J. Freitas Santos*, J. Cadima Ribeiro**
jfsantos@iscap.ipp.pt, jcadima@eeg.uminho.pt
Resumo. A contrafacção internacional afecta negativamente produtores, consumidores e as economias nacionais. Nos últimos anos, algumas tentativas têm sido empreendidas por organizações internacionais (União Europeia, Organização Mundial do Comércio) para resolver este problema complexo. Embora alguns sucessos tenham sido obtidos, o número de apreensões na fronteira externa da União Europeia de mercadoria contrafaccionada não tem parado de crescer. Este estudo analisa a influência das variáveis culturais de Hofstede (distância ao poder, individualismo, masculinidade e aversão à incerteza) na atracção de mercadoria contrafaccionada para os países da União Europeia. O perfil de um país receptor de contrafacção caracteriza-se pela baixa distância ao poder.
Palavras-chave: Contrafacção; Cultura; Hofstede; União Europeia
Abstract. International counterfeiting affects adversely producers, consumers and domestic economies. Some attempts have been made in the last years by international organisations (European Union, World Trade Organisation) to deal with this complex problem. Though some success has been achieved, the number of seizures of counterfeited goods detected in the external borders of EU has increased. This study examines the impact of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions (power distance, individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance) on the attraction of international counterfeiting to European Union member countries. A cultural profile of a counterfeiter country is one in which there is low power distance, low uncertainty avoidance, and low individualism
]]> Keywords: Counterfeiting; Culture; Hofstede; European Union
Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.
Full text only available in PDF format.
References
Andrés, A. (2002) The European software piracy: an empirical application, mimeo, University of Southern Denmark. [ Links ]
Aryanto, V. D. W. (2003) Intellectual property rights theft in far east countries, Journal of Business Administration, Vol. 2, n. 2, Fall.
Bender, C. (2002) Intellectual property rights protection and information technology: evidence from music market panel data, mimeo, University of Muenster, Germany.
Chaudhry, P. E.; Walsh, M. G. (1996) An assessement of the impact of counterfeiting in international markets, Columbia Journal of World Business, Vol. XXXI, n. 3, pp. 34-48.
]]> CEC (COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES) (1998) Green paper: combating counterfeiting and piracy in the single market, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.CEC (COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES) (1999) Final report on responses to the European Commission green paper on counterfeiting and piracy, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
Globerman, S. (1988) Adressing international product piracy, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 19, n. 3, pp. 497-504.
Green, R. and Smith, T. (2002) Executive insights: countering brand counterfeiteirs, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 10, n. 4, pp. 89-106.
Habib, M. and Zurawicki, L. (2002) Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 33, n. 2, pp. 291-307.
Harvey, M. G. and Ronkainen, I. A. (1985) International counterfeiters: marketing sucess without the cost and the risk, Columbia Journal of World Business, Vol. XX, n. 3, pp. 37-45.
Hofstede, G. H. (1991) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind, McGraw Hill, London.
Hofstede, G. H. and Bond, M. H. (1988) The confucian connection: from cultural roots to economic growth, Organizational Dynamics, Vo0l. 16, n.º 4, pp. 5-21.
Husted, B. W. (1999) Wealth, culture and corruption, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 30, n. 2, pp. 339-360.
Javorcik, B. S. (2002) The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: evidence from transition economies, European Economic Review, 48, pp. 39-62.
]]> Lewis, R. D. (1999), When cultures collide: managing sucessfully across cultures, Revised Edition, Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London.Le Nouvel Observateur (LNO) (2005), Atlas économique et politique mondial 2006.
Mole, J. (2003), Mind your manners: managing business cultures in the new global Europe, Third Edition, Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London.
Nill, A. and Shultz, C. J. (1996), The scourge of global counterfeiting, Business Horizons, November/December, pp. 37-42.
OCDE (1998) The economic impact of counterfeiting, Organisation de Cooperation et de Développement Economique, Paris.
Rephann, T. J. (1999) Links between rural development and crime, Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 78, n. 4, pp. 365-386.
Ronkainen, I. and Cusumano, J. (2001) Correlates of intellectual property violations, Multinational Business Review, Vol. 9, n. 1, pp. 59-65.
Sanyal, R. N. and Samanta, S. K. (2004) Determinants of bribery in international business, Thunderbird International Business Review, Vol. 46, n. 2, pp. 133-148.
Tanzi, V. (1998) Corruption around the world: causes, consequences, scope and cures, IMF Working Paper, WP/98/63.
TAXUD (Taxation and Customs Union) (2005) Statistics of counterfeiting, unpublished data, European Comission, Luxembourg.
]]> UNPD (United Nations Development Programme) (2003) Human Development Report 2003, Oxford University Press, New York.
* Professor Coordenador do ISCAP/IPPorto e Membro do NIPE/EEG/Uminho
** Professor Catedrático da Escola de Economia e Gestão da Universidade do Minho e Membro do NIPE.
]]>