<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1646-5830</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Acta Obstétrica e Ginecológica Portuguesa]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Acta Obstet Ginecol Port]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1646-5830</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Euromédice, Edições Médicas Lda.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1646-58302019000100005</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Bacteriúria e patologia do pavimento pélvico]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Bacteriuria and pathology of the pelvic floor]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pereira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sara Rodrigues]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Policiano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Catarina]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Henriques]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alexandra]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ribeirinho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana Luisa]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lourenço]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alexandre Valentim]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="AA1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte Hospital Santa Maria ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Lisboa ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>27</fpage>
<lpage>31</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1646-58302019000100005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1646-58302019000100005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1646-58302019000100005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Overview and Aims: Pelvic floor dysfunction is associated with an increased risk of urinary tract infection (UTI). The correction surgery is a risk for UTI. The first objective was to evaluate and compare bacteriuria rates in patients with pathology of the pelvic floor (pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and/or urinary incontinence (UI)). The second objective was to evaluate bacteriuria rate after surgery. Study Design, Population and Methods: retrospective study that included women proposed for surgery for POP and/or stress urinary incontinence (SUI) between January 2009 and May 2015, in a tertiary hospital. The patients who collected urine for urine culture (UC) before and after intervention were included. Results: For assessment of the first objective 373 patients were included and divided into three groups: POP (168), SUI (117) and POP + SUI (88). The overall bacteriuria rate before surgery was 13.7% (51/373), with no statistically significant difference between the groups: POP (13,1%) vs IU (13,7%) vs POP+IU (14,8%) (p=0,933). To evaluate the second objective 228 patients undergoing surgical correction were included: POP (113) SUI (44) and POP and SUI (71). The overall bacteriuria rate in the postoperative period was 9.6% (22/228), with no statistically significant difference between the groups: POP (9,7%) vs SUI (13,6%) vs POP+SUI (7,0%) (p=0,507). Conclusions: Global bacteriuria rates found are consistent with previous studies. There was no significant variation between bacteriuria rate and surgical intervention performed, namely to correct POP and/or SUI. For this sample, bacteriuria rate in patients with pathology of the pelvic floor (POP and/or SUI) does not vary with the identified condition or with the type of surgical correction.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Bacteriuria]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Pelvic Floor]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Pelvic Organ Prolapse]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Urinary Incontinence]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="right"><font size="2"><b>ESTUDO ORIGINAL/ORIGINAL STUDY</b></font></p>     <p><font size="4"><b>Bacteriúria e patologia do pavimento pélvico</b></font></p>     <p><font size="3"><b>Bacteriuria and pathology of the pelvic floor</b></font></p>     <p><b>Sara Rodrigues Pereira*, Catarina Policiano*, Alexandra Henriques**, Ana    Luisa Ribeirinho***, Alexandre Valentim Lourenço***</b></p>     <p>Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte/ Hospital Santa Maria</p>     <p>*Interna Ginecologia e Obstetrícia</p>     <p>**Assistente Hospitalar</p>     <p>***Assistente Hospitalar Graduado</p>     <p><a href="#c0">Endere&ccedil;o para correspond&ecirc;ncia</a> | <a href="#c0">Direcci&oacute;n    para correspondencia</a> | <a href="#c0">Correspondence</a><a name="topc0"></a></p> <hr/>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>ABSTRACT</B></p>     <p><b>Overview and Aims: </b>Pelvic floor dysfunction is associated with an increased    risk of urinary tract infection (UTI). The correction surgery is a risk for    UTI. The first objective was to evaluate and compare bacteriuria rates in patients    with pathology of the pelvic floor (pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and/or urinary    incontinence (UI)). The second objective was to evaluate bacteriuria rate after    surgery.</p>     <p><b>Study Design, Population and Methods: </b>retrospective study that included    women proposed for surgery for POP and/or stress urinary incontinence (SUI)    between January 2009 and May 2015, in a tertiary hospital. The patients who    collected urine for urine culture (UC) before and after intervention were included.</p>     <p><b>Results: </b>For assessment of the first objective 373 patients were included    and divided into three groups: POP (168), SUI (117) and POP + SUI (88). The    overall bacteriuria rate before surgery was 13.7% (51/373), with no statistically    significant difference between the groups: POP (13,1%) vs IU (13,7%) vs POP+IU    (14,8%) (p=0,933). To evaluate the second objective 228 patients undergoing    surgical correction were included: POP (113) SUI (44) and POP and SUI (71).    The overall bacteriuria rate in the postoperative period was 9.6% (22/228),    with no statistically significant difference between the groups: POP (9,7%)    vs SUI (13,6%) vs POP+SUI (7,0%) (p=0,507).</p>     <p><b>Conclusions: </b>Global bacteriuria rates found are consistent with previous    studies. There was no significant variation between bacteriuria rate and surgical    intervention performed, namely to correct POP and/or SUI. For this sample, bacteriuria    rate in patients with pathology of the pelvic floor (POP and/or SUI) does not    vary with the identified condition or with the type of surgical correction.</p>     <p><b>Keywords: </b>Bacteriuria; Pelvic Floor; Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Urinary    Incontinence</p> <hr/>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Introdução </b></p>     <p>A infeção do trato urinário (ITU) é uma patologia comum na mulher, sendo que    quase metade de todas as mulheres terão pelo menos uma ITU ao longo da sua vida<sup>1</sup>.    Representa pelo menos 40% de todas as infeções hospitalares, e na maioria dos    casos estão associadas a algaliação<sup>2</sup>.</p>     <p>A urina é habitualmente estéril mas é um óptimo meio de crescimento para as    bactérias que atingem a bexiga. O isolamento de um agente específico, a partir    de uma colheita apropriada de urina, de uma pessoa sem sintomatologia sugestiva    de ITU é considerada como bacteriúria assintomática. Esta define-se clinicamente    por duas uroculturas positivas (&gt;10x5 cfu/mL), do mesmo agente, colhidas    com 24 horas de intervalo<sup>3</sup>. </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Estudos anteriores relatam a presença de bacteriúria significativa em mulheres    pré-menopausa e não grávidas na ordem dos 0,8-5,2%. Nas mulheres em pós-menopausa    (50-80 anos) são descrito valores entre os 2,6-16%<sup>4</sup>. O risco de bacteriúria    por cada dia de algaliação varia entre os 5 e os 7%<sup>5,6</sup>. Nos doentes    algaliados, o fator de risco mais importante para desenvolver bacteriúria é    a duração da algaliação. A bacteriúria assintomática, provocada por um único    agente associa-se a algaliação de curta duração. Outros microrganismos costumam    ser adquiridos por doentes com períodos de algaliação superiores a 30 dias<sup>3</sup>.</p>     <p>A patologia do pavimento pélvico associa-se a mulheres numa faixa etária mais    avançada, pelo que, nos últimos anos o número de intervenções cirúrgicas para    correção de patologia do pavimento pélvico tem vindo a aumentar, refletindo    o aumento da esperança média de vida. </p>     <p>Existem poucos estudos que tenham analisado os fatores de risco para ITU associados    à intervenção cirúrgica, apesar de sabermos que cerca de um terço das mulheres    submetidas a cirurgia para correção de incontinência urinária de esforço (IUE)    irá desenvolver ITU<sup>7-9</sup>.</p>     <p>A incontinência urinária (IU) e a ITU estão comprovadamente associadas sendo    que mulheres com ITU sofrem frequentemente de IU e as mulheres com IU têm maior    risco de desenvolver ITU<sup>10,11</sup>.</p>     <p>A ITU recorrente é geralmente definida pela existência de três ou mais episódios    num período de um ano. As mulheres com ITU de repetição apresentam um risco    cinco vezes superior de sofrerem concomitantemente de IU<sup>12,13</sup>.</p>     <p>A correção cirúrgica de patologia do pavimento pélvico pode modificar o risco    de ITU recorrente. A correção de alguns fatores de risco como o prolapso de    órgão pélvico (POP) ou a IU podem vir a reduzir o risco de ITU. Porém, alguns    atos ou complicações, como a retenção urinária, a cistoscopia ou a instrumentação    vesical, podem potenciar o risco de ITU.</p>     <p>A ITU é ainda um importante fator de morbilidade após cirurgia uroginecológica,    sendo comum em mulheres algaliadas mesmo após profilaxia antibiótica<sup>7,12</sup>.  </p>     <p>O estudo SISTEr que comparou a colpossuspensão de Burch com os slings autólogos    para o tratamento da IUE, relatou uma taxa de 48% de ITU nos <i>slings</i> <i>vs</i>    32% no grupo da correção de Burch ao fim de 24 meses de seguimento<sup>7</sup>.</p>     <p>No estudo realizado por Anger (2007) em 1356 <i>slings</i> colocados, 33,6%    das mulheres desenvolveram ITU até três meses após a cirurgia<sup>14</sup>.  </p>     <p>A presença de ITU aumenta em cerca de três vezes o risco de mortalidade após    controlo de outras co-morbilidade<sup>15</sup>. Para conseguir diminuir a taxa    de ITU pós-operatória é fundamental que sejam identificados os fatores de risco    modificáveis.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Dado o papel pouco estudado da intervenção cirúrgica na modificação do risco    de ITU, o primeiro objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar e comparar a taxa de bacteriúria    global em mulheres com patologia do pavimento pélvico (POP e/ou IUE), propostas    para intervenção cirúrgica. O segundo objetivo foi avaliar a taxa de ITU após    cirurgia por POP e/ou IUE.</p>     <p><b>Material e métodos </b></p>     <p>Estudo retrospetivo que incluiu 399 mulheres que foram propostas e submetidas    a cirurgia por POP e/ou IUE entre Janeiro de 2009 a Maio de 2015, num centro    hospitalar terciário. </p>     <p>Para avaliar o primeiro objetivo foram incluídas as doentes propostas para    cirurgia que colheram urina para UC prévia à intervenção. Excluíram-se as doentes    com UC contaminada antes da cirurgia. </p>     <p>Para avaliar o segundo objetivo foram incluídas as doentes que colheram urina    para UC prévia à cirurgia (até dois meses) e para UC na manhã seguinte à cirurgia.    Foram excluídas as doentes com UC prévia à cirurgia com isolamento de agente    infeccioso ou UC contaminada.. </p>     <p>A escolha da técnica cirúrgica para correção de POP e/ou IUE resultou da preferência    do cirurgião, tendo em conta a idade da doente, o grau de prolapso, as condições    anatómicas, os achados no exame urodinâmico e a presença de recidiva. Para correção    do POP as doentes foram submetidas a correções anteriores e/ou posteriores clássicas    ou a correções com próteses anterior e/ou posterior de polipropileno (Prolift®    ou Elevate®) com ou sem histerectomia vaginal concomitante de acordo com a indicação    clínica; os prolapsos da cúpula foram submetidos a sacrocolpopexia (abdominal    ou laparoscópica com rede de polipropileno em Y). A IUE foi corrigida através    da colocação de mini-<i>slings</i> de incisão única (Ajust®) ou através de colocação    de um sling (<i>tension-free vaginal tape)</i> por via trans-obturadora (<i>in-side-out    </i>TVT-O®/TVT-A®) ou retro-púbica (TVT® Exact).</p>     <p>Todas as intervenções cirúrgicas consideradas no estudo foram realizadas no    período da manhã. Todas as doentes receberam 2 g de cefoxitina endovenosa, como    profilaxia antibiótica, nos 30 minutos que antecederam o início da cirurgia.  </p>     <p>A colheita de urina para UC foi realizada na manhã seguinte, ainda com as doentes    algaliadas. A maioria das doentes foram desalgaliadas após a colheita. As doentes    com lesão iatrogénica da bexiga ou outra intercorrência que implicasse administração    de antibioterapia após a intervenção cirúrgica foram excluídas da avaliação.</p>     <p>As variáveis categóricas foram apresentadas em percentagens. Para a análise    estatística foi utilizado o <i>software</i> SPSS v.21. Foi utilizado o teste    estatístico ANOVA para a análise de variâncias entre os grupos. O <i>odds ratio</i>    (OR) corresponde a intervalos de confiança de 95% e foi considerado o valor    de <i>p</i> estatisticamente significativo se inferior a 0,05.</p>     <p><b>Resultados </b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Para avaliação do primeiro objetivo, das 399 doentes elegíveis, 26 foram excluídas    por UC contaminada. Foram incluídas 373 doentes divididas em três grupos: doentes    com POP (168), com IUE (117) e doentes com POP e IUE concomitante (88) - (<a href="#f1">Figura    1</a>). Verificou-se que a média da idade das doentes foi de 61 anos (intervalo    dos 27 aos 84 anos), não se tendo registado diferença estatisticamente significativa    na média da idade entre os grupos POP, IU e POP+IU (<i>p</i>=0,396). </p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><a name="f1"></a><img src="/img/revistas/aogp/v13n1/13n1a05f1.jpg"/></p>     
<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>A taxa global de bacteriúria foi de 13,7% (51/373), não se verificando diferença    estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos: POP (22/168) <i>vs</i> IU (16/117)<i>    vs</i> POP+IU (13/88) (<i>p</i>=0,933). O agente bacteriano mais frequentemente    encontrado foi a <i>Escherichia Coli</i> (28/51), seguida pela <i>Klebsiella    pneumonia</i> (10/51) - (<a href="#q1">Quadro 1</a>).</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><a name="q1"></a><img src="/img/revistas/aogp/v13n1/13n1a05q1.jpg"/></p>     
<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>Das 399 doentes elegíveis para avaliação do segundo objetivo foram excluídas    51 doentes por UC prévia positiva e 34 por UC contaminada, foram ainda excluídas    86 por não terem UC pré e pós cirurgia. Foram incluídas 228 doentes divididas    em três grupos: cirurgia para correção de POP (113), cirurgia para correção    de IUE (44) e cirurgia para correção concomitante de POP e IUE (71) - (<a href="#f2">Figura    2</a>). A média da idade foi de 62 anos (intervalo dos 34 aos 84 anos), não    se tendo registado diferença estatisticamente significativa na média da idade    entre os grupos POP, IUE e POP+IUE (<i>p</i>=0,449). </p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><a name="f2"></a><img src="/img/revistas/aogp/v13n1/13n1a05f2.jpg"/></p>     
<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>A taxa de bacteriúria <i>de novo </i>após cirurgia foi de 9,6% (22/228), não    se verificando diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos: POP    (11/113) <i>vs</i> IU (6/44)<i> vs</i> POP+IU (5/71) (<i>p</i>=0,507). Após    a intervenção cirúrgica, os agentes bacterianos isolados com maior frequência    foram a <i>Klebsiella pneumonia</i> (8/22), o <i>Enterococcus spp </i>(5/22)    seguido pela <i>Escherichia Coli</i> (4/22) - (<a href="#q1">Quadro 1</a>).</p>     <p><b>Discussão </b></p>     <p>A taxa de bacteriúria em mulheres com patologia do pavimento pélvico encontrada    no nosso centro (13,7%) está de acordo com estudos anteriores que apontam para    uma taxa de bacteriúria entre os 10-15%<sup>16,17 </sup>em mulheres com patologia    do pavimento pélvico.</p>     <p>No que toca ao segundo objetivo, o estudo demonstrou que a taxa de bacteriúria    após cirurgia no nosso centro (9,6%) é menor que a taxa descrita em doentes    com cateterização uretral de curta duração (máximo 3 semanas) (31%)<sup>5</sup>.    Este facto pode justificar-se pela administração de antibioterapia profilática    intra-operatoriamente, que poderá diminuir a colonização no período pós-operatório.    A taxa de bacteriúria após cirurgia uroginecológica é sobreponível à taxa de    bacteriúria encontrada noutros trabalhos (9,7%) em que a colheita de urina também    foi realizada num intervalo de tempo inferior a 48 horas após a intervenção<sup>18</sup>.    A taxa de bacteriuria é ainda sobreponível à taxa de ITU no pós-operatório,    encontrada entre 4 a 8 semanas após cirurgia uroginecológica com UC positiva    (10,4%)<sup>9</sup>. O agente isolado com maior frequência após a intervenção    cirúrgica foi a <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (8/22) que embora não corresponda    ao agente mais frequentemente isolado após intervenção uroginecológica <i>(E.Coli)</i>    é um dos agentes mais comum<sup>19</sup>. Esta variação pode relacionar-se com    o número relativamente reduzido de uroculturas positivas (n= 22). </p>     <p>Não se verificou maior taxa de bacteriúria nas doentes submetidas a correção    de IUE em relação às submetidas a cirurgia de POP, apesar das primeiras serem    submetidas a desalgaliação intra-operatória para ajuste da tensão da fita sub-uretral    e posterior re-algaliação, o que teoricamente poderia aumentar a taxa de bacteriúria    no pós-operatório. Não foi encontrada evidência cientifica em estudos anteriores    que confirme esta hipótese em relação ao período pós-operatório.</p>     <p>Foi administrado antibiótico profilático a todas as doentes submetidas a correção    cirúrgica por patologia do pavimento pélvico, cerca de 30 minutos antes do início    da cirurgia. Esta medida associa-se a uma diminuição de taxa de ITU pós-operatória    como já foi demonstrado noutros estudos<sup>20</sup>. </p>     <p>Um dos pontos fortes do estudo reside no facto de se terem efetuado colheitas    a todas as doentes, independentemente das queixas urinárias, obtendo-se o que    se considera uma prevalência representativa. Algumas queixas relacionadas com    possível traumatismo uretral durante a algaliação podem mimetizar queixas urinárias    sugestivas de ITU, pelo que o recurso à UC atribui uma maior fiabilidade ao    estudo<sup>5</sup>. </p>     <p>Uma das limitações do nosso estudo consiste no facto de não terem sido avaliadas    separadamente as doentes com POP do compartimento anterior <i>vs</i> compartimento    posterior. Sabe-se que as mulheres com POP anterior sofrem com maior frequência    de IU por alteração da função vesical e esfincteriana<sup>1</sup>. Em relação    à bacteriúria pós-cirurgia, as mulheres submetidas a correções anteriores são    sempre submetidas a <i>stress test</i> intra-operatoriamente para pesquisa de    incontinência urinária oculta. Se este teste se revelar positivo é realizada    a correção para IUE no mesmo tempo operatório. Neste contexto, é mais provável    que as mulheres com alterações do compartimento anterior sejam submetidas mais    vezes a cateterismo uretral, aumentando o risco de ITU.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Outros fatores confudentes podem ter, de alguma forma, condicionado os resultados,    nomeadamente diabetes mal controlada, imunodepressão, obesidade, estado pré    ou pós-menopausa e história de ITU de repetição. </p>     <p>O facto de ter sido colhida urina para UC a todas as doentes na manhã seguinte    à cirurgia poderá associar-se a uma taxa inferior de bacteriuria. É possível    que a colheita de urina para UC na manhã seguinte à cirurgia se possa associar    a uma possível cobertura antibacteriana residual ou a uma janela curta para    proliferação microbiana, condicionando a taxa de bacteriúria.</p>     <p>O modo de colheita de urina também variou entre as duas UC. A colheita no pré-operatório    é realizada pela doente, podendo associar-se a erros, como por exemplo, colheita    sem desperdício do jacto inicial ou sem as condições de assepsia básicas. A    colheita no pós-operatório é colhida com técnica asséptica antes da desalgaliação    da doente.</p>     <p>São necessários mais estudos de modo a esclarecer se existem estratégias preventivas    como a administração de antibiótico profilático pós-operatório ou se o método    e/ou o material de cateterização uretral podem influenciar a taxa de ITU pós-operatória.</p>     <p>Um aspeto interessante, a avaliar em estudos posteriores, seria tentar perceber    se a taxa de ITU de repetição (mais de três episódios/ano) pré-operatória diminui,    tendo em conta o sucesso cirúrgico, uma vez que um dos factores de risco para    ITU de repetição foi modificado. </p>     <p>Na prática clínica, não é recomendado o tratamento de bacteriúria assintomática    uma vez que como demonstrados em trabalhos anteriores esta resolve espontaneamente    em 80% dos casos<sup>21</sup>, neste sentido a sua pesquisa sistemática também    não é preconizada. </p>     <p>A taxa de bacteriúria encontrada em doentes com patologia do pavimento pélvico    (POP e/ou IU) foi 13,7%, sendo concordante com os valores descritos em estudos    anteriores. Não se verificou variação estatisticamente significativa em relação    à patologia pélvica (POP, IUE e POP+IU). </p>     <p>A taxa de bacteriuria pós-operatória foi 9,6%, também compatível com o descrito    na literatura. Não se estabeleceu relação significativa com a patologia pélvica    para a qual as doentes foram submetidas a correção cirúrgica.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>1. Foxman B; Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity,    and economic costs. Am J Med. 2002; 113-Suppl 1A:5S-13S.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1874335&pid=S1646-5830201900010000500001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>2. Ru&#776;den H, Gastmeier P, Daschner FD, Schumacher M. Nosocomial and community-acquired    infections in Germany. Summary of the results of the First National Prevalence    Study (NIDEP). Infection. 1997; 25(4):199-202.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1874337&pid=S1646-5830201900010000500002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>3. Grabe M, Bartoletti R, Bjerklund-Johansen T.E, Cai T, Çek M, Köves B. Guidelines    on Urological Infections, European Association of Urology. 2013.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1874339&pid=S1646-5830201900010000500003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <p>4 Colgan R, Nicolle LE, McGlone A, Hooton TM. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults.    Am Fam Physician. 2006;15. 74(6):985-990.</p>     <!-- ref --><p>5. Maki DG, Tambyah PA. Engineering out the risk for infection with urinary    catheters. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7(2):342.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1874342&pid=S1646-5830201900010000500005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>6. Tambyah P, Olyszyna D P, Tenke P, Koves P. Urinary catheters and drainage    systems: definition, epidemiology and risk factors. Urogenital Infections. European    Association of Urology, Netherlands. 2010; 523-531.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1874344&pid=S1646-5830201900010000500006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <p>7. Albo ME1, Richter HE, Brubaker L, Norton P, Kraus SR, Zimmern PE, Chai TC,    Zyczynski H, Diokno AC, Tennstedt S, Nager C, Lloyd LK, FitzGerald M, Lemack    GE, Johnson HW, Leng W, Mallett V, Stoddard AM, Menefee S, Varner RE, Kenton    K, Moalli P, Sirls L, Dandreo KJ, Kusek JW, Nyberg LM, Steers W; Burch coloposuspension    versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2007;    356:2143-2155.</p>     <!-- ref --><p>8. Anger JT, Litwin MS, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Rodriquez LV; Complication of sling    surgery among female Medicare beneficiaries. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109:707-714.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1874347&pid=S1646-5830201900010000500008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <p>9. Nygaard I1, Brubaker L, Chai TC, Markland AD, Menefee SA, Sirls L, Sutkin    G, Zimmern P, Arisco A, Huang L, Tennstedt S, Stoddard A. Risk factors for urinary    tract infection following incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011; 22:1255-1265.</p>     <p>10. Brown JS, Grady D, Ouslander JG, Herzog AR, Varner RE, Posner SF. Prevalence    of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in postmenopausal women.    Heart &amp; Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. Obstet    Gynecol. 1999; 94:66-70.</p>     <p>11. Hu KK1, Boyko EJ, Scholes D, Normand E, Chen CL, Grafton J, Fihn SD. Risk    factors for urinary tract infections in postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med.    2004; 164:989-993.</p>     <!-- ref --><p>12. Raz R, Gennesin Y, Wasser J, Stoler Z, Rosenfeld S, Rottensterich E, Stamm    WE. Recurrent urinary tract infections in postmenopausal women. Clin Infect    Dis. 2000; 30(1):152-156.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1874352&pid=S1646-5830201900010000500012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>13. Moore EE, Jackson SL, Boyko EJ, Scholes D, Fihn SD; Urinary incontinence    and urinary tract infection: temporal relationships in postmenopausal women.    Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111(2 Pt 1):317-323.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1874354&pid=S1646-5830201900010000500013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>14. Anger JT, Litwin MS, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Rodriguez LV. Complications of    sling surgery among female medicare beneficiaries. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109:707-714.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1874356&pid=S1646-5830201900010000500014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>15. Platt R, Polk F, Murdock B, Rosner B Mortality associated with nosocomial    urinary-tract infection. N Engl J Med. 1982; 307:637-642.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1874358&pid=S1646-5830201900010000500015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>16. Boscia JA, Kobasa WD, Knight RA, Abrutyn E, Levison ME, Kaye D. Epidemiology    of bacteriuria in an elderly ambulatory population. Am J Med 1986; 80:208-214.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1874360&pid=S1646-5830201900010000500016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>17. Hines AG, Rupp M, Schooneveld TV; Urinary Tract Infection and Asymptomatic    Bacteriuria Guidance. Nebraska Medical Center, 2014.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1874362&pid=S1646-5830201900010000500017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <p>18. &#268; adková I, Huvar I. Vaginal reconstruction for the remedy of pelvic    organ prolapse: the effect, influence on urinary and sexual function and quality    of life in two-years follow-up Part II - Urinary tract: function and complications.    Ceska Gynekol. Summer 2018;83(2):94-102.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>19 Sutkin G, Alperin M, Meyn L, Wiesenfeld HC, Ellison R, Zyczynski HM. Symptomatic    urinary tract infections after surgery for prolapse and/or incontinence. Int    Urogynecol J. 2010; 21:955-961.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1874365&pid=S1646-5830201900010000500019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>20 Hooton TM, Scholes D, Hughes JP, Winter C, Roberts PL, Stapleton AE, Stergachis    A, Stamm WE. A prospective study of risk factors for symptomatic urinary tract    infection in young women. NEJM. 1996; 335:468-474.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1874367&pid=S1646-5830201900010000500020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <p>21 Schiøtz HA1, Tanbo TG. Postoperative voiding, bacteriuria and urinary tract    infection with Foley catheterization after gynecological surgery. Acta Obstet    Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(4):476-481.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><a href="#topc0">Endere&ccedil;o para correspond&ecirc;ncia</a> | <a href="#topc0">Direcci&oacute;n    para correspondencia</a> | <a href="#topc0">Correspondence</a><a name="c0"></a></p>     <p>Sara Rodrigues Pereira</p>     <p>E-Mail: <a href="mailto:sara.pereira59@gmail.com">sara.pereira59@gmail.com</a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Recebido em: </b>20/05/2018</p>     <p><b>Aceite para publicação: </b>27/10/2018</p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Foxman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Med]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>113</volume>
<numero>^s1A</numero>
<issue>^s1A</issue>
<supplement>1A</supplement>
<page-range>5S-13S</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ruden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gastmeier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Daschner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schumacher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Nosocomial and community-acquired infections in Germany: Summary of the results of the First National Prevalence Study (NIDEP)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Infection]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>199-202</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grabe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bartoletti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bjerklund-Johansen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Çek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Köves]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Guidelines on Urological Infections, European Association of Urology, 2013]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Colgan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicolle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McGlone]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hooton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am Fam Physician]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>74</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>985-990</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tambyah]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Engineering out the risk for infection with urinary catheters]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Emerg Infect Dis]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>342</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tambyah]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Olyszyna D]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tenke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Koves]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Urinary catheters and drainage systems: definition, epidemiology and risk factors. Urogenital Infections]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<page-range>523-531</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[European Association of Urology, Netherlands]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Albo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ME]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Richter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brubaker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Norton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kraus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zimmern]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zyczynski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Diokno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tennstedt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nager]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lloyd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FitzGerald]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lemack]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leng]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mallett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stoddard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Menefee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Varner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kenton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moalli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sirls]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dandreo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kusek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nyberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Burch coloposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[N Engl J Med]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>356</volume>
<page-range>2143-2155</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Litwin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Q]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pashos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodriquez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LV]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Complication of sling surgery among female Medicare beneficiaries]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>109</volume>
<page-range>707-714</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nygaard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brubaker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Markland]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Menefee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sirls]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sutkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zimmern]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arisco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tennstedt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stoddard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Risk factors for urinary tract infection following incontinence surgery]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int Urogynecol J]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>1255-1265</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brown]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grady]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ouslander]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herzog]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Varner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Posner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SF]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in postmenopausal women: Heart & Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gyneco]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>94</volume>
<page-range>66-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boyko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scholes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Normand]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grafton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fihn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Risk factors for urinary tract infections in postmenopausal women]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Arch Intern Med]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>164</volume>
<page-range>989-993</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gennesin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wasser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stoler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rosenfeld]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rottensterich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stamm]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WE]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Recurrent urinary tract infections in postmenopausal women]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Infect Dis]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>152-156</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jackson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boyko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scholes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fihn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Urinary incontinence and urinary tract infection: temporal relationships in postmenopausal women]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>111</volume>
<numero>2 Pt 1</numero>
<issue>2 Pt 1</issue>
<page-range>317-323</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Litwin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Q]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pashos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodriguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LV]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Complications of sling surgery among female medicare beneficiaries]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>109</volume>
<page-range>707-714</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Platt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Polk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Murdock]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rosner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Mortality associated with nosocomial urinary-tract infection]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[N Engl J Med]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>307</volume>
<page-range>637-642</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boscia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kobasa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Knight]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abrutyn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Levison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ME]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kaye]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Epidemiology of bacteriuria in an elderly ambulatory population]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Med]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>80</volume>
<page-range>208-214</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hines]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rupp]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schooneveld]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TV]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Urinary Tract Infection and Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Guidance]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Nebraska Medical Center]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cadková]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huvar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Vaginal reconstruction for the remedy of pelvic organ prolapse: the effect, influence on urinary and sexual function and quality of life in two-years follow-up Part II - Urinary tract: function and complications]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ceska Gynekol Summer]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>83</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>94-102</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sutkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alperin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meyn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wiesenfeld]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ellison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zyczynski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Symptomatic urinary tract infections after surgery for prolapse and/or incontinence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int Urogynecol J]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<page-range>955-961</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hooton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scholes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hughes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Winter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roberts]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stapleton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stergachis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stamm]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WE]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A prospective study of risk factors for symptomatic urinary tract infection in young women]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[NEJM]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>335</volume>
<page-range>468-474</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schiøtz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tanbo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Postoperative voiding, bacteriuria and urinary tract infection with Foley catheterization after gynecological surgery]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>85</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>476-481</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
