SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.5 issue1A matter of defeasibilityThe principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibilities between the Member States on EU common asylum policy: Commentary to the judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 6 September 2017, Slovak Republic and Hungary v Council of the European Union author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público

On-line version ISSN 2183-184X

Abstract

SACRAMENTO, Bruno. Reasonable disagreements and legislative discretion: a study based on the principles theory of constitutional rights. e-Pública [online]. 2018, vol.5, n.1, pp.241-275. ISSN 2183-184X.

This paper deals essentially with the relationship between fundamental rights, judicial review and the democratic principle in the context of so-called reasonable disagreements. The limits between legislative and judicial competence in the scope of the disagreements are problematized from a case judged by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court that analyzed the constitutionality of the crime of abortion based on a balancing inspired by the principles theory of constitutional rights, by Robert Alexy. It is argued in this paper that it is possible to seek balance in this relationship through the theory of principles and the recognition of a space of legislative discretion. To this end, some ideas of the principles theory, of the Alexy’s theory of the argumentative representation and of the public justification will be associated.

Keywords : Judicial review; reasonable disagreements; argumentative representation; legislative discretion; public justification.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )