SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 número4Spinal cord ischaemia predictors and outcomes in complex endovascular aortic repair - a single centre retrospective studyPopliteal artery entrapment syndrome: a case report and review of the literature índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular

versão impressa ISSN 1646-706Xversão On-line ISSN 2183-0096

Resumo

FERNANDES, Luís D. et al. Complex solutions to minimise vascular access complications during iliac branch device implantation after EVAR: a narrative review focusing on planning and technical aspects. Angiol Cir Vasc [online]. 2025, vol.21, n.4, pp.171-175.  Epub 31-Dez-2025. ISSN 1646-706X.  https://doi.org/10.48750/acv668.

Introduction:

Secondary implantation of iliac branch devices (IBDs) after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for type Ib endoleak poses unique technical challenges due to altered aortoiliac anatomy and prior femoral access. Selecting an optimal access strategy is critical to minimize complications and ensure procedural success. This review summarizes contemporary transfemoral and upper extremity access techniques, with a focus on modern endovascular solutions that facilitate safe and effective reinterventions.

Methods:

A narrative review of the literature published between 2010 and 2025 was conducted using PubMed, focusing on studies reporting technical strategies, outcomes, and complications of secondary IBD implantation after EVAR. Only original research, including technical notes, was included.

Results:

Across the reviewed studies, upper extremity access was associated with neurologic events, longer operative times, and higher access-site complication rates. Transfemoral “up-and-over” techniques consistently demonstrated technical success rates over 95%, shorter procedural times, and reduced complication rates. Steerable sheath systems enable complete IBD implantation from a single femoral access, with promising safety and efficacy. Technical refinements, including special attention to the prior graft bifurcation and meticulous technique, appear to be key elements to optimising immediate and late outcomes.

Conclusion:

Transfemoral strategies, particularly “up-and-over” techniques using steerable sheaths, appear to be safe and effective alternatives to upper-extremity access for secondary IBD implantation following EVAR. Access strategy should be tailored to patient anatomy and prior graft configuration, with emphasis on minimising vascular trauma, neurologic risk, and procedural complexity.

Palavras-chave : Iliac branch device; endoleak; vascular access; brachial access; steerable sheath; endovascular; abdominal aortic aneurysm.

        · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )