<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0873-6529</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0873-6529</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora Mundos Sociais]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0873-65292024000200141</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7458/spp202410532740</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Canónicos, anticanónicos, e nenhum cânone em absoluto: ir &#8220;para além do cânone&#8221; ou escrutinar as opções anticanónicas?]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Canonicals, anti-canonicals, and no canon at all: going &#8220;beyond the canon&#8221; or scrutinizing the anti-canonical options?]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Canoniques, anti-canoniques, et aucun canon du tout: aller &#8220;au-delà du canon&#8221; ou scruter les options anti-canoniques?]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Canónicos, anti-canónicos, y ningún canon en absoluto: ¿Ir &#8220;más allá del canon&#8221; o escrutar las opciones anti-canónicas?]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oliveira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nuno]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Iscte - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia (CIES-Iscte) ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>105</numero>
<fpage>141</fpage>
<lpage>158</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0873-65292024000200141&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0873-65292024000200141&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0873-65292024000200141&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo Respaldando-me na reflexão que um caso concreto suscitou, neste artigo pretendo refutar algumas das reivindicações dos críticos do cânone sociológico, salientando três vícios lógicos no seu raciocínio que designo por facilitismos. Em contrapartida, sugiro três critérios de acesso ao cânone que podem ser utilizados como parâmetros de admissibilidade dos autores sugeridos como alternativos. Para tal, revisito a polémica entre canónicos e anticanónicos retraçando os seus principais argumentos e proponho escrutinar algumas obras emblemáticas do movimento &#8220;para além do cânone&#8221;. Finalmente, sugiro que a discussão deve ser deslocada da retórica do empoderamento para o valor teórico das alternativas apresentadas pelos críticos do cânone.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract Relying on the reflection that a concrete case has raised, in this article I intend to refute some of the claims of the critics of the sociological canon by highlighting three logical vices in their reasoning that I designate as facilitisms. In contrast, I suggest three criteria for access to the canon that can be used as parameters of admissibility of the authors suggested as alternatives. For this, I revisit the controversy between canonicals and anti-canonicals retracing their main arguments and propose to scrutinize some emblematic works of the &#8220;beyond the canon&#8221; movement. Finally, I suggest that the discussion should be shifted from the rhetoric of empowerment to the theoretical value of the alternatives presented by the critics of the canon.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[Résumé En m&#8217;appuyant sur la réflexion qu&#8217;un cas concret a suscitée, dans cet article, je prétends réfuter certaines des revendications des critiques du canon sociologique en soulignant trois vices logiques dans leur raisonnement que je désigne par facilitismes. En revanche, je suggère trois critères d&#8217;accès au canon qui peuvent être utilisés comme paramètres d&#8217;admissibilité des auteurs suggérés comme alternatives. Pour cela, je revisite la controverse entre canoniques et anti-canoniques en retraçant leurs principaux arguments et je propose d&#8217;examiner certaines &#339;uvres emblématiques du mouvement &#8220;au-delà du canon&#8221;. Enfin, je suggère que la discussion devrait être déplacée de la rhétorique de l&#8217;autonomisation à la valeur théorique des alternatives présentées par les critiques du canon.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen Apoyándome en la reflexión que un caso concreto ha suscitado, en este artículo pretendo refutar algunas de las reivindicaciones de los críticos del canon sociológico destacando tres vicios lógicos en su razonamiento que designo como facilitismos. En contrapartida, sugiero tres criterios de acceso al canon que pueden ser utilizados como parámetros de admisibilidad de los autores sugeridos como alternativos. Para ello, revisito la polémica entre canónicos y anti-canónicos retrazando sus principales argumentos y propongo escrutar algunas obras emblemáticas del movimiento &#8220;más allá del canon&#8221;. Finalmente, sugiero que la discusión debe ser desplazada de la retórica del empoderamiento al valor teórico de las alternativas presentadas por los críticos del canon.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[cânone sociológico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[anticanónico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Marx]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Durkheim]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Weber]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[sociological canon]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[anti-canonical]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Marx]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Durkheim]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Weber.]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Canon sociologique]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[anti-canonique]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Marx]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Durkheim]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Weber.]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[canon sociológico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[anti-canónico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Marx]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Durkheim]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Weber.]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bert N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sidye]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rosalind A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Sociological Theory]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berkeley ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Pine Forge Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alatas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Syed F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Alternative Discourses in Asian Social Science - Responses to Eurocentrism]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nova Deli ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sage India]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alatas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Syed F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sinha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Vineeta]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Sociological Theory beyond the Canon]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Londres ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Palgrave McMillan]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alexander]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jeffrey C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Theoretical Logic in Sociology, Positivism, Pre-suppositions and Current Controversies]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Londres ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge and Kegan Paul]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alexander]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jeffrey C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The centrality of the classics]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Giddens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Anthony]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jonathan H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Social Theory Today]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<page-range>11-57</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Stanford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Stanford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Archer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Margaret]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Culture and Agency. The Place of Culture in Social Theory]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[CUP]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bhambra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gurminder]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Rethinking Modernity - Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Basingstoke e Nova Iorque ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Palgrave Macmillan]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Burawoy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Michael]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Manufacturing Consent]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The University of Chicago Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Burawoy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Michael]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Why is classical theory classical? Theorising the canon and canonizing Du Bois]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Classical Sociology]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>3-4</numero>
<issue>3-4</issue>
<page-range>245-59</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alain]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Caillé]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vandenberghe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Frédéric]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Pour Une Nouvelle Sociologie Classique]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Lormont, França ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Les Editions Le Bord de l&#8217;Eau]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chakrabarty]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Dipesh]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Provincializing Europe. Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Princeton ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Princeton University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Collins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Randal]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A sociological guilt trip: comment on Connell]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[AJS]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>102</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1558-64</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Connell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Raewyn]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Why is classical theory classical?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Journal of Sociology]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>102</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1511-57</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Connell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Raewyn]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Southern Theory. The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Polity]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Coser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Louis]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Masters of Sociological Thought]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nova Iorque ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, inc]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crenshaw]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Kimberlé]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist&#8217;s critique of antidiscrimination doctrine]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[University of Chicago Legal Forum]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>139-68</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Durkheim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Emile]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Textes III. Fonctions Sociales et Institutions]]></source>
<year>1975</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Les Editions de Minuit]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eisenstadt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Shmuel N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Multiple modernities]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Daedalus]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>129</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-29</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fararo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Thomas]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Meaning of General Theoretical Sociology]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[CUP]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gaonkar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Dilip P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Alternative Modernities]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Durham ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Duke University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Giddens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Anthony]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Capitalism and Modern Social Theory]]></source>
<year>1971</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[CUP]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heilbron]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Rise of Social Theory]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Polity Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kemple]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Thomas]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A century after Weber and Simmel]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Theory, Culture &amp; Society]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<numero>7-8</numero>
<issue>7-8</issue>
<page-range>421-30</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kivisto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Peter]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Social Theory. Roots and Branches]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<edition>6</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nova Iorque ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kuhn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Thomas S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]]></source>
<year>1963</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Princeton ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[PUP]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Merton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Robert K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Sociology of Science]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The Univ. of Chicago Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Merton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Robert K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Insiders and outsiders: a chapter in the sociology of knowledge]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Journal of Sociology]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>78</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>9-47</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mouzelis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nicos]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[In defence of the sociological canon: a reply to David Parker]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Sociological Review]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>244-53</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mouzelis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nicos]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Modernity: A non-European conceptualization]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[British Journal of Sociology]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>141-59</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[David]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Why bother with Durkheim?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Sociological Review]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>122-46</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Popper]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Karl]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Objective Knowledge]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Clarendon Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Said]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Edward W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Orientalism]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nova Iorque ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Vintage Books]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schutz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alfred]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Natanson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maurice]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A. Schutz, Collected Papers]]></source>
<year>1953</year>
<volume>I</volume>
<page-range>3-47</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Haia ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Nijhoff]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scott]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Conceptualizing the Social World: Principles of Sociological Analysis]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[CUP]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smith]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Dorothy]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Everyday World as Problematic. A Feminist Sociology]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Boston ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Northeastern University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steinmetz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[George]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Major contributions to sociological theory and research on empire, 1830s- present]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steinmetz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[George]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Sociology &amp; Empire. The Imperial Entanglements of a Discipline]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<page-range>1-50</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Durham e Londres ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Duke U. P.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thompson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Edward P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Making of the English Working Class]]></source>
<year>1968</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Londres ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Penguin]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jonathan H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Theoretical Sociology - 1830 to the Present]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[LA ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sage]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wallerstein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Immanuel]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Open the Social Sciences. Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Standford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Standford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Max]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Knies e o problema da irracionalidade]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Metodologia das Ciências Sociais]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<edition>5</edition>
<page-range>104-208</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cortez-Campinas]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wright]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Erik O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Class Counts. Comparative Studies in Class Analysis]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
