<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0874-5560</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Ex aequo]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Ex aequo]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0874-5560</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Associação Portuguesa de Estudos sobre as Mulheres - APEM]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0874-55602008000200002</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Opportunities and risks in times of globalisation - how gender affects working patterns in different occupations]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Oportunidades e riscos em tempos de globalização - a influência do género no exercício de diferentes profissões]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Opportunités et risques dus a la mondialisation - L’influence du genre dans l’exercice des professions]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nierling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Linda]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Krings]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bettina-Johanna]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,ITAS - Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis Research Centre Karlsruhe ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen ]]></addr-line>
<country>Germany</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>18</numero>
<fpage>11</fpage>
<lpage>38</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0874-55602008000200002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0874-55602008000200002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0874-55602008000200002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Globalisation processes deeply affect living and working realities of men and women in industrialised societies. Whereas the public and academic discourse of global restructuring is widely gender neutral, the introduction of the gender dimension plays a central role in order to understand the manifold effects of globalisation on a local level. On the basis of a huge qualitative study on global change processes and their impact on occupations in different sectors this article argues that male and female realities in globalised working processes have changed distinctively. With regard to the gendered division of labour in the frame of globalisation, empirical findings will be presented which aim to provide an insight in changing working and living conditions of women and men on the local level facing global developments. In which way these processes enable or disable women’s access to societal resources will be discussed with regard to changing or maintaining gender regimes in these occupations.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Os processos de globalização afectam profundamente as condições de vida e de trabalho de homens e mulheres nas sociedades industrializadas. Embora o discurso público e académico em torno da reestruturação global tenda a ser silencioso relativamente à influência do género, a introdução desta dimensão assume uma preponderância central quando se trata de procurar compreender os múltiplos efeitos da globalização a nível local. Baseando-se num estudo qualitativo extensivo sobre os processos de mudança global e as suas implicações nas profissões de vários sectores de actividade, este artigo sustenta que as realidades masculinas e femininas nos processos de trabalho globalizados se têm alterado de modo distinto. No que se refere à divisão sexual do trabalho no quadro da globalização, os resultados empíricos apresentados procuram destacar as alterações nas condições de vida e de trabalho de mulheres e homens a nível global e em face de desenvolvimentos globais. Na tentativa de perspectivar a manutenção ou a mudança das estruturas ligadas ao género nas profissões estudadas, discute-se em que medida aqueles processos possibilitam ou impossibilitam o acesso das mulheres a recursos da sociedade.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[Les processus de la mondialisation influencent fortement les conditions de vie et de travail des hommes et des femmes dans les sociétés industrialisées. Quoique le discours public et académique n’aborde presque pas les aspects de genre, l’introduction de la dimension de genre joue un rôle central pour la compréhension des effets multiples de la mondialisation au niveau local. Sur la base d’une vaste étude qualitative sur les processus de changement mondiaux et leur impact sur les différentes professions dans les différents secteurs, cet article argumente que les réalités de travail des hommes et des femmes ont fortement changées dans un contexte mondialisé. En ce qui concerne la division de travail entre les sexes dans le cadre de la mondialisation, des résultats empiriques seront présentés avec le but de démontrer les conditions de travail et de vie en transition des hommes et des femmes face aux changements mondiaux. Tout en essayant de voir s’il faut maintenir ou changer des structures liées au genre dans les activités étudiées, ont débat dans quelle mesure ces processus améliorent ou dégradent l’accès des femmes aux ressources de la société.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[globalisation, global restructuring]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[gender studies]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[work]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[occupational restructuring]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[globalização]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[reestruturação global]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[estudos de género]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[trabalho]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[reestruturação profissional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Globalisation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[restructuration globale]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[études de genre]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[travail]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[restructuration professionnelle]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p><b>Opportunities and risks in times of globalisation &#8211; how gender affects    working patterns in different occupations</b></p> 	     <p align="right"><b>Linda Nierling<sup>1</sup> </b></p>     <p align="right"><b>Bettina-Johanna Krings<sup>1</sup></b></p>     <p align="right">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="right"><sup>1</sup>Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis    (ITAS), Research Centre Karlsruhe</p>     <p>&nbsp;      </p>     <p><b>Abstract</b> </p>     <p>Globalisation processes deeply affect living and working realities of men and    women in industrialised societies. Whereas the public and academic discourse    of global restructuring is widely gender neutral, the introduction of the gender    dimension plays a central role in order to understand the manifold effects of    globalisation on a local level. On the basis of a huge qualitative study on    global change processes and their impact on occupations in different sectors    this article argues that male and female realities in globalised working processes    have changed distinctively. With regard to the gendered division of labour in    the frame of globalisation, empirical findings will be presented which aim to    provide an insight in changing working and living conditions of women and men    on the local level facing global developments. In which way these processes    enable or disable women’s access to societal resources will be discussed with    regard to changing or maintaining gender regimes in these occupations.</p> 			    <p><b>Keywords</b> globalisation, global restructuring, gender  			studies, work, occupational restructuring</p> 			    <p>&nbsp;</p> 			     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Resumo</b> </p>     <p><b>Oportunidades e riscos em tempos de globalização – a influência do género    no exercício de diferentes profissões</b> </p>     <p>Os processos de globalização afectam profundamente as condições de vida e de    trabalho de homens e mulheres nas sociedades industrializadas. Embora o discurso    público e académico em torno da reestruturação global tenda a ser silencioso    relativamente à influência do género, a introdução desta dimensão assume uma    preponderância central quando se trata de procurar compreender os múltiplos    efeitos da globalização a nível local. Baseando-se num estudo qualitativo extensivo    sobre os processos de mudança global e as suas implicações nas profissões de    vários sectores de actividade, este artigo sustenta que as realidades masculinas    e femininas nos processos de trabalho globalizados se têm alterado de modo distinto.    No que se refere à divisão sexual do trabalho no quadro da globalização, os    resultados empíricos apresentados procuram destacar as alterações nas condições    de vida e de trabalho de mulheres e homens a nível global e em face de desenvolvimentos    globais. Na tentativa de perspectivar a manutenção ou a mudança das estruturas    ligadas ao género nas profissões estudadas, discute-se em que medida aqueles    processos possibilitam ou impossibilitam o acesso das mulheres a recursos da    sociedade.</p> 			    <p><b>Palavras-chave</b> globalização; reestruturação global;  			estudos de género; trabalho; reestruturação profissional.</p> 			    <p>&nbsp;</p> 			     <p><b>Résumé</b> </p>     <p><b>Opportunités et risques dus a la mondialisation – L’influence du genre dans    l’exercice des professions</b> </p>     <p>Les processus de la mondialisation influencent fortement les conditions de    vie et de travail des hommes et des femmes dans les sociétés industrialisées.    Quoique le discours public et académique n’aborde presque pas les aspects de    genre, l’introduction de la dimension de genre joue un rôle central pour la    compréhension des effets multiples de la mondialisation au niveau local. Sur    la base d’une vaste étude qualitative sur les processus de changement mondiaux    et leur impact sur les différentes professions dans les différents secteurs,    cet article argumente que les réalités de travail des hommes et des femmes ont    fortement changées dans un contexte mondialisé.</p> 			    <p>En ce qui concerne la division de travail entre les sexes dans le  			cadre de la mondialisation, des résultats empiriques seront  			présentés avec le but de démontrer les conditions de travail et de  			vie en transition des hommes et des femmes face aux changements  			mondiaux. Tout en essayant de voir s’il faut maintenir ou changer  			des structures liées au genre dans les activités étudiées, ont débat  			dans quelle mesure ces processus améliorent ou dégradent l’accès des  			femmes aux ressources de la société.</p> 			     <p><b>Mots-clés:</b> Globalisation; restructuration globale; études de genre;    travail; restructuration professionnelle</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p> 			    <p align="center">&nbsp;</p> 			    <p align="center"><i>«Two vectors shape the world – technology and  			globalisation. The first helps  			determine human preferences, the second economic realities (...).  			Given what is 			everywhere the purpose of commerce, the global company will shape  			the vectors 			of technology and globalisation into its great strategic fecundity» 			</i>(Theodore Levitt 1983, in Hack, 2007: 28).</p> 			     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Introduction</b><sup><a name="top2" href="#2"><u>1</u></a></sup></p> 			    <p>Since the beginning of the 1990s, technological and political  			processes have had a strong impact on the reorganisation of global  			value chains. On a global scale, these restructuring processes have  			strongly reinforced new forms of the international division of  			labour, and this in turn has affected working conditions at the  			local level (Huws, 2006).</p> 			    <p>Although a few decades ago, the commutability of white-collar  			work seemed «untouchable», technical expertise now offers options  			for offshoring and outsourcing these activities. Thus, it is now not  			only repetitive tasks or lower qualified activities in the  			production sector that have been relocated elsewhere in the world,  			but also «knowledge-based» activities like software development,  			administration, and service-oriented tasks. In academic debates,  			transnational corporations are considered particularly important  			driving factors in these developments. There is general agreement  			that their dominance is growing not only in national and  			international markets, but also as a new business model in terms of  			production and distribution modes, at least in highly industrialised  			societies (Hirsch-Kreinsen, 1998; Kotthoff, 2001; Hack, 2007).</p> 			    <p>Taking these processes into account, it seems that the combined  			impact of economic pressure, technological innovations and the  			restructuring of organisations has very much influenced the working  			conditions of nearly all occupational groups in most European  			countries. On the basis of the empirical findings from a large  			European research project<sup><u><a name="top3" href="#3">2</a></u></sup>,  			this contribution focuses on qualitative changes at the workplace  			level caused by global restructuring. A number of case studies  			conducted in different sectors in fourteen European countries have  			shown, however, that the effects of the increased «globalised» work  			are in fact multifaceted<sup><u><a name="top4" href="#4">3</a></u></sup>.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>One central, theoretical assumption in the project’s approach is  			that work is increasingly being organised according to market  			demands, with customer needs causing peaks in work load and leading  			to an intensification of work. This seems true for nearly all  			sectors under review, while the consequences for career development,  			physical and psychological well-being and future employment  			prospects differ enormously not only between sectors, but also  			between men and women.</p> 			    <p>Indeed, to obtain a comprehensive picture of the interaction  			between global processes and its impact at the local workplace level,  			it seems crucial to introduce the gender perspective. As the  			globalisation discourse in developed countries has already shown,  			the public view of globalisation processes is an incomplete one,  			particularly with regard «to women’s rights as fundamental human  			rights» (Chow, 2003: 445). For this reason, we emphasise research  			that focuses on male and female realities, on changing hierarchical  			arrangements in gender relations as well as on gendered institutions,  			i.e. values, identities, role behaviour and gender power relations.  			Against this background, the authors support the hypothesis that  			globally induced developments strengthen gender-related working  			conditions in the long run, and that in some occupations these  			developments even increase the disadvantages faced particularly by  			women in the labour markets.</p> 			    <p>The following contribution is divided into a theoretical part and  			an empirical one: the first section reflects on the historical  			process of globalisation during which important features developed  			that still seem to affect the current globalisation debate. Some  			theoretical assumptions are then drawn from these reflections on the  			relationship of gender and work during recent global restructuring  			processes. The second section presents the empirical findings of  			three occupational clusters in different European countries in order  			to show the impact of globalisation. The final section offers some  			concluding remarks.</p> 			    <p>&nbsp;</p> 			    <p><b>Global restructuring and work: Gender matters</b></p> 			    <p><i>Globalisation as planetary management</i></p> 			    <p>Globalisation has existed as an idea for more than 500 years.  			From a historical perspective, the dynamics of globalisation were  			also formulated as «the twofold process of the particularisation of  			the universal and the universalisation of the particular» (Robertson  			cited in: Jameson, 1999: XI)<sup><u><a name="top5" href="#5">4</a></u></sup>.  			Thus, cultural variation, the features particular to nations and  			regions, is embedded into a whole which in turn influences the  			understanding of individual practices and routines. The way in which  			the interdependencies between regions and nations are measured and  			how they are connected depends greatly on the perspective used and  			includes processes that may have existed for centuries. To date, the  			perspective «tends to be a function of transaction among unitary  			nation states» (Sassen, 2007a: 4; Sassen 2007b) and this also very  			much defines the power relations between these states.</p> 			    <p>From the perspective of the global system, historical processes  			of globalisation are most often considered to be an ongoing process  			of integrating regions and nations into the world market system (Altvater  			and Mahnkopf, 1997; Münch, 2005; Hack, 2005, 2007)<sup><u><a name="top6" href="#6">5</a></u></sup>.  			The concept of globalisation thus reflects the potential extent of a  			world market and, at the same time, an immense enlargement of  			today’s global communication, both of which seem far more tangible  			now than they did in earlier stages of this process.</p> 			    <p>With these concepts in mind, the process of nation building in  			Europe, its military occupation on other continents, its  			establishment of a bureaucratic and political organisation, its  			total ecological transformation, and its economic expropriation were  			intended to be long-lasting<sup><u><a name="top7" href="#7">6</a></u></sup>.  			According to Enrique Dussel, these views became integrated in a  			concept of «managing» the planetary centre that implied the idea of  			a world system to be managed according to a specific «peripheral  			social formation» (Dussel, 1999: 12; Polanyi, 1978). The idea of  			managing the global system led to the metaphor of centre-periphery  			strongly shaping the global perspective which defined power  			relations between the Northern and the Southern Hemispheres. In this  			sense, perceptions of the global have long been constituted «through  			practices and power projects of past eras, such as the colonial  			empires of the sixteenth and subsequent centuries ...» (Sassen,  			2007a: 5).</p> 			    <p>This historical angle on the global question allows us to  			recognise fundamental tension between the interdependencies of what  			might be unchanged national and cultural identities or the power  			relations of what might be unchanged regions of centre and periphery.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>During the late 1960s and the 1970s, perception of globalisation  			was expanded by several major trends, as capitalistic processes and  			ideologies spread throughout the world (Pyle and Ward, 2003: 463ff.;  			Pyle, 1998; 1999). First, international financial institutions and  			the majority of nations promoted market determination of economic  			outcomes. Second, many developing countries shifted to more «export-oriented»  			production for external trade. Third, in many sectors multinational  			corporations moved into countries level by level, and established  			networks of subcontractors. Fourth, since the late 1970s,  			globalisation has also involved structural adjustment policies,  			mandated by international organisations like the International  			Monetary Fund or the World Bank.</p> 			    <p>Although these trends have been reflected by a critical  			international discourse, the difference between «developed» and «underdeveloped»  			as a reference for the relationship between the countries of the  			Northern and the Southern hemispheres has been widely established<sup><u><a name="top8" href="#8">7</a></u></sup>.  			Therefore «underdeveloped countries» and their «backwardness», did  			not exist per se, but only in relation to «developed countries». It  			was not poverty per se that produced «underdevelopment », but the  			fact that the «developing countries» became part of an international  			system in which the normative idea of one world became relevant in  			several senses: on the one hand, the introduction of capitalistic  			processes seemed to be the model for «development»; on the other  			hand, «underdevelopment» started to be a normative problem. The  			establishment of development policies between countries, however,  			greatly strengthened the interrelation between countries (Tyrell,  			2005).</p> 			    <p>Considering the different meanings of globalisation, the  			discourse on «development» and «underdevelopment» focused strongly  			on two aspects:</p> 			    <p>First, a position developed that conceptualised globalisation as  			«an exclusively European/ American phenomenon that expanded from the  			seventeenth century on throughout all the «backwards» cultures (the  			Eurocentric position in the centre and modernising on the periphery)»  			(Dussel, 1999: 18). After 1960, the centre shifted more towards the  			US (Jameson and Miyoshi, 1999; Wobbe, 2005).</p> 			    <p>Second, from the perspective of the periphery, the process of «modernisation»  			and «development» indicated «rational» management of the world  			system. This position seeks to decry the practises of domination and  			exclusion in this world system. From this point of view,  			administration of the planetary system is based on managerial  			reasoning which implies ecological destruction as well as the  			creation of poverty and social exclusion of regions and individuals  			(Jameson and Miyoshi, 1999; Polanyi, 1978; Altvater and Mahnkopf,  			1997; Hack, 2005). Today, economic operations such as the creation  			of a global market for capital, a global trade regime, and the  			internationalisation of the division of labour, must thus also be  			understood as modern concepts which propagate these reasons  			(Giddens, 1995; Tyrell, 2005).</p> 			    <p>Without a doubt, the meaning of globalisation has changed  			completely since 1989. From that point on, the term «age of  			globalisation» was widely used in public as well as in academic  			debates. With the fall of the Berlin Wall, globalisation was quite  			often spoken of as if it were a force of nature. According to  			Hartmann Tyrell, even in academic debates, the concept of  			globalisation used today has borrowed widely from critical  			interventions that deal with other fields of tension, as described  			above. The everyday use of the term implies the idea of (cultural)  			progression towards a new era. According to these discourses, the  			importance of nation states with their territorial restrictions is  			being replaced by new forms of governance like «connectedness» or  			«global interconnectivity» which greatly strengthen the idea of a  			single world (Tyrell, 2005: 5). In the face of the strong economic  			dynamics of today’s globalisation processes, it seems that the  			global system is in some part being constituted within the national  			identities. As Saskia Sassen underlines, today’s global dynamics cut  			across institutional hierarchies and across the institutional  			encasements of territory. This does not mean, however, that old  			hierarchies disappear but rather that new levels emerge along the  			old hierarchies and that the former can often trump the latter (Sassen,  			2007a: 6).</p> 			    <p>Hence, global processes must in some part be met through their  			specific constitution in each country. Particularly at the level of  			working structure, globalisation processes seem to be strongly  			anchored in national settings. When contemporary consequences of  			these processes are evaluated, it seems important to consider the  			ideological heritage that the concept of globalisation still  			transmits. Especially in terms of a «rational» management of the  			global system as well as in terms of the idea of centre and  			periphery, critical approaches may contribute to new and more  			balanced visions of globalisation. These characteristics have also  			been identified and critically discussed by feminist theorists who  			strongly emphasised the patriarchal structure within these  			processes.</p> 			    <p><i>Globalisation processes and gendered working structure</i></p> 			    <p>Since the 1970s, Feminist Theory has vehemently confronted  			debates on globalisation and its rhetoric meaning of «development»  			as well as «underdevelopment of countries». Here, practices of  			domination and exclusion of countries between these globalisation  			processes – as described above – have been adapted and further  			developed towards gender relationships, especially in countries of  			the Southern hemisphere.</p> 			    <p>The relationship between centre and periphery in terms of the  			distribution of power between the Northern and Southern hemispheres  			was, in particular, seen as part of an ongoing process of female  			oppression by patriarchal structures. Making these adverse effects  			on women’s daily lives visible provided new perspectives on the  			changing qualities global processes were creating at a local level.  			Many forms of subsistence, cultural forms of community, and  			childcare as well as the recognition of women in their communitarian  			environments were placed under a great deal of pressure by global  			processes. Experience from these feminist debates has shown that it  			was extremely important to incorporate gender issues in terms of  			setting up public policy agendas and strategies for effective social  			change locally, nationally, and on a global scale<sup><u><a name="top9" href="#9">8</a></u></sup>.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>But not only the working and living conditions of women in the  			south are affected by globalisation processes. In western  			industrialised societies, these processes have also influenced  			female participation in the labour market. Whereas «at the outset of  			the twentieth century, paid employment was a strong male activity,  			and a clear division of labour existed in most middle-class families»  			(Hofäcker, 2006: 32), it seems that this division of labour has now  			been challenged. In academic literature, increasing female  			participation is generally considered as progress towards fewer  			discriminating gender differences in the labour market.</p> 			    <p>However, feminist theorists have criticised this positive view  			for several reasons (according to Hofäcker, 2006: 32ff; see also  			Daly, 2000): First, despite changes in female participation in the  			labour market, the division of household and care work has changed  			only marginally. Second, empirical studies have shown that there are  			important differences in the extent and the quality of female  			participation in the labour market. Therefore, feminists have  			largely regarded the emergence of «atypical» forms of work (such as  			flexible working arrangements or part-time work) as a continuation  			of enduring gender-based labour inequalities. Third, cross-national  			statistical comparisons suggest that political regimes and  			especially family policies provide a varying degree of support for  			women’s participation (see also Sainsbury, 1999). Thus, there is a  			large body of literature on processes of globalisation, but most  			mainstream theories treat these processes 			as gender-neutral with regard to female participation. According to  			Ether Ngang-ling Chow, ancient and current debates on neoliberal and  			universalistic globalisation accord little attention to gender, and  			women are likely to be underrepresented in their work and living  			experiences in specific societal contexts (Chow, 2003; Werlhof et  			al., 2003)<sup><u><a name="top10" href="#10">9</a></u></sup>.</p> 			    <p>Since globalisation seems inevitable and its effects are now felt  			in the working and living conditions of men and women in the western  			industrialised countries, globalisation and its dynamics are  			producing contradictory effects. At the individual level, «globalisation  			creates employment opportunities and increases female labour force  			participation, wage benefits, economic independence, selfworth and  			more life options, although these advantages are still limited and  			unequal» (Chow, 2003: 453; Wetterer, 2002). However, at the same  			time, it also creates new forms of «feminisation of labour» in  			segregated and low-paid work, wage dependency, labour exploitation,  			economic marginalisation, and poverty and is further worsening the  			already low status of women and their everyday living conditions (Wichterich,  			1998). Here too, economic and political developments on a global  			scale contribute significantly to local situations, showing how  			globalism and localism are interconnected (Sassen, 2007a; 2007b).</p> 			    <p>The following empirical findings provide some insight into actual  			changes in working and living conditions experienced by women and  			men at the local level in terms of gender-related working patterns  			in the framework of globalisation. To return to the hypothesis that  			globally induced developments strengthen gender-related working  			conditions in the long run, these results show that in 			some occupations such developments are increasing the disadvantages  			faced particularly by women in the labour markets. According to this  			hypothesis, the following questions are posed: How do labour  			activities become «more global» and what consequences do these  			changes have on gendered working conditions in local situations? How  			can global processes be described at a workplace level? What are the  			new forms of gendered division of labour? How do institutions make a  			difference in strengthening or weakening these processes in  			different countries?</p> 			    <p>In order to respond to these questions properly from a  			methodological point of view, it seems important to differentiate  			between occupational groups and sectors and show the different  			consequences for men and women in these occupations (Blossfeld and  			Hofmeister, 2006). Due to the scope of the implications these  			processes have for different occupational groups, it seems that  			there are trends of «privileging of economic organisation over areas  			of life and the non-responsibility for the production and survival  			of human beings» (Acker, 1998: 10).</p> 			    <p>In portraying the situation of women and men in European  			countries during global restructuring processes, the results of the  			study thus provide an important insight into the effects of  			globalisation as an ongoing process of a «rational management» on an  			economic scale. Particularly the integration of gender differences  			can reflect a society’s view of the appropriate roles for men and  			women and how this is reinforced by economic, political, social and  			cultural institutions (Pyle and Ward, 2003: 466; Gunnarson and  			Balkmar, 2005). The empirical results contribute to the overall  			debate on globalisation, especially in terms of such categories as  			power relations and subordinations.</p> 			    <p>&nbsp;</p> 			    <p><b>Local working structure: the research field</b></p> 			    <p>The empirical findings are presented on the basis of the  			qualitative research of the European project WORKS (see above).  			Changes in working lives were analysed from an individual  			perspective in in-depth case studies of different occupational  			groups<sup><u><a name="top11" href="#11">10</a></u></sup>. In order  			to record the many facets of global restructuring, individual work  			biographies were analysed in companies of various sizes and over a  			wide range of sectors. The aim was to include industries which  			underwent global restructuring processes at different times. The  			four sectors chosen were clothing, food, IT, and the public sector:  			The clothing sector faced major restructuring processes as early as  			the 1970s (Dunford, 2004), while the food industry started its  			Europe-wide restructuring in the 1990s after the single market was  			established in the European Union (European Foundation, 2004). In  			the IT sector, internationalisation strategies started during the  			industry’s boom years in the 			late 1990s, and resulted in global offshoring processes of IT  			services (Boes and Schwemmle, 2005). Currently, in all countries  			included in the sample, the public sector is undergoing massive  			restructuring processes towards privatisation which is causing  			deregulation of previously well-regulated working conditions.</p> 			    <p>Employees with a wide variety of working profiles from different  			occupational groups in these sectors were interviewed. As the WORKS  			project focuses on work changes in the knowledge-based society, a  			key criterion was to choose occupational groups affected by work  			changes and changes in knowledge requirements in order to analyse  			the effects of global restructuring on different occupations with  			regard to their knowledge intensity. The sample thus ranged from  			highly skilled, knowledge-intensive occupations (designers in the  			clothing sector and IT professionals) to semi-skilled tasks (front-office  			employees in the public sector) and low-skilled employees (production  			workers in the clothing and food sector). The case studies were  			distributed over the 14 countries in order to obtain a  			representative sample of different levels of knowledge intensity of  			the occupations within countries in different parts of Europe (Northern,  			Central, Eastern and Southern Europe) (see annex).</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>One prerequisite for the case studies was that all companies  			researched had undergone restructuring processes at a global level  			during the past five years. In total, 27 occupational case studies  			in 14 European countries with 222 individual interviews were carried  			out. Each case study consisted of 8-12 semi-structured biographical  			interviews with employees of the occupations being researched<sup><u><a name="top12" href="#12">11</a></u></sup>.  			The interviews lasted between 60 and 120 minutes, were conducted  			during working hours with the consent of the company management. The  			interviews were centred around the following research topics: work  			biography, changes in occupational identities, skills and  			qualification, quality of work and work-life balance. The category  			«gender» was an integrative part of the research design and was  			analysed intensively in each of the research topics. Interpretation  			focused on changes in the individual work biography caused by global  			restructuring processes.</p> 			    <p>In order to structure the international research, common  			interview guidelines were designed which were adapted and translated  			by the research partners. This approach aimed to cover a range of  			certain topics in all interviews, but at the same time to keep a  			narrative dimension in the interviews.</p> 			    <p>The interview findings were summarised by the partners in case  			study reports which were structured around the five central research  			topics mentioned above. The overall findings of each of the  			occupational groups were compared cross-nationally and discussed  			within the WORKS consortium (cf. in detail Valenduc et al., 2007).</p> 			    <p>&nbsp;</p> 			    <p><b>Female microspaces: global restructuring and impacts on  			different occupations</b></p> 			    <p>Gender differences are usually neglected in the academic debate  			on globalisation processes. However, the gender approach seems  			particularly apt for showing how global processes aim to change the  			realities of work and life for men and women at the local level and  			analysing the different quality of these changes. In industrialised  			societies there are many facets of global processes with regard to  			challenging options on the one hand and increasing social  			inequalities, particularly for women, on the other. Our aim is thus  			to show how processes of globalisation influence gender relations in  			different occupations in European countries.</p> 			    <p>The occupational groups analysed in the context of the WORKS  			project cover three occupational clusters, ranging from high skilled  			knowledge-intensive work (designers and IT professionals) to  			semi-skilled occupations (front office employees in the public  			sector) and low-skilled manufacturing occupations (production  			workers in the food and clothing sector). This diversity allows the  			sample to cover a wide spectrum of male and female working realities  			today<sup><u><a name="top13" href="#13">12</a></u></sup>.</p> 			    <p><i>New skill demands – new opportunities for women?  			Knowledge-based occupations</i></p> 			    <p>The knowledge-based occupations are represented by two groups:  			professionals in the IT sector and designers in the clothing sector.</p> 			    <p>Since the 1990s, there has been much discussion of IT  			professionals in academic literature as representative of new  			working models in knowledge-intensive sectors (Schmiede, 1996;  			Baukrowitz et al., 2006; Pfeiffer, 2004). Since information  			technology renders its services easily transferable on a global  			scale, the IT sector has faced large-scale internationalisation  			processes in recent years. The aim of the sector’s international  			orientation was to expand international production capacities and  			develop foreign markets. International production structures are now  			very common in the sector and have influenced working conditions in  			several ways (Boes, 2005: 26ff., Boes and Schwemmle, 2005). Not only  			have offshoring processes become a significant economic development,  			but changing working conditions at the workplace level have too.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>By contrast, designers in the clothing sector have rarely been  			the object of research to date. This occupation, however, is of  			particular interest in this context since due to the high level of  			tension arising from its creative demands and the increasing  			economic demands of the clothing sector, a sector which is  			particularly susceptible to global acceleration processes (cf.  			Nierling and Bechmann, 2007). Although the clothing sector has a  			long history that can be traced back to the beginning of  			industrialisation, it is also one of the most dynamic sectors in  			global restructuring processes. The overall economic trend of global  			market orientation leads to an enormous acceleration of production  			processes being especially visible in this sector.</p> 			    <p>In both occupations, labour processes changed fundamentally due  			to globally induced processes, the ensuing developments in each of  			them differed with regard to gender relations, as shown in the  			following:</p> 			    <p>The internationalisation processes in the IT sector have opened  			up new access options to this field of work, especially for women.  			As reported in many studies, the percentage of women is very low in  			sectors with strong technological expertise (cf. Winker, 2002). With  			the internationalisation of IT companies, international markets and  			global collaboration and communication have become important factors  			in the profile of IT professionals which was formerly strongly  			technically based. Empirical evidence shows that the skill portfolio  			has been broadened towards soft skills, such as project management  			skills, customer-oriented communication skills, language skills and  			social interactive skills.</p> 			    <p>As revealed in one of the case studies of the IT sector:</p> 			    <blockquote> 				    <blockquote> 					    <p>both the increasing importance of general skills in sales  					and marketing and the location of IT research in the  					contextualised areas of computer science such as  					geoinformatics, human computer interaction etc. opens the  					field up for people holding degrees in geography, psychology,  					linguistics etc. who are more likely to be women (Holtgrewe,  					2007: 17).</p> 				</blockquote> 			</blockquote> 			    <p>Up to now, these new demands have established new career paths  			and occupational opportunities. Besides the «traditional» technical  			career path, a new «managerial» career path has evolved, demanding  			the skills mentioned above, which seems to be more favourable for  			women. Consequently, the proportion of women working in this field  			has risen significantly in recent years<sup><u><a name="top14" href="#14">13</a></u></sup>.  			In terms of job perspective, IT offers very challenging career  			patterns for both, men and women, i.e. in terms of further  			qualification, international experience, high salary levels, and  			attractive working surroundings (Krings and Nierling, 2007; Valenduc,  			2007).</p> 			    <p>While the demands for new skills open up opportunities in the  			field of IT for female employees too, at the workplace level,  			working conditions are constantly changing. Although current  			economic conditions in the sector are still very much in favour of  			highly satisfying working conditions in terms of quality of work,  			job autonomy, job security as well as career prospects, in recent  			years globally induced acceleration processes have had a great  			effect on the local work situation.</p> 			    <p>At first glance, empirical evidence suggests that the IT sector  			does not present inequalities between the sexes in terms of entry,  			formal qualification and career possibilities. However, due to  			global restructuring, the orientation towards markets has  			significantly increased and led to acceleration processes within the  			daily work routines of the occupation. Tighter schedules and  			deadlines, extensive travel activities as well as unusual working  			hours because of the need for global synchronisation of working  			times are common nowadays. Thus, working tasks are becoming more  			demanding and have to be fulfilled in a shorter time frames.  			Furthermore, working time is very much aligned to the demands of  			international cooperation. This requires i.e. the need to  			communicate late at night or at the weekend with partners abroad.  			Overtime as well as unusual working hours seem to be regarded as  			«normal» in this occupation. At second glance, it becomes obvious  			that women working in this occupation have to align their way of  			working and living very much along the given demands which in  			general follow male working patterns, in which work clearly has  			priority in life.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Globalisation processes in the clothing sector have had a  			different impact on the work realities of female designers. But in  			this occupation too, the work has become increasingly intensified  			due to global dynamics. The high market pressure in the sector has  			led to significant acceleration processes in the clothing industry,  			i.e. the number of collections per year doubled in recent years.  			These 			acceleration processes affect designers directly at the workplace  			level as they have to deal with tighter deadlines, a higher work  			load, compensate flexibly for high peaks in the work load caused by  			collections, and fulfil a multitude of tasks while being under  			constant market control in order to meet the high economic demands  			of the sector.</p> 			    <p>A very high proportion of the designers are women who identify  			themselves strongly with the occupation and the creative aspects of  			the work, although due to the globally induced changes in work  			organisation, the skill portfolio of design has undergone  			significant changes. Aspects such as technical knowledge, and  			coordination with other departments like sales or production have  			become more important and take up an increasing portion of working  			time as well as work content. Although the working profile has  			changed fundamentally, integrating technical, managerial as well as  			administrative tasks, the designers are still very much dedicated to  			their occupation. The creative aspects of the work such as  			developing one’s own ideas and new concepts, and shaping 			and inventing new models very much express the subjectivity of the  			designer. Therefore, the occupation generally has high relevance for  			the employees, providing self-fulfilment, identity and an artistic  			expression of talent. This high commitment to work still seems to  			buffer the new demands that arise from global restructuring  			processes. The new demands are widely integrated into perception of  			the occupation (Nierling et al., 2007). However, this new  			development is sometimes «perceived as threats to creativity: less  			time to create and innovate, more constraints from market feedback.»  			(Valenduc and Muchnik, 2007: 47). This new development strongly  			emphasises the managerial aspects of the occupation – whether this  			development makes the occupation more attractive for male employees  			or changes attitudes towards the occupation among women has to be  			elaborated long term.</p> 			    <p>Female designers who opted for their profession have made a clear  			decision to follow a traditional male biographical pattern, because  			the temporal demands of the occupation are very high. Therefore,  			work clearly stands at the centre of their life, which is strictly  			organised around working demands. Also in the IT sector, globally  			induced work realities have contributed to women adopting a strongly  			male biographical pattern. As a consequence, the biographical stage  			reached by female employees seems crucial in defining the gender  			relationship of knowledge-based occupations.</p> 			    <p>For young women, these fields offer a broad variety of  			challenging working possibilities and career developments. However,  			at the stage of family planning, gender differences become very  			obvious. Due to persisting gender roles in society, women are still  			the main caretakers. As mentioned above, the working time  			requirements in both sectors are very demanding. Part-time work  			models are rarely used, as they seem inappropriate for the prevalent  			male working culture of the IT sector as well as the tight work  			organisation in design. Very often part-time working models are  			deemed to have negative impacts on career development<sup><u><a name="top15" href="#15">14</a></u></sup>.  			Therefore, building a family still leads to occupational  			disadvantages for women.</p> 			    <p>In a male structured work environment like IT or design, women  			very often have to decide either for or against a family or a career.  			Generally, working conditions in the IT sector allow a combination  			of work and family life, although women are often forced to create  			models to combine work and life in an individual way (Krings and  			Nierling, 2007). However, in design, it seems to be impossible for  			women to combine the demands of work and family life:</p> 			    <blockquote> 				    <blockquote> 					    <p>All designers I met were between 25 and 35 years old and  					very few had children, I would say that within the 10 to 15  					with whom I had tighter relations, only one had a baby  					(...). Indeed, it’s not easy to get a job as a designer.  					Everybody wants to keep his job and unfortunately it’s not  					convenient to have a baby at this moment. In any case, I  					wouldn’t even think about it now because of that (French  					designer in Valenduc and Muchnik, 2007: 42).</p> 				</blockquote> 			</blockquote> 			    <p>By contrast, the situation for male designers is not similarly  			polarised; in a traditional way it is mainly their wives who  			organise family life (Valenduc and Muchnik, 2007).</p> 			    <p>The current developments described above reflect the main  			tendencies in gender-related working conditions in the IT sector as  			well as in design. Nevertheless, cultural and national differences  			have a great impact on gender-related working patterns. This is  			particularly visible in combining family and career since crucial  			gender differences arise here in knowledge-intensive occupations.  			Where family life is culturally embedded in institutional settings,  			this allows strongly adapted, family-friendly working models,  			leading i.e. to a «baby boom» in the case of Norway (Krings and  			Nierling, 2007: 64). But these preconditions for a work-life balance  			are much weaker in other parts of Europe. Especially in the Eastern  			European countries, the opposite development can currently be  			observed. For example, after social transformation the field of IT  			is at a developmental stage which demands high commitment to work  			from employees, who are mostly male. The Hungarian case implies:</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<blockquote> 				    <blockquote> 					    <p>Flexibility and overtime provides Hungarian employees  					with a competitive advantage: work councils do not allow  					employees to work at weekends in Austria or in Germany.  					There are no such limitations in Hungary, and employees do  					not mind working at weekends; it increases their efficiency  					and helps them to obtain certain jobs. Flexibility also  					means that, in contrast to their German colleagues, for  					Hungarians it is not a problem to get up from their desk and  					rush straight to the airport to travel to some remote place.  					Young and mostly unmarried Hungarian employees even like  					this (Makó, Illéssy and Csizmadia, 2007: 12).</p> 				</blockquote> 			</blockquote> 			    <p>Integrating family needs in such a working environment seems to  			be very difficult. Furthermore, recent findings show an increasing  			polarisation of male and female work in the new member States (European  			Foundation, 2007). Although the gender equality of former socialist  			regimes is still higher than in the old member states, «a widening  			gap in working hours may reduce women’s longer-term ability to  			compete with men in the labour market» (European Foundation, 2007:  			57). This development confirms that gender relations at work are  			very much shaped by the distribution of working time between the  			sexes, which is still highly influenced by persisting gender roles  			with regard to care responsibilities.</p> 			    <p>In Southern Europe, reconciling work and family life relies  			mainly on the family network, which is still strong in these  			countries. However, these supportive family networks are now  			increasingly disappearing. Because of the lack of institutional and  			organisational support, the reconciliation of work and life is  			becoming very complex and difficult for women who have to organise  			their own 			ways of dealing with both family planning and career development.</p> 			    <p><i>Standardisation and privatisation in a highly regulated  			occupation: female employees in customer services</i></p> 			    <p>Currently, the field of customer services in the public sector is  			facing fundamental changes due to global reorganisation. Fields of  			work which were formerly «publicly» regulated are now increasingly  			being restructured along the lines of the «private» logic of work  			organisation. Deregulation is found in various fields such as wage  			levels, work intensity, job security and increased working time  			flexibility on part of the organisations. One major trend that can  			be observed is a growing level of standardisation, which allows the  			work force to be deployed interchangeably in different fields of  			work (Dunkel and Schönauer, 2007). All these changes affect a field  			of work in which the percentage of women is very high.</p> 			    <p>Empirical evidence shows an area of tension in the sector  			currently as it shifts from a publicly organised field of work field  			to a private one. Although many changes have already occurred in the  			way work is organised in this occupation, i.e. increase in work load,  			longer working hours orientated towards customer needs (which means  			unusual working hours, weekend work, and overtime), working  			conditions are still very much subject to strict employment  			regulations in the public sector. The main changes in working  			conditions were circumvented by outsourcing changing demands, i.e.  			in working time, to private companies. This strategy meant that  			front-office employees have up to now been sheltered from more  			fundamental changes. Thus, establishing service outsourcing as an  			ongoing process seems to be the forerunner of further worsening in  			working conditions for the employees. However, in the long run, the  			option of outsourcing tasks to (cheaper) private companies implies a  			growing reduction in the public sector staff. Thus it is both  			working conditions and job security which will further deteriorate  			in the future.</p> 			    <p>Here too, the gender-related implications of global restructuring  			can be best observed by looking at how working time has developed.  			In this occupation, the division of labour at a household level is  			organised traditionally, and up to now, working conditions in the  			public sector have seemed to be very advantageous for women with  			children.</p> 			    <blockquote> 				    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<blockquote> 					    <p>The reason for wanting to work in the public sector  					definitely ties in with them being mothers with children,  					looking for flexibility in their work but also a sense of  					security which they believed their employer could give them.  					(...) Interestingly, all the women interviewed were married,  					with a husband taking on the main «breadwinner » role. What  					they ask from their employment is that it should enable them  					to give priority to their traditional gender role and not  					create undue conflicts in their lives (Dahlmann, 2007: 11).</p> 				</blockquote> 			</blockquote> 			    <p>Female employees seem to identify themselves with the main carer  			role in a very traditional way and respond individually to changes  			in working time arrangements. These changes are very heterogeneous  			in all countries. Either working time is becoming more flexible or  			it is organised in shift systems which leads to a rigid organisation  			of working time; which of these two options is used, depends  			specifically on the organisations involved. Interestingly both types  			of change processes in working time deeply affected their work and  			life and caused strong resistance in the affected women who had  			organised their family life according to the given working scheme.  			Because of the changes due to restructuring, they were forced to  			reorganise well-practised combination models of work routines and  			family life. Country differences were not decisive in this  			occupational group, because the changes in work organisation were  			very heterogeneous.</p> 			    <p>To sum up, although working relations are still highly regulated  			in comparison to the private sector, employees have to face a high  			level of reorganisation processes. It can be assumed that working  			conditions in public services will resemble those in the private  			sector in the future. Thus, the role of the public sector as a  			protected area of work is rapidly changing in nearly all countries.  			The protected and regulated work environment represented an  			especially attractive field for working mothers who could combine  			the demands of work with family duties and child care in a  			satisfying way. This is reflected by the fact that the attitude  			towards child care is very traditional in all countries. Changes in  			terms of job security due to standardisation processes as well as a  			change in working hours will certainly deeply affect this balance.  			However, the way in which changes in this field of the labour market  			will affect female employment chances and career prospects in the  			future must be the subject of further research. It is certain that  			changes here will have a further significant effect on the working  			and living realities of women involved (Muchnik and Valenduc, 2007).</p> 			    <p><i>Persisting gender stereotypes: women working in production</i></p> 			    <p>The occupational group of production workers has a long history.  			Strictly speaking, it has been in existence since industrial  			production began in the 18th century. Over the past centuries, the  			production process has of course changed fundamentally. It became  			increasingly automatised, which led to a high degree of  			standardisation in working tasks<sup><u><a name="top16" href="#16">15</a></u></sup>.  			In the field of production, global dynamics led to a significant  			decline of European blue-collar work as the companies outsourced  			activities on a large scale (cf. Birindelli et al., 2007). This  			outsourcing greatly affects the daily working realities of  			production workers.</p> 			    <p>The two sectors of food and clothing are industrial sectors with  			a long tradition in national contexts in which production work is  			still an important task. Globalisation affected the sectors in  			different ways: The clothing sector has been very strongly shaped by  			global dynamics and has a long tradition of outsourcing and  			offshoring production work, due to the labour intensity of tasks  			which allow only a very low level of automation (Dunford, 2004).  			Globally induced economic pressure due to acceleration processes in  			international markets are either being shifted to subcontractors  			down the value chain (Flecker and Holtgrewe, 2007: 22) or  			compensated for by high flexibility demands that have to be  			fulfilled by production workers. By contrast, the food sector allows  			a high level of automation, and here global market pressure is at  			present stage arising only slowly, but is steadily gaining  			importance, and is often compensated for by an increased level of  			standardisation as well as flexibility in the use of working time (Meil  			and Schönauer, 2007: 77). In both sectors, a loss of union power due  			to global economic conditions can be seen (Nierling and Krings,  			2007). Because of this, production workers come more directly face  			to face with the forces of globalisation: In both industries, a rise  			in global market pressure has led to standardisation processes,  			insecure working conditions, and high demands on worker flexibility.  			As described in the following, women working in production have been  			particularly affected by the processes of globalisation.</p> 			    <p>Female labour has a long tradition in the production sector  			because a second income has often been economically essential to the  			working class. Nevertheless, strong segregation between the sexes  			still determines the gender-biased allocation of working tasks and  			deployment of skills. Surprisingly these genderrelated working  			patterns have remained constant despite the profound changes in  			working processes and profiles caused by standardisation processes.  			As a case study from the food industry shows, before global  			restructuring processes occurred, the occupational identity of male  			production workers was based strongly on their manual skill in a  			special field of work, which in turn implied the exclusion of women  			in this field. Due to the automation forced by economic pressure,  			the importance of this expertise was eroded. This process of change  			could theoretically have opened up the field for women and  			positively influenced gender relations in this working context.  			However, as the empirical evidence shows, male-dominated structures  			remained strongly intact, even when circumstances changed and «suggest  			the problematic nature of remaking longstanding work identity even  			once past certainties are swept away» (Sayce, Ackers and Greene,  			2007: 99) (cf. Gorm Hansen, 2007).</p> 			    <p>Gender stereotypes in production work have not changed in the  			process of standardisation; on the contrary, they even seem to have  			become reinforced: Women are often chosen for tasks which are often  			highly standardised and repetitive. However, in terms of career,  			tasks involving technical development are essential for progress;  			therefore gender-related allocation of working tasks still results  			in career disadvantages for women, because generally men are chosen  			in preference for technically based tasks. These gender-biased  			decisions lead to further segregation of female and male working  			profiles in the production sector (Nierling and Krings, 2007). Along  			with (technically based) upskilling of male production workers,  			simple and repetitive tasks continue to increasingly be the domain  			of women, which means a process of devaluing «female» tasks and  			revaluing «male» ones. Devaluation and revaluation processes become  			extremely obvious if they affect directly measurable indicators like  			i.e. the wage level. This can be best illustrated by one case study  			from the clothing sector. Here, women do not have access to special  			payments because of a gendered division of tasks:</p> 			    <blockquote> 				    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<blockquote> 					    <p>the work categories men belong to (machine specialist;  					stamp specialist; store workers) have subsidies of risk that  					women categories don’t have (seamstress, embroiderers)  					(Vasconcelos da Silva, Woll and Paulos 2007, 10).</p> 				</blockquote> 			</blockquote> 			    <p>The phenomenon «feminisation of work» – which is already  			well-described in academic literature – still plays a central role  			in the assessment of societal recognition of working tasks as well  			as professions (Becker-Schmidt, 2007; Gottschall, 1995). The  			empirical evidence indicates that, especially in production work,  			the feminisation of tasks becomes manifest in work organisation.</p> 			    <p>Due to global restructuring processes, outsourcing and offshoring  			activities have become very common in production. This development  			causes workers a high level of insecurity about their job future.  			Because of their low-qualified job profile, production workers do  			not have many alternatives and feel very much dependent on the  			economical well-being of the company they working for. Job  			insecurity can be regarded as the most important effect of global  			economic pressure at the workplace level for both female and male  			production workers. According to the findings of Nickie Charles and  			Emma James, at a societal level, job insecurity is gendered, as it  			is considered very much as a male problem:</p> 			    <blockquote> 				    <blockquote> 					    <p>And although job insecurity is equally serious for women  					and men in individual terms, there is still a widespread  					view that the provider role is an important part of men’s  					identity and the inability to provide is particularly  					damaging to men (Charles and James, 2003: 550).</p> 				</blockquote> 			</blockquote> 			    <p>However, the way in which the increased level of job insecurity  			actually influences work and life for both men and women must be the  			subject of further research.</p> 			    <p>In order to meet growing market demands, flexible production  			patterns and increased demands on efficiency have become commonplace  			in food and clothing production. Especially the increased demands on  			flexibility by the firms lead to longer and irregular working hours  			at the individual workplace level, which often includes night shifts  			or overtime<sup><u><a name="top17" href="#17">16</a></u></sup>. In  			line with increased efficiency demands in the work process, the work  			intensity has increased significantly due to global market pressure.</p> 			    <p>Female production workers are especially affected by these  			intensified working demands. Especially because of increased  			temporal restrictions, the combination of work and life becomes more  			difficult and exhausting. Working hours are organised around rigid  			shifts that often include irregular working hours without offering  			temporal flexibility. The time schedules for work often do not match  			the opening hours of childcare facilities or public service  			institutions, so very often the workers have to organise an  			individual fit to bridge both work and family requirements:</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<blockquote> 				    <blockquote> 					    <p>Women who have to take their children to kindergarten  					have quite a lot of problems; when they have morning shifts  					and must clock in at six they cannot take their children  					because nobody looks after them at kindergarten or school...  					(Italian production worker in Pedaci, 2007: 10).</p> 				</blockquote> 			</blockquote> 			    <p>The missing link between the timetables of work and public life  			often has to be organised on an individual basis, where social  			networks provide the most important support.</p> 			    <p>Of course, the practices of balancing work and family life are  			largely influenced by the national background and institutional  			settings of different regimes. In Southern Europe female production  			workers can still rely on a strong family background, whereas  			production workers in Continental and Northern Europe depend much  			more on institutional support or company measures. However, it  			becomes apparent that in no countries do the organisational  			frameworks offer essential support for female production workers.  			Even in Scandinavia, the changes in working conditions have deeply  			affected the living and working circumstances of female workers (Nierling  			and Krings, 2007).</p> 			    <p>&nbsp;</p> 			    <p><b>Global dynamics meet local working routines – final  			conclusions</b></p> 			    <p>The findings show that global restructuring processes have a  			significant impact on occupations in terms of altering local working  			(and living) conditions. One central result which has been  			considered for all occupations is that there is a clear trend  			towards greater economic pressure from the global market economy  			which leads to acceleration and intensification processes as well as  			fundamental changes in skill demands in most occupations.</p> 			    <p>At the individual workplace level, globally induced acceleration  			processes have various effects on occupational groups. With faster  			production cycles and tighter deadlines in highly skilled  			occupations, acceleration processes are experienced as more  			intensive work routines by the employees. One characteristic of  			highly skilled occupations is that the growing pressure is embedded  			into organisational changes that offer employees a high level of  			self control and personal responsibility at work. In these  			occupations, employees identify strongly with the content of the  			work, introducing artistic, intellectual, managerial and  			technological aspects which generally lead to a high adaptation of  			intensified working conditions.</p> 			    <p>By contrast, in <i>low-skilled occupations</i>, global economic  			pressure leads to job insecurity and higher (temporal) flexibility  			demands from the workers. The quality of work and job satisfaction  			is continuously weakened. Since the global management of companies  			is spatially undefined, the power of unions has also deteriorated as  			have formerly strong worker’s collectives. This development is very  			likely to worsen the working conditions of production workers even  			further in the future.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><i>Semi-skilled occupations</i> have been faced with a broad  			range of organisational changes with reorganisation processes in the  			public sector. Daily working life was already deeply affected by  			these changes; ongoing restructuring processes from «public» to «private»  			will certainly aggravate working conditions in the public sector  			even further.</p> 			    <p>With regard to gender relations, global restructuring processes  			have a wide variety of effects which seem strongly correlated with  			occupational level.</p> 			    <p>In terms of <i>skills and qualification</i>, it becomes clear  			that in low– and semiskilled occupations, traditional gender roles  			in terms of task division and skill development are retained.  			Changes in the skill portfolio do not lead to changing career  			patterns or quality of work for female workers; on the contrary,  			maledominated career paths prevail. By contrast, changes in skill  			demands in knowledge-intensive occupations enable female biographies  			in that traditional male occupations and biographical paths are  			opened up and offer women the opportunity to explore new working  			fields. These fields demand high individual commitment towards work,  			and women identify themselves increasingly with the content as well  			as the creative aspects of work. This enables them to gain access to  			the labour markets and the control to explore their own ways of  			working and living.</p> 			    <p>It seems that qualification and skills play an essential role for  			women in achieving substantial and mental independence from  			traditional gender roles in work. Whereas in highly skilled  			occupations, the high qualification level empowers (female)  			employees to actively shape their individual work biography, in  			semi- and low-skilled occupations employees depend much more on the  			organisational framework determined by their current job. This  			provides them with few opportunities to actively change their job  			situation.</p> 			    <p>Still, it is in terms of <i>work-family relations</i> that gender  			inequalities are most striking. In all occupations it becomes  			evident that intensified working conditions have a particular impact  			on women because of their care obligation. But here too, differences  			can be observed related to the occupational level. In low– and  			semi-skilled occupations, employees depend very much on given  			temporal frameworks of the organisations around which they organise  			family life. If these temporal frameworks change, women are forced  			to adapt family life to the new schedules, which often involves high  			subjective costs.</p> 			    <p>In highly skilled occupations, temporal flexibility offers women  			the option of developing individual strategies for combining work  			and family. These employees seem to have more freedom in realising  			their own model of life and to have the power to liberate themselves  			from the (female) obligation of care work. In an extreme case, this  			can even result in the decision to follow professional and career  			paths exclusively. Nevertheless, in all occupational groups the male  			attitude towards work and the lack of involvement in care work  			remains, even if women are on their way to breaking out of the  			traditional role model. Especially if work intensification increases  			due to global pressure, gender differences in work are related to  			care obligations. The «double burden» of female employees becomes  			obvious i.e. in terms of career opportunities or work-life balance.  			Furthermore, it has to be stressed that female empowerment within  			the occupation is orientated to male working patterns; the current  			working structure does not offer options for work and life that  			would allow women to enter into alternative working and living  			concepts.</p> 			    <p>The results also show that the <i>institutional setting</i> as  			well as cultural embeddedness play a crucial role in shaping  			gender-related work relations. Institutional support is capable of  			buffering and influencing the impacts of global change processes on  			the local workplace. It gains particularly in importance in  			lower-skilled occupations where there is little space for individual  			action, since the influence of worker’s representatives is being  			widely diminished. In countries with low institutional support like  			Eastern Europe, workers and employees are exposed much more to  			global forces which can lead to increased sex segregation on the  			workplace. In contrast, the institutional background in Northern  			Europe enables women very much to realise their own living and  			working models. It seems that in times of globalisation, the role of  			institutional backing becomes even more important in the development  			of European working conditions.</p> 			    <p>With regard to the hypothesis that globally induced developments  			strengthen gender-related working conditions in the long run, it  			seems that global restructuring should be considered first as an  			enormous driving force. This driving force definitely influences  			working patterns in local and national territories, even in highly  			industrialised societies. Second, with regard to unequal access,  			control and distribution of resources and opportunities between men  			and women, the results greatly emphasise two different pictures: On  			the one hand in highly skilled occupations, women have gained access  			to the labour market and gendered effects are being registered. On  			the other hand, in lower skilled occupations, existing gender  			regimes remain and even exacerbate gender segregation as well as the  			gendered division of labour.</p> 			    <p>Overall, the results greatly underline the critical dimension of  			globalisation «how it creates differential opportunities, challenges,  			risks and dilemmas for women and men and how, in turn, it modifies  			the process of social change» (Chow, 2003: 446).</p> 			    <p>Furthermore the issues of globalisation such as acceleration  			processes and the increase in market demands within occupational  			ones very much support the idea of globalisation as a concept of  			ongoing «global management». From the gender perspective, it should  			be examined to what extent the term «globalisation » is still  			embedded into a (male) dominated ideology and (European/American)  			culture which is still transporting the centre-periphery metaphor on  			different levels. From that critical perspective, economic expansion  			should be analysed less from the centre and much more from the  			periphery.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p> 			    <p><b>Bibliography</b></p> 			    <!-- ref --><p>Acker, Joan (1998), The Future of Gender and Organisations:  			Connections and Boundaries, Paper for plenary talk for Gender, Work  			and Organisation Conference in Manchester.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000145&pid=S0874-5560200800020000200001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p>Altvater, Elmar, Mahnkopf, Birgit (1997), Grenzen der  			Globalisierung. Ökonomie, Ökologie und Politik in der  			Weltgesellschaft, Münster, Westfälisches Dampfboot.</p> 			    <p>Baukrowitz, Andrea, Berker, Thomas, Boes, Andreas, Pfeiffer,  			Sabine, Schmiede, Rudi, Will, Mascha (org.) (2006), Informatisierung  			der Arbeit – Gesellschaft im Umbruch, Berlin, edition sigma.</p> 			    <p>Becker-Schmidt, Regina (2007), «Geschlechter – und  			arbeitsverhältnisse in Bewegung», in Brigitte Aulenbacher, Maria  			Funder, Heike Jacobsen, Susanne Völker (org.), Arbeit und Geschlecht  			im Umbruch der modernen Gesellschaft. Forschung im Dialog, Wiesbaden,  			VS Verlag, pp. 250-268.</p> 			    <p>Birindelli, Lorenzo, Brynin, Malcolm, Coppin, Laura, Geurts,  			Karen, Greenan, Nathalie, Kalugina, Ekaterina, Longhi, Simonetta,  			Ramioul, Monique, Rusticelli, Emiliano, Walkowiak, Emmanuelle  			(2007), The Transformation of Work? A Quantitative Evaluation of the  			Shape of Employment in Europe. First report from WP9, WORKS report.</p> 			    <p>Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, Hofmeister, Heather (org.) (2006),  			Globalization, Uncertainty and Women’s Careers – An International  			Comparison, Cheltenham, UK, Northhampton, USA, Edward Elgar.</p> 			    <p>Boes, Andreas (2005), «Auf dem Weg in die Sackgasse?  			Internationalisierung im Feld Software und IT-Services», in Andreas  			Boes, Michael Schwemmle (org.), Bangalore statt Böblingen?  			Offshoring und Internationalisierung im IT-Sektor, Hamburg, VSA, pp.  			13-65.</p> 			    <p>Boes, Andreas; Schwemmle, Michael (org.) (2005), Bangalore statt  			Böblingen? Offshoring und Internationalisierung im IT-Sektor,  			Hamburg, VSA.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Braudel, Fernand (1986), Sozialgeschichte des 15.-18.  			Jahrhunderts. Der Handel, München, Kindler.</p> 			    <p>Charles, Nickie; James, Emma (2003), «The gender dimensions of  			job insecurity in a local labour market», Work, Employment and  			Society, 17, 3, pp. 531-552.</p> 			    <p>Chow, Ether Ngang-ling (2003), «Gender matters – studying  			globalization and social change in the 21st Century», International  			Sociology, 18, 3, pp. 443-460.</p> 			    <p>Dahlmann, Simone with assistance from Alison Gosper and John Kirk  			(2007), UK Occupational Case Study. Occupational Case Study on  			Customer Service in the Public Sector UK. Internal working paper,  			WORKS-project.</p> 			    <p>Daly, Mary (2000), «A fine balance. Women’s labour participation  			in international comparison», in Fritz W. Scharpf, Vera A. Schmidts  			(org.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Volume II: Diverse  			responses to challenges, Oxford, Oxford University, pp. 467-510.</p> 			    <p>Dunford, Mick (2004), «The Changing profile and map of the EU  			textile and clothing industry», in Michael Faust, Ulrich Voskamp,  			Volker Wittke (org.), European Industrial Restructuring in a Global  			Economy: Fragmentation and Relocation of Value Chains, Göttingen,  			SOFI, pp. 295-318.</p> 			    <p>Dunkel, Wolfgang, Schönauer, Annika (2007), «Reorganising the  			front-line: customer service in the public sector», in Jörg Flecker,  			Ursula Holtgrewe, Annika Schönauer, Wolfgang Dunkel, Pamela Meil (org.),  			Restructuring Across Value Chains and Changes in Work and Employment.  			Case study Evidence from the Clothing, Food, IT and Public Sector.  			Deliverable 10.1: WP 10 Organisational Case Studies – Synthesis  			Report, WORKS report, pp. 101-129.</p> 			    <p>Dussel, Enrique (1999), «Beyond eurocentrism: the world-system  			and the limits of modernity», in Fredric Jameson, Masao Miyoshi (org.),  			The Cultures of Globalisation, Durham, London, Duke University Press,  			pp. 3-53.</p> 			     <p>Ehrenreich, Barbara, Hochschild, Arlie Russel (org.) (2002), Global Woman.    Nannies, Maids and Sex Workers in the New Economy, New York, Metropolitan Books.European    Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2004), Sectors    Future. Europe’s Food Sector at a Crossroads, [em linha] disponível em <a href="http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/emcc/content/source/tn04006a.html?p1=sectorfutures&p2=null" target="_blank">http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/emcc/content/source/tn04006a.html?p1=sectorfutures&amp;p2=null</a>    [last updated 30 April 2004; accessed 10 August 2007].</p> 			    <p>European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working  			Conditions (2007), Working Conditions in the European Union: The  			Gender Perspective, Office for Official Publications of the European  			Communities, Luxembourg.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Flecker, Jörg, Holtgrewe, Ursula (2007), «Changing fashions of  			work organisation: the clothing industry», in Jörg Flecker, Ursula  			Holtgrewe, Annika Schönauer, Wolfgang Dunkel, Pamela Meil (org.),  			Restructuring Across Value Chains And Changes in Work and Employment.  			Case Study Evidence from the Clothing, Food, IT And Public Sector.  			Deliverable 10.1: WP 10 Organisational Case Studies – Synthesis  			Report, WORKS report, pp. 5-23.</p> 			    <p>Giddens, Anthony (1995), Konsequenzen der Moderne, Frankfurt am  			Main, Suhrkamp.</p> 			    <p>Gorm Hansen, Brigitte (2007), Slaughterhouse Work and The  			Babel-Effect. Occupational case study of production workers in the  			food industry Denmark, Internal working paper, WORKS project.</p> 			    <p>Gottschall, Karin (1995), «Geschlechterverhältnis und  			arbeitsmarktsegregation», in Regina Becker-Schmidt, Gudrun-Axeli  			Knapp (org.), Das Geschlechterverhältnis in den Sozialwissenschaften, 			Frankfurt, New York, Campus, pp. 125-162.</p> 			    <p>Gunnarsson, Ewa; Balkmar, Dag (2006), «The gender dimension», in  			Jörg Flecker, Ulrike Papouschek, Patricia Vendramin, Gérard Valenduc,  			Ewa Gunnarsson, Dag Balkmar (org.), Handbook – Qualitative Research,  			WORKS report.</p> 			    <p>Hack, Lothar (2005), «In search of the lost totality. From Marx’  			societal formation of capitalism to Wallerstein’s “world systems  			analysis”», Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Sonderheft «Weltgesellschaft»,  			pp. 120-158.</p> 			    <p>_____ (2007), Wie Globalisierung gemacht wird. Ein Vergleich der  			Organisationsformen und Konzernstrategien von General Electric und  			Thomson/Thales, Berlin, sigma.</p> 			    <p>Haraway, Donna (1995), Monströse Versprechen. Gender– und  			Technologie-Essays. Hamburg, Argument Verlag.</p> 			    <p>Henshall-Momsen, Janet (org.) (1999), Gender, Migration and  			Domestic Service, London, New York, Routledge.</p> 			    <p>Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut (1998), «Shareholder Value:  			Unternehmensstrategien und neue Strukturen des Kapitalmarktes», in  			Hartmut Hirsch-Kreinsen, Harald Wolf (org.), Arbeit, Gesellschaft,  			Kritik. Orientierungen wider den Zeitgeist, Berlin, sigma.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Hofäcker, Dirk (2006), «Women’s employment in times of  			globalisation: a comparative overview», in Hans-Peter Blossfeld,  			Heather Hofmeister (org.), Globalization, Uncertainty and Women’s  			Careers. An International Comparison, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton,  			MA, USA, Edward Elgar, pp. 32-58.</p> 			    <p>Holtgrewe, Ursula (2007), IT Researchers in between Academia and  			Industry. Occupational Case Study on IT Research in a Public-Private  			Hybrid, Austria, Internal working paper, WORKS project.</p> 			    <p>Huws, Ursula (org.) (2006), The Transformation of Work in a  			Global Knowledge Economy: Towards a Conceptual Framework, Leuven,  			Higher Institute of Labour Studies.</p> 			    <p>Jameson, Fredric; Miyoshi, Masao (org.) (1999), The Cultures of  			Globalisation, Durham, London, Duke University Press.</p> 			    <p>Jameson, Fredric (1999), «Preface», in Fredric Jameson, Masao  			Miyoshi (org.), The Cultures of Globalisation, Durham, London, Duke  			University Press, XI-XVII.</p> 			    <p>Kotthoff, Hermann (2001), «Pluri-local social spaces in global  			operating German companies », in Ludger Pries (org.), The Emergence  			of Transnational Social Spaces, International Migration and  			Transnational Companies in the Early Twenty-first Century, London,  			New York, Routledge, pp. 134-144.</p> 			    <p>Krings, Bettina-Johanna (2006), «Make like a man: the demands of  			creative work, gender and the management of everyday life», Work  			Organisation, Labour &amp; Globalisation, 1, 1, pp. 89-107.</p> 			    <p>Krings, Bettina-Johanna, Nierling, Linda (2007), «Occupational  			monograph – R&amp;D workers in information and communication technology»,  			in Gérard Valenduc, Patricia Vendramin, Bettina-Johanna Krings,  			Linda Nierling (org.), Occupational Case Studies. Synthesis Report  			and Comparative Analysis. Final report of WP11, WORKS report,  			pp.49-71.</p> 			    <p>Lautsch, Brenda A., Scully, Maureen A. (2007), «Restructuring  			time: Implications of workhours reductions for the working class»,  			Human Relations, 60, 5, pp. 719-743.</p> 			    <p>Makó, Csaba, Illéssy, Miklós, Csizmadia, Péter (2007), Domainsoft  			Ltd. – Occupational Case Study, WORKS-Project, Internal working  			paper.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Meil, Pamela, Schönauer, Annika (2007), «Faster food: production  			and logistics in the food processing industry», in Jörg Flecker,  			Ursula Holtgrewe, Annika Schönauer, Wolfgang Dunkel, Pamela Meil (org.),  			Restructuring across Value Chains and Changes in Work and Employment.  			Case Study Evidence from the Clothing, Food, IT and Public Sector.  			Deliverable 10.1: WP 10 Organisational Case Studies – Synthesis  			Report, WORKS report, pp. 59-78.</p> 			    <p>Merchant, Carolyn (1987), Der Tod der Natur, Frankfurt am Main,  			Campus.</p> 			    <p>Mies, Maria, Shiva, Vandana (1995), Ökofeminismus, Zürich,  			Rotpunktverlag.</p> 			    <p>Muchnik, Maira, Valenduc, Gérard (2007), «Occupational monograph  			– front office employees in customer relationships in public  			services», in Gérard Valenduc, Patricia Vendramin, Bettina-Johanna  			Krings, Linda Nierling (org.), Occupational Case Studies. Synthesis  			Report and Comparative Analysis. Final report of WP11. WORKS report,  			pp. 141-160.</p> 			    <p>Münch, Richard (2005), «The Construction of world trade as a  			legitimate order in world society», Zeitschrift für Soziologie,  			Sonderheft «Weltgesellschaft», pp. 290-313.</p> 			    <p>Nierling, Linda, Bechmann, Martin (2007), «Die Bedeutung von  			Wissen in der (Re-)Organisation der deutschen Bekleidungsbranche»,  			Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis, 16, 2, pp. 58-65.</p> 			    <p>Nierling, Linda, Krings, Bettina-Johanna (2007), «Occupational  			monograph – production workers in clothing and food industries», in  			Gérard Valenduc, Patricia Vendramin, Bettina-Johanna Krings, Linda  			Nierling (org.), Occupational Case Studies. Synthesis Report and  			Comparative Analysis. Final report of WP11. WORKS report, pp.  			99-119.</p> 			    <p>Nierling, Linda, Krings, Bettina-Johanna, Bechmann, Martin  			(2007), «Even That is Fun». Occupational Case Study on Design in the  			Clothing Sector, Germany, Internal working paper, WORKS-project.</p> 			    <p>Pfeiffer, Sabine (2004), Arbeitsvermögen. Ein Schlüssel zur  			Analyse (reflexiver) Informatisierung, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag.</p> 			    <p>Pedaci, Marcello (2007), Occupational Case Study on Skilled and  			Semi-Skilled Production Workers of the Food Industry – Italy,  			Internal working paper, WORKS project.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Polanyi, Karl (1978), The Great Transformation, Frankfurt am Main,  			Suhrkamp.</p> 			    <p>Pyle, Jean L., Ward, Kathryn B. (2003), «Gender matters: studying  			globalisation and social change in the 21st century», International  			Sociology, 18, 3, pp. 443-460.</p> 			    <p>Pyle, Jean L. (1998), «Women’s employment and multinational  			corporation networks», in Nelly P. Stromquist (org.), Women in the  			Third World. An Encyclopedia of Contemporary Issues, New York,  			Garland, pp. 341-350.</p> 			    <p>_____ (1999), «Third world women and global restructuring», in  			Janet S. Chafetz (org.), Handbook of the Sociology of Gender, New  			York, Kluwer Academic Publisher, pp. 81-104.</p> 			    <p>Rerrich, Maria S. (2006), Die ganze Welt zu Hause. Cosmobile  			Putzfrauen in Privaten Haushalten, Hamburg, Hamburger Edition.</p> 			    <p>Robertson, Roland (1992), Globalisation: Social Theory and Global  			Culture, Newbury Park, CA, Sage.</p> 			    <p>Sainsbury, Diane (1999), Gender and Welfare State Regimes,  			Oxford, Oxford University.</p> 			    <p>Sassen, Saskia (org.) (2007a), Diphering the Global: its Scales,  			Spaces and Subjects, New York, London, Routledge.</p> 			    <p>Sassen, Saskia (2007b), A Sociology of Globalization, New York,  			Norton.</p> 			    <p>Sayce, Susan, Ackers, Peter, Greene, Anne-Marie (2007), «Work  			restructuring and changing craft identity: the Tale of the  			Disaffected Weavers (or what happens when the rug is pulled from  			under your feet)», Work, Employment and Society, 21, 1, pp. 85-101.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Schmiede, Rudi (org.) (1996), Virtuelle Arbeitswelten. Arbeit,  			Produktion und Subjekt in der «Informationsgesellschaft», Berlin,  			edition sigma.</p> 			    <p>Senghaas-Knobloch, Eva, Nagler, Brigitte (2000), «Von der  			Arbeitskraft zur Berufsrolle? Anerkennung als Herausforderung für  			die industrielle Arbeitskultur im Rahmen neuer Organisations– und  			Managementkonzepte», in Ursula Holtgrewe, Stephan Voswinkel,  			Gabriele Wagner (org.), Anerkennung und Arbeit, Konstanz, UVK,  			101-126.</p> 			    <p>Tyrell, Hartmann (2005), «Singular or plural – preliminary  			remarks on globalisation and world society», Zeitschrift für  			Soziologie, Sonderheft «Weltgesellschaft», 1-50.</p> 			    <p>Valenduc, Gérard (2007), «Occupational monograph – IT  			professionals in software services», in Gérard Valenduc, Patricia  			Vendramin, Bettina-Johanna Krings, Linda Nierling (org.),  			Occupational Case Studies. Synthesis Report and Comparative Analysis.  			Final report of WP11. WORKS report, pp. 73-98.</p> 			    <p>Valenduc, Gérard, Muchnik, Maira (2007), «Occupational monograph  			– Designers in the clothing industry», in Gérard Valenduc, Patricia  			Vendramin, Bettina-Johanna Krings, Linda Nierling (org.),  			Occupational Case Studies. Synthesis Report and Comparative Analysis.  			Final report of WP11. WORKS report, pp. 29-47.</p> 			    <p>Valenduc, Gérard, Vendramin, Patricia, Krings, Bettina-Johanna,  			Nierling, Linda (2007), Occupational Case Studies. Synthesis Report  			and Comparative analysis. Final report of WP11. WORKS report.</p> 			    <p>Vasconcelos da Silva, Ana, Woll, Tobias, Paulos, Margarida  			(2007), «Occ Report». Occupational case study on Designers –  			Portugal. Works-project, Internal working paper.</p> 			    <p>Walby, Sylvia (1986), Patriarchy at Work. Patriarchal and  			Capitalist Relations in Employment, Cambridge, Oxford, Polity.</p> 			    <p>Walby, Sylvia (1990), Theorizing Patriarchy, Oxford, Blackwell.</p> 			    <p>Werlhof V., Claudia, Bennholdt-Thomson, Veronika, Faraclas,  			Nicholas (org.) (2003), Subsistenz und Widerstand. Alternativen zur  			Globalisierung, Wien, Promedia.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Wetterer, Angelika (2002), Arbeitsteilung und  			Geschlechterkonstruktion. «Gender at Work» in theoretischer und  			historischer Perspektive, Konstanz, UVK.</p> 			    <p>Wichterich, Christa (1998), Die globalisierte Frau. Berichte aus  			der Zukunft der Ungleichheit, Hamburg, Rowohlt.</p> 			    <p>Winker, Gabriele (2002), «Informationstechnik und  			Geschlechterhierarchie – eine bewegende Beziehung»,  			Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis, 11, 2, pp. 70-79.</p> 			    <p>Wobbe, Theresa (2005), «Situating Europe within world society.  			Historical semantics and the identity politics of the European Union»,  			Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Sonderheft «Weltgesellschaft», pp.  			348-373.</p> 			    <p>&nbsp;</p> 			    <p><b>Annex</b></p> 			 <table border="0" width="80%" id="table4" cellspacing="0">   <tr> 					<td colspan="16" bgcolor="#C0C0C0"> 					    <p align="center"><b>Table 1: Distribution of occupational  					case studies across countries (number of case studies)</b></td> 				</tr> 				<tr> 					<td width="9%" bgcolor="#808080" style="border-right-style: solid; border-right-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="4%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">Austria</font></b></td> 					<td width="6%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">Belgium</font></b></td> 					<td width="6%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">Bulgaria</font></b></td> 					<td width="6%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">Denmark</font></b></td> 					<td width="4%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">France</font></b></td> 					<td width="6%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">Germany</font></b></td> 					<td width="5%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">Greece</font></b></td> 					<td width="6%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">Hungary</font></b></td> 					<td width="3%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">Italy</font></b></td> 					<td width="5%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">Norway</font></b></td> 					<td width="6%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">Portugal</font></b></td> 					<td width="5%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">Sweden</font></b></td> 					<td width="9%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">The Netherlands</font></b></td> 					<td width="2%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">UK</font></b></td> 					<td width="18%" bgcolor="#808080" align="center" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px"><b> 					<font color="#FFFFFF">In total</font></b></td> 				</tr> 				<tr> 					     <td width="30%" bgcolor="#C0C0C0"><b>High skilled occupations:</b></td> 					<td width="4%" valign="bottom">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="4%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="3%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="9%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="2%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="18%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:4px">&nbsp;</td> 				</tr> 				<tr> 					     <td width="30%" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">Designers    <br> 					in clothing</td> 					<td width="4%" valign="bottom">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="4%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">    <div align="center">1</div></td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">    <div align="center">1</div></td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="3%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<div align="center">1</div></td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="9%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="2%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="18%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:4px">    <div align="center">3</div></td> 				</tr> 				<tr> 					     <td width="30%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">        IT-professionals</td> 					     <td width="4%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px" valign="bottom">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					     <td width="6%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px" valign="bottom">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					     <td width="6%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px" valign="bottom">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					<td width="6%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px" valign="bottom">&nbsp;</td> 					     <td width="4%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px" valign="bottom">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					     <td width="6%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px" valign="bottom">            <div align="center">2</div></td> 					<td width="5%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px" valign="bottom">&nbsp;</td> 					     <td width="6%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px" valign="bottom">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					<td width="3%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px" valign="bottom">&nbsp;</td> 					     <td width="5%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px" valign="bottom">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					<td width="6%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px" valign="bottom">&nbsp;</td> 					     <td width="5%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px" valign="bottom">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					     <td width="9%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px" valign="bottom">            ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<div align="center">1</div></td> 					     <td width="2%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px" valign="bottom">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					     <td width="18%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:4px" valign="bottom">            <div align="center">11</div></td> 				</tr> 				<tr> 					     <td width="30%" bgcolor="#C0C0C0"><b>Semi-skilled occupations:</b></td> 					<td width="4%" valign="bottom">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="4%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="3%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="9%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="2%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="18%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:4px">&nbsp;</td> 				</tr> 				<tr> 					     <td width="30%" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px" bgcolor="#C0C0C0">        Front office     <br> 					employees    <br> 					in customer    <br> 					services in the    <br> 					public sector</td> 					     <td width="4%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					     <td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="4%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px">&nbsp;</td> 					     <td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px">&nbsp;</td> 					     <td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px">            ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<div align="center">1</div></td> 					     <td width="3%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px">&nbsp;</td> 					     <td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					<td width="9%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px">&nbsp;</td> 					     <td width="2%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					     <td width="18%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:3px; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:4px">            <div align="center">7</div></td> 				</tr> 				<tr> 					     <td width="30%" bgcolor="#C0C0C0"><b>Low-skilled occupations:</b></td> 					<td width="4%" valign="bottom">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="4%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="3%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="9%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="2%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="18%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:4px">&nbsp;</td> 				</tr> 				<tr> 					     <td width="30%" bgcolor="#C0C0C0" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">        Production    <br> 					workers in food    <br> 					or clothing</td> 					<td width="4%" valign="bottom" style="border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					     <td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					     <td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					<td width="4%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					     <td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					<td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					     <td width="3%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">            ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<div align="center">1</div></td> 					     <td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					     <td width="6%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">            <div align="center">1</div></td> 					<td width="5%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="9%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					<td width="2%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px">&nbsp;</td> 					     <td width="18%" valign="bottom" style="border-left-style: solid; border-left-width: 3px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-width: 3px; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:4px">            <div align="center">6</div></td> 				</tr> 	</table> 			    <p>&nbsp;</p> 			    <p><b>Notes </b> </p> 			    <p><a name="2" href="#top2">1</a> The authors would like to thank  			the anonymous reviewers for their constructive critical and fruitful  			comments on the paper.</p> 			     <p><a name="3" href="#top3">2</a> In 2005, the European Commission funded a ground-breaking    research project, called Work Organisation Restructuring in the Knowledge Society    (WORKS), to investigate restructuring processes in global value chains and their    impact on organisations as well as on individuals. Combining theoretical work    and a detailed analysis of a wide range of statistics with in-depth case studies,    the team analysed the forces that bring about these changes, including restructuring    of global value chains and the policy environment, and produced a series of    publications highlighting different aspects of these changes: in work organisation,    employer use of technology, skills and knowledge requirements, career trajectories,    occupational segregation, and the quality of working life (for further details,    see: <a href="http://www.worksproject.be" target="_blank">http://www.worksproject.be</a>).</p> 			    <p><a name="4" href="#top4">3</a> One of these many facets is the  			increase in informal work, seen today in huge migration streams from  			Eastern European countries to continental or Southern Europe.  			Domestic and care services as well as prostitution – activities done  			by women – are considered the flipside of the global economy (with  			regard to gender and migration see Rerrich, 2006; Ehrenreich and  			Hochschild, 2002; Henshall-Momsen, 1999).</p> 			    <p><a name="5" href="#top5">4</a> Understanding these processes is  			strongly connected with understanding the philosophical concept of  			modernity which dates back to the Renaissance in Europe. At the end  			of this era, and especially during the Enlightenment, the view of  			the global system changed fundamentally. It encompassed a new  			relationship with nature, a new self-understanding of subjectivity,  			a new intersubjective and political relation towards community and a  			new economic attitude (Dussel, 1999: 13).</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><a name="6" href="#top6">5</a> This process has been described in  			a huge body of literature which primarily deals with the economic  			development of globalisation and its impact on societal development  			(from a critical point of view see Polanyi, 1978; Braudel, 1986;  			Altvater and Mahnkopf, 1997; Hack, 2005).</p> 			    <p><a name="7" href="#top7">6</a> Thus, from a historical point of  			view the semantic development of globalisation is strongly connected  			with the concept of modernity in Europe (see overview Tyrell, 2005;  			Hack, 2005; Jameson and Miyoshi, 1999). If modernity begins with the  			«Renaissance premodern process, and from there a transition is made  			to the properly made in Spain, Amerindia forms part of    <br> 			«modernity» since the moment of the conquest and colonisation (...).  			If modernity enters into crisis at the end of the twentieth century,  			after five centuries of development, it is (...) also a matter of a  			“planetary” description of the phenomenon of modernity» (Dussel,  			1999: 18).</p> 			    <p><a name="8" href="#top8">7</a> In spite of the economic growth in  			Japan and currently in China, the northern transatlantic economic  			system (specifically the links among the European Union, the United  			States, and Canada) represents the major concentration of processes  			of economic globalisation today. «At the turn of the millennium this  			region accounted for 66 percent of worldwide stock market  			capitalisation, 60 percent of inward foreign investment stock and 76  			percent of outward foreign investment stock, 60 percent of worldwide  			sales in mergers and acquisitions, and 80 percent of purchases in  			mergers and acquisitions» (Sassen, 2007b: 60).</p> 			    <p><a name="9" href="#top9">8</a> This experience shows  			significantly that resistance to globalisation on a local level is  			not something new. It is historically derived and locally founded as  			i.e. the Mau Mau movement in Kenya or the Chipko-movement in India  			show (Chow, 2003; Mies and Shiva, 1995).</p> 			    <p><a name="10" href="#top10">9</a> Especially in the fields «women  			and development» or «gender and development» a broad international  			discourse exists which started as far back as the 1970s. Examining  			the gendered impact of economic globalisation, feminist researchers  			reformulated theories and research methodologies (Werlhof et al.,  			2003; Merchant, 1987; Haraway, 1995). Other challenges were the  			impact of economic globalisation on women who vary by race,  			ethnicity and class (Walby, 1986; 1990). Important work on gender  			also has done by international organisations like the United Nations  			Development Program (UNDP) and UNIFEM (Pyle and Ward, 2003: 462ff.).</p> 			    <p><a name="11" href="#top11">10</a> The occupational groups under  			research were: designers in the clothing industry; researchers in  			ICT; skilled and semi-skilled production workers in the food and  			clothing sector; production workers in software development;  			front-office employees in customer services; IT professionals in IT  			service providers. Here, the three occupational groups of the IT  			sector are summarised to one occupation: IT professionals.</p> 			    <p><a name="12" href="#top12">11</a> The sample included the  			following countries: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, France,  			Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, The  			Netherlands and the UK.</p> 			    <p><a name="13" href="#top13">12</a> In the following, the article  			focuses on changes in knowledge-intensive occupations as well  			low-skilled manufacturing occupations, because the analysis showed  			that the changes due to global restructuring were most crucial in  			these occupational clusters.</p> 			    <p><a name="14" href="#top14">13</a> Nevertheless, the percentage of  			women in the field of IT is still very low.</p> 			    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><a name="15" href="#top15">14</a> For many decades, part-time  			work has had a strong gender bias, because this model is used to a  			great extent by female employees. Nevertheless, part-time work is  			still the most common instrument for atypical working time  			arrangements and is still regarded as the main organisational  			instrument for employees to balance work and life, both in political  			and academic debates (European Foundation, 2007).</p> 			    <p><a name="16" href="#top16">15</a> A large body of literature  			focuses on different aspects of production work, although recently  			the subjective perspective of production workers has often been  			neglected (cf. Lautsch and Scully, 2007; Senghaas-Knobloch and  			Nagler, 2000).</p> 			    <p><a name="17" href="#top17">16</a> However it has to be noted that  			the possibility to work night shifts and overtime can be also  			appreciated by the workers because of the low wage level in  			production work (cf. also to Lautsch and Scully, 2007).</p> 			    <p>&nbsp;</p> 			     <p><b>Linda Nierling</b> studied Environmental Sciences and Business Administration    at the University of Lueneburg, Germany and the ETH Zurich, Switzerland. She    graduated in Environmental Sciences in autumn 2005. Since October 2005 she works    as a research fellow at the Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems    Analysis (ITAS) at the Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Germany. Her research focus    lies on change processes in work, gender studies and sustainable development.    Currently she is working on her doctoral thesis on recognition structures of    work. The PhDproject is located at the University of Frankfurt, Germany in the    department of sociology.</p>     <p> Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS)</p>     <p> Research Centre Karlsruhe</p>     <p>Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, </p>     <p>76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen</p>     <p> Germany </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>e-mail: <a href="mailto:nierling@itas.fzk.de"> nierling@itas.fzk.de</a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Bettina-Johanna Krings</b>, M.A. Senior Scientist at the Institute for Technology    Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS) at the Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe. She    has completed her studies in Political Sciences, Sociology and Anthropology.    She had working experiences in Latin America. Since 1994, she was involved in    research activities at ITAS on different issues like science and technology    policy, gender studies, research policy for a sustainable development. Since    1999, she has a strong focus on the relationship between information technologies    and consequences on    <br>   working conditions. She has completed several projects on that issue with strong    bias on different topics.</p>     <p>Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS)</p>     <p> Research Centre Karlsruhe</p>     <p>Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, </p>     <p>76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen</p>     <p> Germany </p>     <p>E-mail: <a href="mailto:nierling@itas.fzk.de"> </a><a href="mailto:krings@itas.fzk.de">    krings@itas.fzk.de</a> </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><i>Artigo recebido em 31 de Maio de 2008 e aceite para publicação em 9 de Setembro    de 2008.</i></p>            ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Acker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joan]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Future of Gender and Organisations: Connections and Boundaries, Paper for plenary talk for Gender, Work and Organisation Conference in Manchester]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
