<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1646-2122</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Portuguesa de Ortopedia e Traumatologia]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Port. Ortop. Traum.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1646-2122</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedade Portuguesa de Ortopedia e Traumatologia]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1646-21222014000100005</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Correlação funcional e ecográfica no tratamento cirúrgico da coifa dos rotadores com seguimento superior a 5 anos]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oliveira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Vânia]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luís]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barreira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pedro]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Costa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luís]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Araújo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[João]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joaquim]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vasconcelos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José Carlos]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lourenço]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José Manuel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade do Porto I.C.B.A.S. ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Porto ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Centro Hospitalar do Porto Hospital de Stº António Serviço de Radiologia]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,Centro Hospitalar do Porto Hospital de Stº António Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>47</fpage>
<lpage>56</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1646-21222014000100005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1646-21222014000100005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1646-21222014000100005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Objectivo: a reparação cirúrgica da coifa dos rotadores visa eliminar a dor e restaurar a função, com sucesso entre 5-90%. A dimensão da ruptura condiciona o resultado. Este estudo visa a eficácia do tratamento cirúrgico com o mínimo de 5 anos de seguimento e correlaciona resultado funcional com achados ecográficos. Material e Métodos: entre 2002 e 2007 o mesmo cirurgião realizou 166 suturas da coifa dos rotadores em 156 doentes. As ecografias pré e pós-operatórias foram sempre realizadas pelo mesmo radiologista. Retrospectivamente avaliou-se tipo de ruptura, cirurgia, sutura e material, complicações, dor (VAS), retorno laboral/atividades e inquirido o grau de satisfação. Completaram follow-up (FU) com avaliação funcional (Constant-Murley Score e UCLA Shoulder Score) e ecográfica 77 doentes, correspondendo a 87 rupturas. Resultados: A idade média foi 55,6 anos (22-77) com FU de 7,4 anos (5-11). Verificaram-se 145 (87,3%) rupturas completas sendo 14 (9,7%) maciças e 61 (42,1%) grandes. Realizaram-se 122 (73,5%) suturas artroscópicas, sendo 44 (26,5%) por mini-open. A avaliação funcional foi 72 (31-100) Constant Score e 29 (19-35) UCLA Score. O VAS foi 2,89 (0-8) com 29 (43,3%) doentes assintomáticos. Ocorreram 4 complicações (2,4%). Ecograficamente, verificou-se 29/87 (33,3%) re-rupturas, 32,3% artroscópicas e 40,1% abertas, lembrando que a sutura aberta foi usada em rupturas maiores. Retomaram atividades 95,5% dos doentes. Registou-se 100% de satisfação relativamente ao pré-operatório. Conclusão: este estudo reforça o impacto do tratamento cirúrgico na dor e verifica eficácia consistente se houver seleção criteriosa. A re-ruptura avaliada ecograficamente nem sempre se correlaciona com função, intervindo outros factores.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Aim: surgical repair of the rotator cuff aims to eliminate pain and restore function with a success rate between 5-90%. The size of the tear has impact on outcome. This study aims to evaluate effectiveness of the surgical repair with up to 5 years of follow-up and correlates functional outcome and ultrasound findings. Patients and Methods: from 2002 to 2007 the same surgeon performed 166 rotator cuff repairs in 156 patients. The same radiologist always performed pre- and postoperative ultrasound. Retrospectively were evaluated tear type, repair technique, suture material, complications, pain (VAS), return to work/activities and asked satisfaction. Seventy-seven patients completed follow-up (FU) with functional assessment (Constant-Murley score and UCLA Shoulder Score) and ultrasound, corresponding to 87 tears. Results: the mean age was 55.6 years (22-77) with FU 7.4 years (5-11). There were 145 (87.3%) complete tears, 14 (9.7%) massive and 61 (42.1%) large. The repair was arthroscopic in 122 (73.5%) cases and mini-open in 44 (26.5%). Functional assessment was 72 (31-100) Constant Score and 29 (19-35) UCLA Score. The VAS was 2.89 (0-8) with 29 (43.3%) asymptomatic patients. There were 4 complications (2.4%). Ultrasound identified 29/87 (33.3%) re-tears, 32.3% arthroscopic and 40.1% opened, noting that the open suture was used in larger tears. A total of 95.5% of patients resumed activities. When compared to preoperative, there was 100% satisfaction. Conclusion: this study strengthens the impact of surgical treatment on pain relief and its consistent effectiveness if careful selection. An ultrasound retear and function does not always correlate, other factors intervene.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Coifa dos rotadores]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[ruptura]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[sutura artroscópica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[cirurgia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[função]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[ecografia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[dor]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Rotator cuff]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[tear]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[arthroscopic repair]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[surgery]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[function]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[ultrasound]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[pain]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="right"><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">ARTIGO ORIGINAL</font></b></p>    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><b><font face="Verdana" size="4">Correlação funcional e ecográfica no tratamento cirúrgico da coifa dos rotadores com seguimento superior a 5 anos</font></b></p>    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Vânia Oliveira<sup>I, II</sup></b>; <b>Luís Silva<sup>I, II</sup></b>; <b>Pedro Barreira<sup>I, II</sup></b>; <b>Luís Costa<sup>I, II</sup></b>; <b>João Araújo<sup>I, III</sup></b>; <b>Joaquim Ramos<sup>I, II</sup></b>; <b>José Carlos Vasconcelos<sup>I, III</sup></b>; <b>José Manuel Lourenço<sup>I, II</sup></b></font></p>    <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">I. I.C.B.A.S. Universidade do Porto. Porto. Portugal.<br />II. Serviço de Radiologia. Centro Hospitalar do Porto. Hospital de Stº António. Portugal.<br />III. Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Centro Hospitalar do Porto. Hospital de Stº António. Portugal.<br /></font></p>    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><a name="topc"></a><a href="#c">Endereço para correspondência</a></font></p>    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">RESUMO</font></b></p><font face="verdana" size="2">    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Objectivo: a repara&ccedil;&atilde;o cir&uacute;rgica da coifa dos rotadores visa eliminar a dor e restaurar a fun&ccedil;&atilde;o, com sucesso entre 5-90%. A dimens&atilde;o da ruptura condiciona o resultado.</p>     <p>Este estudo visa a efic&aacute;cia do tratamento cir&uacute;rgico com o m&iacute;nimo de 5 anos de seguimento e correlaciona resultado funcional com achados ecogr&aacute;ficos.</p>     <p>Material e M&eacute;todos: entre 2002 e 2007 o mesmo cirurgi&atilde;o realizou 166 suturas da coifa dos rotadores em 156 doentes. As ecografias pr&eacute; e p&oacute;s-operat&oacute;rias foram sempre realizadas pelo mesmo radiologista. Retrospectivamente avaliou-se tipo de ruptura, cirurgia, sutura e material, complica&ccedil;&otilde;es, dor (VAS), retorno laboral/atividades e inquirido o grau de satisfa&ccedil;&atilde;o.</p>     <p>Completaram follow-up (FU) com avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o funcional (Constant-Murley Score e UCLA Shoulder Score) e ecogr&aacute;fica 77 doentes, correspondendo a 87 rupturas.</p>     <p>Resultados: A idade m&eacute;dia foi 55,6 anos (22-77) com FU de 7,4 anos (5-11). Verificaram-se 145 (87,3%) rupturas completas sendo 14 (9,7%) maci&ccedil;as e 61 (42,1%) grandes.</p>     <p>Realizaram-se 122 (73,5%) suturas artrosc&oacute;picas, sendo 44 (26,5%) por mini-open.</p>     <p>A avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o funcional foi 72 (31-100) Constant Score e 29 (19-35) UCLA Score. O VAS foi 2,89 (0-8) com 29 (43,3%) doentes assintom&aacute;ticos. Ocorreram 4 complica&ccedil;&otilde;es (2,4%).</p>     <p>Ecograficamente, verificou-se 29/87 (33,3%) re-rupturas, 32,3% artrosc&oacute;picas e 40,1% abertas, lembrando que a sutura aberta foi usada em rupturas maiores.</p>     <p>Retomaram atividades 95,5% dos doentes. Registou-se 100% de satisfa&ccedil;&atilde;o relativamente ao pr&eacute;-operat&oacute;rio.</p>     <p>Conclus&atilde;o: este estudo refor&ccedil;a o impacto do tratamento cir&uacute;rgico na dor e verifica efic&aacute;cia consistente se houver sele&ccedil;&atilde;o criteriosa. A re-ruptura avaliada ecograficamente nem sempre se correlaciona com fun&ccedil;&atilde;o, intervindo outros factores.</p></font>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Palavras chave</b>: Coifa dos rotadores, ruptura, sutura artroscópica, cirurgia, função, ecografia, dor. </font></p>    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">ABSTRACT</font></b></p><font face="verdana" size="2">    <p>Aim: surgical repair of the rotator cuff aims to eliminate pain and restore function with a success rate between 5-90%. The size of the tear has impact on outcome.</p>     <p>This study aims to evaluate effectiveness of the surgical repair with up to 5 years of follow-up and correlates functional outcome and ultrasound findings.</p>     <p>Patients and Methods: from 2002 to 2007 the same surgeon performed 166 rotator cuff repairs in 156 patients. The same radiologist always performed pre- and postoperative ultrasound.</p>     <p>Retrospectively were evaluated tear type, repair technique, suture material, complications, pain (VAS), return to work/activities and asked satisfaction.</p>     <p>Seventy-seven patients completed follow-up (FU) with functional assessment (Constant-Murley score and UCLA Shoulder Score) and ultrasound, corresponding to 87 tears.</p>     <p>Results: the mean age was 55.6 years (22-77) with FU 7.4 years (5-11). There were 145 (87.3%) complete tears, 14 (9.7%) massive and 61 (42.1%) large.</p>     <p>The repair was arthroscopic in 122 (73.5%) cases and mini-open in 44 (26.5%).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Functional assessment was 72 (31-100) Constant Score and 29 (19-35) UCLA Score. The VAS was 2.89 (0-8) with 29 (43.3%) asymptomatic patients. There were 4 complications (2.4%).</p>     <p>Ultrasound identified 29/87 (33.3%) re-tears, 32.3% arthroscopic and 40.1% opened, noting that the open suture was used in larger tears.</p>     <p>A total of 95.5% of patients resumed activities. When compared to preoperative, there was 100% satisfaction.</p>     <p>Conclusion: this study strengthens the impact of surgical treatment on pain relief and its consistent effectiveness if careful selection. An ultrasound retear and function does not always correlate, other factors intervene.</p></font>    <p><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Key words</b>: Rotator cuff, tear, arthroscopic repair, surgery, function, ultrasound, pain. </font></p>    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">INTRODUÇÃO</font></b></p><font face="verdana" size="2">    <p>A patologia da coifa dos rotadores &eacute; frequente, aumenta com a idade, e pode condicionar dor e limita&ccedil;&atilde;o funcional com consequ&ecirc;ncias econ&oacute;micas e psicossociais.</p>
    <p>A rupturas podem ser completas ou parciais, articulares ou bursais, variando de maci&ccedil;as (&gt;2 tend&otilde;es; &gt;5cm) a grandes (3-5cm), m&eacute;dias (1-3cm) ou pequenas (&lt;1cm)1.</p>
    <p>Quando sintom&aacute;tica, o tratamento visa eliminar a dor e restaurar a fun&ccedil;&atilde;o e, quando cir&uacute;rgico, o sucesso varia entre 5-90%. A dimens&atilde;o da ruptura inicial condiciona a efic&aacute;cia (<a href="/img/revistas/rpot/v22n1/22n1a05q1.jpg">Quadro 1</a>) sendo que rupturas maci&ccedil;as associam-se a 60% de re-ruptura comparativamente com 36% em rupturas pequenas/m&eacute;dias. A re-ruptura varia amplamente entre 15-90%2-13 e cirurgia pr&eacute;via constitui factor de risco acrescido.</p>    
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>    <p>    <center><a href="/img/revistas/rpot/v22n1/22n1a05q1.jpg">Quadro 1</a></center></p>    
<p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>Na literatura, o tratamento artrosc&oacute;pico &eacute; efetivo e apresenta vantagens relativamente &agrave; cirurgia cl&aacute;ssica aberta mas a influ&ecirc;ncia t&eacute;cnica e qualidade da sutura s&atilde;o controversas. N&atilde;o &eacute; linear a rela&ccedil;&atilde;o entre integridade da sutura e dor e fun&ccedil;&atilde;o e &eacute; controverso o papel de diversos factores como uso de double row, integridade do deltoide e qualidade tendinosa, integridade da sutura aos 6 meses, revis&atilde;o cir&uacute;rgica ou correla&ccedil;&atilde;o entre rupturas maiores e impingment com hipovasculariza&ccedil;&atilde;o14-22. Para Iagulli et al. 201123, quando grande retra&ccedil;&atilde;o e fraca qualidade tendinosa, os resultados da sutura parcial s&atilde;o compar&aacute;veis a sutura completa.</p>
    <p>Al&eacute;m disso, interfere no sucesso cir&uacute;rgico a mecanoadapta&ccedil;&atilde;o do troquiter, fixa&ccedil;&atilde;o sutura-osso, interface sutura-tend&atilde;o, resist&ecirc;ncia e for&ccedil;a da sutura, seguran&ccedil;a dos n&oacute;s e loop e restaura&ccedil;&atilde;o do footprint anat&oacute;mico24.</p>
    <p>Este estudo avalia a efic&aacute;cia do tratamento cir&uacute;rgico na ruptura da coifa dos rotadores, com o m&iacute;nimo de 5 anos de seguimento. Aprecia-se a rela&ccedil;&atilde;o entre resultado funcional e achados ecogr&aacute;ficos tentando contribuir para optimiza&ccedil;&atilde;o do tratamento destes doentes.</p></font>    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">MATERIAL E MÉTODOS</font></b></p><font face="verdana" size="2">    <p>Entre 2002 e 2007 foram realizadas 166 suturas da coifa dos rotadores em 156 doentes, pelo mesmo cirurgi&atilde;o. As ecografias pr&eacute; e p&oacute;s-operat&oacute;rias foram sempre realizadas pelo mesmo radiologista.</p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Retrospectivamente, foram adicionalmente avaliados os seguintes par&acirc;metros: tipo de ruptura, cirurgia, sutura e material usado, complica&ccedil;&otilde;es, dor (VAS), retorno laboral/atividades pr&eacute;vias e inquirido o grau de satisfa&ccedil;&atilde;o dos doentes (muito bom/bom).</p>
    <p>Completaram follow-up (FU) 77 doentes, com avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o funcional (Constant-Murley Score e UCLA Shoulder Score) e ecogr&aacute;fica, correspondendo a 87 rupturas.</p>
    <p>A an&aacute;lise estat&iacute;stica foi realizada com o SPSS 20.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago, Illinois).</p></font>    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">RESULTADOS</font></b></p><font face="verdana" size="2">    <p>A <a name="topt1"></a><a href="#t1">Tabela 1</a> apresenta os resultados descritivos. A idade m&eacute;dia foi 55,6 anos (22-77) com FU de 7,4 anos (5-11) sendo a maioria 113 (72,4%) do sexo feminino. Em 14 casos tratou-se ruptura aguda traum&aacute;tica, sendo a esmagadora maioria cr&oacute;nica, secund&aacute;ria em 2 casos a artrite reumatoide e 150 degenerativas. No total verificaram-se 145 (87,3%) rupturas completas sendo cerca de metade maci&ccedil;as (9,7%) e grandes (42,1%) (<a name="topf1"></a><a href="#f1">Figura 1</a>). Quando rupturas parciais o predom&iacute;nio foi articular (61,9%).</p>    <p>&nbsp;</p><a name="t1"></a>     <p>    <center><img src="/img/revistas/rpot/v22n1/22n1a05t1.jpg" width="343" height="462" border="0" /></center></p>    
<p>&nbsp;</p><a name="f1"></a>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <center><img src="/img/revistas/rpot/v22n1/22n1a05f1.jpg" width="397" height="870" border="0" /></center></p>    
<p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>A maioria 122 (73,5%) das suturas foram artrosc&oacute;picas sendo 44 (26,5%) abertas por mini-open (<a href="#t2">Tabela 2</a>). Note-se que a cirurgia mini-open realizou-se predominantemente nos anos iniciais do estudo em rupturas maci&ccedil;as ou associadas ao tend&atilde;o subescapular. Nos anos abrangidos pelo estudo foram usadas diferentes &acirc;ncoras e os pontos trans&oacute;sseos com Ethibond Excel&reg;, Ethicon.</p>    <p>&nbsp;</p><a name="t2"></a>     <p>    <center><img src="/img/revistas/rpot/v22n1/22n1a05t2.jpg" /></center></p>    
<p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>Duas suturas foram apenas parciais (1.2%), uma artrosc&oacute;pica e uma mini-open, em rupturas maci&ccedil;as. Em 22 casos foi associado o gesto de tenotomia da longa por&ccedil;&atilde;o do bic&iacute;pite (LPB) e 8 tenodeses da LPB.</p>
    <p>Verificaram-se 4 complica&ccedil;&otilde;es (2,4%): 2 capsulites retr&aacute;cteis submetidas a capsulotomia inferior artrosc&oacute;pica e 2 re-rupturas (uma aos 6 meses e outra p&oacute;s-traum&aacute;tica aos 4 meses) submetidas ambas a nova sutura artrosc&oacute;pica. N&atilde;o se registaram infec&ccedil;&otilde;es.</p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>A avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o funcional foi em m&eacute;dia 72 (31-100: fraco-excelente) com o Constant Score e 29 (19-35: fraco-excelente) com o UCLA Shoulder Score. O VAS m&eacute;dio foi 2,89 (0-8) e 29 (43,3%) doentes encontram-se assintom&aacute;ticos.</p>
    <p>No total das 87 rupturas reavaliadas ecograficamente, verificou-se re-ruptura em 29/87 (33,3%) casos, 32,3% na sutura artrosc&oacute;pica (<a name="topf2"></a><a href="#f2">Figura 2</a>) e 40,1% aberta (<a name="topf3"></a><a href="#f3">Figura 3</a>), sendo a esmagadora maioria (96,6%) em rupturas completas (<a href="#t3">Tabela 3</a>). Ocorreu involu&ccedil;&atilde;o adiposa do tend&atilde;o supra-espinhoso em 20 casos e do supra e infra-espinhoso em 14, num total de 39,1%.</p>    <p>&nbsp;</p><a name="f2"></a>     <p>    <center><img src="/img/revistas/rpot/v22n1/22n1a05f2.jpg" width="391" height="468" border="0" /></center></p>    
<p>&nbsp;</p><a name="f3"></a>     <p>    <center><img src="/img/revistas/rpot/v22n1/22n1a05f3.jpg" width="391" height="462" border="0" /></center></p>    
<p>&nbsp;</p><a name="t3"></a>     <p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<center><img src="/img/revistas/rpot/v22n1/22n1a05t3.jpg" /></center></p>    
<p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>Retomaram atividades pr&eacute;vias 96% dos doentes, sendo que 3 n&atilde;o retomaram e em 1 caso houve necessidade de adapta&ccedil;&atilde;o profissional. Registou-se 100% de satisfa&ccedil;&atilde;o relativamente ao pr&eacute;-operat&oacute;rio.</p></font>    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">DISCUSSÃO</font></b></p><font face="verdana" size="2">    <p>Apesar do impacto da integridade da sutura na fun&ccedil;&atilde;o, estas nem sempre se relacionam.</p>
    <p>O resultado funcional dos doentes sem recidiva n&atilde;o foi significativamente diferente dos doentes com re-ruptura (<a name="topf4"></a><a href="#f4">Figuras 4</a> e <a name="topf5"></a><a href="#f5">5</a>).</p>    <p>&nbsp;</p><a name="f4"></a>     <p>    <center><img src="/img/revistas/rpot/v22n1/22n1a05f4.jpg" width="395" height="615" border="0" /></center></p>    
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p><a name="f5"></a>     <p>    <center><img src="/img/revistas/rpot/v22n1/22n1a05f5.jpg" width="393" height="466" border="0" /></center></p>    
<p>&nbsp;</p>
    <p>As suturas s&atilde;o biomecanicamente est&aacute;veis dependendo da fixa&ccedil;&atilde;o &oacute;ssea, interface sutura-tend&atilde;o, resist&ecirc;ncia, seguran&ccedil;a dos n&oacute;s e restaura&ccedil;&atilde;o do footprint anat&oacute;mico. Al&eacute;m da optimiza&ccedil;&atilde;o t&eacute;cnica, a qualidade tendinosa, vasculariza&ccedil;&atilde;o e cirurgias pr&eacute;vias condicionam o resultado da sutura. Tamb&eacute;m factores extr&iacute;nsecos como idade, g&eacute;nero, obesidade, co-morbilidades, imunossupress&atilde;o e tabaco interferem com a qualidade e integridade da sutura e influenciam a fun&ccedil;&atilde;o<sup>10,15</sup>.</p>
    <p>Estudos pr&eacute;vios revelam que o envolvimento isolado do supra-espinhoso tem resultados superiores, com 75% de integridade aos 5 anos, comparativamente com o envolvimento conjunto do infra-espinhoso, com recidiva superior a 50%<sup>2,3,10,15</sup>.</p>
    <p>Este estudo refor&ccedil;a o impacto do tratamento cir&uacute;rgico na dor, encontrando-se todos os doentes satisfeitos em rela&ccedil;&atilde;o ao pr&eacute;-operat&oacute;rio e repetiriam o tratamento cir&uacute;rgico.</p>
    <p>Verifica-se ampla variabilidade funcional e foram identificados diversos vi&eacute;s na avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o: 1 trauma recente condicionando dor de novo e re-ruptura na ecografia; 1 esvaziamento ganglionar axilar por neoplasia; 1 status p&oacute;s-AVC com sequelas motoras homolateral; 1 les&atilde;o do plexo braquial p&oacute;s-acidente de via&ccedil;&atilde;o; 1 doen&ccedil;a neuromuscular (mobilidades passivas completas); 1 sequelas de poliomielite contralateral; 1 artrodese do ombro contralateral; 1 ruptura completa e 2 maci&ccedil;as contralaterais sintom&aacute;ticas. Estes factores condicionam por si s&oacute; menor fun&ccedil;&atilde;o e n&atilde;o concord&acirc;ncia entre as 2 escalas funcionais usadas. Salienta-se tamb&eacute;m a variabilidade no grau de exig&ecirc;ncia funcional de cada doente.</p>
    <p>Al&eacute;m disso, este estudo &eacute; limitado pelo n&uacute;mero da amostra e car&aacute;cter retrospectivo com consequente aus&ecirc;ncia de avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o funcional pr&eacute;-operat&oacute;ria.</p>
    <p>O FU superior a 5 anos &eacute; vantajoso comparativamente com estudos pr&eacute;vios assim como os factores constantes: mesmo cirurgi&atilde;o e mesmo radiologista.</p>
    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Verifica-se que a involu&ccedil;&atilde;o adiposa &eacute; frequente mas sem correla&ccedil;&atilde;o estat&iacute;stica com fun&ccedil;&atilde;o ou recidiva.</p>
    <p>Valoriza-se esta avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o ecogr&aacute;fica dada a experi&ecirc;ncia do radiologista, apesar de n&atilde;o se poder aplicar a classifica&ccedil;&atilde;o de Goutallier<sup>25,26</sup>. Al&eacute;m disso, Khoury et al. 27 demonstraram boa correla&ccedil;&atilde;o entre resson&acirc;ncia magn&eacute;tica e ecografia na avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o da atrofia muscular e involu&ccedil;&atilde;o adiposa.</p>
    <p>Os resultados deste estudo est&atilde;o de acordo com a literatura, confirmando a influ&ecirc;ncia de factores intr&iacute;nsecos e extr&iacute;nsecos na efic&aacute;cia da repara&ccedil;&atilde;o da coifa dos rotadores. Kim et al4 verificam tamb&eacute;m ampla variabilidade funcional, entre os extremos de cada escala, com m&eacute;dia de 30,9 no UCLA Score e 74,7 no Constant Score com 30,6 meses de FU e, apesar de n&atilde;o ter correla&ccedil;&atilde;o com a integridade da sutura, constataram que os doentes melhoraram funcionalmente no p&oacute;s-operat&oacute;rio. O elevado retorno a atividades pr&eacute;vias e grau de satisfa&ccedil;&atilde;o dos doentes tamb&eacute;m foi constatado em estudos pr&eacute;vios como o de Fealy et al28 que constataram satisfa&ccedil;&atilde;o dos doentes em 92.6%, em que 93% repetiriam o tratamento cir&uacute;rgico, e 83% retomaram atividades pr&eacute;vias.</p>
    <p>Os autores entendem que perante uma ruptura sintom&aacute;tica se deve individualizar tendo em considera&ccedil;&atilde;o mobilidades pr&eacute;-operat&oacute;rias e o impacto da dor, idade e grau de exig&ecirc;ncia funcional de cada doente, na decis&atilde;o cir&uacute;rgica. Mais tardiamente ter&aacute; pior qualidade tendinosa, com involu&ccedil;&atilde;o adiposa, retra&ccedil;&atilde;o e hipovasculariza&ccedil;&atilde;o.</p>
    <p>A sutura artrosc&oacute;pica &eacute; eficaz e em casos de ruptura maci&ccedil;a, cirurgia pr&eacute;via, com co-morbilidades, tabagismo e, na depend&ecirc;ncia da experi&ecirc;ncia do cirurgi&atilde;o, poder&aacute; optar-se por sutura aberta.</p></font>    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">CONCLUSÃO</font></b></p><font face="verdana" size="2">    <p>Este estudo verifica que o tratamento cir&uacute;rgico &eacute; consistentemente eficaz se houver sele&ccedil;&atilde;o criteriosa dos doentes. A re-ruptura da coifa dos rotadores avaliada ecograficamente nem sempre se correlaciona com a fun&ccedil;&atilde;o, intervindo no resultado final outros factores associados.</p></font>    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS</font></b></p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">1. Snyder SJ. Shoulder Arthroscopy. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000113&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </font></p>    <!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">2. Cummins CA, Murrell GA. Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003; 12: 128-133</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000115&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">3. Kim SH, Ha KI, Park JH, Kang JS, Oh SK, Oh I. Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: outcome analysis at 2 to 6 years? follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2003; 9: 746-754</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000116&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">4. Kim KC, Shin HD, Lee WY. Repair Integrity and Functional Outcomes After Arthroscopic Suture-Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair. J Bone Joint Surg (AM). 2012; 94 (8): 1-6</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000117&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">5. Bigliani LU, Cordasco FA, McIlveen SJ, Musso ES. Operative repair of massive rotator cuff tears: long-term results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1992; 1: 120-130</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000118&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">6. Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J. The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg (AM). 2000; 82: 505-515</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000119&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">7. Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K. The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg (AM). 2004; 86: 219-224</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000120&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">8. Klepps S, Bishop J, Lin J. Prospective evaluation of the effect of rotator cuff integrity on the outcome of open rotator cuff repairs. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2004; 32: 1716-1722</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000121&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">9. Bishop J, Klepps S, Lo IK. Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: A prospective study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2006; 15: 290-299</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000122&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">10. Nho SJ, Slabaugh MA, Seroyer ST, Grumet RC, Wilson JB, Verma NN. Does the literature support double-row suture anchor fixation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review comparing double-row and single-row suture anchor configuration. Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 1319-1328</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000123&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">11. DeFranco MJ, Bershadsky B, Ciccone J, Yum JK, Iannotti JP. Functional outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: a correlation of anatomic and clinical results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16: 759-765</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000124&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">12. Thomazeau H, Boukobza E, Morcet N, Chaperon J, Langlais F. Prediction of rotator cuff repair results by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997; 344: 275-283</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000125&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">13. Ko SH, Lee CC, Friedman D. Arthroscopic single-row supraspinatus tendon repair with a modified mattress locking stitch: a prospective, randomized controlled comparison with a simple stitch. Arthroscopy. 2008; 24: 1005-1012</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000126&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">14. Lafosse L, Brozska R, Toussaint B, Gobezie R. The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg (AM). 2007; 80: 1533-1541</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000127&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">15. Harryman DT 2nd, Mack LA, Wang KY, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA 3rd. Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg (AM). 1991; 73: 982-989</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000128&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">16. Calvert PT, Packer NP, Stoker DJ, Bayley JI, Kessel L. Arthrography of the shoulder after operative repair of the torn rotator cuff. JBJS (BR). 1986; 68: 147-150</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000129&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">17. Jost B, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C. Clinical outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg (AM). 2000; 82: 304-314</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000130&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">18. Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal?. J Bone Joint Surg (AM). 2005; 87: 1229-1240</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000131&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">19. Ellman H, Kay SP, Wirth M. Arthroscopic treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: 2- to 7-year follow-up study. Arthroscopy. 1993; 9 (2): 195-200</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000132&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">20. Fuchs B, Gilbart MK, Hodler J, Gerber C. Clinical and structural results of open repair of an isolated one tendon tear of the rotator cuff. JBJS (AM). 2006; 88: 309-316</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000133&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">21. Gartsman GM, Khan M, Hammerman SM. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg (AM). 1998; 80: 832-840</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000134&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">22. Iannotti JP, Deutsch A, Green A, Rudicel S, Christensen J, Marraffino S, et al. Time to failure after rotator cuff repair: a prospective imaging study. J Bone Joint Surg (AM). 2013; 95: 965-971</font></p>    <!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">23. Iagulli ND, Field LD, Hobgood ER. Comparison of Partial Versus Complete Arthroscopic Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears. Am J Sports Med. 2012;    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000136&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </font></p>    <p><font face="verdana" size="2">24. Oh JH, McGarry MH, Jun BJ, Gupta A. Restoration of Shoulder Biomechanics According to Degree of Repair Completion in a Cadaveric Model of Massive Rotator Cuff Tear: Importance of Margin Convergence and Posterior Cuff Fixation. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Nov; 40: 24482453-2453</font></p>    <!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">25. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures: pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 304: 78-83</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000139&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">26. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Gleyze P. Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003; 12: 550-554</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000140&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">27. Khoury V, Cardinal E, Brassard P. Atrophy and fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus muscle: sonography versus MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190 (4): 1105-1111</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000141&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="verdana" size="2">28. Fealy S, Kingham TP, Altchek DW. Mini-open rotator cuff repair using a two-row fixation technique: outcomes analysis in patients with small, moderate, and large rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2002; 18 (6): 665-670</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000142&pid=S1646-2122201400010000500028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><b><font face="Verdana" size="2">Conflito de interesse: </font></b></p><font face="verdana" size="2">    <p>Nada a declarar.</p></font>    <p>&nbsp;</p><a name="c"></a>    <p><b><font face="Verdana" size="2"><a href="#topc">Endereço para correspondência</a></font></b></p>    <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Vânia Oliveira    <br>Centro Hospitalar do Porto    <br>Hospital Santo António    <br>Largo Prof. Abel Salazar    <br>4099-001 Porto    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br>Portugal    <br><a href="mailto:vaniacoliveira@gmail.com">vaniacoliveira@gmail.com</a></font></p>    <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Data de Submissão: </b> 2013-11-16</font></p>    <p><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Data de Revisão: </b> 2014-03-03</font></p>    <p><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Data de Aceitação: </b> 2014-03-03</font></p>     ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Snyder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Shoulder Arthroscopy]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Philadelphia ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Lippincott Williams and Wilkins]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cummins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Murrell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Shoulder Elbow Surg]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<page-range>128-133</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KI]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Park]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: outcome analysis at 2 to 6 years? follow-up]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Arthroscopy]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<page-range>746-754</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WY]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Repair Integrity and Functional Outcomes After Arthroscopic Suture-Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg (AM)]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>94</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>1-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bigliani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LU]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cordasco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McIlveen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Musso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ES]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Operative repair of massive rotator cuff tears: long-term results]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Shoulder Elbow Surg]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>120-130</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gerber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuchs]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hodler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg (AM)]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<page-range>505-515</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galatz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ball]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Teefey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Middleton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yamaguchi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg (AM)]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>86</volume>
<page-range>219-224</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klepps]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bishop]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Prospective evaluation of the effect of rotator cuff integrity on the outcome of open rotator cuff repairs]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The American Journal of Sports Medicine]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<page-range>1716-1722</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bishop]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klepps]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IK]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: A prospective study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<page-range>290-299</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Slabaugh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Seroyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ST]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grumet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wilson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Verma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NN]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Does the literature support double-row suture anchor fixation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review comparing double-row and single-row suture anchor configuration]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Arthroscopy]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<page-range>1319-1328</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DeFranco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bershadsky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ciccone]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yum]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iannotti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Functional outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: a correlation of anatomic and clinical results]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Shoulder Elbow Surg]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<page-range>759-765</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thomazeau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boukobza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morcet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chaperon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Langlais]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Prediction of rotator cuff repair results by magnetic resonance imaging]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Orthop Relat Res]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>344</volume>
<page-range>275-283</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Friedman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Arthroscopic single-row supraspinatus tendon repair with a modified mattress locking stitch: a prospective randomized controlled comparison with a simple stitch]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Arthroscopy]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<page-range>1005-1012</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lafosse]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brozska]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Toussaint]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gobezie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique: Surgical technique]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg (AM)]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>80</volume>
<page-range>1533-1541</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harryman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DT 2nd]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mack]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KY]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jackins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Richardson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ML]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Matsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FA 3rd]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Repairs of the rotator cuff: Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg (AM)]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>73</volume>
<page-range>982-989</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calvert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Packer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stoker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bayley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JI]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kessel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Arthrography of the shoulder after operative repair of the torn rotator cuff]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[JBJS (BR)]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>68</volume>
<page-range>147-150</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jost]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pfirrmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gerber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Clinical outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg (AM)]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<page-range>304-314</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boileau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brassart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Watkinson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carles]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hatzidakis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Krishnan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg (AM)]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>87</volume>
<page-range>1229-1240</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ellman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kay]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wirth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Arthroscopic treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: 2 to 7-year follow-up study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Arthroscopy]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>195-200</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuchs]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gilbart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hodler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gerber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Clinical and structural results of open repair of an isolated one tendon tear of the rotator cuff]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[JBJS (AM)]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>88</volume>
<page-range>309-316</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gartsman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Khan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hammerman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg (AM)]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>80</volume>
<page-range>832-840</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iannotti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Deutsch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Green]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rudicel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Christensen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marraffino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodeo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Time to failure after rotator cuff repair: a prospective imaging study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg (AM)]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>95</volume>
<page-range>965-971</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iagulli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ND]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Field]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hobgood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ER]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Comparison of Partial Versus Complete Arthroscopic Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Sports Med]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McGarry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gupta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Restoration of Shoulder Biomechanics According to Degree of Repair Completion in a Cadaveric Model of Massive Rotator Cuff Tear: Importance of Margin Convergence and Posterior Cuff Fixation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Sports Med]]></source>
<year>11/2</year>
<month>01</month>
<day>2</day>
<volume>40</volume>
<page-range>24482453-2453</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goutallier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Postel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernageau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lavau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Voisin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures: pre and postoperative evaluation by CT scan]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Orthop Relat Res]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>304</volume>
<page-range>78-83</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goutallier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Postel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gleyze]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Shoulder Elbow Surg]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<page-range>550-554</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Khoury]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cardinal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brassard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Atrophy and fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus muscle: sonography versus MRI]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[AJR Am J Roentgenol]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>190</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>1105-1111</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fealy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kingham]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Altchek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DW]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Mini-open rotator cuff repair using a two-row fixation technique: outcomes analysis in patients with small moderate and large rotator cuff tears]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Arthroscopy]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>665-670</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
