<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1646-5830</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Acta Obstétrica e Ginecológica Portuguesa]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Acta Obstet Ginecol Port]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1646-5830</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Euromédice, Edições Médicas Lda.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1646-58302017000200006</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Que fatores influenciam o sucesso da inseminação intrauterina intraconjugal?]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Which factors predict the success of intrauterine insemination?]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sousa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Vera]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Esteves]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Telma]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Laura]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aguiar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fernanda]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carvalho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marta]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jorge]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carlos Calhaz]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="AA1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte Unidade de Medicina da Reprodução ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Lisboa ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>98</fpage>
<lpage>103</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1646-58302017000200006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1646-58302017000200006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1646-58302017000200006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Overview and Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the predictive factors for pregnancy rate after intrauterine insemination. Study Design: Retrospective study Population: 698 couples undergoing intrauterine insemination Methods: All cycles were preceded by ovarian stimulation using gonadotropin. Pregnancy rates were evaluated according to female age, body mass index, duration, type and etiology of infertility, number of preovulatory follicles, endometrial thickness and total motil sperm count. Results: In this study involving 1262 cycles, the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 12.2% and per couple was 21.3%. Logistic regression analysis confirmed the presence of two or more pre-ovulatory follicles as a predictor of pregnancy (p = 0.01). The pregnancy rate showed no independent relationship with woman's age, duration of infertility, number of cycles, endometrial thickness and number of sperm inseminated. Conclusions: The simplicity of the treatment and its non-invasive nature make intrauterine insemination a first-line option for many infertile couples. Considering the limited number of cycles that each couple can perform and the positive influence of the presence of more than one preovulatory follicle, the intrauterine insemination should preferably occur when two follicles exists.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Intrauterine insemination]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Predictive factors]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="right"><font size="2"><b>ESTUDO   ORIGINAL</B>/ORIGINAL STUDY</font></p>     <p><font size="4"><b>Que fatores influenciam o sucesso da insemina&#231;&#227;o intrauterina intraconjugal?</b></font></p>     <p><font size="3"><b>Which   factors predict the success of intrauterine insemination?</b></font></p>     <p><b>Vera Sousa*, Telma   Esteves*, Laura Reis*, Ana Aguiar**, Fernanda Leal***, Marta Carvalho***,   Carlos Calhaz Jorge****</b></p>     <p>Unidade de Medicina da   Reprodu&#231;&#227;o do Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte</p>     <p>*Interna de Ginecologia/Obstetr&#237;cia</p>     <p>**Assistente Hospitalar   de Ginecologia/Obstetr&#237;cia</p>     <p>***Embriologista Cl&#237;nica</p>     <p>****Diretor de Servi&#231;o</p>     <p><a href="#c0">Endere&ccedil;o para correspond&ecirc;ncia</a> | <a href="#c0">Direcci&oacute;n para correspondencia</a> | <a href="#c0">Correspondence</a><a name="topc0"></a></p> <hr/>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p>     <p><b>Overview and Aims: </b>The aim of this study was to   assess the predictive factors for pregnancy rate after intrauterine   insemination.</p>     <p><b>Study Design: </b>Retrospective study</p>     <p><b>Population: </b>698 couples undergoing   intrauterine insemination</p>     <p><b>Methods: </b>All cycles were preceded by   ovarian stimulation using gonadotropin. Pregnancy rates were evaluated   according to female age, body mass index, duration, type and etiology of   infertility, number of preovulatory follicles, endometrial thickness and total   motil sperm count.</p>     <p><b>Results: </b>In this study involving 1262   cycles, the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 12.2% and per couple was   21.3%. Logistic regression analysis confirmed the presence of two or more   pre-ovulatory follicles as a predictor of pregnancy (p = 0.01). The pregnancy   rate showed no independent relationship with woman's age, duration of   infertility, number of cycles, endometrial thickness and number of sperm   inseminated.</p>     <p><b>Conclusions: </b>The simplicity of the   treatment and its non-invasive nature make intrauterine insemination a first-line   option for many infertile couples. Considering the limited number of cycles   that each couple can perform and the positive influence of the presence of more   than one preovulatory follicle, the intrauterine insemination should preferably   occur when two follicles exists.</p>     <p><b>Keywords: </b>Intrauterine insemination; Pregnancy; Predictive   factors.</p> <hr/>     <p>&nbsp;</p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Introdu&#231;&#227;o</b></p>     <p>A insemina&#231;&#227;o intrauterina (IIU) &#233; um procedimento simples, n&#227;o   invasivo, com uma boa rela&#231;&#227;o custo/benef&#237;cio, que consiste na introdu&#231;&#227;o de   s&#233;men previamente processado em laborat&#243;rio, na cavidade uterina. Na maioria   das vezes este procedimento &#233; realizado ap&#243;s hiperestimula&#231;&#227;o ov&#225;rica   controlada (HOC), visando aumentar o potencial de sucesso. &#201; a op&#231;&#227;o para   casais inf&#233;rteis selecionados antes do recurso a tratamentos de procria&#231;&#227;o   medicamente assistida mais complexos e dispendiosos como a fertiliza&#231;&#227;o <i>in     vitro</i> (FIV)   ou a microinje&#231;&#227;o intracitoplasm&#225;tica de espermatozoides (ICSI).</p>     <p>Est&#225;   indicada em situa&#231;&#227;o de infertilidade inexplicada, subfertilidade masculina   (com altera&#231;&#245;es <i>minor</i> na quantidade/qualidade do esperma), fator   ovulat&#243;rio ou cervical, endometriose m&#237;nima a ligeira (estadios I e II), e em   casais com disfun&#231;&#227;o sexual e serodiscordantes para doen&#231;as sexualmente   transmiss&#237;veis (ex. HIV, hepatites). A exist&#234;ncia de infe&#231;&#227;o ou estenose   cervical, endometrite ou doen&#231;a inflamat&#243;ria p&#233;lvica, obstru&#231;&#227;o tub&#225;ria   bilateral ou altera&#231;&#245;es graves da qualidade esperm&#225;tica constituem   contraindica&#231;&#245;es para a realiza&#231;&#227;o da t&#233;cnica.</p>     <p>Apesar   de uma taxa de 10-20% de gravidez por ciclo ser aceit&#225;vel, s&#227;o significativas   as diferen&#231;as nas taxas de gravidez por ciclo apresentadas na literatura (entre   5 e 70%), variando de acordo com as caracter&#237;sticas do casal, etiologia da   infertilidade, n&#250;mero de ciclos realizados e estimula&#231;&#227;o ov&#225;rica, entre outros   fatores<sup>1</sup>.</p>     <p>Este   estudo visa avaliar os fatores preditivos de gravidez ap&#243;s IIU intraconjugal.</p>     <p><b>Materiais e m&#233;todos</b></p>     <p>Foi   realizado um estudo retrospetivo utilizando os registos cl&#237;nicos dos casais   submetidos a IIU hom&#243;loga na Unidade de Medicina da Reprodu&#231;&#227;o do Hospital de   Santa Maria/Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte entre Janeiro de 2011 e Janeiro de   2016.</p>     <p>Todos   os casais apresentavam mais de um ano de infertilidade, pelo menos uma trompa   perme&#225;vel e avalia&#231;&#227;o da qualidade do esperma que permitia esperar pelo menos 1   milh&#227;o de espermatoz&#243;ides/ml ap&#243;s <i>swim-up</i>.</p>     <p>Foram   analisadas as seguintes vari&#225;veis:</p>     <p>-&#160; idade   da mulher; </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>-&#160; &#237;ndice   de massa corporal (IMC) da mulher - sendo as mulheres divididas em 2   grupos: IMC &#8804;25 Kg/m<sup>2</sup>, IMC &gt;25 Kg/m<sup>2</sup>;</p>     <p>-&#160; tipo   de infertilidade - prim&#225;ria ou secund&#225;ria;</p>     <p>-&#160; dura&#231;&#227;o   da infertilidade - &lt;3 anos ou &#8805; 3 anos;</p>     <p>-&#160; etiologia   da infertilidade</p>     <p>-&#160; fator   masculino - altera&#231;&#245;es ligeiras na quantidade, morfologia e motilidade   dos espermatozoides. De salientar que foram inclu&#237;dos espermogramas com baixa   contagem de espermatozoides inesperada no dia da insemina&#231;&#227;o;</p>     <p>-&#160; endometriose   m&#237;nima ou ligeira;</p>     <p>-&#160; fator   ovulat&#243;rio;</p>     <p>-&#160; fator   tub&#225;rio parcial - a permeabilidade tub&#225;ria de pelo menos uma trompa foi   assegurada atrav&#233;s da realiza&#231;&#227;o de histerossalpingografia ou prova de   cromotuba&#231;&#227;o durante cirurgia laparosc&#243;pica;</p>     <p>-&#160; fator   cervical - mulheres submetidas a traqueletomia ou coniza&#231;&#227;o;</p>     <p>-&#160; inexplicada   - n&#227;o foi poss&#237;vel apurar um fator etiol&#243;gico ap&#243;s investiga&#231;&#227;o   (pressup&#245;e a exist&#234;ncia de ciclos ovulat&#243;rios, permeabilidade tub&#225;ria bilateral   e espermograma normal);</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>-&#160; caracter&#237;sticas   do espermograma - os espermogramas com oligo, asteno e/ou teratospermia   foram classificadas como alterados;</p>     <p>-&#160; n&#250;mero   de espermatozoides m&#243;veis inseminados;</p>     <p>-&#160; n&#250;mero   de fol&#237;culos pr&#233;-ovulat&#243;rios &#8805;16mm na &#250;ltima avalia&#231;&#227;o ecogr&#225;fica,   realizada no dia da administra&#231;&#227;o da gonadotrofina cori&#243;nica humana;</p>     <p>-&#160; espessura   endometrial - foi feita a distribui&#231;&#227;o em 2 grupos com base na &#250;ltima   avalia&#231;&#227;o ecogr&#225;fica pr&#233;-ovulat&#243;ria: endom&#233;trio &#8804;7mm, endom&#233;trio &gt;7mm;</p>     <p>-&#160; n&#250;mero   de IIU em cada casal.</p>     <p>Os   protocolos para estimula&#231;&#227;o da ovula&#231;&#227;o inclu&#237;ram gonadotrofinas (Folitropina   alfa - Gonal-F&#174;, Folitropina-beta - Puregon&#174;, ou Menotropina   - Menopur&#174;), associadas em raros casos a citrato de clomifeno (Dufine&#174;),   variando o f&#225;rmaco, o esquema terap&#234;utico e a dosagem de acordo com o perfil de   cada mulher (idade, IMC, caracter&#237;sticas dos ciclos, dura&#231;&#227;o da infertilidade)   e com os resultados de tratamentos pr&#233;vios. A dose mais habitualmente usada foi   de 150 unidades nos 3&#186;, 5&#186; e 7&#186; dias do ciclo, mas houve individualiza&#231;&#227;o   sempre que adequado.</p>     <p>Ap&#243;s   identifica&#231;&#227;o ecogr&#225;fica de pelo menos um fol&#237;culo &#8805;16mm e com o objetivo   de desencadear a ovula&#231;&#227;o, foi indicada a administra&#231;&#227;o de 5000IU de   Gonadotrofina Cori&#243;nica Humana (Pregnyl&#174;), cerca de 36h antes do procedimento.</p>     <p>A   recolha de esperma foi realizada no dia da IIU, com recomenda&#231;&#227;o de 2 a 5 dias   de abstin&#234;ncia pr&#233;via. Foram injectados lentamente com cateter Frydman r&#237;gido   ou flex&#237;vel, 0,2 a 0,3mL da prepara&#231;&#227;o de esperma ap&#243;s processamento   laboratorial pelo m&#233;todo de <i>swim</i>-<i>up</i>. Em seguida as pacientes   permaneceram em repouso cerca de 15 minutos, sendo depois preconizada vida   completamente normal. Foi realizada a suplementa&#231;&#227;o da fase l&#250;tea com   progesterona (300mg/dia, por via oral ou vaginal) at&#233; &#224; menstrua&#231;&#227;o seguinte ou   teste de gravidez.</p>     <p>A   gravidez cl&#237;nica foi confirmada ecograficamente pela presen&#231;a de pelo menos um   saco gestacional.</p>     <p>As   vari&#225;veis foram categorizadas e comparadas atrav&#233;s do teste qui-quadrado. Um   valor de p &lt;0,05 foi considerado significativo.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Resultados</b></p>     <p>No   intervalo de tempo do estudo foram realizadas na nossa Unidade 1263   insemina&#231;&#245;es intrauterinas a 698 casais. Destes, 334 (47,9%) realizaram apenas   1 ciclo, 190 (27,2%) realizaram 2 ciclos, 153 (21,9%) realizaram 3 ciclos, 19   (2,7%) realizaram 4 ciclos e 2 (0,3%) realizaram 5 ciclos durante o per&#237;odo em   estudo.</p>     <p>A   taxa de gravidez cl&#237;nica por ciclo foi de 12,2% e por casal de 21,3%. A taxa de   partos por ciclo s&#243; poder&#225; ser apurada ap&#243;s o t&#233;rmino das 7 gesta&#231;&#245;es em curso,   no entanto poder&#225; variar entre 8,7 e 9,4%. Registaram-se 154 gravidezes   cl&#237;nicas: 2 ect&#243;picas, 128 unifetais, 21 gemelares (6 das quais se tornaram   evolutivas de apenas um feto) e 3 trigemelares (numa das quais evolu&#237;ram apenas   2 fetos).</p>     <p>Das   152 gesta&#231;&#245;es intrauterinas, 33 (21,7%) resultaram aborto espont&#226;neo no   primeiro trimestre (todos em gesta&#231;&#245;es unifetais), 1 interrup&#231;&#227;o m&#233;dica da   gravidez por suspeita de displasia esquel&#233;tica, 89 partos de termo (5 em   gesta&#231;&#245;es gemelares) e 21 partos pr&#233;-termo (9 gesta&#231;&#245;es gemelares e 2 trigemelares) (<a href="#q1">Quadro I</a>). </p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p align="center"><a name="q1"></a><img src="/img/revistas/aogp/v11n2/11n2a06q1.jpg"/></p>    
<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&#192;   data da realiza&#231;&#227;o do procedimento as mulheres apresentavam uma m&#233;dia de idades   de 34,6 anos. Em 944 (74,8%) ciclos as mulheres apresentavam um IMC &#8804;25   Kg/m<sup>2</sup>, apresentando excesso de peso nos restantes casos.</p>     <p>A   dura&#231;&#227;o m&#233;dia da infertilidade foi de 46 meses, tendo 492 (39%) ciclos sido realizados em casais que tentavam uma gravidez h&#225; pelo menos 48 meses. (<a href="#q2">Quadro II</a>)</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><a name="q2"></a><img src="/img/revistas/aogp/v11n2/11n2a06q2.jpg"/></p>    
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>Tratava-se   de uma infertilidade prim&#225;ria em 830 (65,7%) ciclos e secund&#225;ria nos restantes   433 (34,3%).</p>     <p>A   etiologia da infertilidade foi fator masculino em 213 (16,9%) ciclos, fator   feminino em 182 (14,4%), a combina&#231;&#227;o de ambos os fatores em 7 (0,6%) ciclos.   Nos restantes 860 (68,1%) ciclos foi classificada com inexplicada. As causas   femininas foram ainda discriminadas em fator tub&#225;rio parcial em 91 (7,2%)   casos, endometriose m&#237;nima a ligeira em 77 (6,1%), fator ovulat&#243;rio em 8 (0,6%)   e fator uterino em 6 (0,5%) casos, 2 ap&#243;s miomectomia, 3 casos p&#243;s-traqueletomia e 1 caso p&#243;s-coniza&#231;&#227;o cervical (<a href="#q3">Quadro III</a>)</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p align="center"><a name="q3"></a><img src="/img/revistas/aogp/v11n2/11n2a06q3.jpg"/></p>    
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>Na   &#250;ltima avalia&#231;&#227;o ecogr&#225;fica pr&#233;via ao procedimento o n&#250;mero m&#233;dio de fol&#237;culos   pr&#233;-ovulat&#243;rios &#8805;16mm foi 1,5&#177;0,6 (min.1; m&#225;x.3) e na maioria dos casos   (91,1%) a espessura endometrial foi superior a 7 mm.</p>     <p>No   dia do procedimento 943 (74,7%) das amostras de s&#233;men apresentavam   caracter&#237;sticas normais. A mediana de espermatozoides m&#243;veis inseminados foi de   6,9 milh&#245;es.</p>     <p>Embora   sem significado estat&#237;stico, taxas de gravidez superiores foram registadas nas   mulheres com idade inferior a 40 anos, naquelas com IMC superior a 25 Kg/m<sup>2</sup> e nas que tinham pelo menos uma gravidez nos antecedentes.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Registou-se   uma maior taxa de gravidez nos casos em que a infertilidade foi classificada   como mista (fatores masculino e feminino) - 3 dos 7 casais engravidaram   (duas mulheres apresentavam endometriose no estadio I e a outra apresentava   permeabilidade tub&#225;ria unilateral) - seguindo-se as altera&#231;&#245;es   esperm&#225;ticas ligeiras. As taxas de gravidez por insemina&#231;&#227;o (<a href="#q4">Quadro IV</a>) foram mais desfavor&#225;veis nos casos de infertilidade inexplicada e de causa feminina.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>    <p align="center"><a name="q4"></a><img src="/img/revistas/aogp/v11n2/11n2a06q4.jpg"/></p>    
<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>A   an&#225;lise dos diversos fatores femininos permitiu verificar que os casos de   disfun&#231;&#227;o ovulat&#243;ria apresentaram melhor progn&#243;stico, com uma taxa de gravidez   significativamente superior &#224;s restantes (fator ovulat&#243;rio 37,5%, tub&#225;rio   11,0%, endometriose m&#237;nima a ligeira 7,8%).</p>     <p>A   taxa de gravidez foi de 12,3% no primeiro ciclo, 13,1% no segundo ciclo e de   8,9% no terceiro ciclo. Situa&#231;&#245;es cl&#237;nicas muito raras justificaram em alguns   casais a realiza&#231;&#227;o de mais de 3 IIUs. Dos 33 casais nessas circunst&#226;ncias, 7   engravidaram, registando-se 2 abortos espont&#226;neos.</p>     <p>A   ocorr&#234;ncia de gravidez foi significativamente superior quando se verificou a   exist&#234;ncia de mais do que um fol&#237;culo pr&#233;-ovulat&#243;rio &#8805;16mm na &#250;ltima   avalia&#231;&#227;o ecogr&#225;fica (14,8% <i>vs</i> 10%; p=0,03). A maioria das gravidezes   gemelares (70,8%) ocorreu em ciclos com 2 fol&#237;culos pr&#233;-ovulat&#243;rios (<a href="#q4">Quadro IV</a>).</p>     <p>Separadamente   foram avaliados os 150 casais que alcan&#231;aram uma gravidez intrauterina ap&#243;s   IIU, tendo-se verificado uma taxa de gravidez superior quando a resposta &#224;   hiperestimula&#231;&#227;o foi multifolicular (66,9% <i>vs. </i>51,5 %; p=0,02). N&#227;o se   verificou uma associa&#231;&#227;o entre o n&#250;mero de espermatozoides inseminados ou a   espessura endometrial e a taxa de sucesso do procedimento.</p>     <p>Quatro   casais engravidaram em mais do que um ciclo, tratando-se em 3 casos de uma   infertilidade inexplicada. Dois casais registaram 2 abortos espont&#226;neos e   apenas um alcan&#231;ou dois partos de termo. O quarto casal cuja etiologia da   infertilidade residia no fator masculino registou um parto de termo e uma   interrup&#231;&#227;o m&#233;dica de gravidez.</p>     <p>A   an&#225;lise de regress&#227;o log&#237;stica confirmou apenas o n&#250;mero de fol&#237;culos   pr&#233;-ovulat&#243;rios como fator preditivo de gravidez (OR:0,63; 95% CI: 0,45 -   0,89; p=0,01), ou seja, a presen&#231;a de 2 ou mais fol&#237;culos aumentou o sucesso da   t&#233;cnica. A taxa de gravidez n&#227;o apresentou qualquer rela&#231;&#227;o independente com a   idade da mulher, dura&#231;&#227;o da infertilidade, n&#250;mero de ciclos, espessura   endometrial e n&#250;mero de espermatozoides inseminados.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Discuss&#227;o</b></p>     <p>Neste estudo a taxa de gravidez cl&#237;nica obtida por ciclo foi de   12,2% em 1262 ciclos de insemina&#231;&#227;o intrauterina intraconjugal ap&#243;s estimula&#231;&#227;o   ov&#225;rica controlada em 698 casais, vindo de encontro aos valores descritos na   literatura como aceit&#225;veis (entre 10-20%)<sup>1</sup>. A taxa de parto por ciclo   &#233; ligeiramente superior &#224; m&#233;dia europeia: 8,7-9,4% <i>vs.</i> 8,3%<sup>2</sup>.</p>     <p>O   decl&#237;nio da fertilidade feminina com a idade est&#225; bem documentado, resultando   da senesc&#234;ncia uterina/endometrial e da qualidade ovocit&#225;ria<sup>3</sup> e a   influ&#234;ncia da idade no sucesso da IIU &#233; consensual em muitas s&#233;ries<sup>4-8</sup>.   Embora se verifique uma tend&#234;ncia para a diminui&#231;&#227;o da ocorr&#234;ncia de gravidez   em mulheres com idade superior a 40 anos, no nosso estudo este grupo representa   apenas cerca de 10% dos casos, n&#227;o sendo poss&#237;vel apontar a idade feminina como   fator preditivo do sucesso da t&#233;cnica.</p>     <p>Apesar   do impacto negativo que os h&#225;bitos alimentares, tab&#225;gicos e alco&#243;licos exercem   na fecundidade do casal<sup>9</sup>, o IMC n&#227;o demonstrou influ&#234;ncia na   efic&#225;cia da t&#233;cnica, &#224; semelhan&#231;a do referido no estudo de Merviel <i>et al</i><sup>4</sup>.</p>     <p>No   que respeita &#224; etiologia da infertilidade, as altera&#231;&#245;es esperm&#225;ticas ligeiras   e as disfun&#231;&#245;es ovulat&#243;rias apresentaram melhor progn&#243;stico, o que poder&#225;   explicar-se pela prepara&#231;&#227;o esperm&#225;tica e estimula&#231;&#227;o ov&#225;rica controlada   pr&#233;vias &#224; t&#233;cnica.</p>     <p>V&#225;rios   estudos t&#234;m demonstrado o impacto negativo da dura&#231;&#227;o da infertilidade no   sucesso da t&#233;cnica, sem existir no entanto um consenso quanto ao n&#250;mero de anos   a partir dos quais esta t&#233;cnica deva ser desencorajada<sup>1,5,10,11</sup>. Os   nossos resultados mostraram que uma infertilidade de dura&#231;&#227;o inferior a tr&#234;s   anos se associa a uma taxa de gravidez superior quando comparada com   infertilidade de dura&#231;&#227;o mais longa, embora tal diferen&#231;a n&#227;o fosse   estatisticamente significativa.</p>     <p>O   significativo decl&#237;nio da fecundidade ap&#243;s o terceiro ou quarto ciclo   demonstrado noutros estudos<sup>12</sup> indica que aos casais que n&#227;o alcan&#231;am   uma gravidez dever&#225; ser oferecida outra t&#233;cnica de procria&#231;&#227;o medicamente   assistida<sup>13</sup>.</p>     <p>Embora   n&#227;o exista consenso quanto aos par&#226;metros esperm&#225;ticos que advoguem o uso de   FIV ou ICSI em detrimento da IIU, o n&#250;mero m&#237;nimo de espermatoz&#243;ides m&#243;veis   recomendado tem variado entre 0,8 e 10 milh&#245;es/ml ap&#243;s prepara&#231;&#227;o<sup>13,14</sup>,   sendo um valor superior a 5 milh&#245;es um determinante de sucesso da t&#233;cnica para   muitos autores<sup>15,16</sup>. </p>     <p>No   nosso estudo a maioria das gesta&#231;&#245;es ocorreu com a insemina&#231;&#227;o de um n&#250;mero   total de espermatozoides m&#243;veis superior a 5 milh&#245;es, no entanto a insemina&#231;&#227;o   de um n&#250;mero inferior de espermatozoides n&#227;o se acompanhou da esperada e descrita<sup>17</sup> diminui&#231;&#227;o da taxa de gravidez. O n&#250;mero m&#237;nimo de espermatozoides inseminados   em que se registou ocorr&#234;ncia de gravidez foi de 120 000.</p>     <p>A   influ&#234;ncia do n&#250;mero de fol&#237;culos pr&#233;-ovulat&#243;rios na taxa de sucesso da IIU, j&#225;   demonstrada em outros estudos<sup>18,19</sup>, foi no nosso, o &#250;nico fator que   demonstrou um impacto positivo na ocorr&#234;ncia de gravidez. Um desenvolvimento   multifolicular ap&#243;s hiperestimula&#231;&#227;o ov&#225;rica controlada pode resultar num   n&#250;mero aumentado de ov&#243;citos fertiliz&#225;veis e melhor qualidade do endom&#233;trio e   da fase l&#250;tea, melhorando as taxas de fertiliza&#231;&#227;o e implanta&#231;&#227;o<sup>5,10,20</sup>.O risco de gravidez m&#250;ltipla n&#227;o &#233; no entanto desprez&#237;vel.   Na nossa experi&#234;ncia foi de 16%.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>A relativa simplicidade do tratamento e a sua natureza n&#227;o   invasiva tornam a insemina&#231;&#227;o intrauterina uma op&#231;&#227;o de primeira linha para   muitos casais inf&#233;rteis. E poder&#225;, em casais bem selecionados, constituir uma   arma terap&#234;utica muito &#250;til, especialmente tendo em conta as longas listas de   espera para t&#233;cnicas mais complexas na nossa institui&#231;&#227;o.</p>     <p>Atendendo ao n&#250;mero limitado de ciclos que cada casal poder&#225;   realizar e &#224; influ&#234;ncia positiva da exist&#234;ncia de mais do que um fol&#237;culo   pr&#233;-ovulat&#243;rio, conclui-se que para otimiza&#231;&#227;o de resultados, a realiza&#231;&#227;o da   IIU dever&#225; ocorrer preferencialmente quando se verifica a exist&#234;ncia de 2   fol&#237;culos.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>REFER&#202;NCIAS BIBLIOGR&#193;FICAS</b></p>     <!-- ref --><p>1. Duran H, Morshedi M,   Kruger T, Oehninger S. Intrauterine Insemination: a sistematic review on   determinants of succes. Hum Reprod Update. 2002; 8: 373-384.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1862832&pid=S1646-5830201700020000600001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <p>2. Kupka MS, D&#8217;Hooghe T,   Ferraretti AP, Mouzon J, Erb K, Castilla JA, Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C,   Goossens V. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2011: results generated   from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31:233-248.</p>     <!-- ref --><p>3. van Noord-Zaadstra   BM, Looman CW, Alsbach H, Habbema JD, te Velde ER, Karbaat J. Delaying   childbearing: effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy. BMJ. 1991; 302: 1361-1365.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1862835&pid=S1646-5830201700020000600003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>4. Merviel P, Heraud MH,   Lourdel E, Grenier N, Sanguinet P, Copin H. Predictive factors for pregnancy   after intrauterine insemination (IUI): An analysis of 1038 cycles and a review   of the literature. Fertil Steril. 2010; 93(1): 79-93&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1862837&pid=S1646-5830201700020000600004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>5. Zadehmodarres S,   Oladi B, Saeedi S, Jahed F, Ashraf H. Intrauterine insemination with husband   semen: an evaluation of pregnancy rate and factors affecting outcome. J Assist   Reprod Genet . 2009; 26: 7-11.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1862838&pid=S1646-5830201700020000600005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <p>6. Steures P, van der   Steeg JW, Mol BW, Eijkemans MJ, vander Veen F, Habbema JD, Hompes PG, Bossuyt   PM, Verhoeve HR, van Kasteren YM, van Dop PA; Prediction of an ongoing pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82(1): 45-51.</p>     <!-- ref --><p>7. Harris ID, Missmer   SA, Horneistein MD. Poor success of gonadotropin-induced controlled ovarian   hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for older women. Fertil Steril.   2010; 94 (1): 144-148.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1862841&pid=S1646-5830201700020000600007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>8. Yousefi B, Azargon A.   Predictive factors of intrauterine insemination success of women with   infertility over 10 years. JPMA. 2011; 61:165.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1862843&pid=S1646-5830201700020000600008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <p>9. Hassan MA, Killick   SR. Negative lifestyle is associated with a signi&#64257;cant reduction in   fecundity. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81: 384-92.</p>     <p>10. Yavuz A, Demirci O,   S&#246;zen H, Uludo&#287;an M. Predictive factors influencing pregnancy rates after   intrauterine insemination. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013; 11(3):227-234.</p>     <p>11. Kamath MS, Bhave P,   Aleyamma TK, Nair R, Chandy A, Mangalaraj AM, Muthukumar K, Korula George K.   Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination: A prospective   study of factors affecting outcome. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2010; 3(3):   129-134.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>12. Ombelet W, Campo R,   Bosmans E, Nijs M. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) as a first-line treatment in   developing countries and methodological aspects that might influence IUI   success. Hum Reprod. 200;64-72.</p>     <p>13. Reprodu&#231;&#227;o,   Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina da. Orienta&#231;&#245;es T&#233;cnicas em Medicina da Reprodu&#231;&#227;o.   2012; 97-117.</p>     <!-- ref --><p>14. Dong F, Sun Y, Su Y,   Guo Y, Hu L, Wang F. Relationship between processed total motile sperm count of   husband or donor semen and pregnancy outcome following intrauterine   insemination. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2011; 57(5): 251-255.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1862850&pid=S1646-5830201700020000600014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>15. Khalil MR, Rasmussen   PE, Erb K, Laursen SB, Rex S, Westergaard LG. Homologous intrauterine   insemination. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473   cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001; 80(1): 74-81.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1862852&pid=S1646-5830201700020000600015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>16. Badawy A, Elnashar   A, Eltotongy M. Effect of sperm morphology and number on success of   intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2009; 91(3):777-781.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1862854&pid=S1646-5830201700020000600016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>17. Campana A, Sakkas D,   Stalberg A, Bianchi PG, Comte I, Pache T, Walker D. Intrauterine insemination:   evaluation of the results according to the woman&#8217;s age, sperm quality, total   sperm count per insemination and life table analysis. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11(4):   732-736.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1862856&pid=S1646-5830201700020000600017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>18. ALmeida J, Pinelo S,   Serra H, Barbosa A, Felgueira E, Pires I, Tavares A. Estimula&#231;&#227;o ovariana   controlada e insemina&#231;&#227;o intrauterina: uma terapia atual? Rev Bras Ginecol   Obstet. 2011; 33(11): 341-347.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1862858&pid=S1646-5830201700020000600018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>19. Ib&#233;rico G, Vioque J,   Ariza N, Lozano JM, Roca M, Ll&#225;cer J, Bernabeu R. Analysis of factors   influencing pregnancy rates in homologous intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril.   May 2004; 81(5):1308-1313.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1862860&pid=S1646-5830201700020000600019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>20. Ashrafi M, Rashidi   M, Ghasemi A, Arabipoor A, Daghighi S, Pourasghari P, Zolfaghari Z. The Role of   Infertility Etiology in Success Rate of Intrauterine Insemination Cycles: An   Evaluation of Predictive Factors for Pregnancy Rate. Int J Fertil Steril. 2013;   7(2):100-107.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1862862&pid=S1646-5830201700020000600020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><a href="#topc0">Endere&ccedil;o para correspond&ecirc;ncia</a> | <a href="#topc0">Direcci&oacute;n para correspondencia</a> | <a href="#topc0">Correspondence</a><a name="c0"></a></p>      <p>Vera Sousa</p>     <p>Centro Hospitalar   Barreiro Montijo</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Barreiro, Portugal </p>     <p>E-mail: <a href="mailto:verasousa_22@hotmail.com">verasousa_22@hotmail.com</a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Recebido em: </b>24/05/2016</p>     <p><b>Aceite para publica&#231;&#227;o:</b> 25/07/2016</p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duran]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morshedi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kruger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oehninger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Intrauterine Insemination: a sistematic review on determinants of succes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hum Reprod Update]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>373-384</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kupka]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[D'Hooghe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferraretti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mouzon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Erb]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castilla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2011: results generated from European registers by ESHRE]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hum Reprod]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>233-248</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van Noord-Zaadstra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Looman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alsbach]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Habbema]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[te Velde]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ER]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Karbaat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Delaying childbearing: effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMJ]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>302</volume>
<page-range>1361-1365</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Merviel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heraud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lourdel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grenier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanguinet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Copin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): An analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fertil Steril]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>93</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>79-93</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zadehmodarres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oladi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Saeedi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jahed]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ashraf]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Intrauterine insemination with husband semen: an evaluation of pregnancy rate and factors affecting outcome]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Assist Reprod Genet]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<page-range>7-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steures]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van der Steeg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mol]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eijkemans]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[vander Veen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Habbema]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Prediction of an ongoing pregnancy after intrauterine insemination]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fertil Steril]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>45-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harris]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ID]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Missmer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Horneistein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Poor success of gonadotropin-induced controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for older women]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fertil Steril]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>94</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>144-148</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yousefi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Azargon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Predictive factors of intrauterine insemination success of women with infertility over 10 years]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[JPMA]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>61</volume>
<page-range>165</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hassan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Killick]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Negative lifestyle is associated with a significant reduction in fecundity]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fertil Steril]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>81</volume>
<page-range>384-92</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yavuz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Demirci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sözen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Uludogan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Predictive factors influencing pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Iran J Reprod Med]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>227-234</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kamath]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bhave]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aleyamma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nair]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chandy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mangalaraj]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination: A prospective study of factors affecting outcome]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Hum Reprod Sci]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>129-134</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ombelet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Campo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bosmans]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nijs]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Intrauterine insemination (IUI) as a first-line treatment in developing countries and methodological aspects that might influence IUI success]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hum Reprod]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<page-range>64-72</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina da Reprodução</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Orientações Técnicas em Medicina da Reprodução]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<page-range>97-117</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Su]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Relationship between processed total motile sperm count of husband or donor semen and pregnancy outcome following intrauterine insemination]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Syst Biol Reprod Med]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>57</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>251-255</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Khalil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Erb]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Laursen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rex]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Westergaard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Homologous intrauterine insemination: An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>80</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>74-81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Badawy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Elnashar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eltotongy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of sperm morphology and number on success of intrauterine insemination]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fertil Steril]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>91</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>777-781</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Campana]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sakkas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stalberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bianchi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Comte]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pache]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Intrauterine insemination: evaluation of the results according to the woman's age, sperm quality, total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hum Reprod]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>732-736</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALmeida]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pinelo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Serra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barbosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Felgueira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pires]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tavares]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Estimulação ovariana controlada e inseminação intrauterina: uma terapia atual?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>341-347</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ibérico]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vioque]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ariza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lozano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roca]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Llácer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernabeu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Analysis of factors influencing pregnancy rates in homologous intrauterine insemination: Fertil Steril]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[May]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>81</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>1308-1313</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ashrafi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rashidi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ghasemi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arabipoor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Daghighi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pourasghari]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zolfaghari]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Role of Infertility Etiology in Success Rate of Intrauterine Insemination Cycles: An Evaluation of Predictive Factors for Pregnancy Rate]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Fertil Steril]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>100-107</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
