SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número13EL “WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL” EN LA JUSTICIA ESTADOUNIDENSE Y SU POSIBLE APLICACIÓN EN EL MODELO DE JURADO ESPAÑOLDEJUDICIALIZATION AND PROCEDURALISM BASED ON THE NATURE OF CONFLICTS AND ACCORDING TO THE BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTION índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito - Publicação Oficial do Conselho Internacional de Estudos Contemporâneos em Pós-Graduação

versión impresa ISSN 2183-6396versión On-line ISSN 2183-9522

Resumen

MELO, Cíntia Fernanda de Abreu  y  DOGNINI, Leandro Lyra Braga. LAW AND ECONOMICS, REPETITIVE DEMANDS RESOLUTION INCIDENT AND SPECIAL COURTS. Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito [online]. 2021, n.13, pp.319-340.  Epub 08-Sep-2022. ISSN 2183-6396.  https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00013.15.

The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC, in portuguese, Código de Processo Civil) of 2015 gave greater prominence to precedents as a mechanism for rationalizing jurisdictional activity. In a context of expansion of civil litigation, the aim of this article is to assess, adopting the Law and Economics (AED, in portuguese, Análise Econômica do Direito) theoretical framework, the role of judicial precedents in the search for a more complete, stable and isonomic system. In this sense, the repetitive demands resolution incident (IRDR, in portuguese, Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas) stands out as an institute that aims to propose a solution to mass demands based on the same question of law. The hypothesis that arises is that the effectiveness of the jurisdictional provision of the special courts is subject to substantial improvement with the application of the IRDR, passing through the analysis regarding the constitutionality of such an incident, and, if constitutional, what would be the proper procedure, since the CPC essentially turns to the incident in the courts. The methodology is based on the theoretical references of AED, conforming to precedents, IRDR and special courts, in line with the statistical analysis provided by National Council of Justice (CNJ, in portuguese, Conselho Nacional de Justiça). The results achieved demonstrate that special courts respond for significant number of new processes that enter the Judiciary, following the primacy of access to justice, with the model developed by Mendes and Romano Neto being a promising solution to the application of the IRDR in such jurisdictional sphere.

Palabras clave : Precedents; Standardization of jurisprudence; Judicial economy; Legal certainty..

        · resumen en Portugués     · texto en Portugués     · Portugués ( pdf )