SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.40 número5Fatores determinantes na procura de cuidados de saúde a um SUB, por utentes de uma USFPerceção dos médicos de família acerca da abordagem da saúde mental em consulta índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar

versión impresa ISSN 2182-5173

Resumen

SILVA, Mariana Cruz da et al. Therapeutic inertia in osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Rev Port Med Geral Fam [online]. 2024, vol.40, n.5, pp.444-449.  Epub 31-Oct-2024. ISSN 2182-5173.  https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i5.13974.

Introduction:

Osteoporosis (OP) is the most frequent metabolic bone disease, associated with fragility fractures and increased morbimortality. Despite population aging, there has been a downward trend in the implementation of anti-osteoporotic therapy.

Objectives:

To determine the therapeutic inertia in OP in postmenopausal women in primary health care. Verify whether age, T-score, the FRAX value, and anti-osteoporotic therapeutic inertia are associated.

Methods:

Cross-sectional observational study. Inclusion criteria: women aged between 55 and 85 coded with OP (ICPC-2 - L95) or fractures (ICPC-2 - L72-76) in the list of problems. A simple random sample was selected. Therapeutic inertia was defined based on the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology recommendations.

Results:

A sample of 217 patients was obtained. Therapeutic inertia was found in 17.5% of women, which increased to 48.6% in those who suffered fractures (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between the ages of patients with and without therapeutic inertia (77.5 vs 73.0, p<0.010). The median FRAX for major osteoporotic fracture (16.5 vs 9.65, p<0.001) and hip fracture (7.6 vs 3.3, p<0.001) was higher in the group with therapeutic inertia. The difference between T-score values for the lumbar spine (2.45 vs 2.71) and the femoral neck (2.07 vs 2.02) did not reach statistical significance (p=0.299).

Conclusion:

This study highlights the application of the most recent national guidelines regarding osteoporosis treatment in the studied health care unit, but underlines the need for broader intervention in osteoporosis-related fractures and at older ages.

Palabras clave : Osteoporosis; Therapeutic inertia; Primary health care.

        · resumen en Portugués     · texto en Portugués     · Portugués ( pdf )