<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2183-9522</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2183-9522</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Juruá]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2183-95222019000100525</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19135/revista.consinter.00008.30</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[O MICROSSISTEMA DE PRECEDENTES NO NOVO PROCESSO CIVIL BRASILEIRO: UMA INTERPRETAÇÃO]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[THE PRECEDENT MICROSYSTEM IN THE NEW BRAZILIAN CIVIL PROCEDURE: AN INTERPRETATION]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pinto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Adriano Moura da F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nilo Rafael B. de]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A">
<institution><![CDATA[,  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>28</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>28</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>8</numero>
<fpage>525</fpage>
<lpage>542</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2183-95222019000100525&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2183-95222019000100525&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2183-95222019000100525&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo Este estudo tem por objetivo realizar uma análise crítica da utilização de institutos próprios da tradição jurídica conhecida como common law no sistema processual brasileiro. A criação de um sistema de precedentes judiciais é uma aposta definitiva do Código de Processo Civil de 2015 para entregar uma prestação jurisdicional mais eficiente e justa. O que seriam, no entanto, os padrões decisórios que criam precedentes judiciais no novo sistema? Para tentar responder a esta questão, utiliza-se como referencial teórico obras de Câmara (2016, 2018), Streck (2016) e Dworkin (2005), a fim de realizar uma análise bibliográfica perscrutando, inicialmente, o que pretendia o legislador ao criar um sistema de vinculações de decisões dos órgãos jurisdicionais brasileiros. Observa-se que, por meio de institutos próprios da tradição jurídica do common law, o legislador concebe mecanismos de padrões decisórios que devem ser observados, de modo a conferir maior isonomia, segurança jurídica e eficiência ao judiciário brasileiro, muito embora existam dispositivos legais. Como resultado deste estudo, observa-se que, nem todas os padrões decisórios enunciados no art. 927 podem ser considerados precedentes, ainda que vinculantes, bem como existem dispositivos outros na legislação processual que orientam e vinculam decisões judiciais com pouca possibilidade de comunicação com a atuação dos Tribunais. De igual maneira, observa-se que nem todos os incisos do art. 927 vinculam as decisões dos órgãos jurisdicionais, devendo ser interpretado aquele dispositivo em conjunto com todo o sistema lógico-jurídico do código, sob a lógica da integridade e coerência.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract This study intends to perform a critical analysis of common law institutes within the Brazilian civil procedure system. The new Brazilian Civil Procedure Code introduces a new judicial precedent system, in order to deliver fairer decisions. What would be, in the Brazilian system, the decision patterns that could be identified as precedent? To answer that question, the works of Câmara (2018, 2018), Streck (2016) and Dowrkin (2005) are used, in a bibliographical analysis that intends to find out what was the legislator&#8217;s intentions. It is found that, by means of common law tradition principles and concepts, the legislator conceives mechanisms of decision patterns that must be observed by the courts, in order to fulfill the equality and legal certainty assured by the Brazilian Constitution. As a result of this study, it can be said that not all decision patterns mentioned in aticle 927 are to be interpreted as precedent, even if they are binding decisions. Also, some of the dispositives the processual legislation brings instruct and bind judicial decisions with little communication with the courts. In the same way, it can be said that article 927 must be interpretd in conjunction within the judicial system&#8217;s logic as a whole, in orther for it to have integrity and coherence.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Ratio decidendi]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Stare decisis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Precedentes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Uniformização]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Integridade]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Coerência]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Ratio decidendi]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Stare decisis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Precedents]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Uniformization]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Integritye]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Coherence]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BARROSO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luís Roberto]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MELLO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Patrícia Perrone Campos]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Trabalhando com uma nova lógica: a ascensão dos precedentes no Direito brasileiro.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista da AGU]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>v. 15</volume>
<numero>n. 03</numero>
<issue>n. 03</issue>
<page-range>p. 09-52</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília/DF ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>BRASIL. Código de Processo Civil Brasileiro</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Lei 13.105 de 16 de março de 2015]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Diário Oficial]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BUSTAMANTE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Thomas da Rosa de]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A força normativa do direito judicial: uma análise da aplicação prática do precedente no direito brasileiro e dos seus desafios para a legitimação da autoridade do poder judiciário]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Conselho Nacional de Justiça]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BUSTAMANTE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Thomas da Rosa de]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Teoria do Precedente Judicial]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Noeses]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DWORKIN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ronald]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Uma Questão de Princípio.]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<edition>2. ed.</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Martins Fontes]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CÂMARA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alexandre Freitas]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[O Novo Processo Civil Brasileiro]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<edition>2. ed.</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Atlas]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CÂMARA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alexandre Freitas]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Levando os Padrões Decisórios a Sério.]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Atlas]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DIDIER JR.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fredie.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Curso de Direito Processual Civil: teoria da prova, direito probatório, ações probatórias, decisão, precedente, coisa julgada e antecipação dos efeitos da tutela]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>v. 2</volume>
<edition>10. ed.</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Salvador ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Juspodivm]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FINE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Toni M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[O uso do precedente e o papel do princípio do stare decisis no sistema legal norte-americano]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista dos Tribunais]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>v. 782</volume>
<page-range>p. 92</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[RT]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MELLO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Patrícia Perrone Campos]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Precedentes: O desenvolvimento judicial do direito no constitucionalismo contemporâneo]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Renovar]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NEVES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Daniel Amorim Assumpção]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Manual de Direito Processual Civil - Volume Único]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<edition>8. ed.</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Salvador ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Juspodivm]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NERY JUNIOR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nelson]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NERY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rosa Maria de Andrade]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Comentários ao Código de Processo Civil.]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Revista dos Tribunais]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SOUZA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marcelo Alves Dias de]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Do precedente judicial à súmula vinculante.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Curitiba ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Juruá]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[STRECK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lênio Luiz]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hermenêutica, neoconstitucionalismo e o &#8220;problema da discricionariedade dos juízes&#8221;]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[STRECK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lênio Luiz]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Jurisdição, Fundamentação e dever de coerência e integridade no novo CPC.]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WAMBAUGH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eugene]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The study of cases.]]></source>
<year>1894</year>
<edition>2. ed.</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Boston ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Little, Brown]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
