Frederico Delgado Rosa *
* Centro em Rede de Investigação em Antropologia, Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal; fdelgadorosa@fcsh.unl.pt.
RESUMO
Tomando como estudo de caso a monografia de Sharon Hutchinson sobre os nuer, o presente artigo explora os quiproquós do diálogo entre a antropologia contemporânea e os clássicos, procurando detetar certas genealogias invisíveis que remontam aos funcionalistas britânicos, e nomeadamente a Evans-Pritchard. Procede a um esbatimento de certas oposições explícitas entre o presente e o passado da antropologia, revelando que as noções clássicas perpassam de forma subterrânea o discurso daqueles que dizem rejeitá-las e que muitas das preocupações atuais já tinham expressão nas etnografias modernas. É demonstrado que as abordagens estáticas – como a de Evans-Pritchard – tinham uma componente histórica e que a antropologia social britânica teve as suas respostas teóricas e metodológicas para as transformações dos contextos africanos sob domínio colonial.
Palavras-chave: história da antropologia, nuer, Evans-Pritchard, funcionalismo, Sharon Hutchinson, colonialismo.
The ghost of Evans-Pritchard: anthropology’s dialogues with its own history
]]> ABSTRACTThrough the reading of Sharon Hutchinson’s monograph on the Nuer, this article explores the misunderstandings between contemporary anthropology and the modern classics. It tries to identify invisible genealogies that go back to the British functionalists, particularly to Evans-Pritchard, and minimizes the explicit oppositions between the present and the past of anthropology. It reveals that some classical notions are detectable in non-explicit ways among those who claim to reject them and, at the same time, that contemporary concerns have their roots in modern ethnographies. The author shows that static approaches – as the one by Evans-Pritchard on the Nuer – had a historical meaning and recalls that British social anthropology had its own theoretical and methodological answers to the transformations of African contexts under colonial rule.
Keywords: History of anthropology, Nuer, Evans-Pritchard, functionalism, Sharon Hutchinson, colonialism.
Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.
Full text only available in PDF format.
BIBLIOGRAFIA
ARENS, W., 1983, “Evans-Pritchard and the prophets: comments on an ethnographic enigma”, Anthropos, 78: 1-16. [ Links ]
CLIFFORD, James, 1983, “On ethnographic authority”, Representations, 2: 118-146.
]]> DARNELL, Regna, 2001, Invisible Genealogies: A History of Americanist Anthropology. Lincoln e Londres, University of Nebraska Press.ERIKSEN, Thomas, 1993, Ethnicity and Nationalism: Anthropological Perspectives. Londres e Boulder, CO, Pluto Press.
EVANS-PRITCHARD, E. E., 1950, “Social anthropology: past and present”, Man, 50 (198): 118-124.
—, 1954, “Foreword”, em P. P. Howell, A Manual of Nuer Law: Being an Account of Customary Law; its Evolution and Development in the Courts Established by the Sudan Government. Londres, Oxford University Press, v-vii.
—, 1961, Anthropology and History. Manchester, Manchester University Press.
—, 1969 [1940], The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Nova Iorque e Oxford, Oxford University Press.
FIRTH, Raymond, 1951, “Contemporary British social anthropology”, American Anthropologist, 53: 474-489.
—, 1964 [1954], “Social organization and social change”, Essays on Social Organization and Values. University of London, The Athlone Press, 30-58.
—, 1964 [1962], “Comment on ‘Dynamic Theory’ in social anthropology”, Essays on Social Organization and Values. University of London, The Athlone Press, 7-29.
FORTES, Meyer, and E. E. EVANS-PRITCHARD, 1983 [1940], “Introdução”, Sistemas Políticos Africanos. Lisboa, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
]]> HOWELL, Paul Philip, 1954, A Manual of Nuer Law: Being an Account of Customary Law; its Evolution and Development in the Courts Established by the Sudan Government. Londres, Oxford University Press.HUTCHINSON, Sharon, 1996, Nuer Dilemmas: Coping with Money, War and the State. Berkeley, University of California Press.
—, 2000, “Nuer ethnicity militarized”, Anthropology Today, 16 (3): 6-13.
INGOLD, Tim, 2008, “Anthropology is not ethnography”, Proceedings of the British Academy, 154, 69-92.
JOHNSON, Douglas H., 1994, The Nuer Prophets: A History of Prophecy from the Upper Nile in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
LEWIS, Herbert S., 1998, “The misrepresentation of anthropology”, American Anthropologist, 100 (3): 716-731.
LIENHARDT, Godfrey, 1974, “E-P: a personal view: Sir Edward Evans-Pritchard 1902--1973”, Man, 9 (2): 299-304.
MALINOWSKI, Bronislaw, 1945, The Dynamics of Culture Change: An Inquiry into Race Relations in Africa. New Haven, Yale University Press.
ORTNER, Sherry, 1984, “Theory in anthropology since the Sixties”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26 (1): 126-166.
—, 2006, Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power and the Acting Subject. Durham e Londres, Duke University Press.
]]> ROSALDO, Renato, 1986, “From the door of his tent: the fiedlworker and the inquisitor”, em James Clifford e George E. Marcus (orgs.), Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, Los Angeles, Londres, University of California Press, 77-97.SCHAPERA, Isaac, 1962, “Should anthropologists be historians?”, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 92 (2): 143-156.
SOUTHALL, Aidan, 1976, “Nuer and Dinka are people: ecology, ethnicity and logical possibility”, Man, n.s., 11 (4): 463-491.
VINCENT, Joan, 1990, Anthropology and Politics: Traditions, Visions, and Trends. Tucson, The University of Arizona Press.
]]>