<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0874-2049</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Psicologia]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Psicologia]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0874-2049</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia (APP)Edições Colibri]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0874-20491999000100004</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17575/rpsicol.v13i1/2.560</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Efeitos da justiça organizacional percebida sobre a satisfação no trabalho e as opções comportamentais]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Organizational perceived justice, job satisfaction and behavioral options]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caetano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[António]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vala]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jorge]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto Superior de Ciências do Trabalho e da Empresa  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Lisboa ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>1999</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>1999</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>1-2</numero>
<fpage>75</fpage>
<lpage>84</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0874-20491999000100004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0874-20491999000100004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0874-20491999000100004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Neste estudo de campo analisam-se as consequências da justiça organizacional percebida sobre a satisfação no trabalho e a implicação organizacional, assim como a influência destas variáveis sobre duas estratégias comportamentais: saída externa e "saída" interna, definidas, respectivamente, como intenção para abandonar a organização e para se transferir internamente. Foram operacionalizadas três dimensões da justiça percebida: distributiva, procedimental e relacional. Analisaram-se três dimensões da satisfação no trabalho: com o funcionamento da organização, com a supervisão, e com o ambiente de trabalho. Os dados foram recolhidos através de um questionário estruturado respondido por 427 colaboradores de uma empresa industrial e analisados através de modelos causais. Os resultados da path analysis revelam que a saída interna é negativamente influenciada pela implicação organizacional e pela justiça procedimental e relacional. A intenção de saída interna influencia positivamente a intenção de saída externa. A intenção de saída externa ainda negativamente influenciada pela implicação organizacional e pela justiça relacional. A implicação organizacional é influenciada pela satisfação com o funcionamento organizacional e pelo ambiente de trabalho. Os resultados revelam também efeitos distintos das três dimensões da justiça organizacional percebida sobre as dimensões de satisfação no trabalho analisadas. Discute-se o interesse desses resultados para pesquisas futuras, nomeadamente no que se refere às distintas consequências das diferentes dimensões de justiça.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The present field study examined the role of the perception of organizational justice in the workplace using a structured questionnaire. The main purpose of this study was to assess the influence of distributive, procedural, and interactional fairness on important job-related aspects, namely, job satisfaction and behavioral options. Three dimensions of job satisfaction were under scrutiny: satisfaction with pay, satisfaction with work climate and satisfaction with leadership. Two behavioral options were also operationalized: external exit and internal exit. Four hundred and twenty seven of a large industrial organization volunteered to answer the questionnaire. Structural equations modeling of the data indicated that the three dimensions of perceived justice (distributive, procedural, and interactional) have distinctive effects on the outcome measures studied. The findings of the present study are discussed with respect to the under standing of the influence of perceived justice on attitudes in organizational settings]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Justiça organizacional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[satisfação no trabalho]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[opções comportamentais]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p><font face="Verdana" size="4"><b>Efeitos da justi&#231;a organizacional percebida sobre a satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho e as op&#231;&#245;es comportamentais</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="3"><b>Organizational perceived justice, job satisfaction and behavioral options </b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Ant&#243;nio Caetano<sup>*</sup>; Jorge Vala<sup>**</sup></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><sup>*-**</sup>Instituto Superior de Ci&#234;ncias do Trabalho e da Empresa, Lisboa.</font></p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>RESUMO</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Neste estudo de campo analisam-se as consequ&#234;ncias da justi&#231;a organizacional percebida sobre a satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho e a implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional, assim como a influ&#234;ncia destas vari&#225;veis sobre duas estrat&#233;gias comportamentais: sa&#237;da externa e &quot;sa&#237;da&quot; interna, definidas, respectivamente, como inten&#231;&#227;o para abandonar a organiza&#231;&#227;o e para se transferir internamente. Foram operacionalizadas tr&#234;s dimens&#245;es da justi&#231;a percebida: distributiva, procedimental e relacional. Analisaram-se tr&#234;s dimens&#245;es da satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho: com o funcionamento da organiza&#231;&#227;o, com a supervis&#227;o, e com o ambiente de trabalho. Os dados foram recolhidos atrav&#233;s de um question&#225;rio estruturado respondido por 427 colaboradores de uma empresa industrial e analisados atrav&#233;s de modelos causais. Os resultados da path analysis revelam que a sa&#237;da interna &#233; negativamente influenciada pela implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional e pela justi&#231;a procedimental e relacional. A inten&#231;&#227;o de sa&#237;da interna influencia positivamente a inten&#231;&#227;o de sa&#237;da externa. A inten&#231;&#227;o de sa&#237;da externa ainda negativamente influenciada pela implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional e pela justi&#231;a relacional. A implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional &#233; influenciada pela satisfa&#231;&#227;o com o funcionamento organizacional e pelo ambiente de trabalho. Os resultados revelam tamb&#233;m efeitos distintos das tr&#234;s dimens&#245;es da justi&#231;a organizacional percebida sobre as dimens&#245;es de satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho analisadas. Discute-se o interesse desses resultados para pesquisas futuras, nomeadamente no que se refere &#224;s distintas consequ&#234;ncias das diferentes dimens&#245;es de justi&#231;a.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Palavras-chave</b>: Justi&#231;a organizacional; satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho; op&#231;&#245;es comportamentais.</font></p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>ABSTRACT</b></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The present field study examined the role of the perception of organizational justice in the workplace using a structured questionnaire. The main purpose of this study was to assess the influence of distributive, procedural, and interactional fairness on important job-related aspects, namely, job satisfaction and behavioral options. Three dimensions of job satisfaction were under scrutiny: satisfaction with pay, satisfaction with work climate and satisfaction with leadership. Two behavioral options were also operationalized: external exit and internal exit. Four hundred and twenty seven of a large industrial organization volunteered to answer the questionnaire. Structural equations modeling of the data indicated that the three dimensions of perceived justice (distributive, procedural, and interactional) have distinctive effects on the outcome measures studied. The findings of the present study are discussed with respect to the under standing of the influence of perceived justice on attitudes in organizational settings.</font></p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Nas &#250;ltimas d&#233;cadas, a investiga&#231;&#227;o em psicologia social e organizacional tem vindo a reconhecer a import&#226;ncia do papel da justi&#231;a percebida sobre o comportamento dos actores sociais e organizacionais.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Ao n&#237;vel organizacional, t&#234;m sido desenvolvidas diferentes abordagens da justi&#231;a, desde os anos 60.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Resumidamente, podem identificar-se tr&#234;s vagas na literatura sobre justi&#231;a percebida.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">A primeira vaga focalizava-se na justi&#231;a distributiva, que se centra na justi&#231;a dos resultados obtidos pelos actores organizacionais em fun&#231;&#227;o do seu contributo para a organiza&#231;&#227;o.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Esta linha de pesquisa emergiu a partir dos trabalhos pioneiros de Homani (1961) e Adams (1963,1965) sobre a teoria da equidade, fundamentalmente preocupada com a justi&#231;a no contexto dos grupos e organiza&#231;&#245;es e centrada na justi&#231;a da&#237; remunera&#231;&#245;es, al&#233;m de outras recompensas recebidas pelas pessoas em troca do trabalho que realizam (Greenberg, 1982).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Neste quadro de refer&#234;ncia, efectuaram-se in&#250;meros estudos em ordem a averiguar como &#233; que as pessoas reagem &#224; justi&#231;a ou injusti&#231;a de decis&#245;es de aloca&#231;&#227;o de recursos. Por exemplo, alguns estudos emp&#237;ricos analisaram a rela&#231;&#227;o da justi&#231;a distributiva percebida com a motiva&#231;&#227;o e a satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">A segunda vaga centrou a sua aten&#231;&#227;o na justi&#231;a procedimental, procurando analisar a justi&#231;a dos procedimentos utilizados na determina&#231;&#227;o das recompensas recebidas pelas pessoas.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Esta linha de pesquisa come&#231;ou com o trabalho de Thibaut e Walker (1975), o qual revelou que as pessoas s&#227;o afectadas pelos processos de justi&#231;a subjacentes &#224;s tomadas de decis&#227;o.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Esta abordagem induziu uma quantidade substancial de estudos emp&#237;ricos, os quais, em geral, t&#234;m suportado as descobertas de Thibaut e Walker.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Os procedimentos de justi&#231;a podem servir dois prop&#243;sitos principais:</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">1) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;em primeiro lugar, podem ajudar a proteger os interesses das pessoas e, assim, a longo prazo, levar a que elas recebam aquilo que lhes &#233; devido;</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">2) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;em segundo lugar, &quot;os procedimentos de justi&#231;a servem como um sinal dado aos indiv&#237;duos de que eles s&#227;o reconhecidos e respeitados como membros de um grupo ou organiza&#231;&#227;o&quot; (Korsgaard <i>et al,</i> 1995).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Globalmente, a teoria sugere que os indiv&#237;duos valorizam os procedimentos de justi&#231;a porque estes constituem um meio de controlo indirecto sobre uma decis&#227;o quando o controlo directo n&#227;o &#233; poss&#237;vel (Thibault e Walker, 1975).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Mais recentemente, t&#234;m estado em discuss&#227;o dois componentes da justi&#231;a procedimental.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">O primeiro componente diz respeito aos procedimentos formais, isto &#233;, &#224; estrutura dos processos de tomada de decis&#227;o.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">O segundo componente refere-se &#224; justi&#231;a com que s&#227;o tratados os indiv&#237;duos aquando da implementa&#231;&#227;o ou da explica&#231;&#227;o daqueles procedimentos e &#233; conhecido como justi&#231;a relacional.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">De acordo com Bies (1987), a justi&#231;a relacional consiste em dois factores:</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">a) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;se as raz&#245;es para a decis&#227;o foram clara e adequadamente explicadas&quot;;</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">b) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;se os indiv&#237;duos que as implementaram trataram com dignidade e respeito as pessoas afectadas pela decis&#227;o&quot; (Brockner e Siegel, 1996).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Esta segunda vaga de pesquisas procurou explicitar os efeitos da justi&#231;a distributiva e da justi&#231;a procedimental sobre as atitudes e comportamentos dos actores organizacionais.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Neste quadro, a investiga&#231;&#227;o tem vindo a mostrar &quot;que as justi&#231;as distributiva e procedimental est&#227;o diferentemente relacionadas com v&#225;rias categorias de vari&#225;veis dependentes&quot; (idem) (e. g., Sweeney &#38; McFarlin, 1993).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">A terceira vaga da investiga&#231;&#227;o sobre justi&#231;a, que se desenvolve actualmente, procura analisar os efeitos conjuntos e de interac&#231;&#227;o da justi&#231;a distributiva e procedimental, incluindo os seus dois componentes, sobre as atitudes e comportamentos dos membros organizacionais.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Assim, hoje, a pesquisa procura integrar os efeitos das diferentes dimens&#245;es da justi&#231;a organizacional percebida.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Especificamente, em contextos organizacionais, a literatura emp&#237;rica tem incidido sobre as consequ&#234;ncias da justi&#231;a percebida sobre o comportamento e as atitudes dos actores organizacionais, nomeadamente em problemas como a satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho, a satisfa&#231;&#227;o com as remunera&#231;&#245;es, a avalia&#231;&#227;o de desempenho, a tomada de decis&#227;o, os comportamentos de cidadania, a implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional e a inten&#231;&#227;o de <i>turnover</i> (e. g., Greenberg, 1987; Folger e Konovsky, 1989; Vermunt, 1993).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Essas pesquisas t&#234;m evidenciado que a justi&#231;a organizacional percebida &#233; um bom preditor de algumas dimens&#245;es da satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho e da implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional, assim como da inten&#231;&#227;o de <i>turnover.</i></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">A satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho pode ser concebida como uma avalia&#231;&#227;o global que uma pessoa faz do seu trabalho e pode descrever-se atrav&#233;s de duas categorias principais: factores individuais, tais como sexo, idade e tra&#231;os, e factores ambientais, tais como remunera&#231;&#227;o, condi&#231;&#245;es de trabalho, rela&#231;&#245;es interpessoais entre colegas e chefia.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Os estudos emp&#237;ricos realizados no quadro da segunda vaga da pesquisa sobre justi&#231;a percebida evidenciaram efeitos principais da justi&#231;a distributiva e da justi&#231;a procedimental sobre alguns daqueles aspectos da satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Noutro quadro de refer&#234;ncia, tem sido realizada uma quantidade substancial de pesquisas em ordem a analisar as consequ&#234;ncias da satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho sobre o comportamento dos membros organizacionais, mas os resultados n&#227;o t&#234;m sido t&#227;o concludentes como se esperava.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Por exemplo, as rela&#231;&#245;es com o desempenho e o absentismo, embora significativas, t&#234;m sido bastante modestas (e. g., Iaffaldano e Muchinsky, 1992). Contudo, a rela&#231;&#227;o de alguns aspectos da satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho com o <i>turnover</i> tem sido mais substancial e negativa. Tamb&#233;m a sua rela&#231;&#227;o com a implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional se revelou significativa (e positiva).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Outra linha de pesquisa analisou a rela&#231;&#227;o entre a implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional e algumas das vari&#225;veis atr&#225;s referidas, tais como o desempenho, o absentismo e o <i>turnover.</i></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Inicialmente definida como &quot;a for&#231;a da identifica&#231;&#227;o do indiv&#237;duo com a organiza&#231;&#227;o e do seu envolvimento nesta&quot; (Mowday, Porter, e Steers, 1982), a implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional tem sido, mais recentemente, conceptualizada atrav&#233;s de duas dimens&#245;es: implica&#231;&#227;o afectiva, que exprime a identifica&#231;&#227;o com a organiza&#231;&#227;o, e implica&#231;&#227;o de perman&#234;ncia <i>(continuance)</i> quando os indiv&#237;duos percebem que t&#234;m ganhos na troca positiva com a organiza&#231;&#227;o</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Resumindo, para al&#233;m de outras predi&#231;&#245;es, a pesquisa sobre a implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional prev&#234; um efeito negativo sobre a sa&#237;da externa ou <i>turnover.</i></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Como se pode ver por esta revis&#227;o muito sum&#225;ria da literatura, t&#234;m sido utilizados separadamente diferentes construtos para estudar os mesmos (ou semelhantes) fen&#243;menos, e estamos, de certo modo, em presen&#231;a de uma esp&#233;cie de explica&#231;&#245;es pe&#231;a a pe&#231;a.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Na nossa perspectiva, e no quadro da terceira vaga de estudos sobre justi&#231;a organizacional, &#233; preciso analisar conjuntamente as consequ&#234;ncias das tr&#234;s dimens&#245;es da justi&#231;a organizacional.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Al&#233;m disso, &#233; necess&#225;rio relacionar aquelas dimens&#245;es de justi&#231;a com a satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho e a implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional, considerando os seus efeitos mediadores sobre as op&#231;&#245;es comportamentais relacionadas com o trabalho nas organiza&#231;&#245;es.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Assim, neste estudo de campo, analisamos as consequ&#234;ncias da justi&#231;a organizacional percebida sobre a satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho e sobre a implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional, assim como as rela&#231;&#245;es destas vari&#225;veis com duas op&#231;&#245;es comportamentais: a sa&#237;da externa e a &quot;sa&#237;da&quot; interna, definida como inten&#231;&#227;o de transfer&#234;ncia na organiza&#231;&#227;o.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Especificamente, utiliz&#225;mos a modela&#231;&#227;o causal para estimar os caminhos da justi&#231;a percebida para:</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">1) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;tr&#234;s dimens&#245;es da satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho;</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">2) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional afectiva e op&#231;&#245;es comportamentais.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Os tr&#234;s aspectos da satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho operacionalizados s&#227;o:</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">1) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;satisfa&#231;&#227;o com o funcionamento da organiza&#231;&#227;o;</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">2) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;satisfa&#231;&#227;o com o clima de trabalho;</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">3) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;satisfa&#231;&#227;o com a chefia.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Hip&#243;teses</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Com base na literatura emp&#237;rica e te&#243;rica, as hip&#243;teses espec&#237;ficas enunciada foram as seguintes:</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">1) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;as percep&#231;&#245;es da justi&#231;a organizacional influenciam positivamente a satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho;</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">2) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;a satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho influencia positivamente a implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional afectiva;</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">3) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;a implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional afectiva influencia negativamente as inten&#231;&#245;es de sa&#237;da interna e externa;</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">4) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;as percep&#231;&#245;es da justi&#231;a organizacional influenciam directamente e negativamente as inten&#231;&#245;es de sa&#237;da interna e externa;</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">5) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;a inten&#231;&#227;o de sa&#237;da interna influenciam positivamente a inten&#231;&#227;o de sa&#237;da externa.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>M&#233;todo</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><i>Sujeitos</i></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Participaram voluntariamente neste estudo 427 empregados duma empresa industrial.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><i>Procedimentos</i></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">OS sujeitos responderam a um question&#225;rio sobre o funcionamento organizacional. O question&#225;rio foi aplicado em grupos de 10 a 18 indiv&#237;duos. Os indicadores relativos a cada vari&#225;vel foram respondidos atrav&#233;s de uma escala de cinco pontos. Os coeficientes de fidelidade s&#227;o todos elevados.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><i>Resultados</i></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Para analisar as hip&#243;teses apresentadas na <a href="#f1">figura 1</a>, utilizaram-se modelos de equa&#231;&#245;es estruturais que permitem examinar a adequa&#231;&#227;o geral do modelo e analisar modelos alternativos (J&#245;reskog e S&#245;rbom, 1989). Compararam-se os &#237;ndices de adequa&#231;&#227;o do modelo proposto com os &#237;ndices do modelo nulo, no qual n&#227;o se analisam rela&#231;&#245;es entre as vari&#225;veis. A mudan&#231;a no qui-quadrado entre o modelo nulo e o modelo proposto &#233; significativa (p&lt;0,001). Estes resultados indicam que o modelo proposto &#233; superior ao modelo nulo, que n&#227;o especifica rela&#231;&#245;es causais entre as vari&#225;veis.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="f1"></a> <img src="/img/revistas/psi/v13n1-2/13n1-2a04f1.jpg">     
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="q1"></a> <img src="/img/revistas/psi/v13n1-2/13n1-2a04q1.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Embora este modelo apresente um &#237;ndice de adequa&#231;&#227;o geral aceit&#225;vel, inclui algumas <i>paths</i> espec&#237;ficas que n&#227;o s&#227;o significativas, tais como a rela&#231;&#227;o da justi&#231;a distributiva com as op&#231;&#245;es comportamentais e com a satisfa&#231;&#227;o com o clima de trabalho.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">O mesmo acontece na rela&#231;&#227;o da justi&#231;a relacional com a satisfa&#231;&#227;o e com o funcionamento da organiza&#231;&#227;o, e na rela&#231;&#227;o entre a satisfa&#231;&#227;o com a chefia e a implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Assim, gerou-se outro modelo restringindo a zero aquelas <i>paths</i> espec&#237;ficas.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Os resultados para o modelo geral (<a href="#q2">quadro 2</a>) indicam que os dados se lhe ajustam muito bem.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="q2"></a> <img src="/img/revistas/psi/v13n1-2/13n1-2a04q2.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Este modelo (<a href="#f2">figura 2</a>) apoia em parte as nossas hip&#243;teses e explica uma quantidade substancial da vari&#226;ncia da sa&#237;da interna e externa.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="f2"></a> <img src="/img/revistas/psi/v13n1-2/13n1-2a03f2.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Mais especificamente, a sa&#237;da interna &#233; negativamente influenciada pela implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional e pelas justi&#231;as procedimental e relacional, como t&#237;nhamos pressuposto.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">De acordo com as hip&#243;teses, a inten&#231;&#227;o de sa&#237;da interna influencia positivamente a inten&#231;&#227;o de sa&#237;da externa, sendo esta ainda negativamente influenciada pela implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional e pela justi&#231;a relacional.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Contudo, a justi&#231;a distributiva n&#227;o teve qualquer influ&#234;ncia directa sobre a inten&#231;&#227;o de sa&#237;da interna nem externa, apenas tem efeito indirecto atrav&#233;s da satisfa&#231;&#227;o com o funcionamento da organiza&#231;&#227;o e da implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">A implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional afectiva &#233; directamente influenciada pela satisfa&#231;&#227;o com o funcionamento da organiza&#231;&#227;o e pela satisfa&#231;&#227;o com o clima de trabalho, mas n&#227;o pela satisfa&#231;&#227;o com a chefia.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">A justi&#231;a procedimental e a distributiva t&#234;m tamb&#233;m efeitos indirectos, atrav&#233;s daquelas dimens&#245;es de satisfa&#231;&#227;o, sobre a implica&#231;&#227;o organizacional afectiva.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Os resultados mostram igualmente efeitos distintos das tr&#234;s dimens&#245;es de justi&#231;a organizacional sobre as dimens&#245;es da satisfa&#231;&#227;o no trabalho consideradas.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">De facto, a justi&#231;a procedimental influencia todos os aspectos da satisfa&#231;&#227;o, enquanto a justi&#231;a distributiva apenas afecta a satisfa&#231;&#227;o com o funcionamento organizacional e com a chefia.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">A justi&#231;a relacional influencia a satisfa&#231;&#227;o com a chefia e a satisfa&#231;&#227;o com o clima de trabalho.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Discuss&#227;o</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Estes resultados real&#231;am alguns aspectos interessantes para futuras pesquisas.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">As diferentes dimens&#245;es da justi&#231;a organizacional percebida (distributiva, procedimental e relacional) t&#234;m consequ&#234;ncias diversas em termos de resultados organizacionais. De facto, os resultados sugerem que a justi&#231;a procedimental joga um papel central na explica&#231;&#227;o quer da satisfa&#231;&#227;o quer das op&#231;&#245;es comportamentais.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Contrariamente &#224; justi&#231;a distributiva, relativamente &#224; qual apenas se detectaram rela&#231;&#245;es fracas, para a justi&#231;a procedimental (ver Vermunt, 1993) as rela&#231;&#245;es foram muito significativas e muito consistentes entre as diferentes medidas, (por exemplo, para os tr&#234;s tipos de satisfa&#231;&#227;o, ou para os dois tipos de op&#231;&#245;es comportamentais).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Este tipo de resultados merece ser testado noutros estudos emp&#237;ricos.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Tamb&#233;m a justi&#231;a relacional se mostrou como um bom preditor directo da inten&#231;&#227;o de sa&#237;da interna.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Os resultados relativos &#224; justi&#231;a procedimental e &#224; relacional est&#227;o na linha de pesquisas anteriores que evidenciaram a import&#226;ncia destas duas dimens&#245;es de justi&#231;a na explica&#231;&#227;o de outros construtos relacionados com atitudes e comportamentos em contextos organizacionais.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Os resultados tamb&#233;m salientam a necessidade de mais estudos sobre as rela&#231;&#245;es entre a justi&#231;a procedimental e a justi&#231;a relacional, assim como entre estas e a justi&#231;a distributiva.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Outro resultado interessante diz respeito &#224;s op&#231;&#245;es comportamentais. Esta pesquisa sugere que a sa&#237;da externa pode ser uma op&#231;&#227;o que emerge depois de ter falhado a sa&#237;da interna, pelo menos, quando se trada de empregados afectivamente implicados com a organiza&#231;&#227;o. De facto, a inten&#231;&#227;o de sa&#237;da interna prediz a inten&#231;&#227;o de sa&#237;da externa, e isso pode significar que, antes de tomarem uma op&#231;&#227;o de <i>turnover,</i> os sujeitos tentam mudar no interior da organiza&#231;&#227;o.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Contudo, este problema necessita de um estudo longitudinal para ser mais aprofundado.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Refer&#234;ncias</b></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. <i>Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67,</i> 422-436.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500423&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), <i>Advances in experimental social psychology</i> (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). Nova Iorque: Academic Press.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500425&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Bateman, T. S., &#38; Strasser, S. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. <i>Academy of Management Journal, 27,</i> 95-112.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500427&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings &#38; B. M. Staw (Eds.), <i>Research in organizational behavior</i> (Vol. 9, pp. 289-319). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Brockner, J. &#38; Siegel, P. (1996). Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: The role of trust. In R. M. Kramer &#38; T. R. Tyler (Eds.), <i>Trust in organizations</i> (pp. 390-413). Londres: Sage.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500430&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Curry, J. R, Wakefield, D. S., Price, J. L., &#38; Mueller, C. W. (1986). On the causal ordering of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. <i>Academy of Management Journal, 29,</i> 847-858.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500432&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Folger, R. &#38; Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. <i>Academy of Management Journal,</i> 32(1), 115-130.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500434&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Greenberg, J. (1987). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: do means justify the ends? <i>Journal of Applied Psychology, 72,</i> 55-61.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500436&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In J. Greenberg &#38; R. L. Cohen (Eds.), <i>Equity and justice in social behavior</i> (pp. 389-435). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Homan, G. C. (1961). <i>Social behavior: Its elementary forms.</i> Nova Iorque: Hartcourt, Brace, &#38; World.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500439&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Iaffaldano, M. T. &#38; Muchinsky, P. M. (1985). Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. <i>Psychological Bulletin, 97,</i> 251-273.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500441&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">J&#246;reskog, K. G. &#38; S&#246;rbom, D. (1989). <i>LISREL 7: Users reference guide.</i> Chicago: Scientific Software.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500443&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., &#38; Sapienza, A. J. (1995). The role of procedural justice in building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams. <i>Academy of Management Journal, 38,</i> 60-84.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500445&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">McGee, G. W. &#38; Ford, R. C. (1987). Two (or more?) dimensions of organizational commitment: Reexamination of the affective and continuance commitment scales. <i>Journal of Applied Psychology, 72,</i> 638-641.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500447&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Meyer, J. R, &#38; Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the &quot;side-bet theory&quot; of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. <i>Journal of Applied Psychology,</i> 69,372-378.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500449&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Meyer, J. P., Paunomen, S. V., Gellatly, I. R., Goffin, R. D., &#38; Jackson, D. N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of the commitment that counts. <i>Journal of Applied Psychology, 74,</i> 152-156.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500451&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., &#38; Steers, R. M. (1982). <i>Employee-organization linkages. The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover.</i> Nova Iorque: Academic Press.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500453&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Reichers, A. E. (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. <i>Academy of Management Review, 10,</i> 465-476.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500455&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. <i>Administrative Science Quarterly, 22,</i> 46-56.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500457&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Sweeney, R D., &#38; McFarlin, D. B. (1993). Workers' evaluations of the &quot;ends&quot; and the &quot;means&quot;: An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. <i>Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55,</i> 23-40.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500459&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Thibaut, J. &#38; Walker, L. (1975). <i>Procedural justice: A psychological analysis.</i> Hillsdale, Nova Iorque: Erlbaum.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500461&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. <i>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,</i> 850-863.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500463&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Tyler, T. R. &#38; Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. Carroll (Ed.), <i>Applied social psychology and organizational settings</i> (pp. 77-98). Hillsdale, Nova Iorque: Erlbaum.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500465&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Vermunt, R., Van der Kloot, W. A. &#38; Van der Meer, J. (1993), &quot;The Effect of Procedural and Interaccional Criteria on Procedural Fairness Judgements&quot;. <i>Social Justice Research, 6,</i> 183-194.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=500467&pid=S0874-2049199900010000400024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Toward an understanding of inequity]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology]]></source>
<year>1963</year>
<volume>67</volume>
<page-range>422-436</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Inequity in social exchange]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Berkowitz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Advances in experimental social psychology]]></source>
<year>1965</year>
<page-range>267-299</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nova Iorque ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Academic Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bateman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Strasser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Academy of Management Journal]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<page-range>95-112</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bies]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cummings]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Staw]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Research in organizational behavior]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<page-range>289-319</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Greenwich ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[JAI Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brockner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Siegel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: The role of trust]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kramer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tyler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Trust in organizations]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<page-range>390-413</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Londres ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sage]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Curry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wakefield]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Price]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mueller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[On the causal ordering of job satisfaction and organizational commitment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Academy of Management Journal]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<page-range>847-858</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Folger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Konovsky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Academy of Management Journal]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>115-130</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Greenberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: do means justify the ends?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Applied Psychology]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>72</volume>
<page-range>55-61</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Greenberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Greenberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cohen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Equity and justice in social behavior]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<page-range>389-435</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[San Diego ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Academic Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Homan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Social behavior: Its elementary forms]]></source>
<year>1961</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nova Iorque ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hartcourt, Brace, & World]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iaffaldano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muchinsky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Bulletin]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>97</volume>
<page-range>251-273</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jöreskog]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K. G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sörbom]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[LISREL 7: Users reference guide]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Scientific Software]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Korsgaard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schweiger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sapienza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The role of procedural justice in building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Academy of Management Journal]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<page-range>60-84</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McGee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Two (or more?) dimensions of organizational commitment: Reexamination of the affective and continuance commitment scales]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Applied Psychology]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>72</volume>
<page-range>638-641</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Testing the "side-bet theory" of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Applied Psychology]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>69</volume>
<page-range>372-378</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paunomen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gellatly]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goffin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jackson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of the commitment that counts]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Applied Psychology]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>74</volume>
<page-range>152-156</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mowday]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Porter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nova Iorque ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Academic Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reichers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Academy of Management Review]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>465-476</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Administrative Science Quarterly]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>46-56</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sweeney]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McFarlin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Workers' evaluations of the "ends" and the "means": An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<page-range>23-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thibaut]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Procedural justice: A psychological analysis]]></source>
<year>1975</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hillsdale, Nova Iorque ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Erlbaum]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tyler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Personality and Social Psychology]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>67</volume>
<page-range>850-863</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tyler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bies]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carroll]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Applied social psychology and organizational settings]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<page-range>77-98</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hillsdale, Nova Iorque ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Erlbaum]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vermunt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van der Kloot]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van der Meer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA["The Effect of Procedural and Interaccional Criteria on Procedural Fairness Judgements"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Social Justice Research]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>183-194</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
