<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0874-5161</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Investigação Operacional]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Inv. Op.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0874-5161</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[APDIO - Associação Portuguesa de Investigação Operacional]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0874-51612006000100006</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[An integer programming model for truss topology optimization]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Faustino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Júdice]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joaquim J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ribeiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Isabel M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Neves]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. Serra]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A04"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade do Porto Faculdade de Engenharia Departamento de Engenharia Civil]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Porto ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade de Coimbra Departamento de Matemática ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto de Telecomunicações  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Coimbra ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A04">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade do Porto Faculdade de Engenharia Departamento de Engenharia Civil]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2006</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2006</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>11</fpage>
<lpage>127</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0874-51612006000100006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0874-51612006000100006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0874-51612006000100006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[In this paper a truss-structure model is described for finding a kinematically stable structure with optimal topology and cross-sectional size and minimum volume. The underlying model findsapplicationsinsomecivil engineering structuraldesignproblemsand takes into consideration all the conditions associated with the limit states usually presented in structural safety codes. Ultimate limit states are treated applying plasticity theory, while serviceability limit states are dealt with via elasticity theory. The admissible solution space is discretised using bar elements. A 0 &#8722; 1 variable is assigned to each one of these elements, in order to indicate if it is or not included in the solution. The mathematical formulation of the model leads to a mixed 0 1 integer nonlinear program with a nonlinear objective function and linear and bilinear constraints. It is shown that this problem can be reduced into a mixed 0 1 integer linear program by exploiting the so- called reformulation-linearization technique. Some computational experience is included to highlight the importance of these formulations in practice.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Truss topology optimization]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[integer programming]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[reformulation-linearization technique]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="center"><b>An integer programming model for truss topology optimization    </b>      <p align="center"> Ana M. Faustino* </p>     <p align="center">Joaquim J. Júdice </p>     <p align="center">† Isabel M. Ribeiro*</p>     <p align="center"> A. Serra Neves ‡ </p>     <p align="center">* Secção de Matemática do Departamento de Engenharia Civil,    Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal <a href="mailto:afausti@fe.up.pt">afausti@fe.up.pt</a></p>     <p align="center"> <a href="mailto:iribeiro@fe.up.pt">iribeiro@fe.up.pt</a></p>     <p align="center"> † Departamento de Matemática da Universidade de Coimbra and    Instituto de Telecomunicações, Coimbra, Portugal <a href="mailto:joaquim.judice@co.it.pt">joaquim.judice@co.it.pt</a>    &nbsp;</p>     <p align="center">‡ Secção de Materiais de Construção do Departamento de Engenharia    Civil, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Porto <a href="mailto:asneves@fe.up.pt">asneves@fe.up.pt</a>    &nbsp;</p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><b>Abstract </b></p>     <p align="justify">In this paper a truss-structure model is described for finding    a kinematically stable structure with optimal topology and cross-sectional size    and minimum volume. The underlying model findsapplicationsinsomecivil engineering    structuraldesignproblemsand takes into consideration all the conditions associated    with the limit states usually presented in structural safety codes. Ultimate    limit states are treated applying plasticity theory, while serviceability limit    states are dealt with via elasticity theory. The admissible solution space is    discretised using bar elements. A 0 &#8722; 1 variable is assigned to each one    of these elements, in order to indicate if it is or not included in the solution.    The mathematical formulation of the model leads to a mixed 0 1 integer nonlinear    program with a nonlinear objective function and linear and bilinear constraints.    It is shown that this problem can be reduced into a mixed 0 1 integer linear    program by exploiting the so– called reformulation–linearization technique.    Some computational experience is included to highlight the importance of these    formulations in practice.</p>     <p> <b>Keywords:</b> Truss topology optimization, integer programming, reformulation-linearization    technique.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>Texto completo apenas disponível em PDF. </p>     <p>Full text only in PDF. </p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>References</b></p>     <p>[1] Eurocode 1 EN 1991. Basis of Design and Actions on Structures. CEN, Brussels,    1998.</p>     <p> [2] Eurocode 2 EN 1992. DesignofConcreteStructures -Part1:GeneralRulesandRulesfor    Buildings. CEN, Brussels, 1999. </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>[3] I. Arora and M. Haung. Methods for optimization of nonlinear problems with    discrete variables: a review. Structural Optimization, 8:69–85, 1994. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=329199&pid=S0874-5161200600010000600001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p>[4] J. Bauer. A survey of methods for discrete optimum structural design. Computer    Assisted Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, 1:27–38, 1994. </p>     <p>[5] M. P. Bendsoe and O. Sigmund. Topology Optimization -Theory, Methods and    Applications. Springer, 2003. </p>     <p>[6] S. Bollapragada, O. Ghattas, and J. Hoocker. Optimal design of truss structures    by logic-based branch and cut. Operations Research, 49:42–51, 2001. </p>     <p>[7] A. Brooke, D. Kendrick, A. Meeraus, and R. Raman. GAMS a User’s Guide.    GAMS Development Corporation, New York, 1998.</p>     <p> [8] W. Dobbs and L. Felton. Optimization of truss geometry. ASCE Journal of    Structural Division, 95:2105–2118, 1969. </p>     <p>[9] W. Dorn, R. Gomory, and H. Greenberg. Automatic design of optimal structures.    Journal de Mécanique, 3:25–52, 1964. </p>     <p>[10] A. Ghali and A. M. Nevilleand T. G. Brown. Structural analysis: A unified    classical and matrix approach. Spon Press, London, 2003.</p>     <p> [11] O. Ghattas and I. Grossmann. MINLP and milp strategies for discrete sizing    structural optimization problems. In Proceedings of ASCE 10th Conference on    Electronic Computation. Indianapolis, 1991. </p>     <p>[12] A.Ghosh andA.Mllik. Theory of Mechanisms and Machines.Affiliated East-WestPress,    New Delhi, 1988.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p> [13] I.Grossmann,V.T.Voudouris, andO.Ghattas. Mixed-integerlinearprogramming    formulations of some nonlinear discrete design optimization problems. In C.    A. Floudas and P. M. Pardalos, editors, Recent Advances in Global Optimization.    Princeton University Press, 1992. </p>     <p>[14] X. Guo and G. Cheng. An extrapolation approach for the solution of singular    optima. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 19:255–262, 2000.</p>     <p> [15] X.Guo,G.Cheng, andK.Yamazaki.A newapproachforthesolutionof singularoptima    in truss topology optimization with tress and local buckling constraints. Structural    and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 22:364–372, 2001.</p>     <p>[16] A.Hoback.Optimizationof singularproblems. StructuralOptimization,12:93–97,1996.</p>     <p> [17] U. Kirsch.Onsingulartopologiesinoptimumstructuraldesign. StructuralOptimization,    2:133–142, 1990. </p>     <p>[18] G. Rozvany. Difficulties in truss topology optimization with stress, local    bucking and system stability constraints. Structural Optimization, 11:213–217,    1996.</p>     <p> [19] G. Rozvany, M. Bendsoe, and Kirsch. Layout optimization of structures.    Applied Mechanics Reviews, 48:41–118, 1995.</p>     <p> [20] E.Salajegheh andG.Vanderplaats.Optimumdesignof trusseswithdiscretesizing    and shape variables. Structural Optimization, 6:79–85, 1993.</p>     <p> [21] H. Sherali and W. Adams. A Reformulation-Linearization Technique for    Solving Discrete and Continuous Nonconvex Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers,    Boston, 1999. </p>     <p>[22] H. Simon. The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1969.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p> [23] M. Stolpe and k. Svanberg. Modeling topology optimization problems as    mixed linear programs. In Optimization and Systems Theory. Department of Mathematics,    Royal Institute ofTechnology(KTH),SE-10044Stockholm,Sweden,2001.</p>     <p> [24] G. Sved and Z. Ginos. Structural optimization under multiple loading.    International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 10:803–805, 1968.</p>     <p> [25] A.Templeman.Heuristicmethodsindiscretestructuraloptimization.InW.Gutkowski,    editor, DiscreteStructuralOptimization,pages135–165.CISMCourses andLecturesNo.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>       ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arora]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Haung]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Methods for optimization of nonlinear problems with discrete variables: a review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Structural Optimization]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>69-85</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
