliar existente, entre as cultivares Bt e as suas isogénicas. Os artrópodes auxiliares mais abundantes, em qualquer dos anos e cultivares, foram os antocorídeos. Os himenópteros foram o segundo grupo mais representado, seguido das aranhas.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[In order to study the impact of transgenic maize on beneficial arthropods, two varieties of maize Bt (Compa CB and Elgina) and the normal ones (Dracma and Cecília) were sown. The trials were carried out, in Escaroupim, Ribatejo, from 2002 to 2004. The surveys were done by using a cordless hand vacuum machine, every 15 days, during the growing season. The results showed no significant differences between arthropods caught in maize Bt and the normal one. The beneficials with the highest numbers caught during the three years were Anthocoridae, Hymenoptera and Aranea were the first, second and third most representative groups of beneficial arthropods during the three years.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[auxiliares]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[GM]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[milho Bt]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[beneficial arthropods]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[GMO]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[maize Bt]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="center"> <b>Efeito de milho Bt sobre a entomofauna n&atilde;o alvo<sup><a href="#1">1</a></sup>    <a name="top1"></a> </b></p>     <p align="center"><b>Side-effect of maize Bt on non-target arthropods</b> </p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     <P align="center">Filomena Martins, Maria Margarida Vieira, Ant&oacute;nio Manuel    Pereira Lavadinho, Teresa Rita Mendon&ccedil;a<Sup><a href="#2">2</a> <a name="top2"></a></Sup></P>     <P align="center">&nbsp;</P>     <P align="center">&nbsp;</P>     <p align="center"> <b>RESUMO</b> </p>     <p> Com o objectivo de verificar o impacte de milho Bt na fauna auxiliar de artrópodes,    cultivaram-se, durante três anos (2002-2004), duas variedades de milho geneticamente    modificadas (Compa CB e Elgina) e as suas isogénicas (Dracma e Cecília). Os    ensaios foram realizados no Núcleo de Ensaios e de Controlo do Escaroupim, no    Ribatejo. </P>     <p> As amostragens de artrópodes auxiliares foram realizadas quinzenalmente, durante    o ciclo vegetativo da cultura, em quatro talhões, usando o método de aspiração.    Não se encontraram diferenças na fauna auxiliar existente, entre as cultivares    Bt e as suas isogénicas. Os artrópodes auxiliares mais abundantes, em qualquer    dos anos e cultivares, foram os antocorídeos. Os himenópteros foram o segundo    grupo mais representado, seguido das aranhas. </P>     <p> Palavras-chave: auxiliares, GM, milho Bt </P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"> <b>ABSTRACT</b> </p>     <p> In order to study the impact of transgenic maize on beneficial arthropods,    two varieties of maize Bt (Compa CB and Elgina) and the normal ones (Dracma    and Cecília) were sown. The trials were carried out, in Escaroupim, Ribatejo,    from 2002 to 2004. </P>     <p> The surveys were done by using a cordless hand vacuum machine, every 15 days,    during the growing season. The results showed no significant differences between    arthropods caught in maize Bt and the normal one. The beneficials with the highest    numbers caught during the three years were Anthocoridae, Hymenoptera and Aranea    were the first, second and third most representative groups of beneficial arthropods    during the three years. </P>     <p> Key words: beneficial arthropods, GMO, maize Bt </P>     <p>&nbsp;</P>     <p>&nbsp;</P>     <p> Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.</p>     <p>Full text only available in PDF format.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><b> REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS </b></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Albajes, R., López, C. &amp; Pons, X. (2003) - Predatory fauna in cornfields    and response to imidacloprid seed treatment. J. Econ. Entomol. 9, 6: 1805-1813.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000026&pid=S0871-018X200800020000300001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p> Lozzia, G. &amp; Rigamonti, C. (1998). -Preliminary study on the effects of    transgenic maize on non target species. IOBC wprs Bulletin 21: 171-180. </P>     <p> Poza, M. (2005) -Maíz Bt: Seguimiento de la resistencia de los taladros del    maíz y efectos sobre artrópodos depredadores. Antama, Spain, 109 pp. </P>     <p> Vieira, M.M., Martins, F., Lavadinho, A.M.P. &amp; Mendonça, T.R. (2005) -Método    de amostragem por aspiração para captura de artrópodes auxiliares na cultura    do milho. In: IPC (Ed.). A produção integrada e a qualidade e segurança alimentar.    Actas do VII Encontro Nacional de Protecção Integrada, Instituto Politécnico    Coimbra, Coimbra, vol I: 410-413. </P>     <p>&nbsp;</P>     <p> <Sup><a name="1"></a><a href="#top1">1</a> </Sup>O presente trabalho inclui    dados apresentados oralmente no IVCongresso Nacional de Entomologia Aplicada    da Sociedade Espanhola de Entomologia Aplicada, Bragança, Dezembro 2005 e foi    efectuado no âmbito do Projecto Agro 17 “Estudo de impactes de milho geneticamente    modificado em ecossistemas agrícolas”.</P>     <p> <a name="2"></a><a href="#top2"><Sup>2</Sup></a><Sup> </Sup>Direcção-Geral    de Protecção das Culturas (actual DGADR), Quinta do Marquês 2780-155, Oeiras,    Portugal, <a href="mailto:fmartins@dgadr.pt">fmartins@dgadr.pt</a> </P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p> Recepção/Reception: 2007.05.08 aceitação/acception: 2007.08.09 </P>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Albajes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Predatory fauna in cornfields and response to imidacloprid seed treatment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Econ. Entomol.]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1805-1813</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
