<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0872-1904</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Port. Electrochim. Acta]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0872-1904</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedade Portuguesa de Electroquímica]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0872-19042011000400001</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy of Ni-B Coatings and Optimization by Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Das]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Suman K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sahoo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Prasanta]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Jadavpur University Department of Mechanical Engineering ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Kolkata ]]></addr-line>
<country>India</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<fpage>211</fpage>
<lpage>231</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0872-19042011000400001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0872-19042011000400001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0872-19042011000400001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Electroless nickel coatings possess several advantages over electroplating such as ability to coat any material and with uniform thickness. Besides, these coatings are used mainly for their wear resistance and corrosion resistance applications. The present study addresses the corrosion behavior of the coating based on electrical impedance spectroscopy. The effect of the four parameters viz. bath temperature, reducing agent concentration, nickel source concentration and annealing temperature, on the electrochemical characteristics (charge transfer resistance and double layer capacitance) are studied with the help of Taguchi method and grey relational analysis. It is found that the bath temperature has the most significant influence on the corrosion behavior of the coating followed by nickel source concentration. The microstructural characterization of the coating is done with the help of scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffraction analysis and energy dispersive X-ray analysis.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Electroless]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Ni-B]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[corrosion]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[EIS]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Taguchi]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Grey analysis]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  

    <p><b>Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy of Ni-B Coatings and Optimization by Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis</b></p>
     <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>Suman K. Das and Prasanta Sahoo<sup><a href="#0">*</a></sup><a name="top0"></a></b></p>


    <p><i>Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India</i></p>


    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>Abstract</b></p>
    <p>Electroless nickel coatings possess several advantages over electroplating such as ability 
to coat any material and with uniform thickness. Besides, these coatings are used mainly 
for their wear resistance and corrosion resistance applications. The present study 
addresses the corrosion behavior of the coating based on electrical impedance 
spectroscopy. The effect of the four parameters viz. bath temperature, reducing agent 
concentration, nickel source concentration and annealing temperature, on the 
electrochemical characteristics (charge transfer resistance and double layer capacitance) 
are studied with the help of Taguchi method and grey relational analysis. It is found that 
the bath temperature has the most significant influence on the corrosion behavior of the 
coating followed by nickel source concentration. The microstructural characterization of 
the coating is done with the help of scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffraction 
analysis and energy dispersive X-ray analysis.</p>

    <p><b><i>Keywords:</i></b> Electroless, Ni-B, corrosion, EIS, Taguchi, Grey analysis.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Introduction</b></p>
    <p>Electroless nickel coatings have received wide spread acceptance as an 
environment friendly alternative of the conventional electroplating. Their 
properties, especially hardness, wear resistance and corrosion resistance [1,2] 
have led to their application in industries like aerospace and automotive. 
Moreover, their ability to coat any material and with uniform thickness has a 
positive impact on their acceptance. Hypophosphite reduced Ni-P coating [3-5] 
has already been widely accepted and the quest for achieving a superior hard and 
wear resistant surface has brought Ni-B coatings at the focus of research [6-12].</p>
    <p>Ni-B coatings are found to be harder than Ni-P ones in as deposited phase [6]. 
With heat treatment, the hardness of Ni-B coating is found to increase even more 
[6, 7]. The increase of hardness of Ni-B coating with heat treatment is generally 
attributed to the modification of deposit structure allowing the precipitation of 
Ni-B phases according to the Ni-B phase diagram [8]. With hardness, comes the 
ability to withstand wear and tear and Ni-B acquires high wear resistance 
particularly after heat treatment [6, 9]. Narayanan et al. [6] have developed a dual 
layer coating of Ni-P and Ni-B which is found to give even more hardness 
compared to the individual coatings.</p>
    <p>Corrosion can be considered as a deteriorating phenomenon of materials, 
particularly metals, that often dictates the life of a product. By careful monitoring 
and devising newer methods to inhibit corrosion, device life could be improved 
preventing loss to the society. Previous electrochemical studies used to quantify 
corrosion by measuring the loss of weight suffered by a material exposed to the 
corrosive environment. This is one of the easiest methods of evaluating the 
corrosion performance without the use of any sophisticated instrumentation and 
using the least of the resources. But with the development of technology, and 
sophisticated instruments being available, more precise investigations of the 
corrosion behavior of a material are now possible. Present generation studies of 
the corrosion behavior of electroless nickel coating are mainly conducted through 
electrochemical tests viz. electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and 
potentiodynamic polarization studies. The resistance of the coatings towards 
corrosion is evaluated on the basis of the corrosion parameters obtained from 
these studies viz. open circuit potential, corrosion current density, charge transfer 
resistance, double layer capacitance, corrosion rate, etc. [9-11]. Moreover, these 
electrochemical tests give an idea of the mechanistic pathway of corrosion. 
Electroless nickel coatings are widely used for corrosion protection application in 
a variety of environments. They act as barrier coatings, protecting the substrate 
by sealing it off from the corrosive environments, rather than by sacrificial 
action. The corrosion resistance of electroless Ni-P coatings is very much 
dependent on the phosphorous content of the coating. Electroless Ni-high P 
coating is effective in offering an excellent protection, whereas electroless Ni- 
low P and Ni-medium P coatings are not recommended for severe environments 
[5]. The high corrosion resistance of electroless Ni-P coatings may be attributed 
to the preferential dissolution of nickel that occurs even at the open circuit 
potential, leading to the enrichment of phosphorus on the surface layer. The 
enriched phosphorus surface reacts with water to form a layer of adsorbed 
hypophosphite anions. This layer in turn will block the supply of water to the 
electrode surface, thereby preventing the hydration of nickel, which is considered 
to be the first step to form either soluble Ni<sup>2+</sup> species or a passive nickel film. 
Bigdeli and Allahkaram [5] even found the corrosion resistance of Ni-P-SiC 
coating better than that of plain Ni-P coating. This effect they ascribed to a 
reduction in the effective metallic area available for corrosion in Ni-P-nano SiC 
coating. They also observed that heat-treatment at 400 &deg;C for 1 h significantly 
improved the coating density and structure, giving rise to an enhanced corrosion 
resistance for the applied EN and EN composite coatings.</p>
    <p>Electroless Ni-B coatings are found to have a lower resistance against corrosion 
compared to Ni-P coatings [10,13]. The difference in corrosion resistance 
between electroless Ni-P and Ni-B coatings is mainly due to the difference in 
their structure. It is believed that the passivation films that form on Ni-B coated 
surfaces are not as glassy or protective enough as those that form on high 
phosphorous electroless nickel coatings. The phase boundaries present in Ni-B 
deposits might also be responsible for causing discontinuity of the passivation 
film, which are the preferred sites for the initiation of corrosion process. Besides, 
the inhomogeneous distribution of boron and thallium throughout the coating 
provides areas of different corrosion potential on the surface, which would lead 
to the formation of minute active/passive corrosion cells and accelerated the 
corrosion attack [10].</p>
    <p>However, Ni-B coating is applied to increase the corrosion resistance of steel 
[14]. Increase in boron content is found to increase the corrosion resistance of 
Ni-B coatings [12]. Anik et al. [12] noticed that increase of boron content also 
increased the sensitivity of the film corrosion resistance to the film boron 
content. This phenomenon they attributed to the effect of complications arising 
from the local cells formed by the deposited thallium on the corrosion resistance 
decreases as the boron content of the film increases.</p>
    <p>Heat treatment is found to decrease the corrosion resistance of electroless 
coatings invariably [10,12]. This is attributed to the change of microstructure of 
the coatings with heat treatment. Electroless coatings in as deposited condition 
generally exhibit an amorphous structure which imparts higher corrosion 
resistance. But, heat treatment induces crystallinity into the deposits, which in 
turn increases the grain boundaries that form active sites for corrosion attack 
[9,10]. The corrosion resistance of electroless Ni-P and Ni-B deposits is found 
to increase with the incorporation of an additional alloying element such as Cu, 
Zn, W, Mo, etc., or with the incorporation of second phase particles, such as 
silicon nitride, ceria and titania, in the metal matrix [6]. Also, the presence of 
sodium hypophosphite in Ni-B bath enhances the corrosion resistance of Ni-B by 
forming Ni-B-P [9]. The concept of Ni-P/Ni-B duplex coatings was found to 
have a noblest electrochemical performance than the individual Ni-P and Ni-B 
coatings [6, 7]. The Nyquist plots obtained for electroless Ni-P, Ni-B and, 
Ni-P/Ni-B and Ni-B/Ni-P duplex coatings, both in as-plated and heat-treated 
conditions, at their respective open circuit potentials, in 3.5% sodium chloride 
solution, exhibit a single semicircle in the high frequency region. However, these 
curves differ considerably in their size. This indicates that the same fundamental 
process is occurring on all these coatings but over a different effective area in 
each case [6].</p>
    <p>As the corrosion resistance of Ni-B coating is lesser than Ni-P coating, an 
extensive study regarding the corrosion behavior of the former has remained 
neglected. But Ni-B coatings are often preferred in various tribological 
applications due to their superior hardness and wear resistance compared to Ni-P 
coatings. Hence, a systematic study of the electrochemical behavior of Ni-B 
coatings is necessary as the coatings in various applications would definitely 
encounter corrosion. The present study tries to address this need. Here, the effect 
of coating parameters (bath temperature, reducing agent concentration and nickel 
source concentration) and annealing temperature on the corrosion behavior of 
electroless Ni-B coatings is studied with the help of electrochemical impedance 
spectroscopy (EIS).</p>
    <p>The EIS technique has proven to be a valuable test method for the 
electrochemical characterization of the protective coating on metals. This method 
provides very detailed data on the effectiveness of a coating over a relatively 
small area. The EIS technique can indicate the presence and rate of corrosion, 
and the moisture content of the coating prior to corrosion [13]. Thus, the EIS 
technique is chosen to characterize the corrosion behavior of the coatings in the 
present study.</p>
    <p>Taguchi method, in conjunction with Grey relational analysis is employed to 
optimize the process parameters in order to enhance the corrosion resistant 
properties of electroless Ni-B coating. A confirmation experiment is conducted to 
verify the optimal process parameter combination as predicted by Taguchi 
analysis. Analysis of variance is also carried out to observe the level of 
significance of the factors and their interactions. The surface morphology and 
composition of Ni-B coatings are studied with the help of scanning electron 
microscopy, energy dispersed X-ray analysis and X-ray diffraction analysis. The 
present work is a fresh attempt to optimize the coating deposition parameters in 
order to obtain an enhanced corrosion resistance of electroless Ni-B coating. Two 
corrosion parameters (charge transfer resistance and double layer capacitance) 
are considered in the optimization in order to better capture the corrosion 
behaviour of the coating.</p>

    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b><i>Taguchi method</i></b></p>
    <p>G. Taguchi introduced the Taguchi technique [15-17] and since then it has been 
widely used in the engineering domain to get the desired performance 
characteristics by optimizing the design parameters. In Taguchi technique, three-
stages such as system design, parameter design, and tolerance design are 
employed. System design consists of the usage of scientific and engineering 
information required for producing a part. Tolerance design is employed to 
determine and to analyze tolerances about the optimum combinations suggested 
by parameter design. Parameter design is used to obtain the optimum levels of 
process parameters for developing the quality characteristics and to determine the 
product parameter values depending on the optimum process parameter values. 
Based on orthogonal arrays (OA), the number of experiments which may 
increase the time and cost can be reduced by using Taguchi technique. Now, 
Taguchi method arrives at optimality by the use of robust parameter design. 
Robust parameter design is an engineering method for product and process 
design that focuses on minimizing variation. Hence, to account for the variation 
within a trial condition, Taguchi uses signal to noise (S/N) ratio to measure the 
performance of the process response. S/N ratio being the ratio of mean to 
standard deviation can effectively consider the variation encountered in a set of 
trials. Moreover, based on the objective of the experiment, S/N ratio 
characteristics can be divided on the basis of three criteria: lower-the-better (LB), 
higher-the better (HB) and nominal-the best (NB). The parameter level 
combination that maximizes the appropriate S/N ratio is the optimal setting. 

    <p><b><i>Grey relational analysis</i></b></p>
    <p>In the present problem, the electrochemical characteristics are evaluated with the 
help of EIS analysis form which two parameters are considered viz. charge 
transfer resistance and double layer capacitance. Hence, it becomes a multiple 
response problem of optimization. In a system, that is complex and multivariate, 
the relationship between various factors is unclear. Such systems are often &ldquo;grey&rdquo; 
implying poor, incomplete, and uncertain information. Their analysis by classical 
statistical procedures may not be acceptable without large data sets and data 
satisfying certain mathematical criteria. The grey theory [18], on the contrary, 
makes use of relatively small data sets and does not demand strict compliance to 
certain statistical laws, simple or linear relationships among the observables. So, 
it is suitable to apply grey relational theory to the present multi-response 
optimization. The optimization of the process is performed in the following 
steps:</p>
    <p>(a) Performing the grey relational generation in which the results of the 
experiments are normalized in the range between 0 and 1.</p>
    <p>(b) Calculation of the grey relational coefficients from the normalized data to 
represent the correlation between the desired and actual experimental data.</p>
    <p>(c) Calculating the grey relational grade by averaging the grey relational 
coefficients. The grey relational grade is treated as the overall response of the 
process instead of the multiple responses of friction and wear.</p>
    <p>(d) Performing statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the input parameters 
with the grey relational grade and find which parameter significantly affects 
the process performance.</p>
    <p>(e) Selecting the optimal levels of process parameters. </p>
    <p>(f) Conducting confirmation experiment and verifying the optimal process 
parameters setting.</p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Hence, the grey relational analysis converts the multi-response problem into a 
single response one which can be effectively fitted into Taguchi orthogonal 
design for further processing. 

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>Experimental details</b></p>
    <p><b><i>Materials and methods</i></b></p>
    <p>Steel (AISI 1040) blocks of size 20 mm &times; 20 mm &times; 8 mm are used as substrates 
for the development of electroless Ni-B coating. A large number of trials are 
conducted before deciding on the final range of the Ni-B bath composition. The 
bath composition together with the operating conditions for successful deposition 
of electroless Ni-B is shown in Table 1. In the electroless bath, nickel chloride 
provides the nickel ions, while sodium borohydride acts as the reducing agent, 
reducing nickel into its elemental form while itself getting oxidized. Since the 
reaction between nickel chloride and sodium borohydride is quite intense and 
fast, ethylenediamine is used as the complexing agent to slow down this reaction 
and make the process stable. Ethylenediamine forms metastable complexes with 
nickel ions and releases them slowly as required in the reaction. Although 
complexing agent stabilizes the reactions to a great extent, there is always a 
possibility of solution breakdown due to the formation of nickel borides and the 
subsequent chain reaction. Hence a stabilizer is needed so that deposition occurs 
at a predictable rate and on the substrate surface. In the present bath, lead nitrate 
plays the role of a stabilizer and prevents solution breakdown during the coating 
period. The pH of the solution is maintained around 12.5 by continuous 
monitoring with a pH meter. The steps for obtaining the Ni-B deposit are as 
follows:</p>
    <p>&bull; Preparation of the substrate.</p>
    <p>&bull; Cleaning of the substrate using acetone.</p>
    <p>&bull; Pickling treatment of the substrate in dilute (18%) hydrochloric acid.</p>
    <p>&bull; Activation of the substrate in warm (55 &deg;C) palladium chloride solution.</p>
    <p>&bull; Immersion of the substrate in the electroless bath and deposition carried out for 2 h.</p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&bull; After deposition, the coated samples are taken out and cleaned using distilled water.</p>
    <p>&bull; The samples are annealed in a box furnace at different temperatures (250 &deg;C, 350 &deg;C, 450 &deg;C) according to the OA.</p>
    <p>&bull; The annealed samples are air cooled to ambient temperature (28 &deg;C) without any artificial cooling.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p>Table 1. Bath constituents and their ranges.</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01t1.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>There have been several propositions regarding the reaction mechanism of 
electroless Ni-B coatings, but one of the mechanisms proposed by Gorbunova et 
al. [19] is well supported by experimental evidence. The proposed scheme for the 
reaction mechanism of nickel boron plating consists of mainly three steps:</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>Reduction of nickel:</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01s1.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>Reduction of boron:</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01s2.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>Hydrolysis of borohydride:</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01s3.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p>It is important to note here that corrosion of Ni-P coatings is found to be 
dependent on the smoothness of the coating [20], which again depends on the 
smoothness of the substrate. Such behavior is also suspected in case of Ni-B 
coatings [14] and hence to remove the effect of substrate roughness on the final 
response, all the substrates need to be of similar roughness. Thus, large numbers 
of samples are prepared and after all the processing prior to coating, these are 
subjected to roughness evaluation (centre line average, <i>R</i><sub>a</sub>). Only those specimens 
that show insignificant variation (less than 0.1%) in roughness are used for 
coating deposition.</p>

    <p><b><i>Characterization of the coating</i></b></p>
    <p>After the development of the coating, it is necessary to characterize the same so 
that confirmation can be made about the proper development of the coating. 
Moreover, macroscopic behavior of the coating can be related to the changes 
occurring in its microstructure. In the present case, surface morphology of the 
coating is observed through scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL, JSM 
6360) in order to analyze the effect of heat treatment on the microstructure of the 
deposits. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX Corporation) is used to 
determine the composition of the coating in terms of the weight percentages of 
nickel and boron. The different precipitated phases both before and after heat 
treatment are identified with the help of X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis 
(Rigaku, Ultima III).</p> 




    <p><b><i>Choosing design parameters</i></b></p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>It is found that the characteristics of electroless coating get affected by several 
factors such as bath temperature, reducing agent concentration, nickel source 
concentration, stabilizer concentration, pH of the solution, substrate, bath load, 
etc. Consideration of all the factors would make the experimental design highly 
complex and the analysis even more complicated. A review of the recent 
literatures revealed that the three factors viz. bath temperature (A), concentration 
of reducing agent (sodium borohydride) (B) and concentration of nickel source 
(nickel chloride) (C) are the mostly preferred factors used by the researchers to 
control the properties of electroless nickel deposits. The bath temperature 
initiates the reaction mechanism and thereby determines the rate of reaction by 
controlling the ionization and charge transfer process. Borohydride reduced 
plating baths are generally operated between 85-95 &deg;C [1]. Below 85 &deg;C, the 
plating rate is very slow but the rate increases exponentially with increase in 
temperature. Above 95 &deg;C the bath is very much prone to instability. The plating 
rate is also affected by the concentration of sodium borohydride and it is 
generally observed that as the borohydride concentration increases, the plating 
rate increases, but the bath stability decreases. Hence for a stable operation of the 
plating bath, sodium borohydride concentration is kept between 0.6-1.0 g/L. 
Nickel chloride is the source of nickel ions in the bath. Thus these three coating 
parameters are considered as the main design parameters along with their 
interactions in the present study. Moreover, annealing is found to have a great 
effect on the tribological properties of the electroless coatings, but its effect on 
the corrosion resistance properties of electroless Ni-B coatings has remained a 
debatable issue. Hence, the annealing temperature is taken into account as the 
fourth parameter in the experimental design. The considered design parameters, 
together with their levels are shown in Table 2. Consideration of three levels 
allows the study of non-linear effects if any.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p>Table 2. Design parameters and their levels.</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01t2.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p><b><i>Response variable</i></b></p>
    <p>In the present article, corrosion behaviour of electroless Ni-B coatings is studied 
with the help of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Hence, the two 
popularly evaluated parameters, i.e., charge transfer resistance (R<sub>ct</sub>) and double 
layer capacitance (C<sub>dl</sub>), are considered as the response variables. A lower value 
of Rct and a higher value of Cdl indicate that the material under test has a higher 
resistance against corrosion.</p>


    <p><b><i>Design of experiments</i></b></p>
    <p>Design of experiments (DOE) is a technique to obtain the maximum amount of 
conclusive information from the minimum amount of work, time, energy, money, 
or other limited resource. The DOE using Taguchi approach can economically 
satisfy the needs of problem solving and product/process design optimization 
projects in the manufacturing industry. By learning and applying this technique, 
it is possible to significantly reduce the time required for experimental 
investigations. As mentioned earlier, Taguchi method uses an OA (orthogonal 
array) to reduce the number of experiments for determining the optimal process 
parameters. Orthogonal arrays allow one to compute the main and interaction 
effects via a minimum number of experimental trials [17]. Several standard OAs 
have been tabulated by Taguchi. The choice of a suitable OA design is critical for 
the success of an experiment and depends on the total degrees of freedom (dof) 
required to study the main and interaction effects, the goal of the experiment, 
resources and budget available and time constraints. Degree of freedom (dof) 
refers to the number of fair and independent comparisons that can be made from 
a set of observations. In the context of DOE, the number of degrees of freedom 
of a particular parameter is one less than the number of levels associated with the 
parameter. In the present case since each of the main factors is associated with 
three levels, the dof of each of the factors is two. Again, the number of dofs 
associated with an interaction is the product of the number of dof associated with 
each main effect involved in the interaction. In the present case each interaction 
is associated with four dofs (2&times;2). Therefore the total dof for a three level design 
with four main parameters and three interactions is equal to twenty (4&times;2 + 3&times;4).</p> 



    <p>It is important to notice that the number of experimental trials in the OA must be 
greater than the total dof required for studying the effects. Hence, L27 OA, 
requiring twenty seven experimental runs is suitably chosen for the present case. 
The assignment of the factors and interactions to the columns of the array is done 
on the basis of the Triangular Table for 3-level OA [15] as suggested by Taguchi. 
The L27 OA together with the column assignments are shown in Table 3. The 
values in each cell of the main parameter columns (A, B, C and D) in the array 
indicate their levels (1, 2 and 3). Again in case of interactions, two columns are 
assigned to a single interaction and the two cell values in a particular row 
indicate the levels of each of the factors involved in the interaction. The 
unassigned columns in the OA are kept for the error terms.</p> 

    <p>&nbsp;</p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Table 3. L<sub>27</sub> orthogonal array with main parameters and interactions.</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01t3.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b><i>Electrochemical tests</i></b></p>
    <p>The EIS tests are performed with a potentiostat (Gill AC) of ACM Instruments, 
UK. A 3.5% sodium chloride solution is taken as the electrolyte and the tests are 
conducted at a constant ambient temperature of about 25 &deg;C. The electrochemical 
cell consists of three electrodes. The coated specimen forms the working 
electrode which is actually the sample being interrogated. A saturated calomel 
electrode (SCE) forms the reference electrode, which provides a stable 
&#34;reference&#34; against which the applied potential may be accurately measured. A 
platinum electrode serves as the counter electrode, which provides the path for 
the applied current into the solution. The design of the cell is such that only an 
area of 1 cm2 of the coated surface is exposed to the electrolyte. A settling time 
of 15 min is assigned before every experiment in order to stabilize the open 
circuit potential (OCP). The potentiostat is controlled via a PC which also 
captures the EIS data. The applied frequency was varied from 10 KHz to 0.01 Hz 
and the Nyquist plots obtained from the tests in general exhibited a single 
semicircle in the high frequency region which is quite consistent to that observed 
by Sankara Narayanan et al. [10]. The electrical model that can be used to 
simulate this type of electrochemical behaviour is given in Fig. 1. The charge 
transfer resistance (Rct) is represented by the resistance of electron transfer during 
electrochemical reaction course. The double layer capacitance (Cdl) can be 
correlated to the delamination of the coating. Solution resistance (Rs) is referred 
to the resistance between the work electrode and reference electrode. The values 
of charge transfer resistance (Rct) and double layer capacitance (Cdl) were 
determined from the Nyquist plot by fitting a semicircle using the accompanying 
software.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01f1.jpg">    
<p>
    <p><b>Figure 1.</b> Electrical circuit model to fit EIS data.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Results and discussion</b></p>
    <p><b><i>Coating microstructure study</i></b></p>
    <p>The SEM micrographs of the coating surfaces in as-deposited and heat treated (at 
250 &deg;C, 350 &deg;C and 450 &deg;C for one hour) conditions are shown in Fig. 2. The 
surface exhibits a cauliflower like structure which strongly points towards the 
coating possessing a lubricious behavior [8]. The surface of the Ni-B coatings 
appears to be dense and matte grey in colour with low porosity. Also by careful 
observation, it can be noted that the Ni-B nodules are quite deflated and flat in as 
deposited condition but gradually grow in size with increase in heat treatment 
temperature giving rise to coarse grained structure.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01f2.jpg"></p>
    
<p><b>Figure 2.</b> SEM pictures of the coating surface (a) as deposited, (b) annealed at 250 &deg;C,
(c) annealed at 350 &deg;C and (d) annealed at 450 &deg;C.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>Energy dispersive X-ray analysis is performed with one of the latest EDX 
detectors that do not contain any beryllium window, in order to detect light 
elements like boron. The Beryllium window if present absorbs all the soft X-rays 
thereby precluding the detection of lighter elements. The EDX plots are shown in 
Fig. 3 and boron content in terms of weight percentages is found to be in the 
range of 5.72 -7.46, while the remaining is mostly nickel. The XRD analysis 
(Fig. 4) shows that the Ni-B film is almost amorphous in as-deposited phase but 
turns crystalline with heat treatment. This is evident from the presence of 
microcrystalline peaks in as-deposited phase whereas broad peaks of Ni, Ni2B 
and Ni3B are found in samples heat treated at 350 &deg;C.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01f3.jpg"></p>
    
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Figure 3.</b> EDX spectra of Ni-B coatings (a) 0.6 g/L NaBH<sub>4</sub>, (b) 1.0 g/L NaBH<sub>4</sub>.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01f4.jpg"></p>
    
<p><b>Figure 4.</b> XRD plots of electroless Ni-B coating in (a) as-deposited and (b) heat treated at 350 &deg;C.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p><b><i>Grey analysis</i></b></p>
    <p>The results of the EIS tests are given in Table 4. The further transformation of 
the results based on the grey relational analysis is given in Table 5.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p>Table 4. Experimental results for R<sub>ct</sub> and C<sub>dl</sub>.</p>

<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01t4.jpg">
    
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><a name="t5"></a><a href="#topt5">Table 5</a>. Grey relational analysis for R<sub>ct</sub> and C<sub>dl</sub>.</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01t5.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><i>Normalisation of the experimental results</i></p>
    <p>The first step of the grey relational analysis is to perform the linear normalization 
of the experimental results (Rct and Cdl) in the range between 0 and 1. This is 
known as grey relational generating. The normalization can be done based on 
three objectives which include (1) normalization by maximum value (lower-thebetter), 
(2) normalization by minimum value (higher-the-better) and (3) 
normalization by objective value. The present study aims to maximize the 
corrosion resistance of Ni-B coatings. Since, a higher Rct value and a lower Cdl 
value indicate higher corrosion resistance; normalization of the former is carried 
out with higher the better criterion, while the latter with lower the better criterion. 
The normalization expressions for both are given as follows:</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01e1.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p>where x<sub>i</sub>(k) is the value after grey relational generation, while min y<sub>i</sub>(k) and 
max y<sub>i</sub>(k) are respectively, the smallest and largest values of y<sub>i</sub>(k) for the kth 
response; k being 1 (Rct) and 2 (Cdl). The processed data after grey relational 
generation are given in <a href="#t5">Table 5</a><a name="topt5"></a>. Larger normalized results correspond to the 
better performance and the best normalized result should be equal to 1.</p>

    <p><i>Computation of grey relational coefficients</i></p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Grey relational coefficients are calculated to express the relationship between the 
ideal (best = 1) and the actual experimental results. The Grey relational 
coefficient x<sub>i</sub>(k) can be calculated as:</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01e3.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>where &#x394;<sub>0i</sub> = || x<sub>0</sub>(k) - x<sub>i</sub>(k) || = difference of the absolute value between x<sub>0</sub>(k ) and x(k), &#x394;<sub>min</sub> and &#x394;<sub>max</sub>
are respectively the minimum and maximum values of the absolute differences ( &#x394;<sub>0i</sub> ) of all comparing sequences, and &#x3C8; 
is the distinguishing coefficient which is defined in the range 0 &leq; &#x3C8; &leq; 1. The distinguishing coefficient weakens the effect of &Delta;<sub>max</sub> when it gets too big, 
enlarging the different significance of the relational coefficient. The values of 
and grey relational coefficients (with &#x3C8; = 0.5) are given in <a href="#t5">Table 5</a>.</p>




    <p><i>Computation of grey relational grade</i></p>
    <p>The Grey relational coefficient of each performance characteristic is to be 
computed and the overall evaluation of the multi response characteristics is based 
on the Grey relational grade, which is given by:</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01e4.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p>where n = number of performance characteristics (2 in present case). The results 
of the Grey relational grade are produced in Table 6. Higher Grey relational 
grade represents that the experimental result is closer to the ideally normalized 
value. Thus, the higher the grey relational grade, the closer the corresponding 
parameter combination to the optimal.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Table 6. Grey relational grade and order.</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01t6.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>





    <p><b><i>Analysis of signal to noise ratio</i></b></p>
    <p>To evaluate robustness, Taguchi method needs to capture the variability within a 
trial condition. The said purpose is fulfilled by employing the S/N ratio approach 
to measure the quality characteristic deviating from the desired value for the 
evaluation characteristic in the optimum parameter analysis. In the present work 
S/N ratio analysis is done with grey relational grade as the performance index. 
Since, grey relational grade is to be maximized, the S/N ratio is calculated using 
higher the better criterion which is given by:</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01e5.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p>where y is the observed data and n is the number of observations. The columns of 
the OA are orthogonal to each other. Hence it is possible to extract the effect of 
each process parameter at different levels. The average of the grey relational 
grade ratio for each level of the factors of A, B, C and D is given in Table 7. The 
table also consists of ranks based on Delta values. The Delta value corresponding 
to a parameter is nothing but the difference of the highest and the lowest mean 
grey grade of the levels. The parameter with the highest Delta value is assigned 
rank 1, while the parameter with the lowest value is ranked the last one. All the 
other parameters are ranked according to their Delta values. The parameter 
possessing higher Delta value has greater influence over the response. From 
Table 7, it is found that parameter A, i.e., bath temperature, possesses the highest 
Delta value and hence has the greatest influence over the corrosion of electroless 
Ni-B coatings.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p>Table 7. Mean table for grey relational grade.</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01t7.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>




    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The main effect and interaction effect plots are illustrated in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6, 
respectively. The main effects plot gives the optimal combination of coating 
parameters for minimum corrosion. Since, Taguchi method obtains the optimal 
level combination by choosing those levels for which S/N ratio is the highest; the 
optimal combination of parameters is found to be A3B2C2D2. Moreover, the 
main effect plot gives a rough idea about the relative significance of the process 
parameters on the system response. This is determined by the slope of the main 
effect plot for each parameter. The plot having higher inclination will have 
higher influence. From Fig. 5, it is clear that factor A, i.e., bath temperature, is 
the most significant factor, while factor C is also quite significant. The remaining 
factors are moderately significant. In case of interaction plots non-parallelism of 
the parameter plots is observed. Non-parallel lines are indicative of the presence 
of interaction, while intersecting lines are indicative of the presence of strong 
interaction.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01f5.jpg"></p>
    
<p><b>Figure 5.</b> Main effects plot.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01f6.jpg"></p>
    
<p><b>Figure 6.</b> Plots of interaction effects for mean grey grade (a) A vs. B, (b) A vs. C and (c) B vs. C</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>From the interaction plots (Fig. 6), it can be observed that quite strong interaction 
exists between all the factors, e.g., between factors A and B and between B and 
C. In this respect it can be noted that the ratio of optimal level of borohydride 
(B2) and that of nickel chloride (C2) may be helping in achieving a defect free 
coating surface with better passivity ability that reduces the probability of the 
formation of localized corrosion cells. Moreover, the porosity in the coatings is 
found to decrease as the superficial roughness diminishes and the thickness of the 
film increases [13]. Generally, a small area ratio between the substrate and the 
coating causes a rapid corrosion of the substrate and the destruction of the coated 
system. A highly porous coating prevents the anodic current density from 
reaching the critical passivity current density. If the porosity is lesser, the 
corrosion resistivity of the coated material is better. Now, bath temperature is 
responsible for the mobility of the ions in the solution and hence it is found to 
control the thickness of electroless coatings by speeding up the reactions. As it 
can be seen that the thickness of the coating affects its corrosion characteristics, 
bath temperature playing a significant role on the corrosion behavior may 
roughly be explained. Also higher bath temperature (A3) generally results in a 
thicker deposition, which again results in improved corrosion resistivity of the 
coating. </p>




    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b><i>Analysis of variance</i></b></p>
    <p>ANOVA is a statistical technique to find out the significance of individual 
process parameters and their interactions on the system response under 
consideration and also their respective percentages of contribution. This is done 
by separating the total variability of the response used, which is measured by the 
sum of the squared deviations from the total mean response, into contributions by 
each of the design parameters and the error. In the present study ANOVA is 
performed using Minitab [21]. ANOVA results for corrosion of electroless Ni-B 
coating is shown in Table 8. In ANOVA, a ratio called F-ratio, which is the ratio 
between the regression mean square and mean square error is used to measure the 
significance of the parameters under investigation with respect to the variance of 
all the terms included in the error term at the desired significance level, &alpha;. A 
calculated F-ratio which is higher than the tabulated F-ratio indicates that the 
factor is significant at desired &alpha; level. ANOVA table also shows the percentage 
contribution of each parameter. It is seen that parameter A, i.e. bath temperature, 
has got the most significant influence on corrosion at the confidence level of 
99%. Parameter C, i.e. concentration of nickel source, also plays significant 
(95% confidence level) role in controlling the corrosion behavior of electroless 
Ni-B coating within the specific test range. No other parameter is significant at 
the said level of confidence. Among interactions, interaction A&times;B is found to be 
significant at 75% confidence level with a contribution of 13%, while interaction 
B&times;C is found to have a contribution of about 9% in influencing the corrosion 
behavior of the coating.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p>Table 8. Results of ANOVA.</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01t8.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p><b><i>Validation experiment</i></b></p>
    <p>A validation test is the final step of the design of experiment problem, in which 
the improvement in the response obtained at the optimal combination of the 
parameters is compared to that at the initial condition. Estimated grey relational 
grade (<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01estim.jpg">) is calculated at the optimal condition with the help of the following expression:</p>

    
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01e6.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p>where Î³<sub>m</sub> is the total mean grey relational grade, <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01i.jpg"> is the mean grey relational 
grade at the optimal level, and o is the number of the main design parameters that 
significantly affect the polarization characteristics of electroless Ni-B coating. 
The comparison of the predicted grey relational grade, experimental grey 
relational grade and the grey relational grade at the initial condition is shown in 
Table 9. The mid-level combination of coating parameters is assumed as the 
initial condition. From the table, it is found that the improvement of grey 
relational grade at the optimal condition is 0.3239, which is about 53% of the 
mean grey relational grade. This is considered to be a significant improvement. 
The impedance plots for coatings developed with initial and optimal combination 
of parameters are shown in Figure 7. Moreover, the plot of the initial coating in 
as deposited phase is also included in the figure. It can be seen that the plots 
exhibit a semicircular nature in the higher frequency region but the semicircles 
have different sizes. This indicates that the same corrosion phenomenon is 
occurring but over a larger area. Although some researchers have found that heat 
treatment decreases the corrosion resistance of the coating, somewhat 
contradictory observations are noticed in the present study. The improved 
corrosion resistance of the heat treated coating over as deposited one may be 
attributed to improvement in the coating density, structure and morphology as 
observed by other researchers [5].</p>

    
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>    <p>Table 9. Results of confirmation test.</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01t9.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a01f7.jpg"></p>
    
<p><b>Figure 7.</b> Impedance plots: as deposited, initial and optimal.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>Conclusions</b></p>
    <p>In this study Taguchi method, in combination with Grey relational analysis, is 
successfully applied in order to optimize the electrochemical characteristics of 
electroless Ni-B coating via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. <i>L<sub>27</sub></i> 
orthogonal array is employed for the optimization process and the optimum 
parameter combination for maximum corrosion protection is found to be 
A3B2C2D2 (Highest level of bath temperature, Middle level of reducing agent 
concentration, Middle level of nickel source concentration, Middle level of 
annealing temperature). Bath temperature and concentration of nickel source is 
found to be the main contributors in controlling the corrosion resistance of the 
coating. The improvement in the Grey relational grade compared to the mean 
grade is about 53%. The surface of electroless Ni-B coating is found to be 
nodular in nature resembling that of a cauliflower surface. Moreover, the coating 
is found to be amorphous in as deposited phase but gradually turn crystalline 
with heat treatment. 



    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>References</b></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>1. G.O. Mallory, J.B. Hadju, Electroless Plating: Fundamentals and Applications, Orlando: AESF; 1991.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000165&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>2. W. Riedel, Electroless Nickel Plating, Ohio: ASM International; 1991.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000167&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>3. P. Sahoo, S.K. Das, Mater. Des. 32 (2010) 1760-1775.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000169&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>4. P. Sahoo, S.K. Pal, Tribol. Lett. 28 (2007).191-201.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000171&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>5. F. Bigdeli, S.R. Allahkaram, Mater. Des. 30 (2009) 4450-4453.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000173&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>6. T.S.N.S. Narayanan, K. Krishnaveni, S.K. Seshadri, Mater. Chem. Phys. 82 (2003) 771-779.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000175&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>7. A.F. Kanta, V. Vitry, F. Delaunois, J. Alloys Compd. 486 (2009) L21-L23.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000177&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>8. F. Delaunois, P. Lienard, Surf. Coat. Technol.160 (2002) 239-248.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000179&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>9. K.N. Srinivasan, R. Meenakshi, A. Santhi, P.R. Thangavelu, S. John, Surf. Eng. 26 (2010) 153-158.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000181&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>10. T.S.N.S. Narayanan, S.K. Seshadri, J. Alloys. Compd. 365 (2004) 197-205.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000183&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>11. C.T. Dervos, J. Novakovic, P. Vassiliou, Mater Lett. 58 (2004) 619-623.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000185&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>12. M. Anik, E. K&ouml;rpe, E. Sen, Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 (2008) 1718-1727.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000187&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>13. I. Baskaran, T.S.N.S. Narayanan, A. Stephen, Trans. Inst. Met. Finish 87 (2009) 221-224.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000189&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>14. A. Contreras, C. Le&oacute;n, O. Jimenez, E. Sosa, R. P&eacute;rez, Appl. Surf. Sci. 253 (2006) 592-599.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000191&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>15. R.K. Roy, A primer on the Taguchi method. Dearborn, Michigan: Society of Manufacturing Engineers; 1990.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000193&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>16. G. Taguchi, Introduction to Quality Engineering. Asian Productivity Organization; 1990.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000195&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>17. P.J. Ross, Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering. 2nd edn., New York: McGraw Hill; 1996.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000197&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>18. J. Deng, J. Grey System 1 (1989) 1-24.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000199&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>19. K.M. Gorbunova, M.V. Ivanov, V.P. Moiseev, J. Electrochem. Soc. 120 (1973) 613-618.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000201&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>20. W.J. Cheong, B.L. Luan, D.W. Shoesmith, Corros. Sci. 49 (2007) 17771798.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000203&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>21. Minitab User Manual. Making data analysis easier. 13.2 edn. State College, PA, USA: MINITAB Inc.; 2001.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000205&pid=S0872-1904201100040000100021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><Sup><a name="0"></a><a href="#top0">*</a></Sup>Corresponding author. E-mail address <a href="mailto:psjume@gmail.com">psjume@gmail.com</a></p>    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p>Received 27 December 2010; accepted 13 May 2011</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><b>Acknowledgement</b></p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>First author gratefully acknowledges the research support provided by Council of 
Scientific and Industrial Research, India: File No. 9/96(0621)2K10-EMR-I dated 05/03/2010.</p>

     ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mallory]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.O.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hadju]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Electroless Plating: Fundamentals and Applications]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Orlando ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[AESF]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Riedel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year></year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Electroless Nickel Plating]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>1991</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Ohio </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sahoo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Das]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mater. Des.]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<page-range>1760</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sahoo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Tribol. Lett.]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<page-range>191</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bigdeli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allahkaram]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mater. Des.]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>4450</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Narayanan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.S.N.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Krishnaveni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Seshadri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mater. Chem. Phys.]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<page-range>771</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kanta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vitry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Delaunois]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J. Alloys Compd.]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>486</volume>
<page-range>L21</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Delaunois]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lienard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Surf. Coat. Technol.]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>160</volume>
<page-range>239</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Srinivasan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meenakshi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santhi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thangavelu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[John]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Surf. Eng.]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<page-range>153</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Narayanan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.S.N.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Seshadri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J. Alloys. Compd.]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>365</volume>
<page-range>197</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dervos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Novakovic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vassiliou]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mater Lett.]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>58</volume>
<page-range>619</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anik]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Körpe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Surf. Coat. Technol.]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>202</volume>
<page-range>1718</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baskaran]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Narayanan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.S.N.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stephen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Trans. Inst. Met. Finish]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>87</volume>
<page-range>221</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Contreras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[León]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jimenez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Appl. Surf. Sci.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>253</volume>
<page-range>592</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A primer on the Taguchi method]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Dearborn^eMichigan Michigan]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Society of Manufacturing Engineers]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taguchi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Introduction to Quality Engineering]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Asian Productivity Organization]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ross]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<edition>2</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[McGraw Hill]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Deng]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J. Grey System]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>1</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gorbunova]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ivanov]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moiseev]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J. Electrochem. Soc.]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<volume>120</volume>
<page-range>613</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cheong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Luan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shoesmith]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Corros. Sci.]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<page-range>1777</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Minitab User Manual: Making data analysis easier]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<edition>13.2</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[MINITAB Inc.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
