<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1646-5830</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Acta Obstétrica e Ginecológica Portuguesa]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Acta Obstet Ginecol Port]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1646-5830</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Euromédice, Edições Médicas Lda.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1646-58302015000400003</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Predição de pré-eclâmpsia no primeiro trimestre em gravidezes de baixo risco: determinação do cut-off numa amostra da população portuguesa]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[First trimester prediction of pre-eclampsia in low risk pregnancies: determining the cut-off in a portuguese group]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oliveira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Natacha]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carrilho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bruno]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carocha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana Teresa]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cohen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Álvaro]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Isabel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cruz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jader]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Campos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa Ginecologia Obstetricia]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Lisboa ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<fpage>366</fpage>
<lpage>373</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1646-58302015000400003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1646-58302015000400003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1646-58302015000400003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Objective: We aimed to identify the cut-off for risk of pre-eclampsia (PE) in Portuguese population by applying the first trimester prediction model from Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) in a prospective enrolled cohort of low risk pregnant women. Population and methods: A prospective cohort of low risk singleton pregnancies underwent routine first-trimester screening from 2011 through 2013. Maternal characteristics, blood pressure, uterine artery Doppler, levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and free b-human chorionic gonadotropin were evaluated. The prediction of PE in first trimester was calculated through software Astraia, the outcome obtained from medical records and the cutoff value was subsequently calculated. Results: Of the 273 enrolled patients, 7 (2.6%) developed PE. In first trimester women who developed PE presented higher uterine arteries resistance, represented by higher values of lowest and mean uterine pulsatility index, p <0.005. There was no statistical significance among the remaining maternal characteristics, body mass index, blood pressure and PAPP-A. Using the FMF first trimester PE algorithm, an ideal cut-off of 0.045 (1/22) would correctly detect 71% women who developed PE for a 12% false positive rate and a likelihood ratio of 12.98 (area under the curve: 0.69; confidence interval 95%: 0.39-0.99). By applying the reported cutoff to our cohort, we would obtain 71.4% true positives, 88.3% true negatives, 11.4% false positives and 28.6% false negatives. Conclusion: By applying a first trimester PE prediction model to low risk pregnancies derived from a Portuguese population, a significant proportion of patients would have been predicted as high risk. New larger studies are required to confirm the present findings.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Pre-eclampsia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[First trimester]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Algorithm]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Screening]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="right"><font size="2"><b>ESTUDO ORIGINAL/</b></font><font size="2">ORIGINAL STUDY</font></p>     <p><font size="4"><b>Predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia no primeiro trimestre em gravidezes de baixo risco: determina&#231;&#227;o do cut-off numa amostra da popula&#231;&#227;o portuguesa</b></font></p>     <p><font size="3"><b>First trimester prediction of pre-eclampsia in low risk pregnancies: determining the cut-off in a portuguese group</b></font></p>     <p><b>Natacha Oliveira*, Bruno Carrilho*, Ana Carocha*, Ana Teresa Martins**, &#193;lvaro Cohen**, Isabel Martins**, Jader Cruz**, Ana Campos**</b></p>     <p>Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central - Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa</p>     <p>*Interno de Ginecologia Obstetricia, Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central</p>     <p>**Especialista em Ginecologia Obstetr&#237;cia, Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central</p>     <p><a href="#c0">Endere&ccedil;o para correspond&ecirc;ncia</a> | <a href="#c0">Direcci&oacute;n para correspondencia</a> | <a href="#c0">Correspondence</a><a name="topc0"></a></p> <hr/>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective:</b> We aimed to identify the cut-off for risk of pre-eclampsia (PE) in Portuguese population by applying the first trimester prediction model from <i>Fetal Medicine Foundation</i> (FMF) in a prospective enrolled cohort of low risk pregnant women.</p>     <p><b>Population and methods:</b> A prospective cohort of low risk singleton pregnancies underwent routine first-trimester screening from 2011 through 2013. Maternal characteristics, blood pressure, uterine artery Doppler, levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and free b-human chorionic gonadotropin were evaluated. The prediction of PE in first trimester was calculated through software Astraia, the outcome obtained from medical records and the cutoff value was subsequently calculated.</p>     <p><b>Results:</b> Of the 273 enrolled patients, 7 (2.6%) developed PE. In first trimester women who developed PE presented higher uterine arteries resistance, represented by higher values of lowest and mean uterine pulsatility index, p &lt;0.005. There was no statistical significance among the remaining maternal characteristics, body mass index, blood pressure and PAPP-A.</p>     <p>Using the FMF first trimester PE algorithm, an ideal cut-off of 0.045 (1/22) would correctly detect 71% women who developed PE for a 12% false positive rate and a likelihood ratio of 12.98 (area under the curve: 0.69; confidence interval 95%: 0.39-0.99). By applying the reported cutoff to our cohort, we would obtain 71.4% true positives, 88.3% true negatives, 11.4% false positives and 28.6% false negatives.</p>     <p><b>Conclusion:</b> By applying a first trimester PE prediction model to low risk pregnancies derived from a Portuguese population, a significant proportion of patients would have been predicted as high risk. New larger studies are required to confirm the present findings.</p>     <p><b>Keywords: </b> Pre-eclampsia; First trimester; Algorithm; Screening.</p> <hr/>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Introdu&#231;&#227;o</b></p>     <p>A pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia afeta 2% das gravidezes e constitui uma causa <i>major</i> de morbilidade e mortalidade materno-fetal<sup>1</sup>. Apesar da sua baixa incid&#234;ncia, o facto de contribuir em 15% para a incid&#234;ncia de parto pr&#233;-termo e em 9%-42%<sup>2</sup> para a mortalidade materna justifica a necessidade de estratifica&#231;&#227;o precoce do risco de desenvolvimento subsequente. A aplica&#231;&#227;o de algoritmos preditivos de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia no primeiro trimestre permite a identifica&#231;&#227;o de grupos de risco, a institui&#231;&#227;o atempada de medidas profil&#225;ticas e a individualiza&#231;&#227;o da vigil&#226;ncia obst&#233;trica.</p>     <p>Nos &#250;ltimos anos, v&#225;rios modelos preditivos de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia foram desenvolvidos no sentido de determinar desde o primeiro trimestre quais as mulheres em risco de desenvolvimento subsequente de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia<sup>3-14</sup>. A pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia &#233; uma doen&#231;a multifatorial, raz&#227;o pela qual os algoritmos que incluem m&#250;ltiplas vari&#225;veis demonstraram melhor <i>performance</i> na identifica&#231;&#227;o de grupos de risco<sup>3-14</sup>. A hist&#243;ria materna isoladamente associa-se a uma taxa de dete&#231;&#227;o de 30%; quando associada a par&#226;metros biof&#237;sicos (incluindo press&#227;o arterial m&#233;dia e estudo <i>doppler</i> das art&#233;rias uterinas) e bioqu&#237;micos a taxa de dete&#231;&#227;o aumenta significativamente para os 46,7-100% para pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia precoce (&lt;34 semanas) e 29,4-71,1% posteriormente a esta idade gestacional<sup>3-14</sup>.<sup> </sup>No entanto, um estudo previamente publicado demonstrou que a maioria dos algoritmos para predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia apresentam uma pior <i>performance</i> comparativamente ao estudo original, quando aplicados numa popula&#231;&#227;o com diferentes caracter&#237;sticas<sup>15</sup>.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar a <i>performance</i> do algoritmo da <i>Fetal Medicine Foundation</i> para predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia no primeiro trimestre em gr&#225;vidas de baixo risco, numa amostra da popula&#231;&#227;o portuguesa e determinar qual o <i>cut-off</i> ideal para estratifica&#231;&#227;o de risco de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia.</p>     <p><b>M&#233;todos</b></p>     <p>O presente estudo &#233; um estudo prospetivo observacional, desenvolvido entre abril de 2011 e junho de 2013. Mulheres com gravidezes &#250;nicas de baixo risco com idades gestacionais compreendidas entre 11<sup>+0</sup> e 13<sup>+6</sup> semanas submetidas a rastreio combinado do primeiro trimestre, provenientes dos Centros de Sa&#250;de da &#225;rea de refer&#234;ncia da institui&#231;&#227;o, foram inclu&#237;das no estudo, ap&#243;s obten&#231;&#227;o de consentimento informado. O presente estudo foi aprovado pela comiss&#227;o de &#233;tica da institui&#231;&#227;o onde se realizou.</p>     <p>Um question&#225;rio foi aplicado presencialmente por dois investigadores treinados. Os dados avaliados foram: idade, altura, peso, ra&#231;a, h&#225;bitos tab&#225;gicos, tipo de conce&#231;&#227;o (espont&#226;nea, procria&#231;&#227;o medicamente assistida), antecedentes pessoais (hipertens&#227;o arterial cr&#243;nica, diabetes mellitus, doen&#231;a renal cr&#243;nica, trombofilia, s&#237;ndrome de anticorpo anti-fosfol&#237;pido), medica&#231;&#227;o realizada (aspirina, anti-hipertensores), passado obst&#233;trico (n&#250;mero de gravidezes anteriores, complica&#231;&#245;es hipertensivas, idade gestacional do diagn&#243;stico da complica&#231;&#227;o, idade gestacional no parto, peso do rec&#233;m-nascido) e antecedentes familiares (hipertens&#227;o arterial cr&#243;nica em familiares 1&#186; grau, hist&#243;ria de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia na m&#227;e ou irm&#227;). O &#237;ndice de massa corporal foi calculado com base na altura e peso referidos pela gr&#225;vida. A press&#227;o arterial (PA) foi avaliada com recurso a um dispositivo autom&#225;tico, com a gr&#225;vida na posi&#231;&#227;o sentada ap&#243;s 5 minutos de repouso, com os membros superiores ao n&#237;vel do cora&#231;&#227;o e utilizada uma bra&#231;adeira de acordo com a circunfer&#234;ncia do bra&#231;o. A PA foi avaliada duas vezes em ambos os membros superiores e calculada a press&#227;o arterial m&#233;dia [press&#227;o diast&#243;lica + 1/3 (press&#227;o sist&#243;lica - press&#227;o diast&#243;lica)]. Subsequentemente foi realizada uma ecografia por ecografistas certificados pela <i>Fetal Medicine Foundation (<a href="http://www.fetalmedicine.com" target="_blank">www.fetalmedicine.com</a>).</i> Em cada ecografia foi confirmada a idade gestacional atrav&#233;s da medi&#231;&#227;o do comprimento cr&#226;nio-caudal (CCC), confirmado o n&#250;mero de fetos, medida a transluc&#234;ncia da nuca, estabelecida a corionicidade e exclu&#237;das anomalias fetais <i>major</i> ou altera&#231;&#245;es estruturais associadas a aneuploidias. O &#237;ndice de pulsatilidade (IP) de ambas as art&#233;rias uterinas foi avaliado por ecografia <i>Doppler</i> transabdominal. Cada art&#233;ria uterina foi identificada atrav&#233;s do mapeamento a cores do fluxo sangu&#237;neo, a n&#237;vel da crossa identificada a n&#237;vel do p&#250;bis, tendo sido medida a onda de pulso ap&#243;s obten&#231;&#227;o de 3 formatos de onda similares e calculado o IP para cada art&#233;ria uterina. O valor m&#237;nimo, m&#233;dio e m&#225;ximo do IP das duas art&#233;rias foram posteriormente determinados. Previamente &#224; execu&#231;&#227;o do rastreio ecogr&#225;fico do primeiro trimestre ou posteriormente se n&#227;o realizado antes, foi colhido sangue para doseamento da fra&#231;&#227;o livre b da Hormona Gonadotrofina Cori&#243;nica (b-HCG) e Prote&#237;na A plasm&#225;tica associada &#224; gravidez (PAPP-A) para determina&#231;&#227;o do rastreio combinado de anomalias cromoss&#243;micas.</p>     <p>Ap&#243;s colheita de todos os par&#226;metros, estes foram inclu&#237;dos no <i>software</i> Astraia e calculado o risco de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia total e pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia precoce (&lt;34 semanas). A f&#243;rmula utilizada para c&#225;lculo do risco de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia &#233; a mesma disponibilizada pela <i>Fetal Medicine Foundation (</i><i><a href="https://courses.fetalmedicine.com/calculator/pe" target="_blank">https://courses.fetalmedicine.com/calculator/pe</a></i><i>).</i> A f&#243;rmula descrita inclui o doseamento da hormona de crescimento placentar (PlGF), a qual n&#227;o foi doseada no presente estudo, tendo o seu valor sido tratado como ausente.</p>     <p>A recolha de dados face ao diagn&#243;stico posterior de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia, idade gestacional do diagn&#243;stico, morbilidade materna, dados relativos ao parto e peso do rec&#233;m-nascido foram obtidos pela consulta dos respetivos processos cl&#237;nicos. Pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia foi definida como a presen&#231;a de 2 medi&#231;&#245;es de press&#227;o arterial sist&#243;lica &#8805;140 mmHg e/ou press&#227;o arterial diast&#243;lica &#8805;90 mmHg, com um intervalo m&#237;nimo de 4 horas, associadas a uma protein&#250;ria &#8805;300 mg numa urina de 24h ou + de prote&#237;nas na urina numa amostra isolada, numa gravidez com idade gestacional superior a 20 semanas, na presen&#231;a ou n&#227;o de sintomatologia (cefaleias, escotomas ou epigastralgias)<sup>16</sup>. Hipertens&#227;o gestacional foi definida como a presen&#231;a de 2 medi&#231;&#245;es de press&#227;o arterial sist&#243;lica &#8805; 140 mmHg e/ou press&#227;o arterial diast&#243;lica &#8805; 90 mmHg, na aus&#234;ncia de protein&#250;ria significativa, ap&#243;s as 20 semanas de gravidez<sup>16</sup>. Ecl&#226;mpsia foi definida como aparecimento de crises t&#243;nico-cl&#243;nicas, na aus&#234;ncia de outro fator causal. Hipertens&#227;o arterial cr&#243;nica com pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia sobreposta foi definida na presen&#231;a de protein&#250;ria como descrita anteriormente ap&#243;s as 20 semanas de gravidez, numa mulher com o diagn&#243;stico de hipertens&#227;o arterial antes das 20 semanas.</p>     <p>Foram exclu&#237;das gravidezes m&#250;ltiplas, mulheres com CCC superior a 84 mm no momento do recrutamento da amostra, diagn&#243;stico de anomalias fetais <i>major</i> (definidas como aquelas que s&#227;o letais ou necessitam de cirurgia pr&#233;-natal ou p&#243;s-natal) ou aneuploidias, aborto espont&#226;neo ou parto inferior a 23 semanas de gesta&#231;&#227;o, incapacidade para o diagn&#243;stico seguro de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia e aus&#234;ncia de dados sobre o desfecho da gravidez.</p>     <p>Para an&#225;lise estat&#237;stica foi utilizado o teste de Mann-Whitney para compara&#231;&#227;o de var&#225;veis quantitativas e o teste do Qui quadrado de Pearson ou teste exato de Fisher, quando aplic&#225;vel, para compara&#231;&#227;o de vari&#225;veis categ&#243;ricas. A <i>performance</i> do teste de rastreio foi analisada com recurso a &#193;rea sob a Curva e o valor <i>cut-off</i> obtido pela aplica&#231;&#227;o do &#237;ndice de Youden (maior especificidade e sensibilidade). O <i>software</i> estat&#237;stico SPSS 14.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, Il, USA) foi utilizado para an&#225;lise estat&#237;stica. Um valor p inferior a 0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativo.</p>     <p><b>Resultados</b></p>     <p>A popula&#231;&#227;o inclu&#237;da no estudo encontra-se esquematizada na <a href="#f1">Figura 1</a>. Das 273 mulheres que reuniram crit&#233;rios de inclus&#227;o no estudo, 7 (2,6%) desenvolveram pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia, tendo num dos casos o diagn&#243;stico ocorrido antes das 34 semanas de gesta&#231;&#227;o (incid&#234;ncia de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia precoce, 0,4%). As caracter&#237;sticas demogr&#225;ficas da popula&#231;&#227;o encontram-se descritas no <a href="#q1">Quadro I</a>. N&#227;o se observaram diferen&#231;as estatisticamente significativas relativamente &#224; ra&#231;a, paridade, antecedentes de hipertens&#227;o arterial cr&#243;nica, antecedentes pessoais ou familiares de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia e &#237;ndice de massa corporal entre o grupo que desenvolveu pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia e o grupo controlo n&#227;o afetado. O grupo que desenvolveu pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia apresentou no primeiro trimestre maior resist&#234;ncia das art&#233;rias uterinas, traduzido em valores significativamente mais elevados de IP m&#237;nimos e m&#233;dios das art&#233;rias uterinas e uma tend&#234;ncia para valores mais elevados de press&#227;o arterial m&#233;dia e menores valores de PAPP-A, apesar de n&#227;o estatisticamente significativo. Na <a href="#f2">Figura 2</a> encontram-se representados os diagramas referentes &#224;s vari&#225;veis cont&#237;nuas press&#227;o arterial m&#233;dia, IP m&#237;nimo e m&#233;dio das art&#233;rias uterinas e PAPP-A.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><a name="f1"></a><img src="/img/revistas/aogp/v9n5/9n5a03f1.jpg"/></p>     
<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><a name="q1"></a><img src="/img/revistas/aogp/v9n5/9n5a03q1.jpg"/></p>     
<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><a name="f2"></a><img src="/img/revistas/aogp/v9n5/9n5a03f2.jpg"/></p>     
<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>A) Press&#227;o arterial m&#233;dia, B) &#205;ndice de pulsatilidade m&#237;nimo e m&#233;dio das art&#233;rias uterinas, C) Prote&#237;na A associada &#224; gravidez em m&#250;ltiplos da mediana; PE, Pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia</p>     <p>Na <a href="#f3">Figura 3</a> encontra-se representada a curva ROC referente &#224; <i>performance</i> do algoritmo da FMF para predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia no 1&#186; trimestre. A aplica&#231;&#227;o do algoritmo da FMF no 1&#186; trimestre na popula&#231;&#227;o estudada resultou numa &#225;rea sob a curva de 0,69 (intervalo de confian&#231;a a 95%, 0,39-0,99). Utilizando o <i>cut-off</i> obtido a partir da curva ROC baseado no &#237;ndice de Youden, um<i>cut-off</i> de 1/22 (0,045) demonstrou uma sensibilidade de 71% para uma taxa de falsos positivos de 12%, uma raz&#227;o de verosimilhan&#231;a ( <i>likelihood ratio - LR</i>) positiva de 6,11 (IC 95%, 3,44-10,84) e negativa de 0,32 (IC 95%, 0,10-1,04), <a href="#q2">Quadro II</a>. Aplicando o <i>cut-off</i> de 1/22, 36 doentes seriam consideradas em risco de desenvolvimento posterior de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia, das quais 71,4% seriam corretamente identificadas (verdadeiros positivos), 88,3% seriam corretamente identificadas como baixo risco (verdadeiros negativos), 11,4% n&#227;o desenvolveram pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia apesar de inicialmente consideradas de risco (falsos positivos) e 28,6% desenvolveram pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia apesar de consideradas inicialmente de baixo risco (falsos negativos). Reduzindo os falsos positivos para 10% utilizado um <i>cut-off</i> de 1/18, obter-se-ia uma sensibilidade de 55%, um <i>LR</i> positivo de 5,41 (IC 95%, 2,09-13,97) e negativo de 0,62 (IC 95%, 0,33-1,18), <a href="#q2">Quadro II</a>. Utilizando ambos os valores de <i>cut-off</i>, o caso de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia que ocorreu antes das 34 semanas seria corretamente previsto como alto risco.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><a name="f3"></a><img src="/img/revistas/aogp/v9n5/9n5a03f3.jpg"/></p>     
<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><a name="q2"></a><img src="/img/revistas/aogp/v9n5/9n5a03q2.jpg"/></p>     
<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Discuss&#227;o</b></p>     <p>No presente estudo procur&#225;mos avaliar a <i>performance</i> do algoritmo do primeiro trimestre para predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia da <i>Fetal Medicine Foundation</i> numa amostra da popula&#231;&#227;o portuguesa e determinar qual o <i>cut-off</i> de risco associado a uma melhor sensibilidade e especificidade. Ao aplicarmos o algoritmo dispon&#237;vel no <i>software</i> Astraia para predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia no primeiro trimestre, em gr&#225;vidas de baixo risco, seria poss&#237;vel detetar 71% dos casos de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia para uma taxa de falsos positivos de 12%, enquanto reduzindo a taxa de falsos positivos para 8%, a taxa de dete&#231;&#227;o seria de 45%.</p>     <p>No presente estudo, a incid&#234;ncia de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia foi de 2,6%, o que est&#225; de acordo com a incid&#234;ncia reportada na literatura <sup>1,2</sup>. V&#225;rios estudos previamente realizados demonstraram que caracter&#237;sticas maternas como a presen&#231;a de hipertens&#227;o arterial cr&#243;nica, diabetes mellitus, ra&#231;a africana, peso materno aumentado, l&#250;pus eritematoso sist&#233;mico ou s&#237;ndrome de anticorpo anti-fosfol&#237;pido, antecedentes pessoais e familiares de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia se encontram associados a um risco acrescido de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia<sup>2-15</sup>. No presente estudo n&#227;o se observaram diferen&#231;as estatisticamente significativas relativamente &#224;s caracter&#237;sticas maternas previamente descritas, entre as doentes que desenvolveram pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia comparativamente ao grupo controlo n&#227;o afetado. Uma das raz&#245;es para a baixa representatividade de fatores de risco entre os grupos, tais como hipertens&#227;o arterial cr&#243;nica ou diabetes, deve-se ao facto das gravidezes inclu&#237;das no estudo serem de baixo risco. A aus&#234;ncia de diferen&#231;a estatisticamente significativa para as diversas caracter&#237;sticas em foco muito provavelmente deve-se &#224; reduzida dimens&#227;o da amostra e baixa representatividade das mesmas nos dois grupos, n&#227;o podendo ser conclu&#237;da uma aus&#234;ncia de associa&#231;&#227;o. De forma similar, v&#225;rios estudos demostraram que o desenvolvimento posterior de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia se associa a valores mais elevados de press&#227;o arterial m&#233;dia e maior resist&#234;ncia das art&#233;rias uterinas, traduzida num maior &#237;ndice de pulsatilidade, bem como menores valores de PAPP-A no primeiro trimestre <sup>3-9,11,12,17-19</sup>. O presente estudo corroborou os achados para as vari&#225;veis cont&#237;nuas j&#225; previamente demonstrados, observando-se uma maior resist&#234;ncia das art&#233;rias uterinas, com valores m&#237;nimos e m&#233;dios mais elevados do IP das art&#233;rias uterinas, tendo este resultado sido estatisticamente significativo. Apesar de aus&#234;ncia de poder estat&#237;stico, justific&#225;vel pela reduzida dimens&#227;o da amostra, observou-se igualmente uma maior press&#227;o arterial m&#233;dia e menores valores de PAPP-A no primeiro trimestre no grupo que veio a desenvolver pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia comparativamente ao grupo controlo n&#227;o afetado.</p>     <p>Em 2013 Akolekar <i>et al<sup>4</sup></i> atrav&#233;s da aplica&#231;&#227;o de um algoritmo no primeiro trimestre para predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia inclu&#237;ndo caracter&#237;sticas maternas, biof&#237;sicas (press&#227;o arterial m&#233;dia e <i>doppler</i> das art&#233;rias uterinas) e PAPP-A obteve uma taxa de dete&#231;&#227;o de 92,5% (<i>cut-off</i> 1:216) e 59,9% (<i>cut-off</i> 1:12) para pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia precoce e total, respetivamente, para uma taxa de falsos positivos de 10%. Do mesmo grupo de estudo, Poon <i>et al<sup>12</sup></i> pela utiliza&#231;&#227;o dos mesmos par&#226;metros obteve uma taxa de dete&#231;&#227;o no primeiro trimestre de 94,6 (&#225;rea sob a curva 0,96, 95% IC, 81,8-99,2) para pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia precoce. Neste estudo a utiliza&#231;&#227;o de PAPP-A n&#227;o se associou a uma maior taxa de dete&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia tardia, tendo a maior predi&#231;&#227;o resultado da combina&#231;&#227;o de fatores maternos e biof&#237;sicos, traduzida numa sensibilidade de 57% para uma especificidade de 90% (&#225;rea sob a curva 0,86, 95% IC, 48,0-65,7). Scazzocchio <i>et al<sup>9</sup>,</i> numa popula&#231;&#227;o diferente, pela utiliza&#231;&#227;o dos mesmos par&#226;metros no primeiro trimestre, mas atrav&#233;s da aplica&#231;&#227;o de um algoritmo diferente obteve uma taxa de dete&#231;&#227;o de 80,8% para predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia precoce (<i>cut-off</i> 1/178; &#225;rea sob a curva 0,95; 95% IC, 0,94-0,98) e 39,6% para predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia tardia (<i>cut-off</i>; 1/18; &#225;rea sob a curva 0,71, 95% IC 0,66-0,76), para uma taxa de falsos positivos de 10%. A taxa de dete&#231;&#227;o obtida no presente estudo para predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia total foi de 71% para uma especificidade de 88%, mas considerando os valores de refer&#234;ncia pr&#243;ximos dos utilizados nos diversos estudos da FMF, a obten&#231;&#227;o de uma taxa de dete&#231;&#227;o de 43% encontra-se pr&#243;ximo dos valores reportados<sup>4,12</sup>. No entanto, a &#225;rea sob a curva obtida foi de 0,69 (intervalo de confian&#231;a a 95%, 0,39-0,99), inferior &#224;s reportadas<sup>4,12</sup>.</p>     <p>Pela primeira vez um estudo procurou determinar a <i>performance</i> numa amostra da popula&#231;&#227;o portuguesa de um algoritmo criado para predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia no primeiro trimestre. Um aspeto positivo do nosso estudo prende-se com o facto da metodologia utilizada ter sido a mesma da utilizada pela <i>Fetal Medicine Foundation</i> no estudo que teve como base o algoritmo em an&#225;lise, permitindo assim verificar corretamente a sua <i>performance</i> e limitando erros de colheita de dados. Por outro lado, utilizando o valor de risco obtido para cada doente atrav&#233;s da introdu&#231;&#227;o dos dados no <i>software</i> Astraia, minimizou o erro de c&#225;lculo que poderia surgir pela aplica&#231;&#227;o do algoritmo da FMF para predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia, o qual apresenta v&#225;rias f&#243;rmulas interm&#233;dias para c&#225;lculo de cada vari&#225;vel.</p>     <p>A reduzida dimens&#227;o da amostra constitui uma limita&#231;&#227;o ao presente estudo. A amostra final representa apenas 63,3% dos casos inicialmente inclu&#237;dos, sendo justific&#225;vel em parte por em 28,8% dos casos o parto ter ocorrido fora da institui&#231;&#227;o. Tal facto deveu-se a uma restrutura&#231;&#227;o das &#225;reas de referencia&#231;&#227;o aos hospitais e consequentemente uma parte significativa das doentes inicialmente referenciadas para realiza&#231;&#227;o de rastreio combinado do primeiro trimestre na institui&#231;&#227;o onde se realizou o estudo, terem sido posteriormente referenciadas para outra institui&#231;&#227;o no momento do parto. Por outro lado, dada a baixa preval&#234;ncia de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia precoce e dado o tamanho amostral reduzido, n&#227;o foi poss&#237;vel avaliar a <i>performance</i> do algoritmo da FMF na predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia precoce. Por outro lado, o valor de <i>PlGF</i> n&#227;o foi inclu&#237;do no c&#225;lculo, como publicado originalmente no estudo da FMF, por o doseamento do mesmo n&#227;o se encontrar dispon&#237;vel na institui&#231;&#227;o no momento da realiza&#231;&#227;o do estudo. A aus&#234;ncia da inclus&#227;o do doseamento de <i>PlGF</i> no c&#225;lculo de predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia pode ter influenciado negativamente a <i>performance</i> do algoritmo.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>O presente estudo sugere que a aplica&#231;&#227;o de um algoritmo no primeiro trimestre para predi&#231;&#227;o de pr&#233;-ecl&#226;mpsia, utilizando vari&#225;veis facilmente obtidas numa avalia&#231;&#227;o obst&#233;trica de rotina e no rastreio combinado do primeiro trimestre, permite uma dete&#231;&#227;o significativa de casos de risco (71%) para uma taxa de falsos positivos de 12%. Estudos subsequentes, de maiores dimens&#245;es e incluindo gravidezes de risco s&#227;o necess&#225;rios para comprovar os presentes resultados.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>REFER&#202;NCIAS BIBLIOGR&#193;FICAS</b></p>     <!-- ref --><p>1. Scazzocchio E, Figueras F. Contemporary prediction of preeclampsia. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2011. 23:65-71.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851042&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <p>2. Steegers EAP, Dadelszen Pv, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. 2010. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2010;376:631-44.</p>     <!-- ref --><p>3. Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, Sarquis R, Zvanca M, Nicolaides K. Prediction of early, intermediate and late pre-eclampsia from maternal factors, biophysical and biochemical markers at 11-13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 66-74.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851045&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>4. Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, Poon L, Wright D, Nicolaides K. Competing Risks Model in Early Screening for Preeclampsia by Biophysical and Biochemical Markers. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013; 33: 8-15.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851047&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>5. Audibert F, Boucoiran I, An N, Aleksandrov N, Delvin E, Bujold E, Rey E. Screening for preeclampsia using first-trimester serum markers and uterine artery Doppler in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 383.e1-8.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851049&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>6. Parra-Cordero M, Rodrigo R, Barja P, Bosco C, Rencoret G, Sep&#250;lveda-Martinez A, Quezada S. Prediction of early and late pre-eclampsia from maternal characteristics, uterine artery Doppler and markers of vasculogenesis during first trimester of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 538-44.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851051&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>7. Poon L, Karagiannis G, Leal A, Romero X, Nicolaides K. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: screening by uterine artery Doppler imaging and blood pressure at 11-13 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 497-02&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851053&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>8. Herraiz I, Arbu&#233;s J, Cama&#241;o I, G&#243;mez-Montes E, Gra&#241;eras A, Galindo A. Application of a first-trimester prediction model for pre-eclampsia based on uterine arteries and maternal history in high-risk pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 1123-29&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851054&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>9. Scazzocchio E, Figueras F, Crispi F, Meler E, Masoller N, Mula R, Gratacos E. Performance of a first-trimester screening of preeclampsia in a routine care low-risk setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 203e.1-10&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851055&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>10. Park F, Leung C, Poon L, Williams P, Rothwell S, Hyett J. Clinical evaluation of a first trimester algorithm predicting the risk of hypertensive disease of pregnancy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2013; 53: 532-39.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851056&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>11. Odibo A, Zhong Y, Goetzinger K, Odibo L, Bick J, Bower C, Nelson D. First-trimester placental protein-13, PAPP-A, uterine artery Doppler and maternal characteristics in the prediction of pre-eclampsia. Placenta 2011; 32:598-02.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851058&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>12. Poon L, Stratieva V, Piras S, Piri S, Nicolaides K. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: combined screening by uterine artery Doppler, blood pressure and serum PAPP-A at 11-13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 216-23.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851060&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>13. Kuc S, Koster M, Franx A, Schielen P, Visser G. Maternal Characteristics. Mean Arterial Pressure and Serum Markers in Early Prediction of Preeclampsia. Plos ONE 2013; 8: e63546.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851062&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>14. Caradeux J, Serra R, Nien JK, P&#233;rez-Sepulveda A, Schepeler M, Guerra F, Guti&#233;rrez J, Mart&#237;nez J, Cabrera C, Figueroa-Diesel H, Soothil P, Illanes SE. First trimester prediction of early onset preeclampsia using demographic, clinical, and sonographic data: a cohort study. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33: 732-6.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851064&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>15. Oliveira N, Magder LS, Blitzer MG, Baschat AA. First Trimester Prediction of Preeclampsia: External validity of algorithms in a prospectively enrolled cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 286-92.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851066&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>16. Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, Van Assche A, Moutquin Jm. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregnancy 2011; 20: IX-XIV.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851068&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>17. Poon LC, Maiz N, Valencia C, Nicolaides KH. First-trimester maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 22-33.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851070&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>18. Poon LC, Staboulidou I, Maiz N, Plasencia W, Nicolaides KH. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: screening by uterine artery Doppler at 11-13 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 142-48.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851072&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>19. Poon LC, Kametas NA, Pandeva I, Valencia C, Nicolaides KH. Mean arterial blood pressure at 11+0 to 13+6 Weeks in the Prediction of Preeclampsia. Hypertension 2008; 51: 1027-33.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1851074&pid=S1646-5830201500040000300019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><a href="#topc0">Endere&ccedil;o para correspond&ecirc;ncia</a> | <a href="#topc0">Direcci&oacute;n para correspondencia</a> | <a href="#topc0">Correspondence</a><a name="c0"></a></p>     <p>Natacha Oliveira</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central</p>     <p>Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa</p>     <p>Rua Viriato</p>     <p>1069-089 Lisboa</p>     <p>E-mail: <a href="mailto:natacha_oliveira@hotmail.com">natacha_oliveira@hotmail.com</a></p>     <p><b>Recebido em:</b> 02-10-2014</p>     <p><b>Aceite para publica&#231;&#227;o:</b> 25-05-2015</p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scazzocchio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Figueras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Contemporary prediction of preeclampsia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>65-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steegers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EAP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dadelszen Pv]]></surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duvekot]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pijnenborg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Pre-eclampsia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Lancet]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>376</volume>
<page-range>631-44</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Akolekar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Syngelaki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sarquis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zvanca]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicolaides]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Prediction of early, intermediate and late pre-eclampsia from maternal factors, biophysical and biochemical markers at 11-13 weeks]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Prenat Diagn]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>66-74</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Akolekar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Syngelaki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wright]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicolaides]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Competing Risks Model in Early Screening for Preeclampsia by Biophysical and Biochemical Markers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fetal Diagn Ther]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<page-range>8-15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Audibert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boucoiran]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[An]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aleksandrov]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Delvin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bujold]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Screening for preeclampsia using first-trimester serum markers and uterine artery Doppler in nulliparous women]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>203</volume>
<page-range>383.e1-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parra-Cordero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodrigo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barja]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bosco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rencoret]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sepúlveda-Martinez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quezada]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Prediction of early and late pre-eclampsia from maternal characteristics, uterine artery Doppler and markers of vasculogenesis during first trimester of pregnancy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<page-range>538-44</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Karagiannis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Romero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicolaides]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: screening by uterine artery Doppler imaging and blood pressure at 11-13 weeks]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<page-range>497-02</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herraiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arbués]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Camaño]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gómez-Montes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grañeras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galindo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Application of a first-trimester prediction model for pre-eclampsia based on uterine arteries and maternal history in high-risk pregnancies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Prenat Diagn]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<page-range>1123-29</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scazzocchio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Figueras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crispi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Masoller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mula]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gratacos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Performance of a first-trimester screening of preeclampsia in a routine care low-risk setting]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>208</volume>
<page-range>203e1-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Park]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leung]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Williams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rothwell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hyett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Clinical evaluation of a first trimester algorithm predicting the risk of hypertensive disease of pregnancy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<page-range>532-39</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Odibo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zhong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goetzinger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Odibo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bick]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bower]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nelson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[First-trimester placental protein-13, PAPP-A, uterine artery Doppler and maternal characteristics in the prediction of pre-eclampsia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Placenta]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<page-range>598-02</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stratieva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Piras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Piri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicolaides]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: combined screening by uterine artery Doppler, blood pressure and serum PAPP-A at 11-13 weeks]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Prenat Diagn]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>216-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kuc]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Koster]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Franx]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schielen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Visser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Maternal Characteristics: Mean Arterial Pressure and Serum Markers in Early Prediction of Preeclampsia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plos ONE]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>e63546</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caradeux]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Serra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nien]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez-Sepulveda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schepeler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guerra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gutiérrez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cabrera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Figueroa-Diesel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Soothil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Illanes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SE]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[First trimester prediction of early onset preeclampsia using demographic, clinical, and sonographic data: a cohort study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Prenat Diagn]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<page-range>732-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oliveira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Magder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blitzer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baschat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[First Trimester Prediction of Preeclampsia: External validity of algorithms in a prospectively enrolled cohort]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<page-range>286-92</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brown]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lindheimer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de Swiet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van Assche]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moutquin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hypertens Pregnancy]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<page-range>IX-XIV</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valencia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicolaides]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[First-trimester maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and pre-eclampsia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<page-range>22-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Staboulidou]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Plasencia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicolaides]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: screening by uterine artery Doppler at 11-13 weeks]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<page-range>142-48</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kametas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pandeva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valencia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicolaides]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Mean arterial blood pressure at 11+0 to 13+6 Weeks in the Prediction of Preeclampsia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hypertension]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<page-range>1027-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
