<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0872-9662</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Comport. Organ. Gest.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0872-9662</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[ISPA - Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0872-96622008000200006</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The importance of Organizational Commitment to Knowledge Management]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rocha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Felipe de Sequeira]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cardoso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Leonor]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tordera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nuria]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade de Coimbra Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universitat de València Facultad de Psicología ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>211</fpage>
<lpage>232</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0872-96622008000200006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0872-96622008000200006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0872-96622008000200006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[In recent years, Knowledge Management (KM) has assumed great importance in the literature on business and management. However, we still have so little understanding of the human issues in KM processes. Thus, this research aims to contribute to analysing the importance of Organizational Commitment (OC) to KM. First, we used the Cardoso (2003) Knowledge Management Questionnaire (QGC) that embraces all organizational activities around knowledge processes and distinguishes four dimensions of KM. Secondly we applied the Quijano, Masip, Navarro and Aubert (1997) questionnaire (ASH-ICI) that distinguishes two types of commitment (personal and instrumental) into four dimensions. These two questionnaires were applied with 300 employees in the Portuguese industrial ceramics sector. Through multiple regression analysis we found that levels of organizational commitment are statistically important to KM dimensions. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that personal commitment is more important than need commitment. These results are discussed and Organizational Behaviour specialists and Work and Organizational psychologists are challenged to assume more responsibility and an active role in KM studies and practices and to explore human issues in this field.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Nos últimos anos, a Gestão do Conhecimento (GC) tem assumido uma grande relevância na literatura da gestão e dos negócios. Contudo, persiste a escassa compreensão dos aspectos humanos nos processos de GC. Deste modo, esta investigação procura contribuir para a análise da importância do Comprometimento Organizacional (CO) para a GC. Em primeiro lugar, utilizámos o Questionário de Gestão do Conhecimento (QGC) de Cardoso (2003) que compreende em si todas as actividades organizacionais constituintes dos processos do conhecimento e que distingue quatro dimensões da GC. Em segundo lugar, aplicámos o questionário (ASH-ICI) de Quijano, Masip, Navarro e Aubert (1997) que distingue dois tipos de comprometimento (pessoal e instrumental) em quatro dimensões. Estes dois questionários foram aplicados a 300 colaboradores do sector industrial cerâmico português. Através da análise de regressão múltipla, verificámos que os níveis de comprometimento organizacional são estatisticamente importantes para as dimensões da GC. Para além disso, a nossa análise indica que o comprometimento pessoal é mais importante do que o comprometimento de necessidade. Estes resultados são discutidos e os especialistas do Comportamento Organizacional e psicólogos do Trabalho e das Organizações são desafiados a assumir uma maior responsabilidade e um papel mais activo nos estudos e práticas da GC, bem como a explorar os aspectos humanos neste campo.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Knowledge Management]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Organizational Commitment]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Gestão do Conhecimento]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Comprometimento Organizacional]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <P><b>The importance of Organizational Commitment to Knowledge Management </b></P>      <P>&nbsp;</P>      <P>Felipe de Sequeira Rocha <sup>1</sup></P>      <P>Leonor Cardoso <sup>1</sup></P>      <P>Nuria Tordera <sup>2</sup></P>      <P>&nbsp;</P>      <P><I><sup>1</sup>Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ci&ecirc;ncias da Educa&ccedil;&atilde;o  da Universidade de Coimbra </I></P>      <P><I><sup>2</sup>Universitat de Val&egrave;ncia, Facultad de Psicolog&iacute;a </I></P>      <P>&nbsp;</P>      <P align="justify"><B>Abstract</B>. In recent years, Knowledge Management (KM)    has assumed great importance in the literature on business and management. However,    we still have so little understanding of the human issues in KM processes. Thus,    this research aims to contribute to analysing the importance of Organizational    Commitment (OC) to KM. First, we used the Cardoso (2003) Knowledge Management    Questionnaire (QGC) that embraces all organizational activities around knowledge    processes and distinguishes four dimensions of KM. Secondly we applied the Quijano,    Masip, Navarro and Aubert (1997) questionnaire (ASH-ICI) that distinguishes    two types of commitment (personal and instrumental) into four dimensions. These    two questionnaires were applied with 300 employees in the Portuguese industrial    ceramics sector. Through multiple regression analysis we found that levels of    organizational commitment are statistically important to KM dimensions. Furthermore,    our analysis indicates that personal commitment is more important than need    commitment. These results are discussed and Organizational Behaviour specialists    and Work and Organizational psychologists are challenged to assume more responsibility    and an active role in KM studies and practices and to explore human issues in    this field.</P>       ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P><I>Key words</I>: Knowledge Management, Organizational Commitment. </P>      <P>&nbsp;</P>      <P align="justify"><B>Resumo</B>. Nos &uacute;ltimos anos, a Gest&atilde;o do    Conhecimento (GC) tem assumido uma grande relev&acirc;ncia na literatura da    gest&atilde;o e dos neg&oacute;cios. Contudo, persiste a escassa compreens&atilde;o    dos aspectos humanos nos processos de GC. Deste modo, esta investiga&ccedil;&atilde;o    procura contribuir para a an&aacute;lise da import&acirc;ncia do Comprometimento    Organizacional (CO) para a GC. Em primeiro lugar, utiliz&aacute;mos o Question&aacute;rio    de Gest&atilde;o do Conhecimento (QGC) de Cardoso (2003) que compreende em si    todas as actividades organizacionais constituintes dos processos do conhecimento    e que distingue quatro dimens&otilde;es da GC. Em segundo lugar, aplic&aacute;mos    o question&aacute;rio (ASH-ICI) de Quijano, Masip, Navarro e Aubert (1997) que    distingue dois tipos de comprometimento (pessoal e instrumental) em quatro dimens&otilde;es.    Estes dois question&aacute;rios foram aplicados a 300 colaboradores do sector    industrial cer&acirc;mico portugu&ecirc;s. Atrav&eacute;s da an&aacute;lise    de regress&atilde;o m&uacute;ltipla, verific&aacute;mos que os n&iacute;veis    de comprometimento organizacional s&atilde;o estatisticamente importantes para    as dimens&otilde;es da GC. Para al&eacute;m disso, a nossa an&aacute;lise indica    que o comprometimento pessoal &eacute; mais importante do que o comprometimento    de necessidade. Estes resultados s&atilde;o discutidos e os especialistas do    Comportamento Organizacional e psic&oacute;logos do Trabalho e das Organiza&ccedil;&otilde;es    s&atilde;o desafiados a assumir uma maior responsabilidade e um papel mais activo    nos estudos e pr&aacute;ticas da GC, bem como a explorar os aspectos humanos    neste campo.</P>       <P><I>Palavras-chave</I>: Gest&atilde;o do Conhecimento, Comprometimento Organizacional. </P>      <P>&nbsp;</P>     <p>Full text only available in PDF format.</p>     <p>Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.</p>     <P>&nbsp;</P>      <p><B>References </B></p>      <!-- ref --><p>Allen, N. J., &amp; Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents  of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization.  <I>Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63</I>, 1-18. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000022&pid=S0872-9662200800020000600001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p>Alvesson, M. (2005). Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity.  <I>Human Relations, 54</I>, 863-886. </P>      <p>Alvesson, M., &amp; Karreman, D. (2001). ODD couple: Making sense of  the curious concept of knowledge management. <I>Journal of Management  Studies, 38 </I>(7), 995-1016. </P>      <p>Anantatmula, V., &amp; Kanungo, S. (2006). Structuring the  underlying relations among the knowledge management outcomes.  <I>Journal of Knowledge Management, 10 </I>(4), 25-42. </P>      <p>Bell, D. (1999). The axial age of technology foreword: 1999. In  <I>The coming of the Post-Industrial Society</I>. New York: Basic Books. </P>      <p>Bhatt, G. D. (2002). Management strategies for individual knowledge  and organizational knowledge. <I>Journal o</I><I>f Knowledge Management,  6 </I>(1), 31-39. </P>      <p>Bontis, N., &amp; Fitz-enz, J. (2002). Intellectual capital ROI: A causal  map of human capital antecedents and consequents. <I>Journal of Intellectual  Capital, 3 </I>(3), 223-247. </P>      <p>Brown, R. (1996). Organizational commitment: Clarifying the concept  and simplifying the existing construct typology. <I>Journal of Vocational  Behavior, 49</I>, 230-251. </P>      <p>Cabrera, A., Collins, W., &amp; Salgado, J. S. (2006). Determinants  of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. <I>International Journal  of Human Resource Management, 17 </I>(2), 254-264. </P>      <p>Cardoso, L. M. (2003). <I>Gerir conhecimento e gerar conhecimento: Estudo emp&iacute;rico    sobre a gest&atilde;o do conhecimento e seu impacto no desempenho organizacional</I>.    Disserta&ccedil;&atilde;o de Doutoramento em Psicologia. Especializa&ccedil;&atilde;o    em Psicologia do Trabalho e das Organiza&ccedil;&otilde;es, apresentada &agrave;    Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ci&ecirc;ncias da Educa&ccedil;&atilde;o da Universidade    de Coimbra. Dispon&iacute;vel no site da Ariadne Editora (<a href="http://www.ariadne-editora.com/" target="_blank">www.ariadne-editora.com</a>).  </P>      <p>Cardoso, L. M., Gomes, A. D., &amp; Rebelo, T. (2005). Constru&ccedil;&atilde;o  e avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o das qualidades psicom&eacute;tricas do Question&aacute;rio  de Gest&atilde;o do Conhecimento (GC). <I>Psicologia Educa&ccedil;&atilde;o e  Cultura, 9 </I>(2), 535-556. </P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Carneiro, A. (2000). How does knowledge management influence innovation  and competitiveness? <I>Journal of Knowledge Management, 4 </I>(2), 87-98. </P>      <p>Carter, C., &amp; Scarbrough, H. (2001). Towards a second generation of  KM? The people management challenge. <I>Education &amp; Training, 43 </I>(4/5),  215-224. </P>      <p>Chase, R. L. (2006). A decade of knowledge management. <I>Journal  of Knowledge Management, 10 </I>(1), 3-5. </P>      <p>Chauvel, D., &amp; Despres, C. (2002). A review of survey research  in knowledge management: 1997-2001. <I>Journal of Knowledge Management,  6 </I>(3), 207-223. </P>      <p>Chowdhury, S. (2005). The role of affect and cognition-based trust  in complex knowledge sharing. <I>Journal of Managerial Issues, 7 </I>(3),  310-326. </P>      <p>Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance.  <I>Journal of Knowledge Management, 9 </I>(3), 101-115. </P>      <p>Davenport, T., &amp; Prusak, L. (2000). <I>Working knowledge: How  organizations manage what they know</I>. London: Harvard Business School Press. </P>      <p>Despres, C., &amp; Chauvel, D. (1999). Knowledge management(s).  <I>Journal of Knowledge Management, 3 </I>(2), 110-120. </P>      <p>Despres, C., &amp; Hiltrop, J. M. (1995). Human resource management in  the knowledge age: Current practice and perspectives on the future.  <I>Employee Relations, 17 </I>(1), 9-23. </P>      <p>Dyer, G., McDonough, B. (2001). &ldquo;The State of KM&rdquo;, Communicator    eNewsletter <a href="http://www.destinationcrm.com/km/dcrm_km_article.asp?id=822&ed=5%2F1%2F01#?id=822&ed=5%2F1%2F01" target="_blank">http://www.destinationcrm.com/km/dcrm_km_article.asp?id=822&amp;ed=5%2F1%2F01#?id=822&amp;ed=5%2F1%2F01</a>  </P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Gloet, M., &amp; Berrel, M. (2003). The dual paradigm nature of knowledge  management: Implications for achieving quality outcomes in human resource management.  <I>Journal of Knowledge Management, 7 </I>(1), 78-89. </P>      <p>Gupta, B., Iyer, S. L., &amp; Aronson, J. E. (2000). Knowledge Management:  practices and challenges. <I>Industrial Management &amp; Data Systems,  100 </I>(1), 17-21. </P>      <p>Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., &amp; Black, W. (1998). <I>Multivariate  data analysis </I>(5th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. </P>      <p>Hislop, D. (2003). Linking human resource management and knowledge  management via commitment: A review and research agenda. <I>Employee Relations,  25 </I>(1/2), 182-202. </P>      <p>Hoof, B. V., &amp; Ridder, J. A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context:  The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC  use on knowledge sharing. <I>Journal of Knowledge Management, 8 </I>(6),  117-130. </P>      <p>Janz, B. D., &amp; Prasarnphanic, P. (2003). Understanding the antecedents  of effective knowledge management: The importance of a knowledge-centred culture.  <I>Decision Science, 34 </I>(2), 351-373. </P>      <p>Kinnear, L., &amp; Sutherland, M. (2000). Determinants of organizational  commitment amongst knowledge workers. <I>South African Journal of Business  Management, 31 </I>(3), 106-112. </P>      <p>Laszlo, K. C., &amp; Laszlo, A. (2002). Evolving knowledge development:  The role of knowledge management in a changing world. <I>Journal of Knowledge  Management, 6 </I>(4), 400-412. </P>      <p>Lease, S. (1998). Annual review, 1993-1997: Work attitudes and outcomes.  <I>Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53</I>, 154-183. </P>      <p>Lin, C. (2006). To share or not to share: Modelling tacit knowledge  sharing, its mediators and antecedents. <I>Journal of Business Ethics, 70</I>,  411-428. </P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Malhotra, Y., &amp; Galletta, D. (2003). Role of commitment and motivations  in knowledge management systems implementation: Theory, conceptualization,  and measurement of antecedents of success. In <I>Proceedings of the 36th  Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences</I>. </P>      <p>Marqu&eacute;s, D. P., &amp; Sim&oacute;n, F. J. (2006). The effect of  knowledge management practices on firm performance. <I>Journal of Knowledge  Management, 10 </I>(3), 143-156. </P>      <p>Mathieu, J. E., &amp; Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis  of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment.  <I>Psychological Bulletin, 108 </I>(2), 171-194. </P>      <p>Mayer, R., &amp; Remus, U. (2003). Implementing process-oriented knowledge  management strategies. <I>Journal of Knowledge Management, 7 </I>(4), 62-75. </P>      <p>McElroy, M. (1999). Second generation knowledge management. <I>IBM Knowledge  Management Consulting Group</I>, June, 1-9. </P>      <p>McElroy, M. (2000). Integrating complexity theory, knowledge management  and organizational learning. <I>Journal of Knowledge Management, 4 </I>(3),  195-203. </P>      <p>McKenzie, J., Truch, A., &amp; Winkelen, C. (2001). Winning commitment  for knowledge management initiatives. <I>Journal of Change Management, 2 </I> (2), 115-127. </P>      <p>Metaoxiotis, K., Ergazakis, K., &amp; Psarras, J. (2005). Exploring  the world of knowledge management: agreements and disagreements in the  academic/practitioner community. <I>Journal of Knowledge Management, 9  </I>(2), 6-18. </P>      <p>Meyer, J. P., &amp; Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization  of organizational commitment. <I>Human Resource Management Review, 1 </I> (1), 61-89. </P>      <p>Meyer, J. P., &amp; Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace  toward a general model. <I>Human Resource Management Review, 11</I>,  299-326. </P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., &amp; Topolnytsky, L. (2002).  Affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization:  A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences. <I>Journal of  Vocational Behaviour, 61</I>, 20-52. </P>      <p>Milton, N. (2005). <I>Knowledge management for teams and project</I>s. Great  Britain: Publishing. </P>      <p>Moffett, S., McAdam, R., &amp; Parkinson, S. (2003). An empirical analysis  of knowledge management applications. <I>Journal of Knowledge Management,  7 </I>(3), 6-26. </P>      <p>Monteiro, S. J. S. (2007). <I>GC: contributos para a conceitualiza&ccedil;&atilde;o  e operacionaliza&ccedil;&atilde;o. Um projecto de investiga&ccedil;&atilde;o-ac&ccedil;&atilde;o</I>.  Tese de Mestrado n&atilde;o publicada. FPCE, Universidade do Porto. </P>      <p>Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., &amp; Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement  of organizational commitment. <I>Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14</I>,  224-247. </P>      <p>Myers, P. S. (1996). <I>Knowledge management and organizational design</I>.  Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. </P>      <p>Nahapiet, J., &amp; Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual  capital and the organizational advantage. <I>Academy of Management Review,  23 </I>(2), 242-266. </P>      <p>Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge creation company. <I>Harvard Business Review</I>,  November-December, 96-104. </P>      <p>Nonaka, I. (1994). Dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation.  <I>Organizational Science, 5 </I>(1), 14-37. </P>      <p>Nonaka, I., &amp; Teece, D. J. (2001). Research directions for Knowledge  Management. In <I>Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and  Utilizations</I>. London: SAGE Publications. </P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., &amp; Konno, N. (2001). SECI, Ba and leadership:  A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. <I>Long Range Planning,  33</I>, 5-34. </P>      <p>Ofek, E., &amp; Sarvary, M. (2001). Leveraging the customer base:  Creating competitive advantage through knowledge management.  <I>Management Science, 47 </I>(11), 1441-1456. </P>      <p>Oliver, S., &amp; Kandadi, K. R. (2006). How to develop knowledge  culture in organizations? A multiple case study of large distributed  organizations. <I>Journal of Knowledge Management, 10 </I>(4), 6-24. </P>      <p>O&rsquo;Reilly, C. A., &amp; Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment  and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification  and internalization on prosocial behaviour. <I>Journal of Applied Psychology,  71</I>, 492-499. </P>      <p>Peltokorpi, V. (2004). Transactive memory directories in small work units.  <I>Personnel Review, 33 </I>(4), 446-467. </P>      <p>Polanyi, M. (1958). <I>Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical  philosophy</I>. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. </P>      <p>Polanyi, M. (1966). <I>The tacit dimension</I>. Gloucester, MA: Peter  Smith, 1983. </P>      <p>Quijano, S. D., Masip, R., Navarro, J., &amp; Aubert, I. (1997).  <I>Conceptualizaci&oacute;n y medida de compromiso y la identificaci&oacute;n  con la organizaci&oacute;n y la implicaci&oacute;n con el trabajo:  An&aacute;lisis de la estructura factorial del cuestionario ASH-ICI</I>.  Comunicaci&oacute;n presentada al VI Congreso Nacional de Psicolog&iacute;a  Social, San Sebasti&aacute;n, 29-30 de Septiembre y 1 de Octubre de 1997. </P>      <p>Quijano, S. D., Navarro, J., &amp; Cornejo, J. M. (2000). Un modelo  integrado de Compromiso e Identificaci&oacute;n con la Organizaci&oacute;n:  an&aacute;lisis del Cuestionario ASH-ICI. <I>Revista de Psicolog&iacute;a  Social Aplicada, 10 </I>(2), 27-57. </P>      <p>Rebelo, T. (2006). <I>Orienta&ccedil;&atilde;o cultural para a  aprendizagem nas organiza&ccedil;&otilde;es: Condicionantes e consequentes</I>.  Disserta&ccedil;&atilde;o de doutoramento n&atilde;o publicada, Faculdade de  Psicologia e de Ci&ecirc;ncias da Educa&ccedil;&atilde;o da Universidade  de Coimbra. </P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Reinhardt, R. (2001). Knowledge management: Linking theory with practice.  In D. Morey, B. Maybury, &amp; B. Thuraisinghan (Eds.), <I>Knowledge Management:  Classic and Contemporary Works</I>. Cambridge: MIT Press. </P>      <p>Robertson, M., &amp; Hammersely, G. O. (2000). Knowledge management  practices within a knowledge-intensive firm: The significance of the  people management dimension. <I>Journal of European Industrial Training,  24 </I>(2-4), 241-253. </P>      <p>Scarbrough, H., &amp; Carter, C. (2000). <I>Investigating knowledge  management</I>. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel Development. </P>      <p>Snyman, M. M., &amp; Kruger, C. J. (2004). The interdependency between  strategic management and strategic knowledge management. <I>Journal of  Knowledge Management, 8 </I>(1), 5-19. </P>      <p>Storey, J., &amp; Quintas, P. (2001). Knowledge management and HRM.  In J. Storey (Ed.), <I>Human Resource Management, a Critical Text</I>.  London: Thomsom Learning. </P>      <P>Takeuchi, H. (2001). Towards a universal management concept of knowledge.  In I. Nonaka, &amp; D. Teece (Eds.), <I>Managing Industrial Knowledge:  Creation, Transfer and Utilizations</I>. London: SAGE Publications. </P>      <P>Takeuchi, H., &amp; Nonaka, I. (2001). Classic work: Theory of organizational  knowledge creation. In D. Morey, B. Maybury, &amp; B. Thuraisinghan (Eds.),  <I>Knowledge Management: Classic and Contemporary Works</I>. Cambridge: MIT Press. </P>      <P>Thompson, M., &amp; Heron, P. (2005). The difference a manager can make:  organizational justice and knowledge worker commitment. <I>International  Journal of Human Resource Management, 16 </I>(3), 383-404. </P>      <P>Tiago, M. T. B., Couto, J. P. A., Tiago, F. G., &amp; Vieira, J. A. C.  (2007). Knowledge management: An overview of European reality. <I>Management  Research News, 30 </I>(2), 100-114. </P>      <P>Tsoukas, H. (2001). What is organizational knowledge? <I>Journal of  Management Studies, 38 </I>(7), 974-993. </P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P>Van der Bij, X. H., Song, M., &amp; Weggeman, M. (2003). An empirical  investigation into the antecedents of knowledge dissemination at the  strategic business unit level. <I>Product Development &amp; Management  Association, 20</I>, 163-179. </P>      <P>Yahya, S., &amp; Goh, W. (2002). Managing human resource toward  achieving knowledge management. <I>Journal of Knowledge Management, 6  </I>(5), 457-468. </P>      <P>Montano, B. R., &amp; Wang, R. (2003). The value of trust in knowledge  sharing. In E. Coakes (Ed.), <I>Knowledge management: current issues and  challenges</I>. Hershey: IGI Publishing. </P>      <P>Wiig, K. M. (2002). <I>Knowledge Management has many facets</I>. Short  Note from Knowledge Research Institute, Inc. </P>      <P>&nbsp;</P>      <p>Address: Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade    de Coimbra, NEFOG - Núcleo de Estudo e Formação em Organização e Gestão, Rua    do Colégio Novo, Apartado 6153, 3001-802 Coimbra, Portugal.    E-mail:<a href="mailto:feliperocha00@gmail.com">feliperocha00@gmail.com</a></p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Occupational Psychology]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<numero>1-18</numero>
<issue>1-18</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
