<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0872-0754</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Nascer e Crescer]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Nascer e Crescer]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0872-0754</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro Hospitalar do Porto]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0872-07542015000100008</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Carrier screening: will it be possible to eliminate autosomal recessive disorders?]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferreira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José Carlos]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Medical University of Warsaw Warsaw  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Poland</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>20</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>20</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>24</volume>
<fpage>11</fpage>
<lpage>11</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0872-07542015000100008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0872-07542015000100008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0872-07542015000100008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri></article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="right"><b><font size="2" face="Verdana"> INVITED SPEAKERS / COMUNICAÇÕES POR CONVITE </font></b></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b><font size="2" face="Verdana">CC-08</font></b></p>     <p><font size="4" face="Verdana"><b>Carrier screening – will it be possible to eliminate autosomal recessive disorders?</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b><font size="2" face="Verdana">José Carlos Ferreira, MD, PhD<sup>I</sup></font></b></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"><sup>I</sup>Medical University of Warsaw   Warsaw, Poland</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"><a href="mailto:ZEC1962@gmail.com">ZEC1962@gmail.com</a></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">In a future not far away, anyone can have his/her   exome/ genome sequenced for a reasonable price. Lots of debate will deal   with the utility   of doing this. But, at least, a likely useful use of that type of data will be carrier screening. To find out, prior to conception, if a couple   carries recessive disease causing mutations in the same gene, will make it possible, using preimplantation or prenatal   genetic diagnosis, to identify   embryos or fetuses affected. Current screening methods,   for the vast majority   of diseases, rely on   family history. The main   drawback of such methods is the need for the birth of an   affected individual – a proband   – to identify carriers. Universal preconceptional screening   for all/most recessive   disease causing mutations would reduce dramatically this drawback.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">But is it worth   the cost? Are there other   more cost reasonable alternatives to exome sequencing based screening? Are there   other more cost reasonable alternatives to universal screening? That is, population targeted screening?</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">In this new age   of genomics, where   exome based screening is already being offered   to anyone who can afford it, it may be worth   to revisit the discussions about carrier screening.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">Where there is no screening program,   is it reasonable to jump directly to the exome based screening, wait until it gets more affordable, or consider the implementation, even temporary, of other   more limited technologies and programs already   tested. Will it be worth? Which   perspective should be taken? The   public health perspective or the individual perspective? Are there differences between the two perspectives?</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">The history of carrier   screening programs and the   discussions that preceded   them may be good starting   points in the search for answers   to these questions. In the beginning, carrier screening was based   on family history. Later population targeted preconceptional screening for targeted   diseases was added – sickle cell disease in African ancestry, thalassemias in   Mediterranean ancestry, Tay-Sachs   disease in Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) ancestry. Then   several expansions of number of diseases in AJ   ancestry and universal screening for Cystic   Fibrosis occurred. And more   recently, the offer   of universal genomic   based carrier screening to anyone who can afford it is the last development in this process. What were the problems in the implementation of those programs? What was accomplished? What can be learned?</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">This presentation will probably raise more questions than answer them. Discussion will be expected.</font></p>      ]]></body>
</article>
