<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2183-9522</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2183-9522</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Juruá]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2183-95222025000100497</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19135/revista.consinter.00020.23</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[O PRINCÍPIO DA PROPORCIONALIDADE ANTE A ÁRDUA ´ESCOLHA DE SOFIA´ NAS DECISÕES JUDICIAIS]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY BEFORE THE HARDSHIP 'SOPHIE'S CHOICE' IN JUDICIAL DECISIONS]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aurelli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Arlete Inês]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leite]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rita de Cássia Curvo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,PUC/SUP  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Brasil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>20</numero>
<fpage>497</fpage>
<lpage>518</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2183-95222025000100497&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2183-95222025000100497&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2183-95222025000100497&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo Quais ferramentas deve o julgador utilizar em situações de conflito entre direitos igualmente relevantes? É objetivo geral deste ensaio justamente identificar os parâmetros a serem adotados quando o julgador enfrenta um dilema a exigir uma &#8216;escolha de Sofia&#8217;. Não se pode negar que a fundamentação das decisões judiciais deve estar amparada pelo Direito, apoiada nos fatos trazidos ao julgador e alicerçada no ordenamento jurídico. Todavia, nem sempre há respostas prontas a todas as demandas. Em situações de dúvida, pode-se recorrer ao feixe principiológico igualmente integrante do sistema. Dentre os princípios que servem de bússola na direção da escolha, de se destacar o da proporcionalidade. É objetivo específico deste estudo, pois, reconhecer no princípio da proporcionalidade uma forma eficaz de resolução de conflitos árduos. Para tanto, adotaram-se alguns procedimentos metodológicos: análise doutrinária além da seleção de casos práticos. O método de pesquisa bibliográfica associado aos indutivo e comparativo permitiram demonstrar que o princípio da proporcionalidade serve como norte ao julgador no enfrentamento de casos conflitivos. O resultado da pesquisa destaca que a aplicação do princípio da proporcionalidade não só equilibra os limites decisionais como, ainda, evita o excesso, de modo que ao proceder a &#8216;escolha de Sofia&#8217;, deve-se ter em mente que eventuais desvantagens causadas por uma decisão não podem jamais superar as vantagens por ela alcançadas. Como considerações finais, recomenda-se adotar o princípio da proporcionalidade como ferramenta hábil a suplantar a intrincada &#8216;escolha de Sofia&#8217;.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract What tools should the judge use in conflict situations between equally relevant rights? The general objective of this essay is to identify the parameters to be adopted when the judge faces a dilemma that requires a &#8216;Sophie's choice&#8217;. It cannot be denied that the reasoning for judicial decisions must be supported both by the Law and the facts brought to the judge and based on the legal system. However, there are not always ready answers to all demands. In situations of doubt, one can resort to the principles that are also member of the system. Among the principles that serve as a compass in the direction of choice, proportionality stands out. The specific objective of this study, therefore, is to recognize the principle of proportionality as an effective way of resolving difficult conflicts. To this end, some methodological procedures were adopted: doctrinal analysis in addition to the selection of practical cases. The bibliographical research method associated with the inductive and comparative methods allowed demonstrating that the principle of proportionality serves as a guide for the judge in facing conflicting cases. The research result highlights that the application of the principle of proportionality not only balances decisional limits but also avoids excess, so that when proceeding with &#8216;Sophie's choice&#8217;, it must be borne in mind that possible disadvantages caused by a decision can never outweigh the advantages achieved by it. As final considerations, it is recommended to adopt the principle of proportionality as a skillful tool to overcome the intricate &#8216;Sophie&#8217;s choice&#8217;.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Árduas decisões judiciais]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[A escolha das técnicas de fundamentação das decisões]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Princípio da Proporcionalidade.]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Difficult judicial decisions]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[The choice of decision-making techniques]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Principle of Proportionality.]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abbagnano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nicola]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Dicionário de Filosofia]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora Martins Fontes]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alexy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Robert]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Constitucionalismo discursivo]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Porto Alegre ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Livraria do Advogado]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arruda Alvim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Teresa]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[O Juiz Criativo e o Precedente Vinculante - Realidades Compatíveis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista da EMERJ]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>199</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aurelli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Arlete Inês]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A função social da jurisdição e do processo]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yarshell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Flávio Luiz]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zufelato]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Camilo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[40 anos da Teoria Geral do Processo no Brasil]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Malheiros]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[mello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bandeira]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Antônio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Celso]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Curso de Direito Administrativo]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<edition>17ª</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora Malheiros]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barcellos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana Paula de]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ponderação, Racionalidade e Atividade Jurisdicional]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Renovar]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barroso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luis Roberto]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Colisão entre Liberdade de Expressão e Direitos da Personalidade. Critérios de Ponderação. Interpretação Constitucionalmente Adequada do Código Civil e da Lei de Imprensa]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Direito Administrativo]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>235</volume>
<page-range>3</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bonício]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marcelo José Magalhães]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Princípios do processo no novo Código de Processo Civil]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Saraiva]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Canotilho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José Joaquim Gomes]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Direito Constitucional e teoria da constituição]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<edition>7ª</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Coimbra ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora Almedina]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carneiro da Cunha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Leonardo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comentários ao Código de Processo Civil]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Streck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lenio Luiz]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nunes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Dierle]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carneiro da Cunha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Leonardo]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Freire]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alexandre]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Comentários ao Código de Processo Civil]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Saraiva]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carvalho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Paulo de Barros]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Direito Tributário, Linguagem e Método]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<edition>3ª</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora Noeses]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Deu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Teresa Armenta]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ejecución y medidas conminativas personales: un estudio comparado]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Derecho Universidad Católica del Norte, RDUCN]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>23-54</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dinamarco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Candido Rangel]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Comentários ao Código de Processo Civil. Das normas processuais civis e da função jurisdicional]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Saraiva]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Diniz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maria Helena]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Dicionário Jurídico]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora Saraiva]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Figueiredo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Candido de]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Novo Dicionário da Língua Portuguesa]]></source>
<year>1913</year>
<volume>II</volume>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Lisboa ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Livraria Clássica Editora de A.M. Teixeira]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Figueiredo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marcelo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A técnica da proporcionalidade no Supremo Tribunal Federal: espécie válida de solução para a colisão de direitos fundamentais]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de Direito Público (RBDP)]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<numero>52</numero>
<issue>52</issue>
<page-range>55</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Costa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fonseca]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eduardo da]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[O direito vivo das liminares]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Saraiva ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[São Paulo]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gonzaga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Álvaro Luiz Travassos de Azevedo Verbete]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Lógica do Razoável]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Campilongo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Celso Fernandes]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gonzaga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Álvaro Luiz Travassos de Azevedo]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Freire]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[André Luiz]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Enciclopédia Jurídica PUCSP]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<edition>1ª</edition>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Filho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Guerra]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santiago]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Willis]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Processo constitucional e direitos fundamentais]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Celso Bastos Editor]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leite]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rita de Cássia Curvo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Transplantes de Órgãos e Tecidos e os Direitos da Personalidade]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora Juarez de Oliveira]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lopes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[João Batista]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Proporcionalidade e Razoabilidade no processo civil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Processo]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<numero>304</numero>
<issue>304</issue>
<page-range>93-101</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Neto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Oliveira]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Olavo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[O Poder Geral de Coerção]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora Revista dos Tribunais]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pulido]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carlos Bernal]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La migración del principio de proporcionalidad a través de Europa]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Libertas]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>220</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ribeiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Glaucia Maria de Araújo]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alessandra Valle]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Pandemia da COVID-19 no Amazonas: Revisitando o contexto da segunda onda e seus desdobramentos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Internacional Consinter de Direito]]></source>
<year>2024</year>
<numero>XVIII</numero>
<issue>XVIII</issue>
<page-range>663-84</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ribeiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Leonardo Feres da Silva]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Tutela provisória: tutela de urgência e tutela da evidência]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora Revista dos Tribunais]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wambier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Tereza Arruda Alvim]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Existe a &#8216;discricionariedade&#8217; judicial?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Processo]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>70</volume>
<page-range>48-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
