<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0872-1904</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Port. Electrochim. Acta]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0872-1904</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedade Portuguesa de Electroquímica]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0872-19042011000400002</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Investigation of Passive Film Properties and Pitting Resistance of AISI 316 in Aqueous Ethanoic Acid Containing Chloride Ions using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy(EIS)]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mahato]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Neelima]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Singh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Banaras Hindu University Institute of Technology Department of Applied Chemistry]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Varanasi ]]></addr-line>
<country>India</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<fpage>233</fpage>
<lpage>251</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0872-19042011000400002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0872-19042011000400002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0872-19042011000400002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The structure and properties of the passive film formed on the surface of AISI 316 stainless steel in aqueous ethanoic acid have been investigated using EIS. Experiments were carried out at 30 °C in different concentrations of ethanoic acid. Effects on the film properties due to the change of electrode potential, exposure durations and addition of chloride ions to the electrolyte were also studied. Impedance parameters were determined using simple model and equivalent electrical circuit. Results suggest the formation of multilayered passive film on the steel surface. The film possessed dual structure. Inner layers were thin and compact, whereas the outer layer was porous and defective. The measured capacitive behavior was of non ideal nature and hence replaced by constant phase element or CPE. Formation of the passive film and the change in its structure has been explained using impedance parameters.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Constant phase element]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[CPE factor]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[passive film]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[pseudo inductance]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[pitting]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  

    <p><b>Investigation of Passive Film Properties and Pitting Resistance of AISI 316 in Aqueous Ethanoic Acid Containing Chloride Ions using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy(EIS)</b></p>
     <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>Neelima Mahato<sup><a href="#0">*</a></sup><a name="top0"></a> and M.M. Singh</b></p>


    <p><i>Department of Applied Chemistry, Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221 005, India</i></p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>Abstract</b></p>
    <p>The structure and properties of the passive film formed on the surface of AISI 316 
stainless steel in aqueous ethanoic acid have been investigated using EIS. Experiments 
were carried out at 30 &deg;C in different concentrations of ethanoic acid. Effects on the film 
properties due to the change of electrode potential, exposure durations and addition of 
chloride ions to the electrolyte were also studied. Impedance parameters were 
determined using simple model and equivalent electrical circuit. Results suggest the 
formation of multilayered passive film on the steel surface. The film possessed dual 
structure. Inner layers were thin and compact, whereas the outer layer was porous and 
defective. The measured capacitive behavior was of non ideal nature and hence replaced 
by constant phase element or CPE. Formation of the passive film and the change in its 
structure has been explained using impedance parameters.</p> 

    <p><b><i>Keywords:</i></b> Constant phase element, CPE factor, passive film, pseudo inductance, pitting.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Introduction</b></p>
    <p>AISI 316 austenitic stainless steels have been developed for their applicability 
and extensive use in moderate to severe corrosive conditions. The steel exhibits 
high corrosion resistance, primarily, due to the formation of a passive film on its 
surface. Researchers [1-4] have reported that the passive film formed on stainless 
steel surface responds to ac signals and a lot of information regarding film 
properties, kinetics and mechanism of corrosion process can be provided by ac 
impedance measurements. EIS has become a very powerful technique in 
corrosion science. One of the principle advantages of EIS over traditional dc 
techniques is that EIS can be well performed in low solution conductivity, which 
was a problem that may affect the electrochemical measurements of dc 
techniques. Also EIS is a non destructive technique (small signal applied during 
the measurements), so that EIS measurements can be repeated several times 
using the same electrochemical cell without altering its electrochemical 
properties [5].</p> 
    <p>Impedance investigations in aqueous mineral acid media have been reported 
extensively till recent past, but, reports in organic acids are scanty. Ethanoic acid 
is extensively used in processing, pharmaceutical, refinery and petrochemical 
industries. Impedance behavior of AISI 316 SS in ethanoic acid exhibits a 
variety of features owing to its alloy composition and therefore, a systematic 
study provides valuable information regarding the properties of steel in organic 
acid media. Since, the interpretation of results is the most important part of 
impedance investigations and therefore, it is essential to pick the right model to 
explain the results. The method employed in this communication is convenient to 
apply in any other steel-organic acid system.</p>
    <p>The commonly observed features during the impedance measurements of AISI 
316 SS are depressed semicircle, non ideal capacitance and pseudo inductance. 
Theoretically, in ideal cases, the Nyquist plot is a semicircle with its center on 
the x-axis. Depressed semicircles are explained by a number of phenomena 
depending on the nature of the system being investigated. Either some properties 
of the system are not homogeneous, or there is distribution (dispersion) of the 
values of the same feature at different locations over the electrode surface. This 
causes requirement to incorporate a new element in the equivalent electrical 
circuit, i.e., non ideal capacitance (defined as constant phase element CPE) in 
place of ideal capacitance. Mathematically, CPE may be defined as [6]: 

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02e1.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

where, Z<sub>CPE</sub> is CPE's impedance and A is the CPE parameter. It is admittance 
(1/|Z|) at &omega; = 1 rad sand has unit of &Omega;<sup>-1</sup> cm<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>. <i>i</i> is the imaginary number (<i>i</i> = 
(-1)<sup>-1/2</sup>) and &omega; is the angular frequency (&omega; = 2&pi;f, f being the frequency). A consequence of this simple equation is that the phase angle of the CPE impedance is independent of the frequency and has a value of (- n &times; &pi;/2) 
degrees. This gives CPE its name. When n = 1, the equation becomes 

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02e2.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p>This is the same as that for the impedance of an ideal capacitor, where A = C. 
When n is close to 1.0, the CPE resembles a capacitor, but the phase angle is not 
90 &deg;. It is constant and somewhat less than 90 &deg; at all frequencies. In these cases, 
the 'true' capacitance can be calculated from A and n. The factor n is defined as</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02e3.jpg">
    
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>


where, &alpha; is the depression angle (in degrees) that evaluates the semicircle 
depression (of Nyquist plot). In many cases, this impedance element is 
introduced formally only for fitting impedance data. The CPE element may be 
related to a number of different interfacial phenomena. The most straightforward 
interpretation is to consider it as a dispersive capacitance of the double layer. 
[7,8]. It is thought to arise from a distribution of the relaxation times resulting 
from heterogeneities of microscopic level at oxide/electrolyte interface [6, 9, 10]. 
According to Cox and Wong, the CPE behavior is attributed to a geometric 
origin, such as, surface heterogeneity or surface roughness [11]. The factor n or 
CPE power is therefore, also known as roughness coefficient. The slope of the 
linear part of Bode plots gives the value of n. Its value generally decreases with 
the increase in surface roughness.</p>
    <p>When n = 1, the CPE describes an ideal capacitor corresponding to the 
conventional double layer capacitance. It behaves like a resistor for n = 0, and an 
inductor for n = (-1). A protected smooth and bright surface in electrolytic 
solution often has n > 0.8. Surface undermined by corrosion can have values 
ranging from 0.8 for even general corrosion, to 0.6-0.7 for uneven general 
corrosion. The value n = 0.4 - 0.5 is found for uneven localized corrosion or 
wide pits and the CPE represents Warburg impedance involving diffusion 
processes [12]. The value of n is an adjustable parameter that always lies 
between 0.5 and 1. It is found to vary at different potentials corresponding to 
different regions on the Tafelâ€™s plot. This fact is associated with the changes in 
the structure or composition of the passive film on steel surface.</p>
    <p>The pseudo inductance is characterized by a position of impedance spectrum 
appearing in the fourth quadrant when the data set is plotted as real impedance 
component versus the negative of imaginary component. Such type of frequency 
responses is observed in electrochemical impedance measurements for a number 
of corroding systems [13, 14]. This behavior arises from a number of sources 
[15], such as, adsorption processes. It is called pseudo because the process giving 
rise to inductance is probably not like those of a real inductor [16]. According to 
Kendig [17], it is caused by a non linear frequency response resulting from 
irreversible desorption of the adsorbed intermediates. Armstrong et al. [18] and 
Epelboin et al. [19] have proposed methods to model pseudo inductive frequency 
responses and extract corrosion rate information from ac impedance data.</p>
    <p>In principle, an electrochemical process may be modeled by equivalent electrical 
circuit elements, such as, resistors, capacitors and inductors. The interpretation of 
electrochemical impedance spectra requires selection of an appropriate model. 
The selection of an appropriate model can be time consuming, particularly, if a 
detailed study is desired. A number of programming methods for computing 
circuit parameters are available in the literature [20-23]. In this study, we have 
used our own algorithm implemented on Mathematica 7.0 (commonly and 
extensively utilized for analyzing mathematical and numerical problems) for 
analyzing the results and computing the electrical circuit. We present here the 
results of ac impedance investigation of AISI 316 in aqueous ethanoic acid under 
different experimental conditions, such as, concentration of acid, duration of 
exposure, change of applied electrode potential and effect of chloride ions. The 
aim of this work was to study the formation and changes in the structure and 
properties of passive film during corrosion and pitting of AISI 316 in ethanoic
acid medium. In the present communication, the discussion is divided into four 
sections viz., (a) effect of exposure time, (b) effect of concentration, (c) effect of 
applied potential and (d) effect of chloride ion addition.</p> 

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>Experimental</b></p>
    <p><b><i>Materials and methods</i></b></p>
    <p>All the chemicals were procured from Merck, India Ltd. AISI 316 stainless steel 
sheets of thickness 1 mm with composition 16.5-18% Cr, 12.5-15.0% Ni and 2.0-3.0% 
Mo were procured from Good Fellow, England. The sheets were cut and 
filed into rectangular pieces of dimensions 3 cm x 1 cm. The specimens were 
polished mechanically up to mirror finish on a polishing wheel attached with 
emery papers (numbers 100 to 2000) of varying grit size. The mirror polished 
surfaces were cleaned properly by washing with distilled water followed by 
rinsing with acetone and drying in air. Each single piece was attached to a copper 
plate with an extended wire sealed in a glass tube and fixed with screw. An area 
of 1 cm2 on one side of the specimen was left exposed. This assembly was taken 
as the working electrode for electrochemical studies. Ag/AgCl (Orion, Beverly, 
M.A. USA) electrode was used as the reference electrode and a Pt wire as 
counter electrode. A Luggin capillary containing KNO<sub>3</sub> was used to connect the 
reference electrode with the cell. All the electrochemical experiments were 
performed using an Electrochemical Analyzer (CH Instruments Model 604C). 
The temperature was maintained at 30 &deg;C using a thermostat.</p>
    <p>Ethanoic acid was first standardized titrimetrically and solutions of 
concentrations 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80% (by volume) were prepared. 
Aqueous ethanoic acid of concentration 20% was found most corrosive to steels 
[24]. Therefore, to investigate the effect of chloride ions on the corrosion 
behavior of stainless steels, experiments were carried out in different 
concentrations of NaCl ranging from 0.01 to 0.5 M in 20% ethanoic acid.</p>

    <p><b><i>Electrochemical experiments</i></b></p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>All the electrochemical experiments were carried out in the electrochemical cell 
containing 150 mL of unstirred test solutions without deaeration. At the 
beginning of each experiment, the open circuit potential (ocp) was allowed to 
reach an approximately constant value by performing potential versus time 
experiment. When the rate of variation in potential is less than 5 mV/h, the ocp is 
considered to be attained [25]. It took 3-6 hours to attain a stable ocp depending 
upon the composition of the electrolyte. After attainment of ocp, 
potentiodynamic polarization curves were obtained in the range of -0.4 to +1.8 
V at a scan rate of 1 mV s<sup>-1</sup>. The ac impedance measurements were carried out at 
different potentials selected on the basis of polarization curves. A frequency 
range of 0.005 to 105 Hz and amplitude of 0.005 V was selected. The system was 
subjected to a hold time of 1 h at a particular potential prior to impedance 
measurements. All the experiments related to corrosion studies were repeated for 
four times. The mean values of the parameters is recorded in tables 1-5 and 
considered for analysis and discussion.</p> 
    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><a name="t1"></a><a href="#topt1">Table 1</a>. Effect of exposure duration on the impedance measurements of AISI 316 in
20% acetic acid at 30 &#176;C, 0.6 V and 1 mV s<sup>-1</sup>scan rate.</p>

<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02t1.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><a name="t2"></a><a href="#topt2">Table 2</a>. Effect of concentration of acetic acid on the impedance measurements of AISI
316 at 30 &#176;C, 0.6 V and 1mV s<sup>-1</sup> scan rate.</p>

<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02t2.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><a name="t3"></a><a href="#topt3">Table 3</a>. Effect of applied electrode potential on the impedance measurements of AISI
316 in 20% acetic acid at 30 &#176;C and 1 mV s<sup>-1</sup> scan rate.</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02t3.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><a name="t4"></a><a href="#topt4">Table 4</a>. Effect of salt concentration on the impedance measurements of AISI 316 in
20% acetic acid at 30 &#176;C, 0.6 V and 1mV s<sup>-1</sup> scan rate.</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02t4.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><a name="t5"></a><a href="#topt5">Table 5</a>. Effect of applied electrode potential on the impedance measurements of AISI
316 at 30 &#176;C in 20% acetic acid containing 0.4 M NaCl.</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02t5.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>





    <p><b><i>Determination of impedance parameters</i></b></p>
    <p>We have used our own algorithm implemented on Mathematica 7.0 to determine 
circuit parameters rather than using the ones reported in the literature for 
computing the circuit parameters. This gives us a better handle to restrict to a 
single (or few) circuit(s) for fitting to many data sets. We chose the goodness of fit (&chi;<sup>2</sup>) to 
be 

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02e4.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>


in place of the conventional chi square parameter. Here, Z<sub>th</sub> and Z<sub>E</sub> denote the 
theoretical and experimental value of the impedance and index 'I' runs over all 
the data points. This is because our impedance data vary over many orders (101 
to 104). Moreover, the percentage errors occurring at higher orders weigh much 
more compared to those occurring for lower values of impedances. So, we first 
calculated the difference between unity and the ratio of theoretical value of 
impedance versus that obtained from the experimental data. Then we took the 
goodness of fit to be the sum of squares of the absolute values of these 
differences. In other words, we computed the distance in complex impedance 
plane between the experimental value of impedance and its theoretical value for a 
given set of circuit parameters. The goodness of fit of a statistical model 
describes how well it fits a set of observations. Measures of goodness of fit 
typically summarize the discrepancy between observed values and the values 
expected under the model in question. Goodness of fit is a method to measure the 
error in curve fitting. A lower value of chi-square reflects better fitting of the 
data. </p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>We then normalized this distance by dividing it with the experimental data and 
calculated its difference from unity. This was followed by computing the sum of 
square of the absolute values of the differences between theoretical and 
experimental values to obtain goodness of fit parameter as stated in Eq. 4 (<a href="#f3">Fig. 3</a><a name="topf3"></a>). 
After that, we determined the circuit parameters by minimizing the above 
mentioned goodness of fit parameter using Wolfram Mathematica 7.0. The 
corresponding program takes much less evaluation time if the iterative process to 
adjust the CPE exponent(s) is done manually rather than allowing the program 
itself to do so. Such a procedure seems to give much better fitting (as seen by 
eye) of the curves in impedance plots. The Nyquist and Bode plots were fitted by 
fixing the circuit parameters into the impedance equation in the programming 
steps. The program was run over 20 to 500 iterations with different CPE 
exponents in order to minimize the goodness of fit and get maximum fitting. In 
the end, program yields results in the form of circuit parameters viz., solution 
resistance (Rs), charge transfer resistance (Rt), non ideal capacitance in terms of 
constant phase element (CPE), CPE exponent and inductance (L). 

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>Results and discussion</b></p>
    <p>Polarization curves of AISI 316 obtained in aqueous ethanoic acid of 
concentrations ranging from 1-80% are shown in Fig 1(a). The curves show 
typical behavior with a small active region followed by a well defined passive, 
transpassive and secondary passive regions. The passive region extends from 0.2 
to 1.0 V. After addition of different amounts of NaCl to 20% ethanoic acid, the 
E<sub>corr</sub> shifts towards negative direction and the passive region becomes 
successively smaller with the increase in the concentration of NaCl in test 
solution. A well defined pitting potential is also obtained, which indicates 
initiation and propagation of pits on the steel surface (Fig. 1(b)). In the present 
communication, potential points corresponding to the different regions on the 
Tafel's plots of the steel in 20% ethanoic acid and the latter containing 0.4 M 
NaCl are selected (indicated by marked spots in Figs. 1(a) and (b)) for ac 
impedance measurements. The observed plots in the impedance measurements 
were indeed the arc of a circle, but with its center below the x-axis. The results 
are discussed under the following sections. </p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02f1.jpg"></p>
    
<p><b>Figure1.</b> Potentiodynamic polarization curves obtained for AISI 316 after 24 h of
immersion under static conditions in (a) 1-80% aqueous ethanoic acid and 20% acid is
marked at certain potential points selected for impedance investigation, and (b) after
adding different amounts of NaCl ranging from 2.5 mM to 0.5 M to 20% ethanoic acid
and the polarization curve of the steel in 20% ethanoic acid containing 0.4 M NaCl is
marked at certain potential points for impedance analysis.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p><b><i>Effect of exposure time</i></b></p>
    <p>To study the effect of exposure time on the surface film properties of the steel, an 
applied potential of 0.6 V (passive region) was selected. The reason behind is to 
make a comparative study of results obtained in ethanoic acid containing chloride 
ions (discussed in section 3.4) as pitting corrosion process takes place in the 
passive potential range. Nyquist plots (Fig. 2(a)) show the formation of depressed 
semicircular capacitive loops owing to surface heterogeneity.</p> 

    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p><a name="f2"></a>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02f2.jpg"></p>
    
<p><b><a href="#topf2">Figure 2</a>.</b> Effect of exposure duration on impedance measurements (a) Nyquist overlay
plots, (b) capacitive loops formed in the high frequency region of the Nyquist plots, (c)
Bode plots viz., log Z/log freq. and Phase /log frequency.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p>This is caused by surface distribution of reaction rates with the locations on the 
electrode [26]. Such a phenomenon is common with passivating alloys. On 
moving towards the high frequency region of these plots, another capacitive loop 
becomes visible (Fig. 2(b)).</p>
    <p>With increase in the exposure time, the arc of the capacitive loops increases in 
size, but the increase is not very significant. The arc obtained in the low 
frequency region after 6 h (hours) exposure was found more depressed compared 
to the arc at 24 h. The arc at 72 h is the least depressed. The change in the 
dimension of the capacitive arcs indicates that the state of adsorptive 
intermediate changes with time. Sekine et al. [27] have reported the formation of 
[M(CH<sub>3</sub>COO)<sub>m</sub>]<sub>ad</sub> or [M(OH)<sub>n</sub>]<sub>ad</sub> on the surface of AISI 316 SS during this 
process.</p>
    <p>Because of the inherent limitation in the impedance data interpretation (different 
circuits may yield the same spectrum), only the simplest possible equivalent 
circuits were used for spectra fitting. Simulations were carried out with the help 
of Eq. 5 (<a href="#f7">Fig. 7(a)</a><a name="topf7"></a>), incorporating the circuit elements shown in Fig. 3. A 
comparison between the measured and simulated spectra using fitting algorithm 
is presented in Fig. 4. It is preferred that the circuit chosen for the fitting of 
spectra be simple, convenient and capable to explain maximum number of plots. 
Barring a few cases (e.g., 4(b)), in most of the cases an excellent fitting was 
found (Fig. 4(a)). Even, the latter case can be regarded as acceptable considering 
the complexity of the passive film formed on the steel surface. In such cases, to 
fit the curves completely, inclusion of some more circuit elements would be 
required. With each curve, a variety of circuits would appear. The variation of 
circuit elements is so wide ranged that it led to over fitting, thereby making the 
analysis very cumbersome and complicated. Over fitting generally occurs when a 
model is excessively complex, such as having too many parameters relative to 
the number of observations. A model which has been over fit will generally have 
poor predictive performance, as it can exaggerate minor fluctuations in the data. 
This was the reason we used our own algorithm for analyzing the results. 

    <p>&nbsp;</p><a name="f3"></a>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02f3.jpg"></p>
    
<p><b><a href="#topf3">Figure 3</a>.</b> Model of passive film structure formed on the surface of AISI 316 and
equivalent electrical circuit.</p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02f4.jpg"></p>
    
<p><b>Figure 4.</b> Comparison between measured and simulated spectra. Dotted lines represent
measured spectra and solid lines represent simulated spectra. (a) Good fitting and (b)
reasonably moderate fitting.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p>When the metal samples with protective passive films are exposed to a non 
aggressive electrolyte, i.e., ethanoic acid, the impedance response is determined 
essentially by the resistive and capacitive properties of the surface film. Bode 
plots give more clear picture (<a href="#f2">Fig. 2(c)</a><a name="topf2"></a> exhibiting two humps or peaks 
corresponding to the two capacitors (CPEs), and the three depressions 
corresponding to three resistors in the circuit [26]. For deducing the equivalent 
circuit, fitting and simulation, both Nyquist and Bode plots have been utilized. 
To explain these plots, we suggest a simple model in Fig. 3. It displays metal 
surface with a two layered passive film structure and the equivalent circuit with 
five elements. The total impedance (Z) can be calculated using Eq. 5 (<a href="#f7">Fig. 7(a)</a>). 
The numerical values of the circuit elements are recorded in <a href="#t1">Table 1</a><a name="topt1"></a>. Depending 
on whether the film has a single or multilayer structure, the spectra over a wide 
frequency range may exhibit one or more time constants because of film 
resistance or capacitance. The capacitive loop in the high frequency region 
represents the electric charge transfer process. The second capacitive loop at 
intermediate frequencies is attributed to adsorption-desorption processes (of 
intermediates), and the third capacitive loop in the low frequency region is 
associated to a diffusion processes through corrosion products inside the 
pits/cracks. The third capacitive loop is obtained during impedance 
measurements at higher potentials (1.0 to1.6 V) and also when chloride ions were 
added to the medium (section 3.4).</p>




    <p>For the ac impedance experiments under this section, we report the formation of 
two capacitive loops corresponding to charge transfer process (capacitive loop in 
the high frequency region) and diffusion process (loop in the low frequency 
region). The complex plane shows a wide semi-circle at low frequencies and a 
small semi-circle at higher frequencies which becomes further small at higher 
potential (<a href="#f2">Fig. 2(a) and (b)</a>). This is attributed to the difference in the structure 
and properties of the inner and outer layers of the passive film. </p>
    <p>The measured capacitive response was not found to be of ideal capacitor. This 
deviation is incorporated by utilizing a constant-phase element (CPE) for spectra 
fitting, instead of an ideal capacitance element (Cdl). R1 is referred to the 
resistance of the porous layer since it continuously bathes in the electrolyte 
solution. It is also considered as resistance of the solution inside the pores of the 
film [28]. It strongly depends on the defective structure (porosity) of the film. R2 
and R3 are resistances of the compact portions (inner layers) of the passive film. </p>
    <p>As the exposure duration was increased up to 72 h, the resistance of the outer 
layer increases, but not significantly. This indicates thickening of the outer layer 
and the film retains its protective ability. In some literature, it has been reported 
that the increase in film resistance and the decrease in film capacitance with time 
indicate the growth and formation of compact passive film [29, 30]. As the 
surface film grows, different transport mechanisms take place in the inner and 
outer parts of the film. Additionally, the internal redox reactions also play crucial 
role in the formation of a multilayered passive film. The composition of the inner 
and outer layers may vary in different cases. The inner layer is generally more 
continuous and almost non-conducting (high resistance values), whereas the 
outer layer is relatively porous (comparatively lower resistance values). In the 
present investigation, the outer layer capacitance (CPE1) has been found to 
increase with the length of exposure, which suggests that the oxide film has 
further thickened. On increasing the exposure duration from 72 to 96 h, the 
resistance of the inner and outer layers and thus overall film resistance decreases, 
indicating that along with thickening, the film also becomes more defective. This 
probably is due to the generation of pores, channels or cracks in the passive film. 
From these results, it is apparent that extended immersion hours inside the 
electrolytic solution (ethanoic acid) leads to the growth of a defective or porous 
surface film. In this investigation, the main feature of the impedance response, 
i.e., two time constants observed in the spectra of most specimens, is likely due 
to the two layered structure of the passive films. The CPE powers (n<sub>1</sub> and n<sub>2</sub>) 
range from 0.86-0.99. This suggests occurrence of little or no considerable 
roughness on the surface. However, the pristine shine of the surface was lost. </p>


    <p><b><i>Effect of concentration of ethanoic acid</i></b></p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Fig. 5(a) shows Nyquist overlay plots of AISI 316 obtained after 24 h in different 
concentrations of ethanoic acid ranging from 1 to 80% at an applied potential of 
0.6 V and 1 mV s<sup>-1</sup> scan rate. The capacitive loops formed in the high frequency 
region for the same are shown in Fig. 5(b). The semicircular loops in the low 
frequency region are depressed owing to surface heterogeneities. On the other 
hand capacitive loops formed in the high frequency region are somewhat less 
depressed. This indicates that the inner surface film is compact and continuous 
providing good protection. This is further supported by high R2 (10<sup>4</sup> - 10<sup>5</sup> &Omega;) and 
n values (0.9-0.8). The circuit parameters are displayed in <a href="#t2">Table 2</a><a name="topt2"></a>. If the passive 
layer grows uniformly, the resistance increases and capacitance decreases in 
proportion to the increase in the thickness of the film. But in the present case, the 
circuit parameters in different concentrations of ethanoic acid are scattered and 
there appears no correlation. This is not surprising because of the fact that the 
impedance study was carried out at an applied potential in the passive region and 
not at E<sub>corr</sub>. Hence, it is inferred that, the formation, structural nature and 
properties of the passive film on the steel surface, is independent of the acid 
concentration. The structure and properties of the passive film in this case can be 
explained using the model and equivalent circuit given in <a href="#f3">Fig. 3</a>. 

    <p>&nbsp;</p><a name="f5"></a>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02f5.jpg"></p>
    
<p><b><a href="#topf5">Figure 5</a>.</b> Effect of concentration of ethanoic acid on the impedance measurements of
AISI 316. (a) Nyquist overlay plots and (b) capacitive loops of the same in the high
frequency region.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p>During the corrosion process of stainless steels in acidic electrolyte, the 
composition, structure, and morphology of the passive film vary with 
composition and time [28]. The dielectric constant may change according to the 
variation in the film composition and structure. The effective area may also 
increase significantly due to an increase in the surface roughness. In particular, 
the resistivity may vary since it depends strongly upon the defective structure of 
the passive film. If interconnecting pores, channels, or cracks are formed inside 
the oxide film, they affect many properties of the film. Impedance of the whole 
layer can be calculated using equivalent circuit based on the surface film (oxide 
layer) model given in <a href="#f3">Fig. 3</a>, but the details of individual pores, channels, or 
cracks cannot be obtained. The total effect of pores, channels, or cracks on the 
impedance response is reflected in the parameters of the outer layer (R1, CPE1 
and n1) and possibly also in R2 when the defects extend into the barrier layer. R1 
is a measure of general corrosion rates, but alone it is inadequate to characterize 
uniform or localized corrosion. The surface roughness caused by corrosion 
increases the real surface area and double layer capacitance, while decreasing n. 
Although the coefficient n by itself suffices as a roughness indicator, a 
combination of R1 and n gives more valuable information for the classification of 
corrosion patterns. An accelerated corrosion decreases charge transfer resistance 
and increases surface roughness. Hence both R1 and n decrease simultaneously. 
In the event of severe localized corrosion, low values of R1 and n are expected. 
When corrosion is subdued by uniform coverage of a passive film, as in the 
present case, both R1 and n are high. This suggests that the surface is not affected 
due to insignificant corrosion.</p>






    <p><b><i>Effect of applied potential</i></b></p>
    <p>Nyquist plots obtained for AISI 316 at different applied potentials are shown in 
Fig. 6(a) and (b). The corresponding Bode plots are displayed in Fig. 6(c) and 
this represents complete picture for the changes in the spectra on increasing the 
applied potential. Since, different physio-electrochemical reactions take place 
over the steel surface corresponding to different regions on the Tafelâ€™s plot; 
therefore, successive change in the shape of each capacitive loop with potential is 
visible in the diagram.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02f6.jpg"></p>
    
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Figure 6.</b> Effect of potential on impedance measurements of AISI 316. (a) Nyquist
overlay plots; (b) capacitive loops in the high frequency region of the Nyquist plots; and
(c) Bode plots (Phase/log frequency).</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>



    <p>In the low potential region (ocp to 0.8 V), there are only two humps or peaks 
(Fig. 6(c)). These correspond to three resistors and two capacitors. The process 
can be explained by the model shown in <a href="#f3">Fig. 3</a>. When the potential was increased 
from 1.0 to 1.2 V, there appeared one more peak. It corresponds to the 
introduction of a third capacitor in the equivalent circuit. There are now three 
time constants in the equivalent electrical circuit as given in Fig. 7(a). The total 
impedance can be calculated using Eq. 6 (Fig. 7b). On further increasing the 
potential from 1.4 to 1.6 V, inductive loop in the low frequency region is formed 
which appears in the fourth quadrant. In the Bode plot, this phenomenon appears 
as a low frequency tail creeping below zero or negative quadrant Fig. 6(c). This 
is due to the formation of adsorbed intermediates on the steel surface. To explain 
the inductive loop formation in the case of AISI 316 (Fig. 6(b) and (c)) in single 
attempt, the circuit becomes complicated. In order to simplify it, the circuit was 
divided into two parts (Fig. 7(b)). For programming and simulation, the 
experimental text data of the Nyquist and Bode plots were divided into two parts 
and it was found that the algorithm for the above mentioned circuits runs 
successfully.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p><a name="f7"></a>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02f7.jpg"></p>
    
<p><b><a href="#topf7">Figure 7</a>.</b> (a), (b) Combination of equivalent circuits to explain the Nyquist and Bode
plots of AISI 316 obtained at 1.4-1.6 V, and (c) comparison between measured and
simulated spectra.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>




    <p>The comparison of measured and simulated spectra is shown in Fig. 7(c). The 
total impedance can be calculated by taking together the individual impedances 
at different frequencies obtained from Eqs 4 and 6. It can be considered that the 
corrosion process taking place in the high frequency region resembles to the 
model and equivalent circuit given in <a href="#f3">Fig. 3</a>. Whereas, the process taking place in 
the low frequency region differs from the former and follows a different pathway 
involving formation of adsorbed intermediates on the surface. The inductance is 
interpreted as originated mainly from the adsorption of the intermediates 
(possibly Fe (CH<sub>3</sub>COO)<sub>ads</sub>). The parameters are displayed in <a href="#t3">Table 3</a><a name="topt3"></a>. In this case, 
when the inductive loop is not formed (i.e., 1.0 to 1.2 V), the number of circuit 
elements increases to ten. It increases to twelve when inductive loop is there (at 
potential 1.4 to 1.6 V). Due to large number of variables in the curve fitting, it 
usually takes long hours to run it and the proper fitting becomes cumbersome. 
Therefore, this complicated circuit was divided into two simple circuits for the 
fitting and simulation purposes.</p>

    <p>R1 arises due to the anodic interfacial process, possibly the charge transport 
through the surface oxide layer and the rate of which is known to be independent 
of the potential in a wide range. As a result, it remains almost constant in these 
potential ranges. The composition of the metal phase changes during active 
dissolution. This is responsible for a variation in R1 values. The passive film 
formed on the surface governs the major part of chemical reactions occurring on 
the surface. This controls the dissolution rate, overpotentials, enrichment of 
alloying elements on the surface and provokes repassivation. Evidences of 
enrichment of the alloying elements on the surface of steels have already been 
reported by many workers. The passive films of AISI 316 were found to be 
composed of a complex oxide and oxyhydroxide containing Cr<sup>3+</sup>, Fe<sup>3+</sup>, Ni<sup>2+</sup>, 
Mo<sup>4+</sup> and Mo<sup>6+</sup> ions. An increase in the thickness of the passive film with 
increase in Mo content has been reported by Olefjord et al. [31]. By the virtue of 
the alloying elements, there occurs formation of multi-layered passive film on the 
surface. A two-layered film formed in the potential range of ocp to 0.8 V is 
reflected in two CPEs in the equivalent circuit. Similarly, a three-layered film 
formation in the potential range 1.0 to 1.6 V is reflected in three CPEs in the 
equivalent electrical circuit. The impedance study reveals that the corrosion 
phenomenon occurring in the stainless steel-ethanoic acid systems is very 
complex because of the formation of multiple passive layers on the surface.</p> 


    <p><b><i>Effect of chloride ion addition</i></b></p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Impedance measurements were carried out in 20% ethanoic acid containing 
different quantities of NaCl at 30 &deg;C after exposure duration of 24 h. Nyquist 
plots were depressed semicircles with their center below the axis. Bode plots 
show typical double peak features which indicate that the process involved two 
CPEs. The parameters calculated using Eq. 5 are recorded in <a href="#t4">Table 4</a><a name="topt4"></a>. From the 
data, it is evident that the R1 and R2 values are lower compared to those in <a href="#t1">Tables 
1-3</a>. This indicates that the presence of chloride ions increases the conductivity of 
the medium, and invades into the passive film to enhance its defects. The film 
now contains more cracks, pores and channels. If defects are present inside the 
passive film, the electrolyte will penetrate into the film and attack the surface at 
the sites where the film is thin and weak. This leads to a decrease in the electrical 
resistance.</p>



    <p>In order to study the effect of applied potential on the corrosion process in the 
presence of chloride ions, impedance measurements were carried out in 20% 
ethanoic acid containing 0.4 M NaCl. The features of Nyquist plots obtained in 
the potential region ocp to 1.0 V resembled to that shown in <a href="#f5">Fig. 5</a><a name="topf5"></a>, i.e., 
formation of two capacitive loops. At potentials 1.2 and 1.4 V, little different 
behavior was obtained due to the formation of three capacitive loops (Fig. 8). 
This seems to be a well-developed complex diagram, but a closer examination 
reveals a good RC behavior for high frequencies followed by a progressively 
inductive behavior towards the lower frequency part of the diagram. This 
apparent inductive loop is caused by relatively slow changes in the specimen 
properties, in contrast with the fast changes due to the breakdown of passivation 
film. The n values close to unity show that the surface is very little affected due 
to the pitting corrosion caused by the presence of chloride ions. It was observed 
while comparing the n values in the passive region (Tables <a href="#t3">3</a>, <a href="#t4">4</a> and <a href="#t5">5</a><a name="topt5"></a>), that in the 
absence of chloride ions, the values fall in the range 0.81 to 0.96 at potentials 0.4, 
0.6 and 0.8 V. After addition of chloride ions, the n values fall in the range 0.94 
to 0.96 at similar potential inputs. This indicates that the surface heterogeneity or 
roughness in the latter case is less.</p>


    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><img src="/img/revistas/pea/v29n4/29n4a02f8.jpg"></p>
    
<p><b>Figure 8.</b> Overlay of Nyquist plots of AISI 316 in 20 % ethanoic acid containing 0.4
M NaCl at 1.2 and 1.4 V.</p>
    <p>&nbsp;</p>





    <p>This can be explained in terms of alloy composition of the steel in which, besides 
Ni and Cr, 3-4 % molybdenum is also present. The role of Mo in passivation 
process has been reported by many researchers. Apart from resistance to pitting, 
Mo facilitates the process of repassivation as well. Once the pits are formed over 
the surface, the active sites are rapidly covered with molybdenum oxyhydroxides 
or molybdate salts, thereby inhibiting localized corrosion [31]. When passive 
film grows, the oxide lattice is dominated by multiple valent species (ions) of Cr 
and Fe which combine to produce point defects. These defects are possibly 
cancelled by the presence of 4-and 6-valent Mo species and the film becomes 
less defective. This makes the passive film less prone to be penetrated by 
aggressive anions (such as chloride ions in the present case). Thus, Mo reduces 
the chances of chloride ion invasion into the passive film. Studies show that 
chloride ion content in the passive film of Mo free alloys is considerably higher 
than Mo containing alloys [32]. It is further suggested that the mechanism for 
lowering of the chloride ion content in the film is due to the ability of Mo to form 
soluble stable Mo-oxo-chloro complexes [33]. The formation of these 
complexes, during the passivation process, lower the chloride ion content in the 
passive film, thereby making the film more resistant to pitting corrosion. Mo 
assists in repassivation process as well. Soon after the initial dissolution of Mo 
takes place, the protective chloride salt film stabilized by ferrous molybdate is 
eventually precipitated from the test solution. This insoluble chloride complex 
settles at the base of pits, thereby arresting chloride ions in the pit and forbids its 
invasion into the passive film. This, in turn, enables subsequent repassivation to 
occur. Hence, the corrosion resistance property of AISI 316 is improved in the 
aggressive media.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>Conclusions</b></p>
    <p>The formation, structure and properties of the passive film, changes with 
exposure duration, concentration of the ethanoic acid, applied electrode potential 
and concentration of chloride ion. Results show that the passive film formed on 
AISI 316 surface is multilayered and possesses dual structure. The film is made 
up of a thin and compact internal part, and a thicker, porous external part. 
Extended immersion hours inside the electrolytic solution (ethanoic acid) leads to 
the growth of a defective or porous surface film. The formation, structure and 
properties of the passive film are independent of the acid concentration. At 
passivating potential ocp to 0.8 V, there is the formation of two capacitive loops, 
and at higher potential input (1.0-1.2 V), formation of three capacitive loops 
takes place. At higher potentials (1.4-1.6 V), the formation of an inductive loop 
takes place owing to adsorbed intermediates. The capacitive behavior is of non 
ideal nature and it is explained in terms of constant phase element. The CPE 
power or n values show that surface roughness due to corrosion process becomes 
less in 20% ethanoic acid containing 0.4 M NaCl than in absence of the latter, 
owing to the repassivation role played by molybdenum and enabling the steel to 
behave more resistant to pitting corrosion in aggressive medium.</p> 



    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>References</b></p>
    <!-- ref --><p>1. D.D. Macdonald, &quot;Application of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in electrochemistry and corrosion science&quot;, in: R. Varma, J.R. Selman (Eds.), &quot;Techniques for Characterization of Electrodes and Electrochemical Processes&quot;, John Wiley & Sons, NY, (1991). pp. 515-647.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000115&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>2. I. Epelboin, C. Gabrielli, M. Keddam, K. Takenouti, &quot;The study of the passivation process by the electrode impedance analysis&quot;, in: J.O'M Bockris, B.E. Conway, E. Yeager, R.R.White (Eds.), &quot;Comprehensive Treatise of Electrochemistry&quot;, Vol. 4, &quot;Electrochemical Materials Science&quot;, Plenum Press, NY, (1981). pp. 151-188.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000117&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>3. C. Gabrielli, &quot;Identification of electrochemical processes by frequency response analysis&quot;, Technical Report 0004/83, Solartron Instruments (1984). pp. 53-72.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000119&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>4. P. Marcus, V. Maurice, &quot;Structure of thin anodic oxide films formed on single-crystal metal surfaces&quot;, in: A. Wieckowski (Ed.), &quot;Interfacial Electrochemistry-Theory, Experiment and Application&quot;, Marcel Dekker Inc., NY, (1999). pp. 541-558.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000121&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>5. A.M. Nagiub, Port. Electrochim. Acta 23 (2005) 301-314.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000123&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>6. J.B. Jorcin, M.E. Orazem, N. Pebere, B. Tribollet, Electrochim. Acta 51 (2006) 1473-1479.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000125&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>  
    <!-- ref --><p>7. J. Flis, Y.Tobiyama, K. Mochizuki, C. Chiga, Corros. Sci. 39 (1997) 1757-1770.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000127&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>8. A. Jimenez-Morales, J.C. Galvan Rodriguez, J.J. De Damborena, J. Appl. Electrochem. 27 (1997) 550-557.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000129&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>9. M.A. Ameer, M.A. Fekry, F. El-Taib Heakal, Electrochim. Acta 50 (2004) 43-49.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000131&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>10. S.S. El-Egamy, W.A. Badaway, H. Shehata, Mat-wiss. u. Werkstofftech. 31 (2001) 737-744.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000133&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>11. B. Cox, Y.M. Wong, J. Nucl. Mat. 218 (1995) 324-334.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000135&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>12. M.A. Martini Emilsce, L. Muller Iduvirges, Corros. Sci. 42 (2000) 443-454.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000137&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>  
    <!-- ref --><p>13. I. Epelboin, M. Keddam, H. Takenouti, J. Appl. Electrochem. 2 (1972) 7179.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000139&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>14. D.R. MacFariane and S.I. Smedley, J. Electrochem. Soc. 133 (1986) 2240-2244.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000141&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>15. D.C. Silverman, Corrosion NACE 45 (1989) 824-827.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000143&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>16. W.J. Lorenz, F. Mansfeld, Corros. Sci. 21 (1981) 647-672.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000145&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>17. M.J. Kendig, J. Electrochem. Soc. 131 (1984) 2777-2779.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000147&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>18. R.D. Armstrong, M. Henderson, J. Electroanal. Chem. and Interfac. Electrochem. 39 (1972) 81-90.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000149&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>19. I. Epelboin, M. Keddam, J. Electrochem. Soc. 117 (1970) 1052-1056.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000151&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>20. F. Mansfeld, Corrosion, NACE International 36 (1981) 301-307.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000153&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>21. S.M. Gerchakov, L.R. Odey, F. Mansfeld, Corrosion, NACE International 37 (1981) 696-703.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000155&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>22. F. Mansfeld, M.W. Kendig, Workstoff und Korrosion 34 (1983) 397-401.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000157&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>23. M.W. Kendig, E.M. Meyer, G. Lindberg, F. Mansfeld, Corros. Sci. 23 (1983) 1007-1015.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000159&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>24. N. Mahato, &quot;Corrosion and pitting behavior of austenitic stainless steels in ethanoic acid containing chloride ions&quot;, Ph.D. thesis in Applied Chemistry, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (2010).    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000161&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>25. R.G. Kelly, J.R. Scully, D.W. Shoesmith, R.G. Buchheit, &quot;Electrochemical Techniques in Corrosion Science and Engineering&quot;, Marcel Dekker Inc., NY (2003).    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000163&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>26. G.W. Walter, Corros. Sci. 26 (1986) 681-703.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000165&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>27. I. Sekine, A. Masuko, K. Senoo, Corrosion NACE International 43 (1987) 553-560.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000167&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>28. J. Pan, C. Leygraf, R.F.A. Jargelius-Pettersson, Linden, Oxidation of Metals 50 (1998) 431-455.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000169&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>29. A. Baltat-Bazia, N. Celati, M. Keddam, H. Takenouti, R. Wiart, Mat. Sci. Forum 111 (1992) 359-368.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000171&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200029&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>30. N. Celati, S Catherine, M. Keddam, H. Takenouti, Mat. Sci. Forum 192 (1995) 335-344.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000173&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200030&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>31. I. Olefjord, B. Brox, U. Jelvestam, J. Electrochem. Soc. 132 (1985) 28542861.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000175&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200031&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>32. L. Wegrelius, F. Falkenberg, I. Olefjord, J. Electrochem. Soc. 146 (1999) 1397-1406.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000177&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200032&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
    <!-- ref --><p>33. J.R. Ambrose, &quot;Passivity of Metals&quot;, (R. P. Frankenthal and J. Kruger, eds.), Electrochem. Soc., Pennington NJ (1978). p. 740.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000179&pid=S0872-1904201100040000200033&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> 
     <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><Sup><a name="0"></a><a href="#top0">*</a></Sup>Corresponding author. E-mail address <a href="mailto:neelapchem@gmail.com">neelapchem@gmail.com</a></p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>    <p>Received 14 February 2011; accepted 8 June 2011</p>
     <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><b>Acknowledgements</b></p>
    <p>Authors are pleased to thank Dr. Manavendra Nath, Department of Theoretical 
Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai, for fruitful 
discussion. Research grant (Senior Research Fellowship) provided by UGC-India 
to one of the authors is gratefully acknowledged.</p> 
     ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Macdonald]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Application of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in electrochemistry and corrosion science]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Varma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Selman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Techniques for Characterization of Electrodes and Electrochemical Processes]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<page-range>515-647</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[NY ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[John Wiley & Sons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Epelboin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gabrielli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keddam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Takenouti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The study of the passivation process by the electrode impedance analysis]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bockris]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.O'M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Conway]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yeager]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[White]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Comprehensive Treatise of Electrochemistry]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<page-range>151-188</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[NY ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Plenum Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gabrielli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Identification of electrochemical processes by frequency response analysis]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<page-range>53-72</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Solartron Instruments]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marcus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maurice]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Structure of thin anodic oxide films formed on single-crystal metal surfaces]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wieckowski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Interfacial Electrochemistry-Theory, Experiment and Application]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<page-range>541-558</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[NY ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcel Dekker Inc.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nagiub]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Port. Electrochim. Acta]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>301</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jorcin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Orazem]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pebere]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tribollet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Electrochim. Acta]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<page-range>1473</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tobiyama]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mochizuki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chiga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Corros. Sci.]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<page-range>1757</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jimenez-Morales]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galvan Rodriguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Damborena]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J. Appl. Electrochem.]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<page-range>550</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ameer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fekry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[El-Taib Heakal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Electrochim. Acta]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<page-range>43</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[El-Egamy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Badaway]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shehata]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mat-wiss. u. Werkstofftech.]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>737</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cox]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J. Nucl. Mat.]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>218</volume>
<page-range>324</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martini Emilsce]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muller Iduvirges]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Corros. Sci.]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<page-range>443</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Epelboin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keddam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Takenouti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J. Appl. Electrochem.]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>7179</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MacFariane]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smedley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J. Electrochem. Soc.]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>133</volume>
<page-range>2240</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silverman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Corrosion NACE]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<page-range>824</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lorenz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mansfeld]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Corros. Sci.]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<page-range>647</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kendig]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J. Electrochem. Soc.]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>131</volume>
<page-range>2777</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Armstrong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Henderson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J. Electroanal. Chem. and Interfac. Electrochem.]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<page-range>81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Epelboin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keddam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J. Electrochem. Soc.]]></source>
<year>1970</year>
<volume>117</volume>
<page-range>1052</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mansfeld]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Corrosion, NACE International]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<page-range>301</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gerchakov]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Odey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mansfeld]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Corrosion, NACE International]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<page-range>696</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mansfeld]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kendig]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Workstoff und Korrosion]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<page-range>397</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kendig]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lindberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mansfeld]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Corros. Sci.]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>1007</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mahato]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Corrosion and pitting behavior of austenitic stainless steels in ethanoic acid containing chloride ions]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelly]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scully]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shoesmith]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Buchheit]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Electrochemical Techniques in Corrosion Science and Engineering]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[NY ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcel Dekker Inc.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Corros. Sci.]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<page-range>681</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sekine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Masuko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Senoo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Corrosion NACE International]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<page-range>553</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leygraf]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jargelius-Pettersson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.F.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Linden]]></surname>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Oxidation of Metals]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<page-range>431</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baltat-Bazia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Celati]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keddam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Takenouti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wiart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mat. Sci. Forum]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>111</volume>
<page-range>359</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Celati]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Catherine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keddam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Takenouti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mat. Sci. Forum]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>192</volume>
<page-range>335</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Olefjord]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brox]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jelvestam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J. Electrochem. Soc.]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>132</volume>
<page-range>2854</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wegrelius]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Falkenberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Olefjord]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J. Electrochem. Soc.]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>146</volume>
<page-range>1397</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ambrose]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Frankenthal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kruger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Passivity of Metals]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<page-range>740</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Pennington NJ ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Electrochem. Soc.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
