<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2183-184X</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[e-Pública]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2183-184X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa)]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2183-184X2021000200081</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47345/v8n2art6</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Colisões de direitos sociais: o papel da proporcionalidade e de outros parâmetros]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Collisions of social rights: the role of proportionality &amp; other standards]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Canas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Vitalino]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Aff">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade de Lisboa Faculdade de Direito ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>30</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>30</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>81</fpage>
<lpage>121</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2183-184X2021000200081&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2183-184X2021000200081&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2183-184X2021000200081&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo: A doutrina e parte da jurisprudência universais têm assumido paulatinamente que a estrutura dos direitos sociais não difere significativamente da estrutura dos direitos de defesa. Isto leva a inferir que os direitos sociais - ou, mais propriamente, as diferentes situações jurídicas subjetivas em que se desdobram - entrem em vários tipos de colisão com outros bens, interesses ou valores. Identificados esses tipos de colisão, pode então definir-se quais os instrumentos adequados para cumprir as exigências de um processo substantivo devido na composição de cada um deles. Sustenta-se que os instrumentos mais adequados são, variando em função de cada colisão, a proibição do excesso, a proibição do defeito e a garantia do conteúdo mínimo do direito. As jurisdições constitucionais mostram considerável uniformidade na reação às interferências em dimensões negativas, ou ao retrocesso na efetivação, de direitos sociais, bem como na situação de eventual incumprimento da dimensão positiva desses direitos.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract: Global scholarship and court decisions have been gradually assuming that social rights structure does not differ radically from political and civil rights structure. This assumption leads us into the conclusion that social rights - meaning all different claims in which they unfold - might enter in several kinds of collision with other principles, rights, interests or values. After identifying all those possible kinds of collisions one can define what are the tools or standards suitable for the due substantive process to be performed for overcoming each of them. We argue that the most suitable tools are classical proportionality (&#8220;proibição do excesso&#8221;), prohibition of the insufficient promotion of the social right (&#8220;proibição do defeito&#8221;) and the guarantee of the minimum core of the social right. Constitutional courts show considerable uniformity as far as the reactions against limitations to the negative dimensions of the social rights are concerned and also when it comes to the review of any eventual breach of the duties of promotion of the positive dimensions of the social rights.]]></p></abstract>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Novais]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Direitos Sociais. Teoria Jurídica dos Direitos Sociais enquanto Direitos Fundamentais]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Coimbra ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Coimbra Editora]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schutter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[International Human Rights Law. 3rd edition]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kälin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Künzli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Law of International Human Rights Protection. 2nd edition]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bantekas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oette]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[International Human Rights. Law and Practice. 2nd edition]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Canas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[O Princípio da Proibição do Excesso na Conformação e no Controlo dos Atos Legislativos]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Coimbra ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Almedina]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mendes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Branco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PGG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Curso de Direito Constitucional]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<edition>12</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Saraiva]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Proportionality. Constitutional Rights and their Limitations]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bilchitz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Poverty and Fundamental Rights. The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mbazira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Litigating socio-economic rights in South Africa: A choice between corrective and distributive justice]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Pretoria ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Pretoria University Law Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Young]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Proportionality, Reasonableness, and Economic and Social Rights. In Jackson VC, Tushnet M, editors. Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miranda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Direitos Fundamentais. 3.ª ed]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Coimbra ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Almedina]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alexandrino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A estruturação do sistema de direitos, liberdades e garantias na Constituição portuguesa]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Coimbra ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Almedina]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clérico]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Proportionality in Social Rights Adjudication: Making it Workable. In Duarte D, Sampaio JS, editors. Proportionality in Law. An Analytical Perspective]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gardbaum]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Positive and Horizontal Rights: Proportionality&amp;apos;s Next Frontier or a Bridge Too Far? In Jackson V, Tushnet M, editors. Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duarte]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gains and Losses in Balancing Social Rights. In Duarte D, Sampaio JS, editors. Proportionality in Law. An Analytical Perspective]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alexy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A Theory of Constitutional Rights (translation by Julian Rivers)]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
