<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0873-6529</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Sociologia]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0873-6529</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora Mundos Sociais]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0873-65292005000200008</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Mapear o campo artístico]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Mapear o campo artístico]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Mapping the artistic field]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Tracer le champ artistique]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Mapear el campo artístico]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wacquant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Loïc]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,University of California-Berkeley  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,New School for Social Research  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,Centre de Sociologie Européenne  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Paris ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>48</numero>
<fpage>115</fpage>
<lpage>121</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0873-65292005000200008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0873-65292005000200008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0873-65292005000200008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Este artigo analisa a noção de campo artístico de Bourdieu, no intuito de explicar a sua abordagem específica da estética e mapear as características genéricas e as implicações do conceito de campo. A ideia relacional de campo foi desenvolvida ao longo de três décadas para pôr fim à oposição entre análises internalistas e externalistas das práticas e produtos artísticos. O conceito designa uma arena de acção autogovernada que opera simultaneamente como um espaço de forças objectivas e um terreno de lutas em torno de formas de competência e autoridade. A análise de campo é concomitantemente genética e estrutural: implica definir uma topologia de posições sociais pertinentes, caracterizar o habitus dos agentes activos, identificar as fontes e o grau de autonomia que dota o campo da sua capacidade prismática de seleccionar e refractar influências externas e, desse modo, configurar as interacções de acordo com a sua própria morfologia e história.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[This article dissects Bourdieu’s notion of artistic field as a means for explicating his distinctive approach to aesthetics and to map out the generic features and implications of the concept of field. The relational idea of field was developped over three decades to revoke the opposition between internalist and externalist analyses of artistic practices and products. It designates a self-governing arena of action that operates at once as a space of objective forces and a terrain for struggle over forms of competency and authority. Field analysis is at once genetic and structural: it entails drawing a topology of pertinent positions, tracing the habitus of active agents, identifying the sources and degree of autonomy that endows the field with its prismatic capacity to select and refract external influences and thereby shape interactions according to its own morphology and history.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[Cet article analyse la notion de champ artistique de Bourdieu, afin d’expliquer son approche particulière de l’esthétique et de dresser les caractéristiques générales et les enjeux du concept de champ. L’idée relationnelle de champ a été développée au long de trois décennies pour en finir avec l’opposition entre analyses internalistes et externalistes des pratiques et des produits artistiques. Le concept désigne une arène d’action autogouvernée qui opère simultanément comme un espace de forces objectives et comme un terrain de luttes autour de formes de compétence et d’autorité. L’analyse de champ est génétique et structurelle à la fois: elle implique une topologie de positions sociales pertinentes, de caractériser l’habitus des agents actifs, d’identifier les sources et le degré d’autonomie qui dote le champ de sa capacité prismatique à sélectionner et à refouler les influences externes et, partant, de configurer les interactions selon leur propre morphologie et leur histoire.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Este artículo analiza la noción de campo artístico de Bourdieu, con la intención de explicar su abordaje especifico de la estética y mapear las características genéricas y las implicaciones del concepto de campo. La idea relacional de campo fue desarrollada a lo largo de tres décadas para poner fin a la oposición entre análisis internalistas y externalistas de las prácticas y productos artísticos. El concepto designa una arena de acción auto-gobernada que opera simultáneamente como un espacio de fuerzas objetivas y un terreno de luchas en torno a formas de competencia y autoridad. El análisis de campo es al mismo tiempo genético y estructural: implica definir una topología de posiciones sociales pertinentes, caracterizar el habitus de los agentes activos, identificar las fuentes y el grado de autonomía que dota al campo de su capacidad prismática para seleccionar y reflejar influencias externas y, de este modo, configurar las interacciones de acuerdo con su propia morfología e historia.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Pierre Bourdieu]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[campo artístico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[produção cultural]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Pierre Bourdieu]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[artistic field]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[cultural production]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Pierre Bourdieu]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[champ artistique]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[production culturel]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Pierre Bourdieu]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[campo artístico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[producción cultural]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p><strong>Mapear o Campo Art&iacute;stico</strong></p>     <p><I>Lo&#239;c Wacquant</I><a href="#1">*</a><a name="top1"></a> </p>     <P>&nbsp;</P>     <P><B>Resumo</B></P>     <P> <I>Mapear o campo    art&#237;stico</I> </P>     <P> Este artigo analisa    a no&#231;&#227;o de campo art&#237;stico de Bourdieu, no intuito de explicar    a sua abordagem espec&#237;fica da est&#233;tica e mapear as caracter&#237;sticas    gen&#233;ricas e as implica&#231;&#245;es do conceito de campo. A ideia relacional    de campo foi desenvolvida ao longo de tr&#234;s d&#233;cadas para p&#244;r fim    &#224; oposi&#231;&#227;o entre an&#225;lises internalistas e externalistas    das pr&#225;ticas e produtos art&#237;sticos. O conceito designa uma arena de    ac&#231;&#227;o autogovernada que opera simultaneamente como um espa&#231;o    de for&#231;as objectivas e um terreno de lutas em torno de formas de compet&#234;ncia    e autoridade. A an&#225;lise de campo &#233; concomitantemente gen&#233;tica    e estrutural: implica definir uma topologia de posi&#231;&#245;es sociais pertinentes,    caracterizar o <I>habitus</I> dos agentes activos, identificar as fontes e o    grau de autonomia que dota o campo da sua capacidade prism&#225;tica de seleccionar    e refractar influ&#234;ncias externas e, desse modo, configurar as interac&#231;&#245;es    de acordo com a sua pr&#243;pria morfologia e hist&#243;ria. </P>     <P> <U>Palavras-chave</U>    Pierre Bourdieu, campo art&#237;stico, produ&#231;&#227;o cultural. </P>     <P>&nbsp;</P>     <P><B>Abstract</B></P>     <P><I>Mapping the    artistic field</I> </P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P> This article dissects    Bourdieu&#146;s notion of artistic field as a means for explicating his distinctive    approach to aesthetics and to map out the generic features and implications    of the concept of field. The relational idea of field was developped over three    decades to revoke the opposition between internalist and externalist analyses    of artistic practices and products. It designates a self-governing arena of    action that operates at once as a space of objective forces and a terrain for    struggle over forms of competency and authority. Field analysis is at once genetic    and structural: it entails drawing a topology of pertinent positions, tracing    the habitus of active agents, identifying the sources and degree of autonomy    that endows the field with its prismatic capacity to select and refract external    influences and thereby shape interactions according to its own morphology and    history. </P>     <P > <U>Key-words</U>    Pierre Bourdieu, artistic field, cultural production. </P>     <P>&nbsp;</P>     <P><B>R&#233;sum&#233;</B></P>     <P> <I>Tracer le champ    artistique</I> </P>     <P> Cet article analyse    la notion de champ artistique de Bourdieu, afin d&#146;expliquer son approche    particuli&#232;re de l&#146;esth&#233;tique et de dresser les caract&#233;ristiques    g&#233;n&#233;rales et les enjeux du concept de champ. L&#146;id&#233;e relationnelle    de champ a &#233;t&#233; d&#233;velopp&#233;e au long de trois d&#233;cennies    pour en finir avec l&#146;opposition entre analyses internalistes et externalistes    des pratiques et des produits artistiques. Le concept d&#233;signe une ar&#232;ne    d&#146;action autogouvern&#233;e qui op&#232;re simultan&#233;ment comme un    espace de forces objectives et comme un terrain de luttes autour de formes de    comp&#233;tence et d&#146;autorit&#233;. L&#146;analyse de champ est g&#233;n&#233;tique    et structurelle &#224; la fois: elle implique une topologie de positions sociales    pertinentes, de caract&#233;riser l&#146;habitus des agents actifs, d&#146;identifier    les sources et le degr&#233; d&#146;autonomie qui dote le champ de sa capacit&#233;    prismatique &#224; s&#233;lectionner et &#224; refouler les influences externes    et, partant, de configurer les interactions selon leur propre morphologie et    leur histoire. </P>     <P> <U>Mots-cl&#233;s</U> Pierre    Bourdieu, champ artistique, production culturel. </P>     <P>&nbsp;</P>     <P><B>Resumen</B> </P>     <P> <I>Mapear el campo    art&#237;stico</I> </P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P> Este art&#237;culo    analiza la noci&#243;n de campo art&#237;stico de Bourdieu, con la intenci&#243;n    de explicar su abordaje especifico de la est&#233;tica y mapear las caracter&#237;sticas    gen&#233;ricas y las implicaciones del concepto de campo. La idea relacional    de campo fue desarrollada a lo largo de tres d&#233;cadas para poner fin a la    oposici&#243;n entre an&#225;lisis internalistas y externalistas de las pr&#225;cticas    y productos art&#237;sticos. El concepto designa una arena de acci&#243;n auto-gobernada    que opera simult&#225;neamente como un espacio de fuerzas objetivas y un terreno    de luchas en torno a formas de competencia y autoridad. El an&#225;lisis de    campo es al mismo tiempo gen&#233;tico y estructural: implica definir una topolog&#237;a    de posiciones sociales pertinentes, caracterizar el <I>habitus</I> de los agentes    activos, identificar las fuentes y el grado de autonom&#237;a que dota al campo    de su capacidad prism&#225;tica para seleccionar y reflejar influencias externas    y, de este modo, configurar las interacciones de acuerdo con su propia morfolog&#237;a    e historia. </P>     <P> <U>Palabras-clave</U>    Pierre Bourdieu, campo art&#237;stico, producci&#243;n cultural. </P>     <P>&nbsp; </P>     <P>Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF. </P>     <p>Full text only available in PDF format.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>      <P> <B>Refer&#234;ncias    bibliogr&#225;ficas</B> </P>     <!-- ref --><P> <I>Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales</I> (1991), n&#250;mero tem&#225;tico sobre  &#147;Les Avant-Gardes&#148;, 88. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000030&pid=S0873-6529200500020000800001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><P > <I>Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales</I> (1995), n&#250;mero tem&#225;tico sobre  &#147;La musique et les musiciens&#148;, 110. </P>     <P > <I>Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales</I> (1996), n&#250;mero tem&#225;tico sobre  &#147;Litt&#233;rature et politique&#148;, 111-112. </P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P> Becker, Howard (1982), <I>Art Worlds</I>, Berkeley, University of California Press. </P>     <P> Bourdieu, Pierre (1966, 1969), &#147;Intellectual field and creative project&#148;,  em Michael F. D. Young (org.), <I>Knowledge and Control: New Directions for  the Sociology of Education</I>, Londres, Collier-Macmillan, pp. 161-188. </P>     <P > Bourdieu, Pierre (1971, 1991), &#147;Genesis and structure of the religious  field&#148;, <I>Comparative Social Research</I>, 13, pp. 1-43 </P>     <P > Bourdieu, Pierre (com Yvette Delsaut) (1975), &#147;Le couturier et sa griffe:  contribution &#224; une th&#233;orie de la magie&#148;, <I>Actes de la Recherche en Sciences  Sociales</I>, 1, pp. 7-36. </P>     <P> Bourdieu, Pierre (1977, 1980), &#147;The production of belief: contribution  to an economy of symbolic goods&#148;, <I>Media, Culture and Society</I>, 2, pp. 261-293.  Reeditado em Bourdieu, 1993. </P>     <P> Bourdieu, Pierre (1979, 1984), <I>Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement  of Taste</I>, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; Londres, Routledge and  Kegan Paul. </P>     <P> Bourdieu, Pierre (1980, 1990), <I>The Logic of Practice</I>, Cambridge, Polity  Press; Stanford, Stanford University Press. </P>     <P> Bourdieu, Pierre (1983), &#147;The field of cultural production, or the economic  world reversed&#148;, <I>Poetics</I>, 12, pp. 311-356. Reeditado em Bourdieu, 1993. </P>     <P> Bourdieu, Pierre (1986, 1987), &#147;The force of law: towards a sociology of  the juridical field&#148;, <I>Hastings Journal of Law</I>, 38, pp. 209-248. </P>     <P> Bourdieu, Pierre (1987a), &#147;L&#146;institutionnalisation de l&#146;anomie&#148;, <I>Cahiers  du Mus&#233;e National d&#146;Art Moderne, </I>19-20, pp. 6-19. Reeditado em Bourdieu,  1993. </P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P> Bourdieu, Pierre    (1987b), &#147;The historical genesis of a pure aesthetics&#148;, <I>The Journal    of Aesthetics and Art Criticism</I>, em Richard Schusterman (org.), n&#250;mero    especial sobre &#147;Analytic Aesthetics&#148;, pp. 201-210. Reeditado em Bourdieu,    1993. </P>     <P> Bourdieu, Pierre (1988, 1991), <I>The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger</I>,  Cambridge, Polity Press; Stanford, Stanford University Press. </P>     <P> Bourdieu, Pierre (1991) &#147;The peculiar history of scientific reason&#148;, <I>Sociological  Forum</I>, 5-2, pp. 3-26. </P>     <P> Bourdieu, Pierre (1992, 1996), <I>The Rules of the Art: Genesis and Structure  of the Literary Field</I>, Cambridge, Polity Press; Stanford, Stanford University  Press. </P>     <P> Bourdieu Pierre (1993), <I>The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art  and Literature</I>, Cambridge, Polity Press; Nova Iorque, Columbia University  Press. </P>     <P> Bourdieu, Pierre (1994), &#147;L&#146;emprise du journalisme&#148;, <I>Actes de la Recherche  en Sciences Sociales</I>, 101-102, pp. 3-9. </P>     <P> Boschetti, Anna (1985, 1988), <I>The Intellectual Enterprise: Sartre and &#147;Les  Temps Modernes&#148;</I>, Evanston, Northwestern University Press. </P>     <P> Charle, Christophe (1979), <I>La Crise Litt&#233;raire &#224; l&#146;&#201;poque du Naturalisme:  Roman, Th&#233;&#226;tre et Politique</I>, Paris, Presses de l&#146;&#201;cole Normale Sup&#233;rieure. </P>     <P> Charle, Christophe (1991), <I>Naissance des &#147;Intellectuels&#148;, 1880-1900</I>, Paris,  Editions de Minuit. </P>     <P> Christin, Olivier (1991), <I>Une R&#233;volution Symbolique: L&#146;Iconoclasme Hugenot  et la Reconstruction Catholique</I>, Paris, Editions de Minuit. </P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P> Danto, Arthur (1964), &#147;The artworld&#148;, <I>Journal of Philosophy</I>, 61, pp. 571-584. </P>     <P> Fabiani, Jean-Louis (1988), <I>Les Philosophes de la R&#233;publique</I>, Paris, Editions  de Minuit. </P>     <P> Gamboni, Dario (1989), <I>La Plume et le Pinceau: Odilon Redon et la Litt&#233;rature</I>,  Paris, Editions de Minuit. </P>     <P> Heinich, Nathalie (1996), <I>The Glory of Van Gogh: An Anthropology of Admiration</I>,  Princeton, Princeton University Press. </P>     <P> Jurt, Joseph (1995), <I>Das Literarische Feld: Das Koncept Pierre Bourdieu  in Theorie und Praxis</I>, Darmstadt, Wissenchaftsliche Buchgessellschaft. </P>     <P> Menger, Pierre-Michel (1983), <I>Le Paradoxe du Musicien</I>, Paris, Flammarion. </P>     <P> Moi, Toril (1994), <I>Simone de Beauvoir</I>, Oxford e Nova Iorque, Blackwell  Publishers. </P>     <P> Pinto, Louis (1995), <I>Les Neveux de Zarathoustra</I>, Paris, Seuil. </P>     <P> Ponton, R&#233;mi (1977), <I>Le Champ Litt&#233;raire en France de 1865 &#224; 1905</I>, Paris,  EHESS. </P>     <P> Ringer, Fritz (1992), <I>Fields of Knowledge: French Academic Culture in Comparative  Perspective, 1890-1920</I>, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. </P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P> Simonin, Anne (1994), <I>Les &#201;ditions de Minuit, 1942-1955: le Devoir d&#146;Insoumission</I>,  Paris, IMEC &#201;ditions. </P>     <P> Thiesse, Anne-Marie (1991), <I>&#201;crire la France: Le Mouvement R&#233;gionaliste  de Langue Fran&#231;aise entre la Belle &#201;poque e la Lib&#233;ration</I>, Paris, Presses  Universitaires de France. </P>     <P> Verger, Annie (1987), &#147;L&#146;art d&#146;estimer l&#146;art: comment classer l&#146;incomparable&#148;,  <I>Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales</I>, 66/67, pp. 105-12. </P>     <P> Viala, Alain (1985), <I>Naissance de l&#146;&#201;crivain: Sociologie de la    Litt&#233;rature &#224; l&#146;&#194;ge Classique</I>, Paris, Editions de Minuit.  </P>     <P>&nbsp;</P>     <P> <a href="#top1">*</a><a name="1"></a>Lo&#239;c    Wacquant &#233; professor de sociologia na University of California-Berkeley,    Distinguished University Professor de Sociologia e Antropologia na New School    for Social Research, e investigador no Centre de Sociologie Europ&#233;enne    em Paris. <I>E-mail</I>:<a href="mailto:loic@uclink4.berkeley.edu"> loic@uclink4.berkeley.edu    </a></P>      <P>&nbsp;</P>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<numero>88</numero>
<issue>88</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
