<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0872-1904</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Port. Electrochim. Acta]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0872-1904</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedade Portuguesa de Electroquímica]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0872-19042014000200004</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4152/pea.201402137</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Improvement of Corrosion Resistance of Ni-P-Al2O3 Composite Coating by Optimizing Process Parameters Using Potentiodynamic Polarization Test]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gadhari]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Prasanna]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sahoo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Prasanta]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Jadavpur University Department of Mechanical Engineering ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Kolkata ]]></addr-line>
<country>India</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>137</fpage>
<lpage>156</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0872-19042014000200004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0872-19042014000200004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0872-19042014000200004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Electroless Ni-P based composite coatings are more popular due to their excellent hardness, yield strength, wear resistance, frictional resistance, corrosion resistance, and good lubricity. The present study deals with significance of various coating process parameters on the corrosion behavior of the Ni-P-Al2O3 composite coatings on mild steel substrate. Corrosion behavior of the composite coatings after heat treatment at various annealing temperatures (300 °C, 400 °C, and 500 °C) are investigated by potentiodynamic polarization test using 3.5% NaCl solution. For maximization of corrosion resistance, the electrochemical parameters, corrosion potential (Ecorr) and corrosion current density (Icorr), are optimized using Taguchi based grey relational analysis. For optimization four coating process parameters are considered, namely, concentration of nickel source, concentration of reducing agent, concentration of second phase particles (alumina particles), and annealing temperature, as main design factors. The optimum combinations of the said design factors are obtained from the analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) reveals that the concentration of alumina particles and annealing temperature has the significant influence on the corrosion resistance of the composite coatings. The microstructure of the surface is studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and chemical composition is studied by energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX). The X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) is used to identify the phase transformation behavior of the composite coatings.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Ni-P-Al2O3 composite coating]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[corrosion]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[potentiodynamic polarization]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[optimization]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ 

<!--     <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>doi: 10.4152/pea.201402137</p> -->

    <p><b>Improvement of Corrosion Resistance of Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Composite Coating by Optimizing Process Parameters Using Potentiodynamic Polarization Test</b></p>

    <p>
<b>Prasanna Gadhari</b>
 and <b>Prasanta Sahoo</b><sup><a href="#0">*</a></sup>
</p>

    <p><i> Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India</i></p>


    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>Abstract</b></p>

    <p>Electroless Ni-P based composite coatings are more popular due to their excellent 
hardness, yield strength, wear resistance, frictional resistance, corrosion resistance, and 
good lubricity. The present study deals with significance of various coating process 
parameters on the corrosion behavior of the Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite coatings on mild 
steel substrate. Corrosion behavior of the composite coatings after heat treatment at 
various annealing temperatures (300 &deg;C, 400 &deg;C, and 500 &deg;C) are investigated by 
potentiodynamic polarization test using 3.5% NaCl solution. For maximization of 
corrosion resistance, the electrochemical parameters, corrosion potential (E<sub>corr</sub>) and 
corrosion current density (I<sub>corr</sub>), are optimized using Taguchi based grey relational 
analysis. For optimization four coating process parameters are considered, namely, 
concentration of nickel source, concentration of reducing agent, concentration of second 
phase particles (alumina particles), and annealing temperature, as main design factors. 
The optimum combinations of the said design factors are obtained from the analysis. 
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) reveals that the concentration of alumina particles and 
annealing temperature has the significant influence on the corrosion resistance of the 
composite coatings. The microstructure of the surface is studied by scanning electron 
microscopy (SEM) and chemical composition is studied by energy dispersive X-ray 
analysis (EDX). The X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) is used to identify the phase 
transformation behavior of the composite coatings.</p>

    <p><b><i>Keywords:</i></b> Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite coating, corrosion, potentiodynamic polarization, optimization.</p>


    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>Introduction</b></p>

    <p>In industries protection of machine parts, tools, and equipment from 
environmental changes, corrosion, erosion, friction and wear is very essential.</p>

    <p>For that purpose these should be made from hard, tough, wear and corrosion 
resistant materials, but it is not beneficial in all respect. In such cases it should be 
possible by applying specific layer on the base material to protect form corrosion 
and environmental changes and also to increase wear and friction resistance. 
Special coatings for surface protection are an essential part of design, 
development and synthesis of advance and novel materials. Recently, electroless 
coatings have gained wide popularity in automobile, mechanical, aerospace, 
chemical and in scientific domain, due to its ability to produce hard, wear 
resistant, friction resistant, and corrosion resistant surface [1]. Electroless plating 
is an autocatalytic process in which the reduction of the metallic ions and coating 
deposition can be carried out through the oxidation of the reducing agent. The 
substrate develops a potential when it is dipped in electroless bath, which 
contains a source of metallic ions, reducing agent, complexing agent, stabilizer, 
additives and wetting agents, etc. Due to the developed potential, both positive 
and negative ions are attracted towards the substrate surface and release their 
energy through charge transfer process. The non-crystalline amorphous Ni-P 
coatings with more than 7 wt.% phosphorus content have excellent corrosion 
resistance. Hence they are used in corrosive environments such as oil and gas 
industry, mining, chemical, and structural components. The electroless coatings 
can be broadly classified into four groups viz, pure nickel and black nickel 
coatings, alloy and poly alloy coatings, composite coatings, and electroless nano 
coatings [2]. The electroless coating has highly consistent thickness across all the 
surfaces, including edges and complex interior geometry.</p>

    <p>Electroless nickel composite coatings are developed by co-deposition of fine 
inert second phase particles into a metal matrix from an electroless bath. This 
coating is developed by impact and deposition of second phase particles on the 
surface of the substrate and subsequent surrounding of these particles by Ni-P 
matrix as it is deposited. To improve mechanical and tribological properties 
along with lubricity of Ni-P coatings, second phase particles have been 
introduced into the Ni-P matrix. The composite coatings can be mainly 
categorized into two groups: (1) coatings incorporating soft particles like PTFE, 
MoS2, HBN, graphite to improved corrosion resistance, reduced friction 
coefficient, and to provide better lubricity and (2) coatings containing hard 
particles e.g., SiC, WC, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, Si3N4 CeO<sub>2</sub>, TiO<sub>2</sub>, ZrO<sub>2</sub>, and diamond, etc., for 
getting the higher hardness, wear, friction, and corrosion resistance [3]. The 
excellent properties of electroless nickel composite coatings depend on the stable 
and uniform distribution of nano or composite particles; otherwise composite 
coatings would have non-uniformly distributed particulates and numerous 
defects, owing to segregation and agglomeration of nano or composite particles 
with high surface energy and activity in the electroless bath [4]. An appropriate 
heat treatment at 400 &deg;C for 1 hour can increase hardness and tribological 
properties such as frictional and wear resistance of composite coatings 
significantly [5]. Various hard particles explained above are commonly used as 
reinforcement phase. Among these hard particles, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> is the most important in 
engineering materials because of its high elastic modulus, strength retention at 
high temperature, and high wear resistance [6]. In general, the incorporation of 
second phase particles in electroless Ni-P composite coatings depends on 
particle impingement on the coating surface and holding time of the particle on 
the coating surface [7]. Alirezaei et al. [8] have reported that deposition rate, codeposition 
particle percent, roughness and hardness of Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> coatings have 
been influenced by the concentration of alumina in bath, whereas average 
roughness and hardness increase with particle content.</p>

    <p>Electroless Ni-P coatings are well known for their excellent corrosion resistance. 
In particular environment it is higher than that of pure nickel or chromium alloy 
due to two factors, namely, amorphous nature and passivity of the coating [9]. 
The corrosion resistance of the coating depends on several factors for, e. g., 
phosphorus content, porosity, and heat treatment of the coatings. The most 
important factor that affects coating porosity is the surface roughness, which is 
influenced by mechanical preparation of surface and deposition of composite 
particles on the coated sample. To avoid the porosity of the composite coating, 
composite particles must be uniformly distributed over the coated surface. In this 
regard the surfactant plays very important role. Due to the presence of surfactant 
in the electroless bath, the composite particles are uniformly distributed over the 
coated surface and it also increases the corrosion resistance of the coating. 
Recently, much attention is being paid towards nickel phosphorus based 
composite coatings because their properties are much better than the basic Ni-P 
and Ni-B coatings [4].</p>

    <p>According to polarization test results, Araghi et al. [10] have found that Ni-P- 
B4C composite coating exhibited good corrosion resistance but not better than 
Ni-P coating. The reduction in corrosion resistance is due to the creation of 
micro cracks on the surface of the composite coating. Zarebidaki et al. [11] have 
confirmed that the corrosion resistance of Ni-P-SiC coatings depends on the 
dispersion of nano particles throughout the coatings. At higher concentration, the 
SiC particles are agglomerated on the coated surface, which provokes the 
porosity of the composite coating. On the basis of Nyquist plot they also 
confirmed that Ni-P coatings have better corrosion resistance as compared to Ni- 
P/nano-SiC composite coatings. Parveen et al. [12] have found that the addition 
of CNT particles in the zinc coating increases the corrosion resistance. 
Zarebidaki et al. [13] have observed that the proper heat treatment significantly 
improves the coating density and structure. Due to change in coating structure 
and density, the corrosion resistance of Ni-P-CNT composite coating enhanced 
significantly. It is also observed that the corrosion resistance of coating depends 
on various factors such as phosphorus content, nature of corrosion solution, and 
incorporation of composite particles in Ni-P coatings. The experimental results 
confirmed that the Ni-P-CNT composite coating has better corrosion resistance 
as compared to Ni-P coating. As the composite coating has less effective 
metallic area prone to corrosion due to presence of CNT particles. Zarebidaki et 
al. [11] have observed that the porosity percent of the composite coatings 
decreased by increasing incorporation of alumina particles in the composite 
coatings, which results into increase in corrosion resistance. Allahkaram et al. 
[14] have found that incorporation of ZnO nano particles increases the corrosion 
resistance of the coating due to decrease in electrochemically active area of the 
coating surface. Same trend is observed by M. Momenzadeh and S. Sanjabi [15] 
for Ni-P-TiO<sub>2</sub> nano composite coatings in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.</p>

    <p>Rabizadeh et al. [16] have found that Ni-P/nano-SiO<sub>2</sub> composite coatings have 
better corrosion protection as compared to electroless Ni-P coatings because of 
less corrosion prone area available on the surface of composite coatings. Cheng 
lee [17] has found that Ni-P/nano-TiO<sub>2</sub> composite coating with denser structure 
and higher phosphorus content improved the electrochemical properties of the 
composite coating and also found that above 15 g/L TiO<sub>2</sub> concentration the 
corrosion resistance decreased. Cheng Lee [18] has performed immersion test in 
3.5 wt.% NaCl solution for different duration from one hour to 720 hours and 
found that Ni-P-CNT composite coating has higher corrosion protection 
compared to Ni-P/nano composite coating due to denser and uniform distribution 
of composite particles with higher phosphorus content. J. Novakovic and P. 
Vassiliou [19] have found that after vacuum heat treatment composite coating 
has less corrosion resistance as compared to electroless Ni-P coating and similar 
trend is seen in as deposited coating with higher corrosion resistance as 
compared to annealed samples.</p>

    <p>Electrochemical corrosion measurements give a basic picture of corrosion 
behavior of material in a particular corrosion medium. It is clear from literature 
review on Ni-P coatings that the preferential dissolution of nickel occurs at open 
circuit potential, leading to the enrichment of phosphorus on the surface layer. 
The enrich phosphorus on the coated surface reacts with water from the 
electrolyte to form a layer of adsorbed hypophosphite anions, which block the 
supply of water to the electrode surface. It prevents the hydration of nickel, 
which forms a passive nickel film. In general, electroless Ni-P is a barrier 
coating, which protects the substrate surface by sealing off from the corrosive 
environment. The corrosion resistance of electrolessly coated surface depends on 
the amorphous nature and passivity. Amorphous alloy offers better corrosion 
resistance as compared to crystalline or polycrystalline materials because of 
freedom from grain/grain boundaries and glossy film which is formed and 
passivate their surfaces.</p>

    <p>The studies of the corrosion behavior of electroless nickel coating are mainly 
conducted through electrochemical tests, namely, potentiodynamic polarization 
studies and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The resistance of the 
coatings towards corrosion is evaluated on the basis of the corrosion parameters 
obtained from corrosion potential (E<sub>corr</sub>), corrosion current density (I<sub>corr</sub>), charge 
transfer resistance (Rct), double-layer capacitance (Cdl), and corrosion rate (Rc), 
etc. The present study deals with the evaluation of corrosion behavior of the Ni- 
P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite coating, with the help of potentiodynamic polarization tests. 
The Taguchi method together with grey relational analysis is employed to 
optimize the process parameters in order to identify the combination of 
parameters that induce the maximum corrosion resistant properties in the coating. 
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is employed to observe the level of significance 
of the factors and their interactions. In the last, validation of the result obtained 
through the analysis is done with the help of confirmation test. The surface 
morphology and composition of Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> coatings are studied with the help 
of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersed X-ray analysis (EDX) 
and X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD).</p>


    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>Experimental details</b></p>

    <p><b><i>Preparation of composite coating</i></b></p>

    <p>Effective deposition of coating on the substrate depends on the preparation of the 
substrate, hence it is essential to prepare the substrate surface carefully and 
properly. In the present study mild steel (AISI 1040) of size 20 mm &times; 20 mm &times; 2 
mm is used as substrate material for Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite coatings. Shaping, 
parting, milling processes are used accordingly for the preparation of the 
sample. The sample is then subjected to surface grinding process. The substrate 
is mechanically cleaned from foreign matters and corrosion products. After that 
the mild steel substrate is cleaned using distilled water. Sequentially a pickling 
treatment is given to the substrate with dilute (50 %) hydrochloric acid for short 
duration to remove any surface layer formed like rust followed by rinsed with 
distilled water and methanol cleaning. The substrate is activated by dipping into a 
warm palladium chloride solution (55 &deg;C). This step is necessary to start the 
deposition on the substrate as soon as it is placed inside the electroless bath. The 
activated substrate is then immersed into the electroless bath maintained at 85 &deg;C, 
and the coating is carried out for a period of three hours.</p>

    <p><a href="#f1">Fig. 1</a> shows the experimental set up for electroless Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite 
coating.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="f1">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04f1.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>It consists of heater and magnetic stirrer (IKA&reg; RCT basic) with 
temperature ranges from 0 to 310 &deg;C and stirrer speed ranges from 0 to 1500 
rpm. A rigid stand is provided to hold and support the substrate and glass coated 
temperature sensor. Glass beaker (250 mL size) contained with electroless bath 
(200 mL) is provided on the heating plate. The bath temperature is set with the 
help of temperature sensing knob, and stirrer speed can be set with the help of the 
stirrer speed setting knob. The function of the magnetic stirrer is to maintain the 
composite particles in suspension without agglomeration in bottom of glass 
beaker. The stirrer speed can be fixed after large number of trials to avoid the 
instability of the electroless bath due to agglomeration of particles. 
The bath composition and operating conditions for electroless Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> 
composite coatings are selected after several experiments, and proper ranges of 
the parameters are chosen accordingly. The three most important parameters are 
varied and others are kept constant for coating deposition. The electroless bath 
composition and operating conditions used for the deposition electroless Ni-P- 
Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite coatings are shown in <a href="#t1">Table 1</a>.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="t1">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04t1.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>To have better dispersion of 
second phase alumina particles and to avoid agglomeration of particles, a given 
amount of surfactant SDS (Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate) is added to the electroless 
nickel poly alloy bath. About 50 mL of electroless nickel solution containing 
required amount of alumina powder are thoroughly mixed with the help of PTFE 
magnetic stirrer. Magnetic stirrer (Remi make 2MLH) is used to get uniform 
suspension of particles in the solution. At first a Ni-P layer is deposited for 1 
hour to prevent the porosity of the coating and then the solution containing Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> 
particles is introduced into the same bath for the subsequent 2 hours for Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> co-deposition.</p>

    <p>During chemical reaction the nickel sulphate, which is used as source of metallic 
ions, supplies the nickel ions in the solution, while sodium hypophosphite (used 
as a reducing agent) reduces the nickel ions from their positive valence state to 
zero valence state. But as the reaction between nickel sulphate and sodium 
hypophosphite is quite fast and intense, instant decomposition of the bath is 
inevitable. Hence, complexing agents (tri sodium citrate and sodium acetate) are 
required to slow down the reaction into a viable form. Complexing agents form 
meta-stable complexes with nickel ions and release them slowly for the reaction, 
which helps to maintain the stability of electroless bath. But even after the 
addition of complexing agents, there remains a possibility of instability of the 
solution. Hence, a stabilizer (Lead acetate) is needed so that the solution remains 
stable for the duration of the coating. To increase the wettability and surface 
charge of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles surfactant, sodium dodecyl Sulphate (SDS) is used. The 
important functions of surfactant are to lower the surface tension of liquid, easier 
spreading of the particles, and reduce the interfacial tension between the solid 
and liquid surfaces. It reduces the agglomeration of the particles and electrostatic 
adsorption of suspended particles on the substrate [20]. The coating thickness is 
found to lie in the range of 28-32 microns. After coating is over, the samples are 
cleaned with distilled water. To understand the effect of heat treatment on 
corrosion resistance of the composite coatings, the coated samples are annealed 
in a box furnace for 1 hr at different temperatures (300 &deg;C, 400 &deg;C and 500 &deg;C) 
according to the Orthogonal Array (OA). After annealing, the samples are 
cooled to room temperature without the application of any artificial cooling.</p>


    <p><b><i>Optimization of process parameters</i></b></p>

    <p>In composite coating there are several factors which have impact on 
characteristics of coating like as nickel source concentration, reducing agent 
concentration, pH of the solution, bath temperature, stabilizer and wetting agent 
concentration, concentration of second phase particles, substrate, etc. To obtain 
an optimum combination for maximum corrosion resistance the various coating 
parameters are varied within the specific range. However, from literature review 
it is clear that the three factors, viz., concentration of nickel source (nickel 
sulphate solution, A), concentration of reducing agent (sodium hypophosphite 
solution, B), and concentration of second phase particles (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> powder, C), are 
the most commonly used by the researchers to control the properties of 
composite coatings [20-22]. Moreover, annealing is found to have a great effect 
on the corrosion resistance of the coating. Thus, annealing temperature (D) is 
taken into account as the fourth parameter in the experimental design to study its 
effect on the corrosion resistance of the coating. The considered design 
parameters, together with their levels, are shown in <a href="#t2">Table 2</a>.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="t2">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04t2.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>To obtain the desired performance characteristics of the many engineering 
problems, optimization is essential. These problems are dealt with the 
optimization of design parameters to achieve better or desired performance. 
Taguchi design technique is one of the optimization techniques, which is simple 
in use and robust in design. It consists of system design, parameter design, and 
tolerance design. Scientific and engineering information required to produce a 
part is given by the system design. Parameter design suggests the optimum 
combination for process parameter level by analyzing tolerance for developing 
quality characteristics. Hence, an attempt has been made to optimize the 
corrosion behavior of electroless Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite coating using grey 
based Taguchi method [23]. The concept of this method is the optimization of 
process parameters with high quality and low cost. The method recommends the 
use of loss function to measure the quality characteristics. The value of the loss 
function is transformed into a statistical measured called signal to noise ratio 
(S/N ratio). It is the ratio of mean (desirable value or signal) to standard deviation 
(noise). S/N ratio can effectively consider the variation encountered in a set of 
trials. Based on the objective of the study, the S/N ratio characteristics can be 
divided on the basis of three criteria: lower-the-better (LB), higher-the better 
(HB) and nominal-the best (NB). A larger S/N ratio represents minimization of 
noise factors. The combination of parameter levels which gives maximum S/N 
ratio are known as optimum combination of parameter levels.</p>

    <p>The present study deals with evaluation of corrosion characteristics by measuring 
the corrosion current density and corrosion potential. Due to corrosion potential 
and corrosion current density, it becomes a complex multivariate problem and 
cannot be solved by the Taguchi method single-handedly. Because higher S/N 
ratio of one response may correspond to the lower S/N ratio of other. Grey 
relational analysis is an effective tool, which can be employed for the overall 
evaluation of the S/N ratio to optimize the multiple response characteristics. The 
grey system theory was first proposed by Deng in 1989 [24]. Any system in 
nature is neither full of accurate information (white system) nor completely lack 
of information (black system). Mostly the system consists of partial information 
(grey system, which is the mixture of white and black system). The optimization 
of the process is performed in various steps as follows:</p>

    <p>&bull; The result of the experiments is normalized in the range of zero and one by 
performing the grey relational generation.</p>

    <p>&bull; The normalized data represent the correlation between desired experimental 
data and actual experimental data. With the help of normalized data the grey 
relational coefficients are calculated.</p>

    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&bull; By averaging the grey relational coefficients the grey relational grade is 
calculated. The grey relational grade is treated as the overall response of the 
process instead of the multiple responses of corrosion potential and corrosion 
current density.</p>

    <p>A statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) is performed to find the significant 
parameters of the experiment. With ANOVA and grey relational analysis, the 
optimal combination of the process parameters can be predicted. In the last, a 
confirmation test is conducted to verify the optimum process parameters obtained 
from the analysis.</p>

    <p>In the present study, corrosion behavior of electroless Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite 
coating is studied with the help of potentiodynamic polarization characteristics. 
Corrosion potential (E<sub>corr</sub>) and corrosion current density (I<sub>corr</sub>) are obtained from 
the Tafel extrapolation of the polarization curve. E<sub>corr</sub> and I<sub>corr</sub> are taken as the 
response variables for the current density. A positive (nobler) E<sub>corr</sub> value and a 
lower I<sub>corr</sub> value indicate that the coating under test has higher corrosion 
resistance.</p>

    <p>The design of experiment of the present study includes an orthogonal array based 
on Taguchi method to reduce the number of experiments for the optimization of 
the coating process parameters for corrosion characteristics. The selection of 
orthogonal array plays important role to complete the experiment successfully. 
An OA allows one to compute the total degree of freedom (DOF) of main and 
interaction effects via a minimum number of experimental trials. As it is a three 
level four factor experiment the total DOF considering the individual factors and 
their interaction is 20. Hence the L<sub>27</sub> OA is chosen which has 27 rows 
corresponding to the number of experiments and 26 DOF with 13 columns. The 
L<sub>27</sub> OA is shown in <a href="#t3">Table 3</a>.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="t3">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04t3.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>Each row in the table represents the specific 
combination of experimental run and each column represents a specific factor or 
interactions. The cell value indicates the level of corresponding factor or 
interaction assigned to that column. The experimental run is controlled by the 
setting of the design factors and not by the interactions.</p>


    <p><b><i>Potentiodynamic test and microstructure study</i></b></p>

    <p>The potentiodynamic polarization tests of heat treated electroless Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> 
composite coated samples are carried out using a potentiostat (Gill AC) of ACM 
instrument, UK. The tests are conducted by using 3.5% NaCl solution as 
electrolyte at ambient temperature of 30 &deg;C. The electrochemical cell consists of 
three electrodes. A saturated calomel electrode (SCE) is used as reference 
electrode, which provides a stable 'reference' against which the applied potential 
may be accurately measured. A platinum electrode is worked as counter 
electrode or auxiliary electrode, which provides the path for the applied current 
into the solution. The coated specimen is used as working electrode, which 
actually is the sample being interrogated. The design of the cell is such that only 
an area of 1 cm2 of the coated surface is exposed to the electrolyte. 
The experimental set of potentiodynamic polarization test is shown in <a href="#f2">Fig.2</a>.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="f2">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04f2.jpg">
    
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>A settling time of 15 minutes is assigned before every test in order to stabilize the 
open circuit potential (OCP). The potentiostat is controlled with the help of 
personnel computer which also stores the polarization data. The polarization 
curve is obtained from dedicated software, which also possesses a special tool in 
order to extrapolate the values of corrosion potential and corrosion current 
density from the plot. A Tafel ruler is provided with associated software to 
measure the corrosion potential and corrosion current density. A horizontal ruler 
is matched at the junction of cathodic and anodic branch. This point gives the 
value of corrosion potential and the corrosion current density is obtained by 
extrapolating the fitting lines of the anodic and cathodic branches of the Tafel 
curve.</p>

    <p>The weight percentage of nickel, phosphorus, aluminum oxide, and oxygen in the 
composite coating is verified by using energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX 
Corporation). Scanning electron microscope (JEOL, JSM-6360) is used to 
observe the surface morphology of the composite coating before and after the 
heat treatment. This is done in order to analyze the effect of heat treatment on the 
electroless Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite coatings. The phase compositions of 
composite coatings before and after heat treatment are detected by using an X-ray 
diffraction analyzer (Rigaku, Ultima III).</p>


    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>Results and discussion</b></p>

    <p><b><i>Surface morphology and characterization of the composite coating</i></b></p>

    <p><a href="#f3">Fig. 3</a> shows the SEM micrographs of as deposited and heat treated Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> 
composite coating.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="f3">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04f3.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>From the figure it is clear that the coated surface has smooth 
surface with almost uniform distribution of alumina particles over the coated 
surface without any porosity. It is due to the presence of the surfactant (SDS) in 
the electroless bath. When the composite coating is heat treated at 400 &deg;C for one 
hour, the globules of nickel and phosphorus are seen with embedded alumina 
particles. The globules become more compact, which further reduced the 
porosity of the coating. It may result into increase in corrosion resistance of the 
composite coating.</p>

    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><a href="#f4">Fig. 4</a> shows the EDAX analysis of as deposited Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite coating.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="f4">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04f4.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>The EDAX analysis is done on the coatings developed from the bath consisting 
of different concentration of nickel sulpahte, sodium hypophosphite, and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> 
particles.</p>

    <p>From analysis it is confirmed that the composite coating consisting of 5 g/L of 
Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles has 78.07 wt% of nickel, 6.67 wt% of phosphorus, 8.74 wt% of 
oxygen, and 6.52 wt% of alumina particles. Similarly the composite coating with 
10 g/L of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles has 72.46 wt% of nickel, 6.92 wt% of phosphorus, 
11.06 wt% of oxygen, and 9.56 wt% of alumina particles. It indicates that the 
alumina content in the composite coating is increased with increase in Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> 
particles in the electroless bath.</p>

    <p>An X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyzer (Rigaku, Ultima III) is used for 
identification of the different compounds in the electroless Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> 
composite with and without heat treatment. <a href="#f5">Figure 5</a> shows the XRD plots of as 
deposited and heat treated composite coatings.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="f5">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04f5.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>From the figure it is seen that in as deposited condition the phase is mostly 
amorphous in nature as single broad peak is available at the diffraction angle of 
44.468. After heat treatment at 400 &deg;C for one hour, the amorphous phase of 
composite coating gets converted into crystalline phase. Different peaks are seen 
at different diffraction angles. The highest peak of Ni3P with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> is observed at 
the diffraction angle of 44.320. Ni3P peaks are also observed at the diffraction 
angles of 43.1, 43.5, 43.74, 44.26, and 45.04. Similarly peaks of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> are 
observed at diffraction angles of 37.06, 53.46, 55.7, and 77.28. Peaks of Ni are 
observed at diffraction angles of 52.18, and 77.38.</p>


    <p><b><i>Optimization of process parameters and validation test</i></b></p>

    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The present investigation deals with two responses, namely corrosion potential 
and corrosion current density for optimization of corrosion resistance of Ni-P- 
Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite coatings. Grey analysis is a method which converts 
multivariable (response) problem into single response (variable) problem. The 
experimental values of corrosion potential (E<sub>corr</sub>) and corrosion current density 
(I<sub>corr</sub>) from potentiodynamic polarization test are given in <a href="#t4">Table 4</a>.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="t4">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04t4.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>The specific set of calculations are performed to convert the given multiple 
responses into a single performance index also called as grey relational grade.</p>

    <p>Linear normalization of the experimental results, i.e., corrosion potential and 
corrosion current density, in the range of zero and one are essential for 
generating the grey relational coefficient. A material will have lower tendency to 
corrosion if E<sub>corr</sub> value tends to be positive and lower value of I<sub>corr</sub>. From <a href="#t4">Table 4</a> 
it is clear that the values of corrosion potential for all experiments are negative, 
hence higher the better criterion is used for normalization. Similarly for all 
positive values of corrosion current density, lower the better criterion is used for 
normalization. The expressions for higher the better and lower the better criterion 
are given as below.</p>

    <p>Equation for higher the better:</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="e1">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04e1.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>Equation for lower the better:</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="e2">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04e2.jpg">
    
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>where x<sub>i</sub>( k ) is the value after grey relational generation, while min y<sub>i</sub>( k ) 
and max y<sub>i</sub>( k ) are the smallest and largest values of y<sub>i</sub>( k ) for the k<sub>th</sub> response. The 
data after grey relational grade are shown in <a href="#t5">Table 5</a>.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="t5">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04t5.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>The grey relational 
coefficient is calculated from the normalized value and the equation for grey 
relational coefficient is as follows.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="e3">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04e3.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>where &Delta;<sub>oi</sub> = &#449; x<sub>oi</sub>( k ) - x<sub>i</sub>( k ) &#449; 
is the difference of the absolute value between x<sub>oi</sub>( k ) and x<sub>i</sub>( k ). 
&Delta;<sub>min</sub> and &Delta;<sub>max</sub> are the minimum and maximum values of the absolute 
differences (&Delta;<sub>oi</sub>) of all comparing sequences. The grey relational coefficients are 
calculated for the experimental data using &xi; = 0.5. The values of grey relational 
coefficients are shown in <a href="#t5">Table 5</a>.</p>

    <p>The overall multiple response characteristics evaluation is based on grey 
relational grade and is calculated as follows</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="e4">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04e4.jpg">
    
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>where n is the number of process responses. The grey relational grades are 
considered for the optimization of multi response parameter design problem. The 
values of grey relational grades with their order are shown in <a href="#t6">Table 6</a>.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="t6">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04t6.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>To optimize the process parameters for high quality with low cost, Taguchi 
method is the most suitable method. This method uses S/N ratio to convert the 
experimental results into a value for the evaluation characteristics in the optimum 
parameter analysis. Here signal stands for desirable or mean value and noise 
tands for undesirable value (SD). A larger S/N ratio represents a better quality 
characteristic because of the minimization of noise and corresponding process 
parameters are incentive to variation of environmental conditions and other noise 
factors. The S/N ratio is maximized to reduce the effect of random noise factors 
and to significant effect on the process parameters.</p>

    <p>Since the grey relational grade has to be maximized, the S/N ratio is calculated 
using higher the better criterion which is given by:</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="e5">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04e5.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>where y is the observed data and n is the number of observations. As the 
experimental design is orthogonal, it is possible to separate out the effect of each 
coating parameter at different levels. The mean grey relational grade for three 
levels of the four factors is summarized in <a href="#t7">Table 7</a>.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="t7">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04t7.jpg">
    
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>All the calculations are 
performed using Minitab software [25]. The response table shows the average of 
the selected characteristic for each level of the factors. The ranks shown in the 
table are based on Delta statistics and it compares the relative magnitude of 
effects. The Delta statistics is the difference of highest average and lowest 
average of each factor. Ranks are assigned on the basis of Delta values; rank 1 is 
assigned to the highest Delta value, rank 2 is assigned to next highest value, and 
so on. <a href="#f6">Fig. 6</a> shows the main effects plot for mean of grades and <a href="#f7">Fig. 7</a> shows the 
interaction plots between the process parameters.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="f6">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04f6.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="f7">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04f7.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>In the main effects plot if the line for particular parameter is horizontal, then the 
particular parameter has no significant effect. On the other hand, a parameter for 
which the line has maximum inclination will have the most significant effect. 
From the main effect plot it is clear that parameter D (annealing temperature) has 
the most significant effect and parameter C (concentration of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles) 
also has a significant effect. Increase in corrosion resistance of composite coating 
with introduction of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles has also been observed earlier. In Ni-P- 
(Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-TiC) composite coating, the corrosion rate and corrosion current are less 
as compared to the Ni-P coating [6]. In other case [3], the authors have observed 
that corrosion resistance is inreased with increase in Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles. Parameters 
A and B are less significant due to less inclination to the horizontal line.</p>

    <p><a href="#f7">Fig. 7</a> shows the interaction between parameters A, B, and C. From plot it can be 
seen that the lines intersect in all plots, i.e., all factors have some amount of 
interaction between each other. From the interaction plot it can be observed that 
strong interaction between parameter B and C and between parameter A and C 
occurs. Hence from the present analysis it is confirmed that annealing 
temperature and concentration of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles are the significant parameters 
for the corrosion characteristics of Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite coatings. In Taguchi 
method optimum level of combinations are selecting for those levels, which are 
having higher S/N ratios. In the present study the optimal combination is found 
to be A1B3C3D3.</p>

    <p>In the main effects plot if the line for particular parameter is horizontal, then the 
particular parameter has no significant effect. On the other hand, a parameter for 
which the line has maximum inclination will have the most significant effect. 
From the main effect plot it is clear that parameter D (annealing temperature) has 
the most significant effect and parameter C (concentration of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles) 
also has a significant effect. Increase in corrosion resistance of composite coating 
with introduction of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles has also been observed earlier. In Ni-P- 
(Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-TiC) composite coating, the corrosion rate and corrosion current are less 
as compared to the Ni-P coating [6]. In other case [3], the authors have observed 
that corrosion resistance is inreased with increase in Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles. Parameters 
A and B are less significant due to less inclination to the horizontal line.</p>

    <p><a href="#f7">Fig. 7</a> shows the interaction between parameters A, B, and C. From plot it can be 
seen that the lines intersect in all plots, i.e., all factors have some amount of 
interaction between each other. From the interaction plot it can be observed that 
strong interaction between parameter B and C and between parameter A and C 
occurs. Hence from the present analysis it is confirmed that annealing 
temperature and concentration of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles are the significant parameters 
for the corrosion characteristics of Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite coatings. In Taguchi 
method optimum level of combinations are selecting for those levels, which are 
having higher S/N ratios. In the present study the optimal combination is found 
to be A1B3C3D3.</p>

    <p>The influence of the process parameters on corrosion resistance of the coating 
and significance level of the process parameters can be investigated with the help 
of ANOVA. Analysis of variance is a statstical technique which can provide 
some important conclusions based on analysis of the experimental data. ANOVA 
separates the total variability of the response into contribution of each of the 
factors and the error. The results obtained through ANOVA with the mean grey 
relational grade are performed using Minitab software. ANOVA results for 
potentiodynamic behaviour of the composite coatings are shown in <a href="#t8">Table 8</a>.</p> 

    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="t8">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04t8.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>ANOVA calculations are based on the F-ratio, also called as the variance ratio: 
the ratio between variance due to change in the process parameter levels and the 
variance due to experimental error. It is used to measure the significance of the 
parameters under investigation with respect to variance of all the terms included 
in the error term at the desired significance level. If the calculated value is higher 
than the tabulated value, then the factor is significant at the desired level. In 
general, if the F value increases, the significance of the parameter also increases. 
The ANOVA table shows the percentage contribution of each parameter. From 
the table it is observed that parameter D, i.e., the annealing temperature, has the 
most significant effect on the potentiodynamic behaviour at the confidence level 
of 97.5% within the specific test range. The concentration of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles (C) 
is also significant at the 95% confidence level. Among the interactions, the 
interaction of parameters between A and C has the significant contribution. The 
percentage contribution of the factors and interactions is calculated to know the 
influence of the process parameters. From ANOVA's table it is clear that 
parameter D has the largest contribution (18.12%) followed by parameter C 
(15.88%). Among interactions, A&times;C interaction has highest contribution 
(25.48%) followed by B&times;C (16.80%).</p>

    <p>Validation of the result of optimum parameters calculated by Taguchi method is 
the final step. The confirmation experiment is performed by conducting the 
experiment with optimal setting of the factors and levels previously calculated.</p>

    <p>The predicted value of S/N ratio at the optimum level his calculated as</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="e6">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04e6.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>where &eta;<sub>m</sub> is the total mean grade, &eta; is the mean grade at optimal level, and o is the 
number of main design parameters that significantly affect the corrosion 
resistance of Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite coating.</p>

    <p>The results of the validation test in the present study are shown in <a href="#t9">Table 9</a>.</p> 

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="t9">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04t9.jpg">
    
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <p>The improvement of grey relational grade from initial to optimal condition is 
0.262372, which is about 36.72% of the mean relational grade and is a significant 
improvement. The polarization curves for the Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite coatings 
developed at initial and optimal condition are shown in <a href="#f8">Fig. 8</a>.</p>

    <p>&nbsp;</p>
<a name="f8">
<img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a04f8.jpg">
    
<p>&nbsp;</p>


    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>Conclusion</b></p>

    <p>In the present study, Taguchi method in combination with Grey relational 
analysis is used in order to optimize the electrochemical characteristics of 
electroless Ni-P-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite coating via potentiodynamic polarization in 
3.5% NaCl solution. The optimum parameter combination is found to be 
A1B3C3D3. At optimum combination nickel concentration is 35 g/L, reducing 
agent concentration is 25 g/L, concentration of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles is 15 g/L, and 
annealing temperature is 500 &deg;C. From ANOVA results it is confirmed that 
annealing temperature and concentration of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles have most significant 
influence on potentiodynamic behavior of composite coating. The interaction 
between nickel source and concentration of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles has the maximum 
significance among the interactions. The corrosion resistance of the composite 
coating improves with increase in alumina content and annealing temperature 
higher than 400 &deg;C. The improvement of grey relational grade from initial 
condition to the optimal condition is found to be 36.72%. The coating 
composition is studied by EDX analysis. The micro structural analysis and 
crystallization behavior of the coating is studied with the help of SEM and XRD 
analysis. From SEM micrograph it is clear that the alumina particles are 
uniformly distributed over the smooth coated surface without porosity. From 
EDX analysis it is confirmed that the coating is composite coating with the 
presence of alumina particles, nickel, phosphorus, and oxygen. The XRD plots 
reveal that the as deposited composite coating is amorphous in nature and it 
converts into crystalline structure after heat treatment at 400 &deg;C with Ni3P as a 
major compound.</p>


    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><b>References</b></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>1. Balaraju J N, Narayanan T S N S, Seshadri S K. J Appl Electrochem. 2003;33:807.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000132&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>2. Sudagar J, Lian ., Sha W. J Alloys Compd. 2013;571:183.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000134&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>3. Sharma A, Singh A K. J Mater Eng Perform. 2013;22:176.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000136&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>4. Sahoo P, Das S K. Mater Design. 2011;32:1760.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000138&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>5. Apachitei I, Tichelaar F D, Duszczyk J, et al. Surf Coat Tech. 2001;148:284.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000140&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>6. Abdel Aal A, Zaki Z I, Hamid Z A. Mater Sci Eng A. 2007;447, 87.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000142&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>7. Balaraju J N, Narayanan T S N S, Sheshadri SK. Mater Res Bull. 2006;41:847.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000144&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>8. Alirezaei S H, Monirvaghefi S M, Salehi M, et al. Surf Coat Tech. 2004;184:170.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000146&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>9. Riedel W. Electroless nickel plating. Hertfordshire (UK):Stevenage, Finishing Publications Ltd; 1991.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000148&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>10. Araghi A, Paydar M H. Mater Design. 2010;31:3095.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000150&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>11. Zarebidaki A, Allahkaram S R. Micro Nano Lett. 2011;6:937.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000152&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>12. Praveen B M, Venkatesha T V, Naik Y A, et al. Surf Coat Tech. 2007;201:5836.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000154&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>13. Zarebidaki A, Allahkaram S R. Micro Nano Lett. 2012;7:90.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000156&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>14. Allahkaram S R, Alivand R F, Bakhsh M S. Iran J Mater Sci Eng. 2013;10:10.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000158&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>15. Momenzadeh M, Sanjabi S. Mater Corros. 2012;63:7.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000160&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>16. Rabizadeh T, Allahkaram S R. Mater Design. 2011;32:133-138.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000162&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>17. Lee C K. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:8487.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000164&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>18. Lee C K. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:12941.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000166&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>19. Novakovic J, Vassiliou P. Electrochim Acta 2009;54:2499.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000168&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>20. Liu D, Yan Y, Lee K, et al. Mater Corros. 2009;60:690.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000170&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>21. Sahoo P. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2008;41:095305.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000172&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>22. Das S K., Sahoo P. Adv Mechan Eng. 2012;703168.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000174&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>

    <!-- ref --><p>23. Roy R K. A primer on the Taguchi method. Ann Arbor, Mich, USA:Dearborn, Society of Manufacturing Engineers;1990&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000176&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p>24. Deng J. Introduction to Grey System, J Grey System. 1989;1:1.</p>

    <!-- ref --><p>25. Minitab user manual (release 13.2). Making data analysis easier. MINITAB Incorporation, State College, PA, USA;2001.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000178&pid=S0872-1904201400020000400025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>


    <p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p><a name=0></a><sup><a href="#top">*</a></sup>Corresponding author. E-mail address: <a href="mailto:psjume@gmail.com">psjume@gmail.com</a></p>

    <p>Received 16 April 2014; accepted 23 April 2014</p>

    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.peacta.org" target="_blank">www.peacta.org</a> </p>


     ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Balaraju]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Narayanan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T S N S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Seshadri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J Appl Electrochem]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<page-range>807</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sudagar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lian]]></surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J Alloys Compd]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>571</volume>
<page-range>183</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sharma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Singh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J Mater Eng Perform]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>176</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sahoo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Das]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mater Design]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<page-range>1760</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Apachitei]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tichelaar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duszczyk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Surf Coat Tech]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>148</volume>
<page-range>284</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abdel Aal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zaki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hamid]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mater Sci Eng A]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>447</volume>
<page-range>87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Balaraju]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Narayanan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T S N S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sheshadri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mater Res Bull]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<page-range>847</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alirezaei]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Monirvaghefi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salehi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Surf Coat Tech]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>184</volume>
<page-range>170</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Riedel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Electroless nickel plating]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hertfordshire ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Stevenage, Finishing Publications Ltd]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Araghi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paydar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mater Design]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>3095</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zarebidaki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allahkaram]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Micro Nano Lett]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>937</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Praveen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Venkatesha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Naik]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Surf Coat Tech]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>201</volume>
<page-range>5836</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zarebidaki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allahkaram]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Micro Nano Lett]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>90</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allahkaram]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alivand]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bakhsh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Iran J Mater Sci Eng]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Momenzadeh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanjabi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mater Corros]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<page-range>7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rabizadeh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allahkaram]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mater Design]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<page-range>133</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Electrochem Sci]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>8487</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Electrochem Sci]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>12941</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Novakovic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vassiliou]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Electrochim Acta]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<page-range>2499</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Liu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mater Corros]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>60</volume>
<page-range>690</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sahoo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J Phys D: Appl Phys]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<page-range>095305</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Das]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sahoo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Adv Mechan Eng]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<page-range>703168</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A primer on the Taguchi method]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Ann Arbor^eMich Mich]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Dearborn, Society of Manufacturing Engineers]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Deng]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J Grey System]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>1</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Minitab user manual (release 13.2): Making data analysis easier]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[State College^ePA PA]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[MINITAB Incorporation]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
