<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0873-6561</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Etnográfica]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Etnográfica]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0873-6561</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro em Rede de Investigação em Antropologia - CRIA]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0873-65612011000200013</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Usos e Costumes dos Bantu]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thomaz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Omar Ribeiro]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Estadual de Campinas Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>405</fpage>
<lpage>407</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0873-65612011000200013&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0873-65612011000200013&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0873-65612011000200013&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri></article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <P><b>Omar Ribeiro Thomaz </b>(Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Unicamp,    Brazil)</P>     <P>&nbsp;</P>     <P>Obra Recenseada: Henri Junod, <b>Usos e Costumes dos Bantu</b>, Campinas, IFCH/Unicamp,    2009, 436 pp.</P>     <P>&nbsp;</P>     <P>“Classic is not a book (I must stress) that necessarily possesses this or that    set of qualities; it is rather a book that generations of people, urged by different    reasons, read with foregoing zeal and with mysterious loyalty” (Jorge Luis Borges,    “Sobre los clásicos”, in <I>Obras Completas II</I>, Barcelona, Emecé, 1996:    151).</P>     <P>When dealing with the life and work of Henri Junod, Patrick Harries highlights    his standing in the high ranges of the anthropological discipline,[<a name="top1"></a><a href="#1">1</a>]    stressing that authors like Malinowski, Evans-Pritchard, Max Gluckman and, more    recently, Adrian Hastings all remember <I>The Life of a South African Tribe    </I>as a “masterpiece”, a classic of the anthropological field after all. A    unique classic, nonetheless, since it is linked to evolutionist theoretical    assumptions fiercely criticized by the founders of modern anthropology and never    effectively invoked back from the past in any other sense than as part of the    “history of the discipline”. What is the meaning, thus, of all these tributes    to Junod’s work by field anthropologists and ferocious critics of the pre-modern    phase of the discipline? How to reassess nowadays the ethnographic work carried    out by a missionary, created by someone who never gave up what he considered    his primary calling, the conversion of South African natives to Christianity?</P>     <P>There is no doubt that <I>The Life of a South African Tribe </I>is a classic.    It is so, although, in a rather different sense, surpassing the purpose set    to it by its very author. In his view, he was recording for posterity a way    of life doomed to disappear under the advance of European civilization. In which    sense does it reach beyond that? His interest reaches much further than that    of a historian of the discipline. <I>The Life of a South African Tribe</I> seems    to address, on one side, the diverse groups that, unified under the demonymic    of Tsonga, have become the object of Junod’s scrutiny[<a name="top2"></a><a href="#2">2</a>]    – they seem to still regard with vivid interest his masterful work, different    from the modern Nuer, who apparently are, as Sharon E. Hutchinson has noted,    completely immune to the classical study performed by Evans-Pritchard about    their ancestors[<a name="top3"></a><a href="#3">3</a>] – and, on the other side,    the group of anthropologists and historians dedicated to assess the contemporary    situation of the peoples of southern Mozambique. In what refers particularly    to the anthropologists, I would dare to say that their main interest resides    precisely in the kind of anthropology Junod has developed.</P>     <P><I>The Life of a South African Tribe </I>bears all the highly praised traits of the best modern (or  modernist) ethnographic works, even though it has been effectively written  before modernism could have taken root in the field of social anthropology: it  is rigorously assembled on the basis of a thoroughly accomplished fieldwork, and  could only have been written due to the long permanence of the  anthropologist&#8202;/&#8202;ethnographer on the field, to the deep knowledge of the native  language, to the careful selection of qualified informants, accordingly prepared  by the ethnographer and with whom a relationship of genuine friendship comes to  be established.</P>     <P>If Junod’s work approaches the method of what would eventually be  called a modernist anthropology, it also keeps a safe distance from this method,  if only to better overcome it. In many different instances Junod cuts the flow  of the ethnographic prose in order to make room for reflections and information  about how the Tsonga of southern Mozambique would be undergoing contemporary  transformations; his comments figure not only in an introductory section or in  footnotes, as would later become usual for many functionalist or  structural-functionalist texts, and his notes about the ongoing changes are not  restricted to his valuable annexes, they are rather scattered along the whole  text. The case of polygamy is exemplary. Junod not only reflects upon the  advantages and disadvantages of polygamy as an anthropologist, that is, trying  to approach the native point of view, but also challenges frontally the  Christian Tsonga on that thorny subject. How did they, who had undergone a  radical change in their beliefs, perceive polygamy? Similarly, he does not fall  short of pronouncing his own perception, based on the complex set of beliefs of  an ethnographer who is at the same time a Christian missionary. We are dealing  after all with a polyphonic text.</P>     <P>Perhaps one of the most impressive elements of Henri Junod’s  monograph is his assessment of Tsonga history. He strives to recover the  historical dimension in the self-perception of the group, their historical  relations with neighboring groups, with missionaries, soldiers, settlers,  colonial agents, Englishmen, Boers and Portuguese. The Tsonga are far from  fitting into a crystallized representation of Sub-Saharan African groups as  projected upon many actual communities by anthropologists endorsed or not by the  colonial administration. Junod’s historical survey opened many doors for an  anthropology interested in perceiving and describing social transformation,  inspiring in particular a certain heterodox tradition of Anglo-Saxon and, even  more clearly, South-African authors – such names as Isaac Shapera, Max Gluckman,  Hilda Kuper, Adam Kuper, Monica Wilson, and Victor Turner, come to mind, among  many others.</P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P>When reflecting upon the changes and challenges faced by the peoples  of Southern Mozambique, it is strikingly evident that it was not a one-way  development, that the transformation was not heading irreversibly towards  adaptation to the colonial society, contrary to views held by stricter cultural  evolutionist voices. The author cannot hide his surprise at the transformation  that even groups of white settlers were undergoing when living side by side with  indigenous groups, some of them adopting extensive elements of native  traditions, rituals, uses and costumes, and polygamy comes to the forefront here  again as a favorite example for the author, in a development that embodies the  main fear haunting European colonialist minds established in Southern Africa:  the risks of an eventual <I>kafirization </I>of the white  settler.</P>     <P>In the context where Junod’s work was inscribed, evolutionism was,  among the many different available interpretations of cultural diversity, the  most progressive. His humanism and universalism-oriented interlocutors were very  far away: in the colonial context, and even in Europe, racialist ideas were  hegemonic. On one side, there were those who believed that any effort directed  at civilizing or evangelizing peoples living in southern African territories  would bear no fruit at all: the natives would be racially inferior and the  thirst for freedom intrinsic to the heritage of the Enlightenment would amount  to no more than a cherished illusion; on the other side, were those who defended  that European intervention in Africa should be limited to the promotion of an  industrious working ethos among indigenous peoples, based on new forms of  compulsory labor under which the natives would be condemned to perennial  supervision and control by the white settlers. Evolutionism, with the whole  edifice of its historical understanding that would eventually be so thoroughly  criticized, still retained a crucial element inherited from Enlightenment ideas,  both theoretically and practically condemned by contemporaries as something  completely out of fashion and utterly out of touch with the realities of the  colonial endeavor as it was regarded at the turn of the 20th century: the idea  that all human beings are equally perfectible.</P>     <P>However, the most fascinating aspect of Junod’s work is his  procedural perception of the social reality among the Tsonga. And it is from  this perspective that the author establishes a real agenda for the Africanist  anthropology of his time: confronting the entangled notions of individual and  person; entwining basic elements of village life with encompassing structures of  politics and kinship; reassessing institutes of land ownership within the  conflictual process of colonial settlement; highlighting the role played by  magic, witchcraft and religion in native daily life; and finally, achieving a  major empirical discovery, with crucial consequences for the modern  anthropological discipline, regarding the eminence of ritual life and rites of  passage. In political matters, Henri Junod goes way beyond all those who  preceded him, stressing that the African chief was far from being a local  despot, for his power would be subject to multiple social checks and instances  of control. Legitimacy in the discharge of political functions or in the  exercise of political power would be rather anchored in a set of expectations  and practices that would outreach the supposed transcendence of  tradition.</P>     <P>By reading <I>The Life of a South African Tribe </I>today, we are  presented not only to a rich image of how the Tsonga of southern Mozambique  would have been and lived upon the arrival of European settlers, we are rather  thrown straight into what was, and still is, a social universe in undeniable and  violent transformation, a world in turmoil.</P>     <P>&nbsp;</P>     <P><b>Notes</b></P>       <!-- ref --><P><SUP><a name="1"></a>[<a href="#top1">1</a>]</SUP>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;    Patrick Harries, <I>Junod e as Sociedades Africanas: Impacto dos Missionários    Suíços na África Austral</I>. Maputo, Paulinas, 2007, pp. 1-2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000019&pid=S0873-6561201100020001300001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><P><SUP><a name="2"></a>[<a href="#top2">2</a>]</SUP>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;    Published recently in Mozambique under the title (in Portuguese) <I>Usos e Costumes    dos Bantu</I> (Maputo, Arquivo Histórico de Moçambique, 1996), both volumes    of Junod’s work have become a favorite topic of discussion among university    students and an indispensable item to figure in the library of any Mozambican    intelectual.</P>      <P><SUP><a name="3"></a>[<a href="#top3">3</a>]</SUP>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;    Cf. Sharon E. Hutchinson, <I>Nuer Dilemmas: Coping with Money, War, and the    State</I>. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1996.</P>       ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harries]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Patrick]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Junod e as Sociedades Africanas: Impacto dos Missionários Suíços na África Austral]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<page-range>1-2</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Maputo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Paulinas]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
