CASE REPORT

Endovascular treatment of blunt traumatic injuries of the subclavian and axillary arteries

Tratamento endovascular de traumatismos arteriais fechados das artérias subclávia e axilar

Nelson Oliveira^a,b,*, Gonçalo Alves^a, Hugo Rodrigues^a, Frederico Bastos Gonçalves^a, João Martins^a, José Aragão Morais^a, Maria Emília Ferreira^a, João Albuquerque Castro^a, Luís Mota Capitão^a

 

^a Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Santa Marta Hospital - Central Lisbon Hospital Center, Lisboa, Portugal

^b Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo, Ponta Delgada, Portugal

 

^*Corresponding author:

 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Blunt trauma of the axillary and subclavian arteries is uncommon. Conventional surgery presents significant morbidity associated to the need of extensive exposure and challenging dissection through traumatized tissues. Endovascular treatment is an alternative that has increasingly been used in traumatic arterial injuries. This report presents three cases that were managed by endovascular techniques.

Methods: We report the cases of three patients with blunt traumatic injuries of the subclavian and axillary arteries who were treated at our Institution in 2013 with endovascular techniques. Each case presented distinctly, resulting from different traumatic mechanisms and the therapeutical approach was adapted accordingly.

Results: Case 1: A 68-year-old man was admitted with an acute limb ischemia of the left upper limb after a fall from his own walking height. A computerized tomography angiography demonstrated a dissection of the left subclavian artery. Resource to a proximal angioplasty with stent allowed the recovery of the limb perfusion fixating the flap. Case 2: A 34-year-old male who fell from a height of 8 m, with multiple costal arch fractures and the complete transection of the subclavian artery. In this case, a covered stent excluded the rupture. Case 3: A 45-year-old woman presented to our department with an acutely ischemic left upper limb with 3 days of progression after a distension of the scapuloh-umeral articulation. Although a digital amputation was ultimately necessary, hand-salvage was accomplished through thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis.

Conclusion: Blunt trauma of the axillosubclavian arteries is rare and its diagnosis may be challenging. Endovascular treatment of blunt traumatic injuries of the subclavian and axillary arteries is an alternative to traditional surgical treatment, which may be used solely or in combination with the latter to reduce invasiveness and improve outcome of arterial injuries. © 2014 Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Blunt trauma; Endovascular treatment; Axillary artery; Subclavian artery; Stent

 

RESUMO

Introdução: O traumatismo arterial subclávio-axilar é raro, sendo a maioria das lesões produzidas por traumatismo penetrantes. A Cirurgia Convencional está associada a morbilidade significativa devido à necessidade de uma exposição extensa para obtenção de controlo vascular e devido ao risco de iatrogenia durante a dissecção cirúrgica em tecidos traumatizados. A abordagem endovascular é uma alternativa que tem vindo a ser utilizada mais frequentemente em traumatismos vasculares.

Métodos: Reportamos os casos de 3 doentes que foram tratados na nossa Instituição em 2013 com lesões fechadas das artérias subclávia e axilar com recurso a técnicas endovasculares. Cada caso teve uma apresentação clínica distinta, tendo resultado de mecanismo de traumatismo diferentes, e a abordagem terapêutica foi adaptada à apresentação clínica, assim como à patologia subjacente.

Resultados: Caso 1: um homem de 68 anos foi admitido com uma isquemia aguda do membro superior esquerdo após uma queda da sua própria altura com traumatismo do ombro. Uma angiografia por tomografia computorizada (AngioTC) demonstrou a dissecção da artéria subclávia. A revascularização realizada incluiu a realização de uma angioplastia da artéria subclávia com stent descoberto com fixação do flap de dissecção proximal. Caso 2: um homem de 34 anos foi vítima de uma queda de 8 metros em altura, da qual além de múltiplas fraturas de arcos costais resultou a rotura completa da artéria subclávia direita. Neste doente, foi realizada e exclusão endovascular da rotura com um stent coberto. Caso 3: uma mulher de 45 anos foi admitida com um quadro de isquemia aguda do membro superior esquerdo com 3 dias de evolução após um estiramento da articulação escapulo-umeral sem luxação de ombro ou fratura associada. Embora tenha sido necessária a realização de uma amputação digital por irreversibilidade da isquemia, a trombectomia complementada com trombólise arterial dirigida por cateter permitiu a conservação da mão.

Conclusões: O traumatismo fechado das artérias subclávia e axilar é raro e o seu diagnóstico pode ser desafiante caso não haja uma elevada suspeição clínica. As técnicas endovasculares podem ser utilizadas em alternativa ou em conjugação com a Cirurgia Convencional, reduzindo a invasibilidade e morbilidade associadas ao tratamento dos traumatismos arteriais neste território. © 2014 Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. Todos os direitos reservados.

Palavras-chave: Traumatismo arterial fechado; Tratamento endovascular; Artéria axillar; Artéria subclávia; Stent

 

Introduction

Acute arterial traumatic lesions involving the axillary and subclavian arteries are uncommon, accounting for 1---9% of all traumatic vascular injuries.^1---5 Most cases are caused by penetrating mechanisms, with only up to 5% of these injuries produced by blunt trauma.^3,6 Blunt trauma may involve multiple structures but presentation of a subclavian or axillary arterial lesion may not be clinically notorious,³ delaying diagnosis and adversely affecting patient outcome.⁷

Direct surgical repair of these vessels requires extensive exposure obtained through frequently traumatized tissues which is not free from complications.⁸ When feasible, endovascular techniques are a less invasive and also effective alternative to standard conventional surgery⁹ and have increasingly been applied as an alternative or complementary to surgical treatment of vascular traumatic injuries.¹⁰

The aim of this publication is to report 3 cases where presentation and management following blunt trauma of the arterial thoracic outlet differed significantly, illustrating the potential use of different endovascular armamentaria to achieve adequate revascularization.

 

Case 1

A 68-year-old man, without any relevant past medical history, was referred with acute left upper limb pain. The patient mentioned trauma of his left shoulder as a consequence of a fall from ground level, 2 h before presentation. At observation, he presented with high blood pressure (170 mmHg systolic), decreased temperature of the left hand and absent pulses in the upper left limb. Plain X-rays excluded bone fractures. Color-flow Doppler showed the presence of a triphasic arterial waveform in the proximal subclavian artery, a monophasic arterial waveform in the distal subclavian and axillary artery as well as an occluded brachial artery from its origin down to the elbow. A Computerized Tomography Angiography (CTA) was performed which confirmed the findings and revealed a dissected proximal subclavian artery as shown in Fig. 1.

After informed consent, a brachial artery cutdown and a right femoral percutaneous access were obtained. A diagnostic catheter was positioned in the aortic arch from the femoral access and an endovenous bolus of 5000 units of non-fractioned heparin was given. Mechanical thrombectomy of the brachial artery with a Fogarty catheter under fluoroscopic control was performed, with care not to traumatize the dissected subclavian artery. Subsequently, the dissection was crossed from brachial retrograde access through its true lumen and snared from the femoral access. Finally, one balloon-expandable bare-metal stent 10 mm × 60 mm (Assurant^® Cobalt Iliac) and one self-expanding stent 10 mm × 40mm (Complete SE Iliac^®) were sequentially implanted at the proximal dissection site and at a secondary distal dissection flap. Completion angiography showed a persistent flow limiting dissection of the distal axillary artery and thus another self-expandable 8 × 40 bare-metal stent was deployed with immediate resolution of the dissection. Final 2-plan angiography excluded the persistence of flow-limiting dissection with adequate runoff to the arm (Fig. 1).

The patient was discharged 48 h after the intervention under double-platelet inhibition with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel for the first 30 days. From thereafter, single-platelet inhibition was continued. The patient was started on statins and anti-hypertensive drugs. After a follow-up period of 10 months, the patient was free from in-stent stenosis and all upper limb pulses were palpable and symmetric.

 

Case 2

A 34-year-old man with a body-mass index of 34 and a history of endovenous drug abuse sustained a fall from a height of 8 meters. The impact point was his right hemithorax, shoulder and pelvis. On admission the patient was awake, hemodynamically stable and referred numbness and paralysis of his right upper limb. The right arm was cyanosed, cold and pulses were not palpable. Neurological exploration identified a flaccid paralysis of right upper limb with an associated Claude---Bernard---Horner Syndrome.

Plain X-rays showed only a fracture of the ischio-pubic ramus. A head and cervical CT-scan were performed and identified a hematoma that originated from the middle segment of right subclavian artery injury and occupied the whole right thoracic outlet (Fig. 2). There was also a C6 spinous process fracture.

Informed consent was obtained and a right brachial artery cutdown was executed along with a retrograde right femoral percutaneous access. Arteriography confirmed the middle subclavian segment rupture. Crossing of the lesion required snaring of the femoral wire from the brachial access. An ePTFE-lined stent-graft (Viabahn^® Gore 9 mm × 100 mm) was implanted excluding the lesion but preserving vertebral artery perfusion. Post-implantation balloon dilation was performed to ensure adequate proximal and distal seal. Restored anterograde direct blood flow to the right upper limb was confirmed on final arteriography, with a patent vertebral artery and absence of endoleaks (Fig. 2).

The patient recovered from ischemia, and the hematoma progressively subdued. He was discharged 5 days after intervention under single antiplatelet therapy. After 10 months of follow-up, the patient remains with palpable and symmetric upper limb pulses and is undergoing physiotherapy for neurological rehabilitation.

 

Case 3

A 45-year-old female with a past medical history of arterial hypertension and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, presented to the emergency department with complaints of pain, diminished strength and poikilothermia of the left upper limb. Symptoms had started after a jerk of that limb when she was attempting to move a heavy object and had progressively worsened during 3 days. Although assessed by an insurance assisting physician during those days, vascular evaluation was only sought when her forearm progressively became cyanotic and she lost hand motor function. Upon admission, left upper limb pulses were absent and cyanosis had extended to the upper third of the arm. Initial evaluation included a color Duplex-ultrasonography, which demonstrated thrombosis of the axillary, brachial, cubital and proximal radial artery.

At that time, an urgent thromboembolectomy was performed with immediate success. The patient was kept on unfractioned heparin perfusion with an aPTT goal of 60---120 s. After 5 h, pain recurred and palpable ulnar and radial pulses were again lost. A CTA was performed and identified nearly occlusive thrombosis of the proximal subclavian artery (Fig. 3). In addition, distal thrombosis of the ulnar and radial arteries was observed. A second thrombectomy was performed under fluoroscopic guidance and after intraoperative arteriography confirmed permeability from the distal subclavian artery to the palmar arch; a thrombolysis catheter was positioned in the proximal subclavian artery to resolve residual thrombus present at that location. A bolus of 2 mg of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) was given and an infusion of rtPA was started at a rate of 2 mg/h. Heparin perfusion was reduced to 600 UI/h, and fibrinogen was controlled periodically according to department protocol. Despite initial clinical improvement with significant pain relief, after 24 h, pain had worsened. The whole hand and the forearm were then cyanosed and no arterial flux was detected on continuous Doppler. An arteriography confirmed resolution of the thrombotic lesion of the proximal subclavian artery but ulnar and radial arteries had rethrombosed. A third thrombectomy was required and the thrombolytic catheter was positioned selectively in the ulnar artery. Infusion rate of rtPA and unfractioned heparin were maintained. Thrombolysis was suspended after 72 h and, despite anticoagulation there was confinement of ischemic signs to the 2^nd and 4^th fingers which progressed to irreversible necrosis and were amputated.

The patient was sent home after 24 days of hospitalization due to infection of the amputations. At discharge, distal pulses were not palpable but bitonal waveforms on continuous Doppler were present and the surgical wounds were healing well. The patient was started on oral anticoagulation with warfarin with an international normalized ratio goal of 2---3. Thrombophilia was excluded by laboratorial and genetic workup. After 7 months of follow-up, surgical wounds have all healed and the patient has resumed functional rehabilitation.

 

Discussion

Blunt trauma of the subclavian and axillary arteries is uncommon and may present differently.^11,12 The subclavian artery is particularly protected by an important muscularskeletal-ligamentous apparatus formed by the subclavius muscle, the clavicle, the first rib, the deep cervical fascia and the costo-coracoid ligament.¹³ For this reason, most blunt lesions of the subclavian artery resulting from downward forces applied to the thorax require involvement of great energies and are associated with important bone or soft tissue injuries in the majority of cases.¹⁴ In cases where an upward force is applied on the chest, the subclavian artery may be pinched between the rib and the clavicle, causing distal subclavian or axillary lesions. Additionally, the axillary and subclavian arterial axis is prone to stretch/traction forces that may result from shear/deceleration trauma or from isolated shoulder impact.^3,7 Resulting arterial injuries may be proximal, and not associated to bone or soft tissue lesions. These types of forces may explain the pathophysiology of the lesions found in cases 1 and 3 of our report. Additionally, in both cases, atherosclerotic risk factors were identified and therefore, resulting intimal thickening may also have some importance on the development of the arterial lesion.

Diagnosis of acute arterial injury may not pose a great challenge in the presence of ominous findings such as first rib fracture, diminished or absent upper limb pulses, palpable supraclavicular hematoma, widened mediastinum on chest roentgenogram, brachial palsy or severe bleeding in penetrating trauma.¹³ Nevertheless a vascular lesion may be present without these findings.¹² Furthermore, other associated injuries may divert attention from limb perfusion resulting in delayed recognition of arterial lesions. An arterial injury should always be suspected in the presence of a brachial-ankle index below 0.9.¹² In case 3 of our report, a delay of 3 days between the traumatic event and patient presentation with an immediately threatened ischemic limb had a negative impact on clinical outcome.

In a trauma setting, diagnostic exams may be performed if the patient is hemodynamically stable, and provide valuable information. Plain chest and neck roentgenograms may give away the presence of a hemothorax or a mediastinal hematoma besides associated bone fractures. Color-flow Doppler may provide accurate hemodynamic characterization of the axillary and subclavian axis. However, associated traumatic lesions and inaccessibility of the proximal segment of the subclavian artery are limiting factors. Currently, angiography has been replaced by multidetector CTA. Increased availability in most trauma centers, accurate diagnosis regarding vascular pathology (sensitivities of 97---99.3% and specificities 87.1---99.8%) and detection of associated lesions of the surrounding structures have turned CTA into the diagnostic exam of choice.^15,16 Extreme cases with hemodynamic instability may be transferred to the operating theater and surgically explored, or a diagnostic angiography may be performed on-table, followed by exploration or endovascular repair, as necessary.

Complex surgical access and limited collective experience make the management of axillary and subclavian arterial lesions particularly challenging.^17,18 Vascular repair may require extensive paraclavicular incisions for control; dissection though hematoma-distorted planes is feasible but not without a significant risk of neurovascular injury and significant hemorrhage.²¹ In comparison, endovascular treatment is a safe and attractive alternative to conventional surgery in trauma patients.^17,19

Endovascular repair has been defended as the first choice of treatment for stable patients¹⁷ however, appropriate patient selection for endovascular approach is critical.²⁰ Indications for potential endovascular repair include pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, first-order branch vessel injury/avulsion, arterial intimal flap and focal arterial injury.²¹ Active uncontrollable hemorrhage, limb-threatening ischemia, airway or brachial plexus compression, concomitant aero-digestive injuries or infected wounds have all been cited as contraindications for endovascular management.¹⁷ Additionally, arteriographic contraindications include excessive luminal discrepancy between the proximal and distal arterial involvement site, inability to cross the lesion with a guidewire¹⁷ and acute occlusion.²² Other limitations reported regarding endovascular treatment are complete vessel transection, involvement of critical branch vessels and distal axillary involvement.²¹ However, many discrepancies can be found between reports on exclusion criteria. Also, the creation of a brachial-femoral wire has allowed the treatment of complex lesions such as completely transected and occluded arteries.²³ In case 2, after a failed attempt of crossing the lesion in a retrograde fashion, a femoral percutaneous access was obtained and a snare was performed successfully, as described by others.²³ Regarding hemodynamically unstable patients, proximal balloon occlusion has been successfully used for hemorrhage control prior to a definitive repair²⁴ and may still allow further wire advancement and lesion crossing and treatment.²³ Failure to obtain lesion exclusion due to proximal and distal luminal mismatch is a concern. The axillosubclavian axis is very elastic and prone to extreme spasm in response to injury and poor distal perfusion and so preoperative valorization is dificult. Further, a luminal discrepancy cutoff for endovascular treatment exclusion is yet to be quantitatively established.

Primary success (defined as complete exclusion of the lesion and restoration of anterograde blood flow without flow-limiting stenosis) in 100% of cases has been reported on an intention-to-treat analysis in small series.^17,22,23,25 However, Carrick et al. reported a primary success in only 3 in 8 endovascular treated patients. Two of these cases were misdiagnosed and indication for treatment was withdrawn after angiography, one other patient became hemodynamically unstable during lesion crossing with the wire and had his endovascular repair deferred to the next day after proximal balloon occlusion and appropriate resuscitation. In another patient anterograde crossing of the lesion failed and conversion to open surgery took place and finally in one other patient failure to exclude the lesion occurred due to inadequate proximal sealing.²⁴ Danetz et al. on a retrospective analysis determined endovascular feasibility in 17 of 46 axillosubclavian vascular injuries.²¹ However, long lesions, total or subtotal transections that have been successfully treated in other reports²³ were considered contraindications in this report.

The main setbacks of endovascular treatment are treatment-related early thromboembolic events and the uncertain long-term outcome particularly in young patients, which are more frequently involved in trauma.¹⁷ Neointimal hyperplasia with consequent late stenosis and occlusion regarding non-traumatic disease affecting other territories is well documented but extrapolation to the traumatic setting may not be linear.²² A 32% of significant in-stent stenosis or occlusion was reported in a group of 25 patients who had a mean follow-up period of 49 months.¹⁷ Importantly, those 8 patients with significant stenosis or occlusion did not present limb-threatening ischemia and the 3 occluded stentgrafts showed no structural defects. In addition, those patients who were treated were amenable to endovascular correction of the underlying pathology.¹⁷ Another report found a 14.2% rate of stenosis over a mean follow-up time of 22.6 months, and no treatment was deemed necessary in this single patient.²⁴ Also, in regard to outcome, one-year exclusion rate of the arterial injury was 90% and freedom from bypass was 100% in another report.²⁶

We acknowledge that self-expandable stents, due to their memory force and elasticity, are to be preferred in the management of traumatic subclavian or axillary arterial lesions if bare-metal stent implantation is indicated. These vessels are extremely elastic and highly mobile, which are also prone to external compressive forces from the structures forming thoracic outlet that may ultimately lead to stent deformity/fracture. However, in case 1, a balloon-expandable stent was preferred to enhance deployment accuracy, which was deemed necessary to securely treat a near ostial proximal dissection entry site of the left subclavian artery. Although balloon-expandable stents have been consistently associated to increased risk of fracture^25,27---29 self-expanding stents are also not free from risk of fracture as reported by Phipp et al.³⁰

 

Conclusion

Clinical presentation of traumatic axillosubclavian lesions may be subtle and result from apparently unsuspicious mechanisms delaying diagnosis with a hazardous impact on patient outcome. Endovascular management of traumatic lesions of the subclavian and axillary arteries, alone or in combination with open surgery is safe and results in less invasiveness and surgical trauma. However, experience and follow-up are limited and more evidence is still required to access long-term outcomes of this type of treatment.

 

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Patients’ data protection. We followed our institution’s protocols.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors have obtained the written informed consent of the patients or subjects mentioned in the article. The corresponding author is in possession of this document.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

 

References

1. Rich NM, Hobson RW, Jarstfer BS, Geer TM. Subclavian artery trauma. J Trauma. 1973;13:485---96.         [ Links ]

2. Graham RM, Feliciano DV, Mattox KL, et al. Management of subclavian vascular injuries. J Trauma. 1980;20: 537---44.         [ Links ]

3. Costa MC, Robbs JV. Nonpenetrating subclavian artery trauma. J Vasc Surg. 1988;8:71---5.         [ Links ]

4. Lin PH, Koffron AJ, Guske PJ, et al. Penetrating injuries of the subclavian artery. Am J Surg. 2003;185(6):580---4.         [ Links ]

5. McKinley AG, Carrim AT, Robbs JV. Management of proximal axillary and subclavian artery injuries. Br J Surg. 2000;87(1): 79---85.         [ Links ]

6. Demetriades D, Chahwan S, Gomez H, et al. Penetrating injuries to the subclavian and axillary vessels. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188(3):290---5.         [ Links ]

7. Cox CS, Allen GS, Fischer RP, et al. Blunt versus penetrating subclavian artery injury: presentation, injury pattern, outcome. J Trauma. 1999;46(3):445---9.         [ Links ]

8. Schönholz CJ, Uflacker R, De Gregorio MA, et al. Stent-graft treatment of trauma to the supra-aortic arteries. A review. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;48(5):537---49.         [ Links ]

9. Patel AV, Marin ML, Veith FJ, et al. Endovascular graft repair of penetrating subclavian artery injuries. J Endovasc Surg. 1996;3:382---8.         [ Links ]

10. Parodi JC, Schonolz C, Ferreira LM, et al. Endovascular treatment of traumatic arterial lesions. Ann Vasc Surg. 1999;13:121---9.         [ Links ]

11. Sturm JT, Cicero JJ. The clinical diagnosis of ruptured subclavian artery following blunt thoracic trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 1983;12(1):17---9.         [ Links ]

12. Demetriades D, Asensio JA. Subclavian and axillary vascular injuries. Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81(6):1357---73, xiii. Review.         [ Links ]

13. Assenza M, Centonze L, Valesini L, et al. Traumatic subclavian arterial rupture: a case report and review of literature. World J Emerg Surg. 2012;7(1):18.         [ Links ]

14. Kendall KM, Burton JH, Cushing B. Fatal subclavian artery transection from isolated clavicle fracture. J Trauma. 2000;48(2):316---8.         [ Links ]

15. O’Connor JV, Byrne C, Scalea TM, et al. Open Access Vascular injuries after blunt chest trauma: diagnosis and management. Scand J Trauma Resus Emergency Med. 2009;17:42.         [ Links ]

16. Kaewlai R, Avery LL, Asrani AV, et al. RadioGraphics. 2008;28:1555---70.         [ Links ]

17. du Toit DF, Lambrechts AV, Stark H, et al. The endovascular management of penetrating carotid artery injuries: long-term follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(4):739---43.         [ Links ]

18. Sobnach S, Nicol AJ, Nathire H, et al. An analysis of 50 surgically managed penetrating subclavian artery injuries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39(2):155---9.         [ Links ]

19. Brandt MM, Kazanjian S, Wahl WL. The utility of endovascular stents in the treatment of blunt arterial injuries. J Trauma. 2001;51(5):901---5.         [ Links ]

20. Xenos ES, Freeman M, Stevens S, et al. Covered stents for injuries of subclavian and axillary arteries. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(3):451---4.         [ Links ]

21. Danetz JS, Cassano AD, Stoner MC, et al. Feasibility of endovascular repair in penetrating axillosubclavian injuries: a retrospective review. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(2): 246---54.         [ Links ]

22. du Toit DF, Strauss DC, Blaszczyk M, et al. Endovascular treatment of penetrating thoracic outlet arterial injuries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19(5):489---95.         [ Links ]

23. Shalhub S, Starnes BW, Tran NT. Endovascular treatment of axillosubclavian arterial transection in patients with blunt traumatic injury. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(4):1141---4.         [ Links ]

24. Carrick MM, Morrison CA, Pham HQ, et al. Modern management of traumatic subclavian artery injuries: a single institution’s experience in the evolution of endovascular repair. Am J Surg. 2010;199(1):28---34.         [ Links ]

25. Castelli P, Caronno R, Piffaretti G, et al. Endovascular repair of traumatic injuries of the subclavian and axillary arteries. Injury. 2005;36(6):778---82.         [ Links ]

26. White R, Krajcer Z, Johnson M, et al. Results of a multicenter trial for the treatment of traumatic vascular injury with a covered stent. J Trauma. 2006;60(6): 1189---95.         [ Links ]

27. Shinozaki N, Langhoff R, Schulte KL. Reocclusion caused by stent fracture implanted in the subclavian artery ostium: a case report. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2013;28(1):111---4.         [ Links ]

28. Lee CE, Shaiful AY, Hanif H. Subclavian artery stent fracture. Med J Malaysia. 2009;64(4):330---2.         [ Links ]

29. Math RS, Shankarappa RK, Dwarakaprasad R, et al. Multiple fractures with pseudoaneurysm formation in a subclavian artery stent. Circulation. 2011;123(20):e602---4.         [ Links ]

30. Phipp LH, Scott DJ, Kessel D, Robertson I. Subclavian stents and stent-grafts: cause for concern? J Endovasc Surg. 1999;6(3):223---6.         [ Links ]

 

^*Corresponding author:

E-mail addresses: nfgoliveira@sapo.pt, n.gomesoliveira@erasmusmc.nl (N. Oliveira).

 

Received 7 May 2014;

Accepted 22 July 2014

Available online 11 October 2014